7 Special Studies

The pathologist’s H&E is like the clinician’s H&P (history and physical) - basic exams to be performed on every patient or specimen forming the cornerstone of diagnosis. However, the pathologist is no longer limited to the H&E; there are a wide variety of special studies available to evaluate pathologic processes, from simple histochemical stains to global gene expression patterns. Pathologists are now clinical cell biologists. Familiarity with the types of special studies available is important as the initial processing of the gross specimen may limit the types of studies that can be performed.

HISTOCHEMISTRY

Almost all histochemical stains are suitable for formalin-fixed tissues. Common stains and their uses are listed in Table 7-1. However, numerous other types of stains and modifications are used and pathologists must be aware of individual laboratory practices.

TABLE 7–1 HISTOCHEMICAL STAINS

STAIN COMPONENTS STAINED POSSIBLE USES AND COMMENTS
AFOG (acid fuschin orange G; modified Masson’s trichrome)
Nuclei – brown
Connective tissue – blue
Basement membrane – blue
Proteins, fibrin, readsorption droplets in cells, immune complexes – red/orange/yellow
RBCs – yellow
Evaluation of renal biopsies
Alcian blue
Acid mucins – blue (e.g., normal intestinal glands)
Nuclei – red
Cytoplasm – pink
Sometimes used to identify mucosubstances in mesotheliomas or intestinal metaplasia. Affected by pH. Hyaluronidase digestion can be used to identify hyaluronic acid.
Alcian blue/PAS
Intestinal metaplasia – dark purple
Normal stomach – pink
Demonstrates both acid and neutral mucins
Alcian yellow
Free mucus – yellow
Bacteria – dark blue
Identification of H. pylori in gastric biopsies
Acid-fast bacilli stains (Fite-Faraco, Ziehl-Neelson, Kinyoun)
TB – red and beaded
MAI – red
Nocardia – pink
Tissue – blue
Identification of mycobacteria. Modifications are used to demonstrate M. leprae or Nocardia. Carnoy’s fixed tissues cannot be used and B-5 is suboptimal. Slides must be examined under oil.
Alizarin red S Calcium – orange red, polarizes Identifies calcium in tissues
Bile Bile – dark green on a yellow background Identification of bile
Bodian’s
Nerve fibers and neurofibrils – black
Nuclei – black
Tissue – blue
Neural tumors, identification of axons
Chloroacetate esterase (Leder; CAE)
Mature myeloid cells, mast cells – red granules
Nuclei – blue
Evaluation of leukemias
Identification of mast cells
Cannot be used for tissue fixed in Zenker’s or B-5.
Congo red
Amyloid – orange red with apple green birefringence after polarization
Nuclei – blue
Detection of amyloid. Immunoperoxidase studies can be used to identify specific types. Overstaining can result in false positives.
Dieterle
Spirochetes, Legionella, other bacteria – brown to black
Tissue – pale yellow or tan
Infectious lesions
Melanin, chromatin, formalin pigment, and foreign material may also stain
Diff Quik (a modified Giemsa stain)
H. pylori – dark blue
Other bacteria – blue
Nuclei – dark blue
Cytoplasm – pink
Evaluation of chronic gastritis
Elastic stains (Verhoeff–van Gieson)
Elastic fibers – blue black to black
Nuclei – blue to black
Collagen – red
Other tissue – yellow
Identification of arteries and veins, vasculitis, invasion of lung tumors into visceral pleura, abnormal elastic fibers in elastofibromas
Fibrin (see Phosphotungstic acid hematoxylin or Mallory PTAH)   To demonstrate fibrin in renal biopsies
Fontana-Masson
Melanin, argentaffin granules, chromaffin granules, some lipofuschin – black
Nuclei – red
Identification of melanin in melanomas and secretory granules in neuroendocrine tumors
This stain has largely been replaced by IHC
Giemsa (May-Grunwald)
Bacteria (e.g., H. pylori) – blue
Parasites (Leishmania, Plasmodium) – blue
Mast cells – red to purple granules
Nuclei – blue
Cytoplasm of leukocytes – pink to blue depending on cell type and differentiation
Lymphoproliferative disorders (good nuclear and cytoplasmic detail)
Identification of bacteria, rickettsias, and Toxoplasma gondii
Gram (Brown-Hopps, Brown-Brenn)
Gram-positive bacteria – blue
Gram-negative bacteria – red
Nuclei – red
Tissue – variable
Identification of bacteria, some cases of actinomycetes, Nocardia, coccidioidomycosis, blastomycosis, cryptococcosis, aspergillosis, rhinosporidiosis, and amebiasis
Grimelius
Argentaffin and argyrophil granules – dark brown to black
Nuclei – red
Background – pale yellow-brown
Evaluation of neuroendocrine tumors (largely replaced by the use of immunohistochemistry for chromogranin)
Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)
Nuclei – dark blue or purple
Cytoplasm – pink to red
Standard stain for the routine evaluation of tissues
Iron (colloidal iron)
Ferric iron (e.g., hemosiderin) – blue
Nuclei – red
Background – pink
Bone marrow (iron stores, myelodysplasias), liver (hemochromatosis)
Chromophobe renal cell carcinomas are positive
Jone’s silver methenamine Basement membrane – dark maroon to black Evaluation of renal biopsies
Melanin bleach  
Removes melanin from tissue, usually for IHC
Melanin can be difficult to distinguish from IHC positivity
Methyl green-pyronin Y
DNA (nuclei) – green to blue-green
RNA - red
Goblet cells - mint green
Plasma cell and immunoblast cytoplasm - pink to red
Mast cells - orange
Background - pale pink to colorless
Plasma cell lesions (largely replaced by IHC)
Does not work well on tissues decalcified with formic acid.
Mucicarmine (Mayer)
Mucin - deep rose to red
Capsule of Cryptococcus - deep rose to red
Nuclei - black
Tissue - blue or yellow
Identification of adenocarcinomas, identification of Cryptococcus
Oil red O
Fat - red
Nuclei - blue
Requires frozen sections (lipids are dissolved by most fixatives or during processing). Tissue fixed in formalin can be used if tissue is frozen.
Periodic acid – Schiff (PAS)
Glycogen - red
Basement membranes (BM) - red
Mucins - red
Colloid - red
Fungi - red
Classification of tumors with glycogen (e.g., Ewing’s/PNET, rhabdomyosarcoma, renal cell carcinoma), glomerular diseases (BM), identification of adenocarcinomas (mucin), fungal diseases (especially in argentophic areas – neutrophils and debris), spironolactone bodies in adrenal adenomas treated with this drug
Periodic acid – Schiff with diastase digestion (PAS-D) As above except glycogen that has been digested will not be stained
Identification of glycogen in tumors
Identification of fungus in glycogen-rich tissue (e.g., skin)
PAS-D resistant deposits in liver are present in alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency
Phosphotungstic acid hematoxylin (Mallory PTAH)
Glial fibers - blue
Nuclei - blue
Neurons - salmon
Myelin - blue
Skeletal muscle cross striations - blue
Fibrin - blue
Collagen - red brown
Identification of neural lesions
Skeletal muscle differentiation (Zenker’s fixative is preferred). This stain has been replaced by IHC for muscle markers.
Reticular fibers (Gomor’s reticulin, Gordon and Sweets, Snook)
Reticulin - black
Mature collagen, type 1 – brown
Immature collagen, types 3 and 4 - black
Bone marrow (myelophthisis), liver (fibrosis, veno-occlusive disease), carcinoma vs. sarcoma (reticular network) (but largely replaced by IHC)
Silver stain (Grocott methenamine–silver nitrate – GMS)
Fungi - black
Pneumocystis - black
Mucin - taupe to gray
Tissue - green
Evaluation of infectious diseases
Bacteria will also stain black.
Steiner
Spirochetes, H. pylori, Legionella, other bacteria - dark brown to black
Tissue - light yellow
Evaluation of infectious diseases
Sulfated Alcian blue
Myocytes – yellow
Connective tissue – red-purple
Amyloid – sea-foam green
Identification of amyloid in cardiac biopsies
Toluidine blue
Mast cells - deep violet
Background - blue
Mast cell diseases, chronic cystitis
Trichrome (Gomori, Masson)
Mature collagen, type 1 – dark blue
Immature collagen, types 3 and 4 - light blue
Mucin - green or blue
Nuclei - black
Cytoplasm, keratin, muscle fibers - red
Liver (fibrosis)
Trichrome - modified
Viable myocardium - magenta to brick red
Nonviable myocardium -dusky gray to mauve
Evaluation of myocardial biopsies
Von Kossa calcium
Calcium - black
Tissue - red
Demonstration of phosphate and carbonate radicals with calcium in tissues, identification of malakoplakia (Michaelis-Gutmann bodies)
Warthin Starry
Spirochetes - black
Other bacteria - black
(including Bartonella sp.)
Tissue - pale yellow to light brown
Infectious lesions (including syphilis, cat scratch fever, and bacillary angiomatosis)
Wright’s
Eosinophilic granules - pink
Neutrophilic granules - purple
Lymphocytic cytoplasm - blue
Nuclei -blue to purple
Blood smears

The WebPath section of the University of Utah site (http://library.med.utah.edu/webpath) has useful descriptions of special stains and illustrative photographs.

IMMUNOPEROXIDASE STUDIES

The development of methods to detect antigens on tissue sections with antibodies was a major advance in surgical pathology. Immunohistochemical (IHC) studies are most frequently used for the following purposes:

Classification of tumors (e.g., carcinoma vs. lymphoma, B cell vs. T cell lymphoma).
Identification of in situ lesions vs. invasive carcinomas (e.g., myoepithelial markers in breast cancers, basal cell markers in prostate).
Prognostic factors (e.g., Ki-67 in glioblastomas).
Predictive factors to guide specific therapy (e.g., c-KIT, estrogen and progesterone receptors, HER2/neu).
Identification of extracellular material (e.g., β-2 microglobulin amyloid).
Identification of infectious agents (e.g., CMV or HSV).

Use of Immunohistochemistry.

A differential diagnosis is generated after examination of the H&E-stained slides. IHC is then used to gain evidence for or against diagnostic possibilities. “Trolling” cases through an immunohistochemistry laboratory by ordering numerous antibody studies without a clear reason in mind is more likely to lead to misguided diagnosis due to aberrant immunoreactivity than to provide an unexpected correct diagnosis.

Panels.

There are no absolute rules for immunoreactivity in cells and tissues. Aberrant immunoreactivity or loss of immunoreactivity is occasionally observed for all antibodies, either due to biologic variability (e.g., occasional keratin-positive melanomas) or technical factors (e.g., impure antibodies, cross-reaction with other antigens, failure to preserve antigenicity). Thus, immunohistochemical markers are used most effectively as panels of markers with interpretation based on an immunohistochemical profile.

