7 Special Studies
The pathologist’s H&E is like the clinician’s H&P (history and physical) - basic exams to be performed on every