Slides for Immunohistochemistry.

Tissue is often dislodged from normal glass slides during the treatments required for IHC. Thus, slides must be coated (e.g., with glue, poly-L-lysine, gelatin, albumin) or special commercial slides must be used. If slides are being prepared by another laboratory, the type of glass slide to be used must be specified.

Factors Affecting Immunogenicity.

There are numerous variables that can affect antigenicity. The most common are listed below. Each laboratory must optimize its procedures for each antibody used. Studies on tissues or slides not prepared in the routine fashion for a laboratory must be interpreted with caution.

Type of fixative. Some fixatives destroy some antigens (e.g., Bouin’s diminishes ER immunoreactivity, keratins are not well preserved in B5).1 Most studies are based on formalin-fixed tissue. Results cannot be assumed to be equivalent for other fixatives.
Length of time of fixation in formalin causes protein cross-linking, and antigenicity generally decreases with fixation times over 24 hours. To some extent, this effect can be reversed using antigen retrieval methods. Antigenicity can also be reduced if the tissue is fixed for too short a period (e.g., less than 6 hours).
Prior decalcification in hydrochloric acid. Decreases antigenicity of some epitopes (predominantly nuclear) but not others (predominantly cytoplasmic).2 Decalcifying agents using EDTA did not alter immunogenicity.
Decreased: estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), Ki-67, p53, BerEp4 (tumor cells), H blood group.
Not affected: calcitonin, chromogranin, GCDFP-15, HMB 45, thyroglobulin, S100, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), keratins (CK 20, CAM5.2, AE1/AE3), A and B blood groups, others.
Temperature of baking the slide.
Length of time since the glass slide was cut. The immunoreactivity of the majority of antigens declines over days to weeks with potential complete loss at one month.3,4 The loss may be due to exposure of tissue to air with oxidation of amino acids, as the immunogenicity of tissue deeper in the block can be preserved for many years. Antigen retrieval methods do not completely restore the antigenicity of old slides. Coating slides with paraffin, storing the slides in a nitrogen desiccator, and/or storing at lower temperatures can partially preserve antigenicity. However, studies should be performed on newly cut slides, if possible.
Antigen retrieval procedures (e.g., proteolysis, heating [microwave, steam], special incubation fluids). To some extent these methods reverse the effects of formalin fixation. Variable effects are observed for different antibodies.
Type of antibody (polyclonal vs. monoclonal vs. mixture of different monoclonals, epitope detected, mouse vs. rabbit). Very different results can be obtained with different antibodies to the same protein or different commercial sources of the same antibody.
Incubation time, incubation temperature, dilution of antibody.
Methods of signal amplification.

Controls.

Controls are essential for the appropriate interpretation of immunohistochemical studies and ensure that all steps of this complicated procedure have been performed adequately.

Positive controls consisting of tissues known to be immunoreactive should be included each time an antibody is used for a test case. Internal positive controls should always be evaluated when present, as they control not only for the technique used but also for the antigenicity of the tissue under investigation. The immunoperoxidase table lists normal cells that are generally immunoreactive for each antibody. Some laboratories have used vimentin as a control for immunogenicity as almost all tissue should demonstrate positivity.5 Given the wide and non-specific distribution of vimentin, smooth muscle alpha actin may be more useful in this context as pericytes, vascular smooth muscle, and myoepithelial cells present in most tissues are immunoreactive.

Examples of internal controls:

S100: Normal nerves, melanocytes, and Langerhans cells in epidermis, cartilage, some myoepithelial cells, skin adnexa
Estrogen and progesterone receptors: Normal luminal cells in ducts and lobules of the breast
CD31, FVIII: Vascular endothelium
c-KIT (CD117): Mast cells
Smooth muscle alpha actin: Blood vessel walls, myoepithelial cells in the breast
Vimentin: Blood vessels, stromal cells
High molecular weight (MW) keratin: Squamous epithelium
Low MW keratin: Glandular epithelium
CD15: Polymorphonuclear leukocytes

Negative controls usually consist of replacing the primary antibody with non-immune animal serum diluted to the same concentration as the primary antibody. No positive reaction should be present. If multiple primary antibodies are used reactive with different target antigens, then they may serve as negative controls for each other. Although the best negative control would be to use antibody preabsorbed against the target antigen, this is rarely practical in a diagnostic laboratory. Diagnostic slides should also be evaluated for internal negative controls. Aberrant immunoreactivity of tissues that should not be positive is indicative that the immunoreactivity is nonspecific and the study should not be used for interpretation.

Evaluation of Studies

The following features must be taken into consideration when evaluating studies:

Location of Immunoreactivity

Antigens are present in specific sites. Some antigens may be present in more than one location or be extracellular.

Nonspecific positivity should be suspected when immunoreactivity is present in atypical locations:

Background: Suspect nonspecific positivity if normal cells or noncellular components are positive. This can occur with suboptimal performance of the assay or suboptimal antibodies.
Edge artifact: Antibodies can pool at edges or holes in tissue. True positivity should also be present in the center of the tissue.
Necrosis or crushing of cells: Nonspecific positivity can be seen in disrupted cells. Although keratin is generally reliable in necrotic tumors, other markers generally should not be interpreted.
Inappropriate location (e.g., cytoplasm instead of nucleus): Occasionally ER or PR are present in the cytoplasm instead of the nucleus. This is not interpreted as a positive result. Plasma cells have large amounts of cytoplasmic immunoglobulins that can crossreact with many antibodies.
In rare cases, immunoreactivity in an unusual location is of diagnostic importance:
TTF-1: Cytoplasmic (instead of nuclear) positivity in hepatocellular carcinomas.
Ki-67 (MIB1): Cytoplasmic and membrane (instead of nuclear) positivity in trabecular hyalinizing adenomas of the thyroid and sclerosing hemangiomas of the lung.
Beta-catenin: Nuclear (instead of cytoplasmic) positivity in solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas and pancreatoblastomas. Both nuclear and cytoplasmic positivity is seen in the majority of colon carcinomas. Nuclear positivity is present in about 20% of endometrioid endometrial carcinomas and 70% of cases of desmoid-type fibromatosis.
ALK: The pattern of immunoreactivity correlates with the different types of chromosomal translocations in anaplastic large cell lymphomas.
NPM (nucleophosmin) shuttles between the cytoplasm and nucleus. NPM1 mutations occur in about 30% of adult AML and cause aberrant cytoplasmic expression of NPM (“NPMc+ AML”). These cases have a specific gene expression profile and distinctive clinical and prognostic features.

Examples of the normal location of antigens are shown in Figure 7-1.

image

Figure 7–1 Location of immunoreactivity (indicated in blue).

Identification of Immunoreactive Cells

Immunoreactivity of tumor cells must be distinguished from immunoreactivity of normal entrapped cells (e.g., desmin [+] skeletal muscle cells infiltrated by tumor, S100 [+] Langerhans cells in tumors, smooth muscle alpha actin [+] blood vessels, etc.). Plasma cells have large amounts of cytoplasmic immunoglobulin and can react nonspecifically with many antibodies.

Intensity of Immunoreactivity

Some weak immunoreactivity may be present as a nonspecific finding. It is important to compare positive cells with control slides and with normally nonimmunoreactive cells to determine whether the immunoreactivity is significant.

Number of Immunoreactive Cells

In some cases, the number of positive cells may be important as a criterion for positivity or as a prognostic marker (e.g., markers of proliferation such as Ki-67, HER2/neu). In other cases, rare weakly positive cells must be distinguished from intermingled normal cells or just nonspecific immunoreactivity.

Criteria for a “Positive” Result

Specific criteria for evaluating IHC have been developed for a few antibodies (see Tables 7-12 to 7-16). However, criteria do not exist for most antibodies or are not universally used by all pathologists. The significance of immunoreactivity varies with the type of lesion, the antibody, and the specific assay. Strong positivity in the majority of cells is easily interpreted as positive. As the number of positive cells decreases, and the intensity of immunoreactivity weakens, the lower threshold of a “positive” result becomes more difficult to determine.

Time

Alkaline phosphatase chromogens (red color) fade over time. DAB (a brown color) is more permanent. This is not a problem in evaluating current pathology specimens. However, if slides are reviewed after a period of time, some chromogens may fade and once positive results may appear to be negative.

Common Panels for Immunohistochemical Studies

The following tables include information from the literature as well as the personal experiences of the staff at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Because of the many differences in specific antibodies, laboratory assays, and criteria for considering a result “positive,” results may vary for different institutions. The results have been divided into five categories for general markers and four categories for hematopathology markers. Note that “%” refers to the number of tumors reported to be positive, not the number of cells positive within a tumor (Table 7-2).

TABLE 7–2 EVALUATION OF POSITIVITY OF IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL STUDIES

image

The actual markers used to evaluate a case will depend upon the differential diagnosis based on the H&E appearance. In some cases, an initial panel, which is often used for typical cases, has been suggested. Not all markers listed would be used for all cases and some markers are included to indicate when they would not be useful for distinguishing the tumors listed in the table.

POSITIVE is defined as the presence of immunoreactive cells and NEGATIVE as the absence of immunoreactive cells. Unfortunately, “positive” has also been used in some studies to mean “absence of immunoreactivity” when this finding supports a diagnosis. For example, the absence of SMAD4 (DPC4) has been reported as a “positive” result for pancreatic carcinoma, as this marker is absent in the majority of these tumors. This method of reporting results becomes confusing as “positive” and “negative” are dependent on the expected diagnosis. It is preferable to report the findings (positive = immunoreactivity present; negative = immunoreactivity absent) and then interpret them as supporting, or not supporting, the diagnoses in the differential diagnosis.

Cytokeratin 7 and cytokeratin 20 tables

The combination of these two cytokeratins have been found to be useful to divide carcinomas into four main groups (Ck7+/Ck20+, Ck7+/Ck20-, Ck7-/Ck20+, Ck7-/Ck20-).

In Tables 7-3 to 7-7, other commonly used antibodies have been included to show differences within each group. The most useful additional antibodies will depend on the specific differential diagnosis.6-8

TABLE 7–3 PREDOMINANTLY CK7+/CK20+

image

TABLE 7–4 NO DOMINANT CK7/CK20 PATTERN OR PATTERN UNKNOWN

image

TABLE 7–5 PREDOMINANTLY CK7+/CK20−

image
image

TABLE 7–6 CK7−/CK20+

image

TABLE 7–7 PREDOMINANTLY CK7−/CK20–

image
image

Small blue cell tumors

See Table 7-8.

TABLE 7–8 SMALL BLUE CELL TUMORS

image

Spindle cell lesions, soft tissue lesions, and sarcomas

See Table 7-9.

TABLE 7–9 SPINDLE CELL/SOFT TISSUE LESIONS/SARCOMAS

image
image
image
image

Metastatic tumors of unknown origin

Pathologists frequently receive specimens with metastatic tumors. Often, the site of origin is known to the clinician, but this information is not provided to the pathologist. A good clinical history is frequently more successful for correct classification than a battery of studies.

The Ck7/Ck20 pattern is generally helpful to narrow down the potential site of origin of carcinomas (see Tables 7-3 to 7-7). Additional studies can then be used to identify specific types of carcinoma.

The most important tumors to identify are those with specific therapeutic treatments for cure or palliation (Table 7-10).10

TABLE 7–10 METASTATIC TUMORS OF UNKNOWN ORIGIN

image

Poorly differentiated tumors

See Table 7-11.

TABLE 7–11 POORLY DIFFERENTIATED TUMORS

TYPE OF TUMOR IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL MARKER COMMENTS
Carcinoma Broad spectrum keratins AE1/AE3 or PANK (MNF-116)
Some carcinomas may express unusual keratin sub-types. If negative, try other keratin types (e.g., CAM5.2). The Ck7/Ck20 pattern may be helpful in determining the likely site of origin.
Some non-carcinomas can have an epithelioid appearance and strongly express keratins (e.g., epithelioid angiosarcoma, epithelioid sarcoma, mesothelioma).
Melanoma S100 protein
S100 is strongly positive in the vast majority of melanomas.
Some carcinomas (especially breast) and sarcomas are also positive for S100 and additional markers may be required.
HMB-45 and MART-1 are expressed by most epithelioid melanomas but may be focal or absent in non-epithelioid melanomas (e.g., spindle cell or desmoplastic melanomas).
Lymphoma Leukocyte common antigen (LCA)
Present in almost all non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas.
May be absent in 30% of anaplastic (Ki-1) large cell lymphomas. These lymphomas are keratin negative but may express EMA. These tumors will be positive for CD30 (Ki-1) and ALK.

Estrogen and progesterone receptor evaluation

Hormone receptors are routinely determined on all invasive breast carcinomas and DCIS. ER and PR are weak prognostic markers and are more useful to predict the likelihood of response to hormonal therapies.

Many different methods are currently used to report the results of IHC studies for ER and PR. One method that has been used in multiple studies is the Allred score method (Table 7-12).

TABLE 7–12 ER AND PR—ALLRED SCORE

image

Patients with carcinomas that scored 3 (<1% of cells with intermediate intensity or 1% to 10% of cells with weak intensity) or above had improved disease-free survival when treated with endocrine therapy.11 Patients with carcinomas with a total score of 2 (<1% weakly positive cells) had a survival rate similar to ER-negative carcinomas (total score of 0).

About 80% of DCIS cases are positive for ER using the same method of scoring. Women with ER-positive DCIS were shown to experience fewer local recurrences, contralateral recurrences, and distant recurrences when treated with tamoxifen (NSABP B24 study).

With optimization of IHC using newer antigen retrieval methods, 99.2% of carcinomas will have scores of 0, 7, or 8.12 Therefore, many laboratories report results as positive or negative. The value of further subdividing cases by percent positive cells, H-score, or image analysis for either prognosis or to predict response to tamoxifen has not been demonstrated. Intensity of immunoreactivity is difficult to evaluate as most cases show strong reactivity with optimal assay methods and most carcinomas show considerable variability in intensity.

A possible method for reporting results is shown in Table 7-13. The same system can be used for reporting progesterone receptor results. The use of both ER and PR may be helpful for determining the likelihood of response to tamoxifen, as has been shown with data using the biochemical assay (Table 7-14). Presumably, the presence of the ER-regulated gene product PR is more predictive of an intact ER regulatory pathway.

TABLE 7–13 REPORTING RESULTS OF ER AND PR EVALUATION

image

TABLE 7–14 RESPONSE TO TAMOXIFEN

STATUS OF CARCINOMA % OF CARCINOMAS % OF PATIENTS RESPONDING TO TAMOXIFEN
ER+ PR+ 63% 75% to 80%
ER+ PR– 15% 25% to 30%
ER– PR+ 5% 40% to 45%
ER– PR– 17% <10%

Recent national guidelines for reporting ER and PR have been released and should be consulted for additional information about performing and interpreting these studies (Hammond ME, et al, American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations for Immunohistochemical Testing of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer, J Clin Oncol 2010 Apr 19).False negative results, and to a lesser extent, false positive results, can also be problems. False negative results may be due to a large number of causes including:

Low sensitivity of the assay
Errors in performing the assay
Delayed fixation of tissue
Over- or underfixation of tissue
Overheating of tissue (e.g., with cautery during surgery)
Decalcification of tissue

Most cases of false negativity can be suspected, as the normal breast tissue will also be negative. In such cases, the assay should be repeated on the same block, a different block from the same case, or blocks from another case, if available. If the normal tissue remains negative, the possibility of loss of antigenicity in the tissue can be mentioned in the report.

False positive results are quite unusual, as the antibody should not crossreact with other antigens.

Entrapped normal ducts or lobules misinterpreted as carcinoma — this can be a difficult issue for DCIS as some ducts or lobules may be only partially involved by DCIS.
Control placed on same slide misinterpreted as the carcinoma
Sclerosing adenosis or myofibroblastoma (or other benign lesions) misinterpreted as invasive carcinoma

HER2/neu score

The HER2/neu immunoreactivity scoring system in Table 7-15 was recommended by an expert panel.13 Other panel suggestions:

If cytoplasmic positivity obscures the membrane pattern, repeat the assay or perform FISH.
If normal ducts and lobules show definitive positivity, repeat the assay.
In cases of invasive carcinoma, only the areas of invasion should be scored. In some cases the associated DCIS can show stronger immunoreactivity.
Fixation must be in neutral buffered formalin and should, ideally, be between 6 and 48 hours for excisions, and at least 1 hour for needle biopsies. However, any effect from longer fixation has not been shown.
Unstained slides should not be used if prepared >6 weeks earlier. Loss of antigenicity has been shown for other antigens, but not specifically for HER2.

TABLE 7–15 HER2-IHC SCORING

image

Only membrane immunoreactivity is scored. Marked cytoplasmic immunoreactivity may make interpretation difficult. FISH studies may be preferred for such cases (Table 7-16).

TABLE 7–16 FISH RESULTS

RESULT CRITERIA comment
Positive for amplification >6.0 gene copies or >2.2 ratio  
Equivocal for amplification 4.0 to 6.0 genes or 1.8 to 2.2 ratio Guidelines suggest counting additional cells for FISH, retesting, or performing IHC
Negative for amplification <4.0 genes or <1.8 ratio  

Patients with a ratio of 2.0 or greater have been eligible for Herceptin trials.

In >90% of carcinomas with protein overexpression, the HER2/neu gene has been amplified. In 3% to 5% of cases, protein overexpression can occur due to other mechanisms. In <5% of cases, there may be gene amplification without protein overexpression. In general, there is a 20% to 40% response to Herceptin alone in patients with cancers showing gene amplification by FISH, and <5% of patients respond if the gene is not amplified. Therefore, FISH studies may be helpful for cases with 2+ positivity or difficult to interpret cases (e.g., with variable positivity or cytoplasmic positivity).

Well- and moderately differentiated lobular carcinomas are rarely positive (<5%). However, in some cases there may be edge enhancement of individual tumor cells that may be difficult to interpret. FISH studies may be helpful.

In rare cases, DCIS overexpresses HER2/neu but the accompanying invasive carcinoma does not. This is a source of potential false positive results for IHC or FISH.

Myoepithelial markers in breast carcinoma

Myoepithelial markers can be useful for the evaluation of breast lesions (Table 7-17):

Invasive carcinoma vs. sclerosing adenosis (frequently involved by DCIS, LCIS, or apocrine metaplasia).
DCIS vs. DCIS with microinvasion – Double immunolabeling with p63 (brown nuclear) and cytokeratin (AE1/AE3 – red cytoplasm) can be useful to highlight small nests of tumor cells lacking myoepithelial cells. A double stain with SMMHC and cytokeratin AE1/AE3 can also be helpful.
DCIS vs. carcinoma invading as circumscribed tumor nests vs. lymphovascular invasion.
Microglandular adenosis is the only “benign” breast lesion that lacks myoepithelial cells. However, this lesion may be a form of well-differentiated non-metastasizing invasive carcinoma. The cells are negative for ER and PR and strongly positive for S100.

TABLE 7–17 MYOEPITHELIAL MARKERS IN BREAST CARCINOMA

image

Epidermal lesions of the nipple

See Table 7-18.

TABLE 7–18 EPIDERMAL LESIONS OF THE NIPPLE AND PAGET DISEASE AT OTHER SITES

image

Breast carcinoma in males versus metastatic prostate carcinoma

See Table 7-19.

TABLE 7–19 BREAST CARCINOMA IN MALES VERSUS METASTATIC PROSTATE CARCINOMA

image

Signet ring cell carcinomas of the stomach and breast (lobular carcinoma)

See Table 7-20 and Fig. 7-2.

TABLE 7–20 SIGNET RING CELL CARCINOMAS OF THE STOMACH AND BREAST (LOBULAR CARCINOMA)

image
image

Figure 7–2 Metastatic lobular carcinoma of the breast can morphologically resemble primary signet ring cell gastric carcinomas. Both typically lack e-cadherin expression. In addition, lobular breast carcinomas can be clinically occult or can present as distant metastases many years after the initial presentation. Signet ring cells associated with breast carcinoma more commonly have a central mucin vacuole with a targetoid appearance (cell A). Gastric signet ring cells usually have many small vacuoles giving the cytoplasm a foamy appearance (cell B). These criteria are not reliable in distinguishing these two carcinomas. However, the presence of the first type of signet ring cell in a biopsy from the gastrointestinal tract should raise the possibility of metastatic breast carcinoma.14 The majority of lobular breast carcinomas will be ER positive, and this is a reliable marker to exclude gastric carcinoma. In the minority of ER-negative cases, PR, GCDFP, MUC1, CDX2, and Hep Par may be helpful markers.15

Fibroblastic/myofibroblastic lesions of the breast

See Table 7-21.

TABLE 7–21 FIBROBLASTIC/MYOFIBROBLASTIC LESIONS OF THE BREAST

image

Ovarian carcinoma versus mesothelioma

See Table 7-22.

TABLE 7–22 OVARIAN CARCINOMA VERSUS MESOTHELIOMA

image

Primary ovarian carcinoma versus metastatic carcinomas

See Table 7-23.

TABLE 7–23 PRIMARY OVARIAN CARCINOMA VERSUS METASTATIC CARCINOMAS

image

Endocervical carcinoma versus endometrial carcinoma

See Table 7-24.

TABLE 7–24 ENDOCERVICAL CARCINOMA VERSUS ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA

image

Endometrial stromal sarcoma versus leiomyosarcoma

See Table 7-25.

TABLE 7–25 ENDOMETRIAL STROMAL SARCOMA VERSUS LEIOMYOSARCOMA

image

Trophoblastic lesions

See Table 7-26.

TABLE 7–26 TROPHOBLASTIC LESIONS

image

Metastatic adenocarcinomas in the abdomen

See Table 7-27.

TABLE 7–27 METASTATIC ADENOCARCINOMAS IN THE ABDOMEN

image

CNS neoplasms

See Table 7-28.

TABLE 7–28 CNS NEOPLASMS

image

Hemangioblastoma versus metastatic renal cell carcinoma

See Table 7-29.

TABLE 7–29 HEMANGIOBLASTOMA VERSUS METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA

image

Tumors of germ cells and sex-cord stromal tumors

See Table 7-30.

TABLE 7–30 TUMORS OF GERM CELLS AND SEX-CORD STROMAL TUMORS

image

Adrenal and kidney tumors

See Table 7-31.

TABLE 7–31 ADRENAL AND KIDNEY TUMORS

image

Tumors of bladder, prostatic, and renal origin

See Table 7-32.

TABLE 7–32 TUMORS OF BLADDER, PROSTATIC, AND RENAL ORIGIN

image

Prostate carcinoma versus other lesions

See Table 7-33.

TABLE 7–33 PROSTATE CARCINOMA VERSUS OTHER LESIONS

image

Hepatic tumors

See Table 7-34.

TABLE 7–34 HEPATIC TUMORS

image

Thyroid and parathyroid lesions

See Table 7-35.

TABLE 7–35 THYROID AND PARATHYROID LESIONS

image

Differential diagnosis of epithelial mesothelioma and lung adenocarcinoma

See Table 7-36.

TABLE 7–36 DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF EPITHELIAL MESOTHELIOMA AND LUNG ADENOCARCINOMA

image

Initial panel: AE1/AE3, calretinin, WT-1 (clone 6F-H2), CEA, Leu-M1, and TTF-1 with additional studies ordered in difficult cases.

Other antibodies generally reported as negative in epithelial mesotheliomas and positive in lung adenocarcinomas include the following: MOC-1, B72.3, Ber-EP4, and BG-8. Cytokeratins 5/6 are reported to be positive in mesotheliomas and negative in lung carcinomas. However, in our experience, these markers have proven less useful than the ones listed earlier. The use of EMA is controversial. Strong membrane positivity is characteristic of epithelial mesothelioma, whereas cytoplasmic positivity is characteristic of adenocarcinomas.

Less is known about the immunophenotype of pure sarcomatoid mesotheliomas. The spindle cells are positive for cytokeratin, but are less frequently positive for the other markers as compared to the epithelioid cells. Tumors that can, on occasion, resemble mesotheliomas are generally negative for cytokeratins, with the notable exceptions of some cases of angiosarcoma, epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, synovial sarcoma, epithelioid sarcoma, and leiomyosarcoma (see Table 7-9).16

Lung carcinoma

See Tables 7-37 and 7-38.

TABLE 7–37 LUNG CARCINOMAS

image

TABLE 7–38 DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF LUNG CARCINOMAS

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS MOST USEFUL MARKERS
Adenocarcinoma vs. squamous cell carcinoma Keratin 7, keratin 20, TTF-1, p63
Small cell carcinoma vs. basaloid squamous cell carcinoma P63, TTF-1
Small cell carcinoma vs. carcinoid tumor Mitoses, necrosis, amount of cytoplasm
Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma vs. carcinoid tumor Mitoses, necrosis
Mucinous lung carcinoma vs. metastatic colon cancer TTF-1, CDX2 (mucinous BAC can be focally positive for CDX2)
Lung carcinoma vs. metastatic breast carcinoma TTF-1, compare ER/PR/HER2 pattern in primary breast carcinoma and lung tumor

B-cell neoplasms

See Table 7-39.

TABLE 7–39 B-CELL NEOPLASMS

image
image

T-cell neoplasms

See Table 7-40.

TABLE 7–40 T-CELL NEOPLASMS

image image

Hodgkin lymphoma

See Table 7-41.

TABLE 7–41 HODGKIN LYMPHOMA

image

Amyloid

Amyloidosis (Greek for amylon = starch plus eidos = resemblance) is seen in many different clinical settings and is associated with many diseases. Pathologists can narrow down the differential diagnosis considerably to help guide clinical decision making. Finding an amyloid deposit in any tissue is similar to finding metastatic carcinoma in a lymph node – in both settings clinical information (e.g., history, physical examination, radiology studies, results of laboratory tests) is essential in arriving at the correct interpretation. A little immunohistochemistry and a lot of clinical judgment by the pathologist can help establish the cause with a greater degree of certainty.17

Finding and characterizing amyloid deposits:

1. Examine the H&E slide for noncellular material in the correct location for the suspected disease (Table 7-42).
2. Amyloid deposits will be orange-pink on Congo Red stains or sea-foam green on Sulfated Alcian blue stains. Amyloid may be more apparent on these stains. HOWEVER, beware of overcalling cases in which there is not a histologic correlate for amyloid in the stained tissue. If there is background positivity in normal tissue due to overstaining, the slide cannot be interpreted. Positive controls must show appropriate specific positivity.
3. Congo red-positive amyloid should become an apple green color when viewed under polarized light. This may require the high-quality polarizers that are built in to the microscope. Lower quality polarizers (i.e., the cut squares of polarizing material) may not be adequate. Collagen (silver when H&E is polarized) and fibrin (does not polarize) may mimic amyloid.
4. The amyloid deposits can be further characterized using immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence (see Table 7-42) based on the clinical information, the organ or structures involved, and the distribution of amyloid deposits in the tissue. Amyloid can also be identified using EM (non-branching fibrils, 7.5 to 10 nm width and up to 1 micron in length).
5. A firm diagnosis is not always possible. The final diagnosis should be based on a combination of histologic, immunohistochemical, and clinical data.

TABLE 7–42 AMYLOID

image

Antibodies for immunohistochemistry

See Tables 7-43 and 7-44.

TABLE 7–43 ANTIBODIES FOR IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY

image

TABLE 7–44 ALTERNATIVE NAMES FOR ANTIGENS

LOOKING FOR? FIND IT UNDER:
1D5 Estrogen receptor (G)
6F/3D Beta-amyloid
12E7 CD99 (G, H)
34βE12 Keratins (G)
38.13 CD77(H)
70 kD NF Neurofilaments (G)
200 kD NF Neurofilaments (G)
903 Keratins--34βE12 (G)
A (blood group antigen) Blood group antigens (G)
A (Ig heavy chain alpha) Heavy chain immunoglobulins (H)
A32 antigen CD146 (G)
A103 MELAN-A (G)
AAT Alpha 1-antitrypsin (G, H)
ACH Alpha-1 antichymotrypsin (H)
AE1/AE3 Keratins (G)
AFP Alpha-fetoprotein (G)
Alpha 1-antitrypsin Alpha 1-antitrypsin (G, H)
Alpha 1-antichymotrypsin Alpha 1-antichymotrypsin (H)
Alpha 1-fetoprotein Alpha fetoprotein (G)
Alpha fetoprotein Alpha fetoprotein (G)
Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase AMACR (G)
Alpha smooth muscle actin Alpha smooth muscle actin (G)
AMACR AMACR (G)
Amyloid Beta-amyloid (G)
Androgen receptor Androgen receptor (G)
Apolipoprotein J Clusterin (H)
AR Androgen receptor (G)
B (blood group antigen) Blood group antigens (G)
B1 CD20 (H)
B2 CD21 (H)
B4 CD19 (H)
B72.3 B72.3 (G)
bcl-1 Cyclin D1 (H)
bcl-2 bcl-2 (H, G)
B-cell specific activator protein BSAP (H)
BER-EP4 BER-EP4 (G)
BERH2 CD30 (G, H)
Beta-amyloid Beta-amyloid (G)
Beta-catenin Beta-catenin (G)
Beta-2 microglobulin Beta-2 microglobulin (G)
BG8 BG8 (G)
B-HCG Human chorionic gonadotropin (G)
BLA.36 CD77 (H)
BL-CAM CD22 (H)
Blood group antigens Blood group antigens (G, H)
BR-2 Gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (G)
BRST-2 Gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (G)
C3b/C4bR CD35 (H)
C5b-9 C5b-9 (G)
c-kit CD117 (G)
CA 15-3 Epithelial membrane antigen (G, H)
CA 19-9 CA 19-9 (G)
CA 27.28 Epithelial membrane antigen (G, H)
CA 72-4 B72.3 (G)
CA125 CA125 (G)
CA19-9 CA19-9 (G)
Calcitonin Calcitonin (G), Hormones (G)
Caldesmon Caldesmon (G)
Calgranulin MAC 387 (G)
CALLA CD10 (G, H)
CALP Calponin (G)
Calponin Calponin (G)
Calprotectin MAC 387 (G)
Calretinin Calretinin (G)
CAM5.2 Keratins (G)
Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 CA19-9 (G)
Carcinoembryonic antigen Carcinoembryonic antigen (G)
CD1a CD1a (H)
CD2 CD2 (H)
CD3 CD3 (H)
CD4 CD4 (H)
CD5 CD5 (G, H)
CD7 CD7 (H)
CD8 CD8 (H)
CD10 CD10 (G, H)
CD11b CD11b (H)
CD11c CD11c (H)
CD13 CD13 (H)
CD15 CD15 (G, H)
CD16 CD16 (H)
CD19 CD19 (H)
CD20 CD20 (H)
CD21 CD21 (H)
CD22 CD22 (H)
CD23 CD23 (H)
CD25 CD25 (H)
CD30 CD30 (G, H)
CD31 CD31 (G)
CD33 CD33 (H)
CD34 CD34 (G, H)
CD35 CD35 (H)
CD38 CD38 (H)
CD43 CD43 (H)
CD44v3 CD44v3 (G)
CD45 CD45 (H)
CD45RA CD45RA (H)
CD45Ro CD45Ro (H)
CD56 CD56 (H)
CD57 CD57 (G)
CD61 CD61 (H)
CD68 CD68 (G, H)
CD74 CD74 (H)
CDw75 CDw75 (H)
CD77 CD77 (H)
CD79a CD79a (H)
CD79b CD79b (H)
CD95 CD95 (H)
CD99 CD99 (G, H)
CD117 CD117 (G)
CD141 CD141 (G)
CDX CDX (G)
CDKN2 p16 (G)
CDP Gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (G)
CEA Carcinoembryonic antigen (G)
c-erbB2 HER-2/neu (G)
Chromogranin A Chromogranin A (G)
c-kit CD117 (G)
CLA CD45 (H) or HECA-452 (H)
CLDN1 Claudin (G)
Clusterin Clusterin (H)
Collagen IV Collagen IV (G)
Common acute leukemia antigen CD10 (G, H)
Complement lysis inhibitor Clusterin (H)
CR1 CD35 (H)
Cyclin D1 Cyclin D1 (H)
Cystic fibrosis antigen MAC 387 (G)
D (Ig heavy chain delta) Heavy chain immunoglobulins (H)
DBA.44 DBA.44 (H)
Desmin Desmin (G)
DF3 Epithelial membrane antigen (G, H)
DPB CD45RA (H)
E2 antigen CD99 (G, H)
EBERS Epstein-Barr virus (G, H)
EBNA Epstein-Barr virus (G, H)
E-cadherin E-cadherin (G)
EGFR EGFR (G)
EM ACT HHF-35 (G)
EMA Epithelial membrane antigen (G)
E-MEL HMB-45 (G)
Endothelial cell antigen HECA-452 (H)
Ep-CAM BER-EP4 (G)
Epidermal growth factor receptor EGFR (G)
Epithelial membrane antigen Epithelial membrane antigen (G, H)
Epithelial specific antigen BER-EP4 (G)
Epstein-Barr virus Epstein-Barr virus (G, H)
ER Estrogen receptor (G)
erbB2 HER-2/neu (G)
ESA BER-EP4 (G)
Estrogen receptor Estrogen receptor (G)
Ewing’s sarcoma marker CD99 (G, H)
Factor VIII related antigen Factor VIII (G)
FVIII:RAg Factor VIII (G)
Factor XIIIa Factor XIIIa (G)
Fascin Fascin (H)
Fast myosin Myosin heavy chain (G)
Fibronectin Fibronectin (G)
Fli-1 Fli-1 (G)
FMC7 FMC7 (H)
FMC 29 CD99 (G, H)
Friend leukemia integrin-site 1 Fli-1 (G)
FVIII:g Factor VIII (G)
G (Ig heavy chain gamma) Heavy chain immunoglobulins (H)
Gal-3 Galectin-3 (G)
Galectin-3 Galectin-3 (G)
Gastrin Hormones (G)
GCDFP Gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (G)
GFAP Glial fibriallary acidic protein (G)
Glial fibrillary acidic protein Glial fibriallary acidic protein (G)
Glucagon Hormones (G)
Glucose transporter 1 GLUT-1 (G)
GLUT-1 GLUT-1 (G)
GPIIIa CD61 (H)
gp80 Clusterin (H)
gp200 RCC (G)
GPA Glycophorin A (H)
Granzyme B Granzyme B (H)
Gross cystic disease fluid disease-15 Gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (G)
H (blood group antigen) Blood group antigens (G)
H222 Estrogen receptor (G)
Hb Hemoglobin (H)
HBME-1 HBME-1 (G)
h-caldesmon Caldesmon (G)
H-CAM CD44v3 (G)
HCG Human chorionic gonadotropin (G)
HCL DBA.44 (H)
HBME-1 HBME-1 (G)
Heavy chain immunoglobulins Heavy chain immunoglobulins (H)
HECA-452 HECA-452 (H)
Hematopoietic progenitor cell, class 1 CD34
Hemoglobin Hemoglobin (H)
HepPar-1 HepPar-1 (G)
Hepatocyte paraffin-1 HepPar-1 (G)
HER-2/neu HER-2/neu (G)
HHF-35 HHF-35 (G)
HHV8 HHV8 (H)
HLA-DR HLA-DR (H)
HMB-45 HMB-45 (G)
HMFG Epithelial membrane antigen (G, H)
hMLH1 hMLH1 (G)
hMSH2 hMLH1 (G)
HNK-1 CD57 (G)
HP1 HepPar-1 (G)
HPCA-1 CD34 (G, H)
HPL Human placental lactogen (G)
HuLy-m6 CD99 (G, H)
Human chorionic gonadotropin Human chorionic gonadotropin (G)
Human herpes virus 8 HHV8 (G, H)
Human mutL homologue 1 hMLH1 (G)
Human mutS homologue 2 hMLH1 (G)
Human placental lactogen Human placental lactogen (G)
IL-2 receptor CD25 (H)
Inhibin-alpha subunit Inhibin-alpha subunit (G)
Insulin Hormones (G)
J5 CD10 (G, H)
JOVI 1 TCR (H)
K (Ig lighit chain kappa) Light chain immunoglobulins (H)
Keratin 5/6 Keratins (G)
Keratin 7 Keratins (G)
Keratin 20 Keratins (G)
Keratins Keratins (G)
Ki-1 CD30 (G, H)
Ki-67 Ki-67 (G)
kip2 p57 (G)
Kit CD117 (G)
KP-1 CD68 (G, H)
L (Ig light chain lambda) Light chain immunoglobulins (H)
L1 antigen MAC 387 (G)
L26 CD20 (H)
L60 CD43 (H)
Laminin Laminin (G)
LCA CD45 (H)
Leu 1 CD5 (H)
Leu 2 CD8 (H)
Leu 3 CD4 (H)
Leu 5a + b CD2 (H)
Leu 7 CD57 (G, H)
Leu 9 CD7 (H)
Leu16 CD20 (H)
Leu 22 CD43 (H)
Leukocyte common antigen CD45 (H)
Leu-M1 CD15 (G, H)
Light chain immunoglobulins Light chain immunoglobulins (H)
LFA-2 CD2 (H)
LMP-1 Epstein-Barr virus (G, H)
LN1 CDw75 (H)
LN2 CD74 (H)
Lysozyme Lysozyme (H, G)
M (Ig heavy chain mu) Heavy chain immunoglobulins (H)
Mac-1 CD11b (H)
MAC 387 MAC 387 (G)
Mac-M CD68 (G, H)
MART 1 MELAN A (G)
Mast cell tryptase Mast cell tryptase (H)
mb-1 CD79a (H)
MCAM CD146 (G)
ME491 CD63 (G)
MELAN-A MELAN-A (G)
Melanoma antigen recognized by T cells MELAN-A (G)
Melanoma-associated antigen CD63 (G)
Melanoma cell adhesion molecule CD146 (G)
Melanoma-specific antigen HMB-45 (G)
MELCAM (or Mel-CAM) CD146 (G)
MIB-1 Ki-67 (G)
MIC-2 CD99 (G, H)
MLH1 hMLH1
MN-4 CD146 (G)
MNF-116 Keratin--Pan-K (G)
MPO Myeloperoxidase (H)
MRF4 Myf-4 (G)
MSA HHF-35 (G)
MSH2 or MSH6 hMLH1
MTS1 p16 (G)
MUC1 Epithelial membrane antigen (G, H)
MUC18 CD146 (G)
Muscle common actin HHF-35 (G)
Muscle specific actin HHF-35 (G)
My 7 CD13 (H)
My 9 CD33 (H)
Myeloperoxidase Myeloperoxidase (H)
Myf-4 Myf-4 (G)
MyoD1 MyoD1 (G)
Myogenin Myf-4 (G)
Myoglobin Myoglobin (G)
Myosin heavy chain Myosin heavy chain (G)
NCAM CD56 (H)
Neprilysin CD10 (G, H)
NEU N NEU N (G)
Neurofilaments Neurofilaments (G)
Neuron specific enolase Neuron specific enolase (G)
NFP Neurofilaments (G)
NKI-betab HMB-45 (G)
NKI/C3 CD63 (G)
NSE Neuron specific enolase (G)
O13 CD99 (G, H)
OC125 CA125 (G)
Oct2 Oct2 (H)
Octomer transcription factor Oct2 (H)
p16 p16 (G)
p27kip1 p27kip1 (G)
p53 p53 (G)
p57 p57 (G)
p63 p63 (G)
P504S AMACR (G)
PAN-K Keratins (G)
PAP Prostate acid phosphatase (G)
PECAM-1 CD31 (G)
PEM Epithelial membrane antigen (G, H)
Perforin Perforin (H)
PGM1 CD68 (G, H)
PgR Progesterone receptor (G)
PK antigen CD77 (H)
Placental alkaline phosphatase Placental alkaline phosphatase (G)
PLAP Placental alkaline phosphatase (G)
Platelet glycoprotein IIIa CD61 (H)
PMS2 hMLH1
Podoplanin D2-40
PR Progesterone receptor (G)
PRAD1 Cyclin D1 (H)
PrAP Prostate acid phosphatase (G)
Prealbumin Prealbumin (G)
Progesterone receptor Progesterone receptor (G)
Prostate acid phosphatase Prostate acid phosphatase (G)
Prostate specific antigen Prostate specific antigen (G)
PSA Prostate specific antigen (G)
QBEnd10 CD34 (G, H)
Renal cell carcinoma marker RCC (G)
ret ret (G)
RCC RCC (G)
rT3 CD2 (H)
S-100 S-100 (G)
S-Endo-1 CD146 (G)
SGP-2 Clusterin (H)
SMA Alpha smooth muscle actin (G)
SM-ACT Alpha smooth muscle actin (G)
Smad4 DPC4 (G)
SM-MHC Myosin heavy chain (G)
Somatostatin Hormones (G)
SP40 Clusterin (H)
Stem cell factor receptor CD117 (G)
Synaptophysin Synaptophysin (G)
Syndecan-1 CD138 (H)
Synuclein-1 Synuclein-1 (G)
T3 CD3 (H)
T4 CD4 (H)
T6 CD1a (H)
T8 CD8 (H)
T11 CD2 (H)
T64 Clusterin (H)
TAG-72 B72.3 (G)
Tau Tau (G)
T cell antigen receptor TCR (H)
T cell intracellular antigen TIA-1 (H)
TCR TCR (H)
TdT Terminal deoxytransferase (H)
TE CD2 (H)
Terminal deoxytransferase Terminal deoxytransferase (H)
TH CD4 (H)
Thrombomodulin CD141 (G)
Thyroglobulin Thyroglobulin (G)
Thyroid transcription factor 1 TTF-1 (G)
TIA-1 TIA-1 (H)
TM CD141 (G)
traf-1 traf-1 (H)
Transthyretin Prealbumin (G)
TRPM2 Clusterin (H)
TTF-1 TTF-1 (G)
TTR Prealbumin (G)
Tumor-associated glycoprotein 72 B72.3 (G)
Tumor necrosis factor receptor–associated factor traf-1 (H)
UCHL-1 CD45Ro (H)
UEA 1 Ulex (G)
Ulex Ulex (G)
Vimentin Vimentin (G)
von Willebrand’s factor Factor VIII (G)
VWF Factor VIII (G)
Wilms’ tumor 1 protein WT1 (G)
WT1 WT1 (G)

G, general markers; H, hematopathology markers.

Results

The results of studies are incorporated into the surgical pathology report. The following information is included:

1. The type of tissue studied: formalin-fixed (or other fixatives) tissue, cryostat sections, cytology preparations, etc.
2. The type of immunoagents used, being as specific as possible. For example, do not just list keratin but specify the type of keratin (e.g., AE1/AE3).
3. The results of the studies in great enough detail to allow interpretation. For example the type of cell that is immunoreactive (e.g., tumor vs. nontumor), intensity of immunoreactivity (e.g., weak, strong) and/or the number of cells immunoreactive (e.g., focal vs. diffuse).
4. Integration of the results into the final diagnosis specifying whether they confirm or support a diagnosis, make one diagnosis more likely than others, or exclude one or more diagnoses.

ELECTRON MICROSCOPY

Indications for EM Studies

Diagnostic renal biopsies for glomerular disease
Adenocarcinoma versus mesothelioma (see Table 7-36)
Difficult to classify tumors (Tables 7-45 and 7-46)
Nerve (e.g., toxic or drug-induced neuropathy) and muscle biopsies (e.g., inclusion body or nemaline myopathy)
Bullous skin diseases (e.g., epidermolysis bullosa)
Ciliary dysmorphology (primary ciliary dyskinesia or Kartagener syndrome)
Endomyocardial biopsies (e.g., adriamycin toxicity, amyloid, nemaline myopathy)
Liver biopsies for microvesicular fat in acute fatty liver of pregnancy
Small bowel biopsies to look for pathogens (e.g., Whipple disease)
Congenital, inherited, and metabolic diseases (e.g., ceroid lipofuscinoses)
Prion diseases

TABLE 7–45 ELECTRON MICROSCOPIC FEATURES OF POORLY DIFFERENTIATED TUMORS

image

TABLE 7–46 CELLS, TUMORS, AND STRUCTURES WITH CHARACTERISTIC FINDINGS BY ELECTRON MICROSCOPY

TUMOR EM FINDINGS CORRELATIONS AND OTHER DIAGNOSTIC TESTS
Alveolar soft part sarcoma Rhomboid, rod-shaped, or spiculated crystals in a regular latttice pattern.
The characteristic cytoplasmic crystals are composed of monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1) and its chaperone CD147. These proteins are found in many other cell types and are not specific for this tumor.
Cytogenetics: t(X;17) creates a ASPL-TFE3 fusion protein.
IHC: TFE3 positive (as well as rare pediatric renal tumors with the same translocation). Nuclear immunoreactivity is not present in other tumors or normal tissues.
Histo: The crystals are PAS with diastase positive.
Amyloid Non-branching fibrils, 7.5 to 10 nm in width and up to 1 micron in length.
May be present associated with plasma cell tumors, medullary carcinoma of the thyroid, Alzheimer’s disease, or as an isolated finding (primary amyloidosis).
IHC: Can be used to identify specific types of amyloid (e.g., lambda or kappa chains, beta2 microglobulin, calcitonin, tau)
Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma of the lung (BAL)
Lamellar (surfactant) “myelin-like” granules in the supranuclear cytoplasm (typical of Type II pneumocytes).
Clara-like electron-dense granules in supranuclear cytoplasm.
Intranuclear inclusions comprised of parallel microtubular arrays.
These features can also be seen in metastatic BAL.
Cytogenetics: These carcinomas are less likely to be associated with smoking and have fewer cytogenetic changes.
Bronchioloalveolar carcinomas or adenocarcinomas with features of BAL are more likely to respond to Iressa (38%) as compared to other lung carcinomas (14%) due to specific mutations in EGFR.
Mucinous BAL has intranuclear inclusions but generally lacks the other EM features.
Chordoma
Desmosomes, large vacuoles, glycogen, dilated ER, cytoplasmic invaginations, and intermediate filaments
The physaliphorous (= having bubbles or vacuoles) appearance is due to dilated ER, glycogen, and cytoplasmic invaginations.
IHC: Keratin (corresponds to intermediate filaments), EMA, S100
Clear cell sarcoma
Melanosomes in various stages of development.
Glycogen (resulting in clear cytoplasm).
Cytogenetics: t(12;22) EWS;ATF1 fusion protein
IHC: S100, HMB45
Dense core granules
Dense core granules (vesicle bound by a single membrane with a dense center – 60 to 300 nm) – cytoplasmic organelles involved in regulated exocytosis of cell products.
Examples:
Pancreatic beta cells (insulin): angular crystalline inclusions
Pheochromocytoma (epinephrine and norepinephrine): Large, pleomorphic, often clear or only partially filled
Carcinoid:
Foregut – small, round
Midgut – larger, pleomorphic
Hindgut – mixed
Found in tumors of neuronal or neuroendocrine origin.
Vesicles are comprised of granins (predominantly chromogranin A, chromogranin B, and secretogranin II) and various peptide hormones and transmitters, ATP, and biogenic amines
IHC: Chromogranin A (most specific). Specific products of tumors can also be detected.
Note: Prostate cancers and breast cancers can also show strong chromogranin positivity and can be mistaken for neuroendocrine tumors, particularly at metastatic sites.
Desmoplastic small round cell tumor Numerous desmosomes and tight junctions, numerous cell processes, large number of organelles (mitochondria and RER), microfilaments, small neurosecretory granules
Cytogenetics: t(11;22) EWS;WT1 fusion protein
IHC: Keratin, desmin, WT-1, actin, EMA, NSE
Endothelial cells
Weibel-Palade bodies (cigar-shaped membrane-bound structures filled with tubules in parallel arrays).
Intracytoplasmic lumina may be present in normal cells and in epithelioid vascular neoplasms.
Weibel-Palade bodies are frequently absent in tumors arising from endothelial cells (e.g., angiosarcomas). IHC markers are more sensitive to detect endothelial derivation. The membranes are formed by P-selectin and the tubules contain FVIII.
IHC: Vascular markers (CD34, CD31, FVIII)
Ewing sarcoma (PNET) Homogeneous cell population characterized by the lack of specialized features, large pools of glycogen, no organelles, no extracellular matrix, variable numbers of neurosecretory granules and cell processes.
Cytogenetics: t(11;22) EWS;FLI1 fusion protein (and other less common variants)
IHC: CD99. FLI1 is also present, but is less specific.
Histo: PAS +/− diastase can detect glycogen, but is not currently used for diagnosis.
Granular cell tumor Numerous lysosomes (filled with tubular, vesicular, and amorphous material), phagosomes, and granules (correlating with the “granular” cytoplasm), reduplicated basal lamina surrounding groups of cells. IHC: S100, inhibin, CD68, calretinin
Langerhans cell histiocytosis Birbeck granules (rod-or tennis racket-shaped) structures of variable length with a central periodically striated lamella.
May serve as a reservoir for Langerin (a transmembrane type II Ca2+-dependent lectin) and CD1a in the endosomal recycling compartment.
IHC: CD1a, Langerin, S100
Mast cells Lameller or scroll-like membrane pattern, granules of variable size. IHC: CD117 (c-kit), mast cell tryptase
Medullary carcinoma of the thyroid Numerous neurosecretory granules (calcitonin) associated with stromal amyloid (calcitonin).
Cytogenetics: Mutations in the RET gene (sporadic and germline)
IHC: Calcitonin (in tumor cells and amyloid), chromogranin
Merkel cell carcinoma Neurosecretory granules in processes or along cell membranes (subplasmalemmal). IHC: Chromogranin, NSE, cytokeratin 20
Mesothelioma Elongated, serpiginous, and branched microvilli (generally 10 to 16 length: 1 width) apical without a glycocalyx or actin rootlets.
Cytogenetics: Characteristic chromosome deletions and loss of 9 and 22
IHC: Calretinin, WT-1
Neuroblastoma Cellular processes with microtubules (neuropil), dense core granules, Homer-Wright rosettes (the center is comprised of a tangle of cell processes), synaptic vesicles, no glycogen
Cytogenetics: Changes are linked to prognosis
IHC: Chromogranin, NSE, NFP, synaptophysin
Oncocytoma Numerous mitochondria packed in the cytoplasm (correlating with the granular appearance of the cytoplasm). In contrast, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma has fewer mitochondria and more microvesicles.
Cytogenetics: Monosomy with loss of X or Y, 11q13. Chromophobe carcinomas have different cytogenetic changes.
IHC: RCC is negative in oncocytomas but positive in 45% to 50% of chromophobe renal cell carcinomas.
Perineurioma Long cell processes wrapping around adjacent cells IHC: Claudin-1 (a component of tight junctions), EMA
Rhabdoid tumor of the kidney Large paranuclear whorls of intermediate filaments (corresponding to cytokeratin and vimentin) and occasional tonofilaments
Cytogenetics: hSNF5/INI1 deletions and mutations on chromosome 22
IHC: Cytokeratin (+), vimentin (+), absence of INI1 nuclear protein
Rhabdomyosarcoma
Parallel thick (12 to 15 cm) and thin (6 to 8 nm) myosin-actin filaments, Z-bands, filament ribosomal complexes.
Spider cells may be seen in cardiac tumors (clear cytoplasm divided by cytoplasmic processes and cross striations formed by leptofibrils).
Cytogenetics: Characteristic changes in alveolar and embryonal types
IHC: Muscle markers (HHF-35, desmin, myf4)
Schwannoma Basal lamina prominent, often reduplicated. Luse bodies (long spacing collagen, extracellular), myelin figures, long cell processes wrapping around collagen, may rarely have melanosomes (melanotic schwannoma)
Cytogenetics: Deletion of 2q (NF2 inactivation)
IHC: S100

See Tables 7-8, 7-9, 7-22, and 7-47 for additional information.

Method

Ultrastructural details of tissues are lost rapidly. Therefore, fresh tissue must be fixed rapidly and well for EM. Tissues are usually fixed in special fixatives for EM to preserve lipids and glycogen (e.g., 2% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4).

1. Place a small fragment of tissue in a drop of fixative on a cutting surface.
2. Cut the tissue into multiple tiny fragments, each no greater than 0.1 cm in any dimension.
3. Place the tissue into the vial of fixative. Shake the vial to make sure all the tissue fragments are covered by fixative.

Note: If tissue from a small biopsy is found to be nondiagnostic on H&E, any tissue saved for EM should be retrieved for examination by light microscopy.

Results

A separate electron microscopy report is usually issued. The results should be incorporated into the final diagnosis.19

SNAP FROZEN TISSUE

Frozen tissue is useful for staining (some antibodies only detect antigens in frozen tissue), enzyme studies (muscle biopsies), and to save tissue for DNA or RNA studies.

Indications

All specimens with a question of a lymphoproliferative disorder, sarcomas, unusual tumors, muscle biopsies.

Methods

Small (approximately 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.3 cm3) portions of tissue are placed in a clean specimen container moistened with a small amount of normal saline until they can be frozen. Specimens should be snap frozen using liquid nitrogen or dry ice and stored at –20°C.

Results

The results of studies on frozen tissue are usually incorporated into the surgical pathology report.

IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE

Like immunoperoxidase studies, immunofluorescence (IF) detects antigens in tissues. However, because amplification of the signal is not used, it is better suited for precise localization of antigen/antibody complexes in tissues or for determining the deposition pattern of immune complexes (e.g., linear vs. granular). Thus, it is most useful for the investigation of diseases related to immune complex deposition such as glomerular diseases and bullous diseases of the skin.

Tissue for IF may be snap frozen (see instructions earlier) or stored in special fixatives for IF. If the specimen is not frozen, special care must be taken to ensure that the biopsy is kept moist in a sealed container.

Direct IF: Uses antibodies to detect antigens in the patient’s tissues.
Indirect IF: Uses control tissues to detect antibodies (e.g., anti-BM) in the patient’s serum.
Indications

Some skin biopsies (e.g., lupus, pemphigus, pemphigoid, and dermatitis herpetiformis), all diagnostic nontransplant renal biopsies, some transplant renal biopsies, identification of amyloid in cardiac biopsies, and the evaluation of vasculitis in nerve biopsies.

Method

Tissue must be submitted fresh.

Results

The results of the examination are usually incorporated into the surgical pathology report.

Immunofluorescence of Skin Lesions

SLE (lupus band test): linear or granular staining along dermal epidermal junction for multiple immunoreactants in about 80% of cases (most commonly IgG and less often IgM or C3). The specificity increases with the number of positive immunoreactants. Uninvolved sun-exposed skin shows positivity in most patients with active systemic lupus. Uninvolved skin in patients with discoid lupus is usually negative for this test.
Herpes gestationis: perilesional skin shows linear BM zone C3 and sometimes IgG.
Dermatitis herpetiformis: granular IgA at tips of dermal papillae of uninvolved skin.
Pemphigus: IgG and C3 between epidermal cells creating a net-like pattern. In pemphigus vulgaris, a split just above the basal cell layer creates a “tombstone” appearance to the row of basal cells at the base of the vesicle. In pemphigus foliaceus and related disorders, the split occurs near the granular cell layer.
Pemphigoid: Ig and C3 along basement membrane but not between cells. Indirect IF reveals an anti-BM antibody.

MOLECULAR GENETIC PATHOLOGY

Molecular genetic pathology is the newest subspeciality in pathology with board certification. Molecular diagnostics incorporates many types of techniques for the investigation of genetic alterations in cells and viruses (e.g., Southern blotting, PCR analysis, FISH). It has applications in three main areas:

Inherited diseases:

Identification of inherited diseases (e.g., cystic fibrosis, hemochromatosis, Factor V Leiden, Prothrombin 20210A, Fragile X syndrome).
Identification of genes conferring susceptibility to diseases (e.g., microsatellite instability [MSI], BRCA1 and 2)

Infectious diseases:

Detection of organisms
Identification of specific organisms
Quantitation of viral infection (e.g., HIV viral load)

Cancer:

Identification of specific genetic alterations associated with tumors
Identification of gene mutations associated with susceptibility to treatment (e.g., EGFR mutations in lung cancer, c-kit mutations in GIST)
Identification of clonality in hematolymphoid proliferations
Detection of minimal residual disease after treatment

These studies are especially helpful for hematolymphoid proliferations that are difficult to classify because of the frequent and characteristic rearrangements that occur in many of these disorders. Unlike cytogenetics, the cells need not be viable. However, it is preferable that the nucleic acids are relatively intact. Southern blot and RNA-based PCR (RT-PCR) assays are best performed on fresh or frozen tissues. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue is amenable to DNA-based PCR assays. Some fixatives (e.g., Bouin’s) cause extensive breakage of DNA and may preclude genetic analysis of the tissue.

Indications

B-cell proliferations – clonal rearrangements of the immunoglobulin heavy and light chain genes; specific translocations
T-cell proliferations – rearrangements of the γ and β T-cell receptor genes
Leukemias
Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders – clonal populations of EBV-infected cells
Oligodendrogliomas – PCR-based LOH analysis for 1p/19q deletions.
Colon cancers possibly associated with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal carcinoma syndrome (HNPCC): microsatellite instability (MSI) testing of colon cancers occurring in patients 50 years of age or younger.
Human papilloma virus testing: cervical PAP smears, squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (see subsequent section).
GIST – most have mutations in the KIT tyrosine kinase gene. A smaller group (5% to 7%) have mutations in the KIT-homologous tyrosine kinase PDGFRA. About 10% to 15% of GISTs are negative for KIT and PDGFRA mutations (termed “wild-type GISTs”). The specific type of mutation is correlated with prognosis and the respone to specific types of treatment.
Lung adenocarcinoma – some cancers have mutations in EGFR that predict response to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib.
Method of Submitting Tissue

Fresh or frozen tissue (e.g., snap frozen tissue) as well as fluids may be used. Cytologic preparations can be used for FISH. Paraffin blocks can also be used.

Results

The results are usually either reported separately or incorporated into the surgical pathology report.

CYTOGENETICS

Cytogenetic studies have been demonstrated to be useful in several areas important to pathology:

Tumor classification: Particularly sarcomas (e.g., Ewing’s sarcoma and synovial sarcoma), lymphomas, leukemias, kidney tumors, brain tumors, and other unusual tumors.
Benign vs. malignant lesions:
Reactive mesothelial cells vs. mesothelioma
Lipoma vs. liposarcoma
Prognosis: Neuroblastoma, oligodendroglioma, multiple myeloma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Treatment: Amplification of HER2/neu to predict response to Herceptin.
Research: Translocations are common to many tumors and usually identify genes important to the pathogenesis of the tumor

Cells may be cultured to perform complete karyotype analysis or tissues can be analyzed for specific chromosomal alterations by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

FISH studies can be performed on cultured cells, cytology specimens, touch preparations, and paraffin-embedded tissues.

Indications

For karyotype analysis: Soft tissue tumors, mesotheliomas (tissue or pleural fluid), unusual tumors, poorly differentiated tumors, all subcutaneous lipomas >10 cm or of unusual gross appearance, all deep-seated lipomas (subfascial, intramuscular, intraabdominal, retroperitoneal, clinically apparent cord tumors), unusual uterine masses.
For FISH: Oligodendroglioma, neuroblastoma.
Method for Submitting Tissue

Tissue for karyotyping must be fresh, viable, and relatively sterile. However, tissue may be submitted even if it has not been handled under strictly sterile conditions (contamination is not usually a problem). If specimens are to be held overnight, the tissue should be minced (into 0.1 cm cubes) in a sterile specimen container, covered with culture medium, and held overnight in the refrigerator. Fluids may also be submitted for analysis (especially pleural effusions with a suspicion of mesothelioma).

Results

The results of the cytogenetic analysis should be incorporated into the final diagnosis or reported separately (Tables 7-47 and 7-48).

TABLE 7–47 COMMON CYTOGENETIC AND GENETIC CHANGES IN SOLID TUMORS OF DIAGNOSTIC OR THERAPEUTIC SIGNIFICANCE

image

TABLE 7–48 COMMON CYTOGENETIC CHANGES IN LYMPHOMAS AND LEUKEMIAS

image

Tumors and Diseases Associated with Germline Mutations (Tables 7-49 and 7-50)

The following features are suggestive of hereditary susceptibility to cancer:

Two or more close relatives on the same side of the family with cancer
Evidence of autosomal dominant transmission
Early development of cancer in the patient and relatives (in general, <50 years of age)
Multiple primary cancers
Multiple types of cancers
Unusual pathologic features of tumors (Table 7-49)
A constellation of tumors suggestive of a specific syndrome (Table 7-50)

TABLE 7–49 PATHOLOGIC FEATURES OF TUMORS AND DISEASES SUGGESTIVE OF A GERMLINE MUTATION

image

TABLE 7–50 HEREDITARY SYNDROMES ASSOCIATED WITH MULTIPLE TUMORS

image

Pathologists can aid in the detection of hereditary carcinomas by being aware of the types and pathologic characteristics of carcinomas associated with these syndromes. Patients with germline mutations are important to identify in order to:

Screen patients for other common tumors or other components of the disease
Consider prophylactic surgery or preventive interventions
Offer screening to family members at risk and genetic counseling

Although the sporadic forms of cancers, in general, far outnumber cases associated with germline mutations, in some cases the appearance or site of a carcinoma is highly suggestive of a known syndrome and further investigation may be warranted.

ANALYTICAL CYTOLOGY (FLOW CYTOMETRY)

Flow cytometers analyze populations of thousands of dissaggregated cells as they pass by stationary detectors. Cell size and cytoplasmic granularity can be measured as well as DNA content and the presence or absence of immunohistochemical markers added to the cell suspension. Newer techniques can analyze three or more features simultaneously to divide cells into unique populations. DNA content can be used to determine the number of cells in S-phase (a measure of proliferation - S-phase fraction). Because cells are not visualized by this technique, one must be sure to submit only lesional tissue.

Indications for Ploidy and S-Phase Analysis

Hydatidiform moles – complete (diploid), partial (triploid)
Some carcinomas – DNA ploidy and S-phase have been reported to be of prognostic significance for some carcinomas (e.g., colon, breast, and prostate) but is not routinely performed at all institutions or used by all oncologists.
Indications for Cell Surface Marker Analysis

Lymphomas and leukemias
Method for Submitting Tissue

Single cell suspensions are necessary for analysis. For fresh tissues, cells must be viable. Fresh tissue (approximately 0.3 to 0.5 cm3) is placed in a specimen container and kept moist with HBSS. Tissues can be held overnight in a refrigerator.

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections may also be used for DNA ploidy analysis by the Hedley method, although the results are not as satisfactory due to nuclear fragmentation.

Results

The results are usually incorporated into the final surgical pathology report.

CYTOLOGIC PREPARATIONS FROM SURGICAL SPECIMENS

Cytologic preparations of surgical specimens often add additional information.

Intraoperative diagnosis: Touch preps or smears are especially valuable for:
Infectious cases (to avoid contamination of the cryostat and aerosolization of infectious agents)
Neuropathology cases – for diagnosis and for the performance of cytogenetic (FISH) analysis.
Tumors (for excellent cytologic detail, especially lymphomas and papillary carcinomas of the thyroid)
Special stains: Stains for microorganisms can be performed the same day on cytologic smears of specimens from critically ill patients. Do not submit air-dried smears of infectious cases for staining as the unfixed material may constitute a hazard to laboratory personnel. Fat is dissolved during routine processing, but can be demonstrated with fat stains on air dried slides.
Genetic studies (FISH): In touch preparations nuclei are intact, unlike tissue sections in which only partial nuclei are present. This feature makes these preparations superior for techniques such as FISH and image analysis.

Comparing cytology preparations and the corresponding surgical specimen is always a useful exercise in learning the comparative morphology of these techniques.

SPECIMEN RADIOGRAPHY

Specimen radiographs are often preferable over patient radiographs:

A permanent record of the radiograph can be kept with the case.
A radiograph of the specimen may reveal more details of the underlying process (e.g., fewer structures may be present to complicate the appearance).
There may have been a significant time interval between the patient radiograph and the surgical excision.
The radiograph will often indicate important sites to examine histologically (tumor invasion into a rib or microcalcifications in a breast biopsy).
The specimen radiograph can confirm that the clinical lesion was removed.
Indications

Tumors of bone and cartilage
Tumors invading into bone
Avascular necrosis
All bioprosthetic heart valves (to document the degree of calcification)
Breast biopsies or mastectomies performed for mammographic lesions that cannot be located grossly. Paraffin blocks of breast tissue can be radiographed if microcalcifications were seen by specimen radiography but not in histologic sections and were not identified prior to processing. Clips placed after core needle biopsy are also easily identified.

Calcifications can dissolve in formalin over several days. If the demonstration of calcifications is important (e.g., mammographically detected calcifications) it is preferable to process the tissue within 1 to 2 days. If processing is to be delayed, the tissue can be stored in ethanol.

Method

Radiographic equipment is available in radiology departments and in some pathology departments. The specimen may be placed on a piece of wax paper (to keep the surfaces clean) lying on the film. Specimens can be radiographed after decalcification (not all calcium is removed) but best results are obtained on fresh undecalcified specimens. Lungs should not be inflated prior to radiography.

If the specimen is small, two exposures at different settings or at different angles may be useful. Lead sheets can be used to allow two exposures on one piece of film.

If the film is too dark (overexposed), the exposure is too high and a lower setting should be tried. If the film is too light (i.e., unexposed) the exposure is too low and a higher setting is indicated.

Special injection techniques with radiocontrast media are available for unusual specimens (e.g., a recipient lung with pulmonary hypertension, vascular ectasia of the bowel).

Octreotide and Sentinel Nodes

Labeled compounds are sometimes used to localize certain types of tumors (generally neuroendocrine) or sentinel lymph nodes. The patient is injected with the isotope prior to surgery and the surgeon uses a hand held probe to identify the labeled tissue. The amount of radioactivity in the tissue is small and generally does not pose a hazard to pathologists handling the tissue and does not need special disposal methods. However, each pathology department should consult with their radiation safety department to ensure appropriate handling of such tissues. In some cases, if a gross lesion is not present corresponding to the area of octreotide uptake, specimens can be imaged using a gamma camera.

Results

The radiographs are documented in the gross description and any information gained from the radiograph is incorporated into the surgical pathology report.

TISSUE FOR RESEARCH — TUMOR BANK

The pathology department is a unique resource for researchers who need human tissues. The pathologist plays a key role as patient advocate and diagnostician in order to provide appropriate human tissues for biologic research. Most hospitals have a policy that allows the release of tissue for research if it would otherwise be discarded. Therefore, tissue is never provided for research until all necessary tissue has been taken for diagnosis. Tissue from primary diagnostic breast biopsies and open lung biopsies without gross lesions must not be given away. It is in the best interest of the patient that a pathologist evaluate the specimen rather than have tissue given away by nonpathologists who are not aware of what is needed for diagnosis.

Indications

By request of researchers who have obtained permission from the hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB). Patients must provide specific consent. In some cases, all patient identification will need to be removed from the specimen.

MICROBIOLOGICAL CULTURE AND SMEARS

The investigation of infectious disease by culture is complementary to its investigation by histologic sections (Tables 7-51 to 7-53).

TABLE 7–51 IDENTIFICATION OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES

CULTURE HISTOLOGIC SECTIONS
Can be performed on aspirates, swabs, fluids, or tissues. Requires surgical excision of tissues.
Cultures amplify the number of organisms present, allowing them to be recognized. Organisms may be rare, or not seen in tissue sections.
The specific organism can be identified and tested for drug susceptibility. Categories of organisms can be recognized but specific identification may not be possible.
Some organisms cannot be cultured. Many organisms can be identified that will not grow in culture or that require long culture times (e.g., TB).
It may be difficult to exclude contamination for a positive culture.
Morphologic evidence of an inflammatory response provides evidence for a clinical infection. The location of the infection may be of diagnostic importance (e.g., cellulitis vs. necrotizing fasciitis or superficial colonization of devitalized tissue vs. deep infections involving viable tissues).
The use of special studies, such as PCR and other molecular assays, may be warranted if the tissue pattern of injury is indicative of a potential organism despite lack of culture evidence and/or lack of organisms seen on tissue sections.

TABLE 7-52 FUNGI: HISTOLOGIC APPEARANCE IN SURGICAL SPECIMENS

image

TABLE 7-53 VIRUSES: HISTOLOGIC APPEARANCE AND ASSOCIATED NEOPLASMS

image
Indications

Suspected infectious processes, either by clinical data or by frozen section
Suspected sarcoid to exclude an infectious process
Method

Tissue is kept as sterile as possible. Suture removal kits are a convenient source of sterile scissors and forceps. Serially section the specimen to determine if there are focal lesions. Place representative sections in a sterile specimen container making sure to retain a duplicate piece of tissue for histology. Label with the patient’s name and unit number, patient’s physician, type of specimen, collection date, and time of collection (required for Joint commission accreditation).

Results

The results are generally reported by the microbiology laboratory. Communication with the microbiology laboratory and staff is essential to correlate histologic results with microbiology results from the same specimen.

Reports

The results of culture of surgical specimens are usually reported in a separate report.

REFERENCES

1. Werner M., Chott Fabiano A., Battifora H. Effect of formalin fixation and processing on immunohistochemistry. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:1016-1019.

2. Arber J.M., Arber D.A., Jenkins K.A., Battifora H. Effect of decalcification and fixation in paraffin-section immunohistochemistry. Applied Immunohistochem. 1996;4:241-248.

3. Fergenbaum J.H., Garcia-Closas M., Hewitt S.M., et al. Loss of antigenicity in stored sections of breast cancer tissue microarrays. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:667-672.

4. Wester K., Wahlund E., Sunderstrom C., et al. Paraffin section storage and immunohistochemistry: effects of time, temperature, fixation, and retrieval protocol with emphasis on p53 protein and MIB1 antigen. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2000;8:61-70.

5. Battifora H. Assessment of antigen damage in immunohistochemistry, the vimentin internal control. Am J Clin Pathol. 1991;6:669-671.

6. Chu P.G., Weiss L.M. Keratin expression in human tissues and neoplasms. Histopathology. 2002;40:403-439.

7. Gyure K.A., Morrison A.C. Cytokeratin 7 and 20 expression in choroid plexus tumors: utility in differentiating these neoplasms from metastatic carcinomas. Mod Pathol. 2000;13:638-643.

8. Wang N.P., Zee S., Zarbo R.J. Coordinate expression of cytokeratins 7 and 20 defines unique subsets of carcinomas. Appl Immunohistochem. 1995;3:99-107.

9. Mierau G.W., Berry P.J., Malott R.L., et al. Appraisal of the comparative utility of immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy in the diagnosis of childhood round cell tumors. Ultrastruct Pathol. 1996;20:507-517.

10. Varadhachary G.R., Abbruzzese J.L., Lenzi R. Diagnostic strategies for unknown primary cancer. Cancer. 2004;100:1776-1785.

11. Harvey J.M., et al. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1474-1481.

12. Collins L.C., Botero M.L., Schnitt S.J. Bimodal frequency distribution of estrogen receptor immunohistochemical staining results in breast cancer: an analysis of 825 cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 2005;123:16-20.

13. Wolff A.C., et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007;131:18-43.

14. Battifora H. Metastatic breast carcinoma to the stomach simulating linitis plastica. Applied Immunohistochem. 1994;2:225-228.

15. O’Connell F.P., Wang H.H., Odze R.D. Utility of immunohistochemistry in distinguishing primary adenocarcinomas from metastatic breast carcinomas in the gastrointestinal tract. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129:338-347.

16. Corson J.M. Pathology of mesothelioma. Thorac Surg Clin N Am. 2004;14:447-460.

17. Kebbel A., Rocken C. Immunohistochemical classification of amyloid in surgical pathology revisited. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30:673-683.

18. Cao Y., Karsten U., Milqers J. Imnunohistochemical characterization of a panel of 56 antibodies with normal human small intestine, colon, and breast tissues. Tumor Biol. 1998;19(Suppl 1):88-99.

19. Electron Microscopy of Tumors, Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology, Volume 20: the entire February 2003 issue is devoted to electron microscopy.

20. Lerone DH. Medically Important Fungi, 4th edition: a guide to identification, ASM Press, 2004.

21. Chandler F.W., Watts J.C. Pathologic Diagnosis of Fungal Infections. ASCP Press; 1987.

22. Nuovo G.J., Plaza J.A., Magro C. Rapid diagnosis of smallpox infection and differentiation from its mimics. Diag Mol Pathol. 2003;12:103-107.

23. Eyzaguirre E., Haque A.K. Application of immunohistochemistry to infections. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008;132:424-431.

24. McLaughlin-Drubin M.E., Munger K. Viruses associated with human cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1782:127-150.

25. Nuovo G.J. The utility of in situ-based methodologies including in situ polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis and study of viral infections,. Hum Pathol. 2007;38:1123-1136.

26. Slifka M.K., Hanifin J.M. Smallpox: the basics. Dermatol Clin. 2004;22:263-274.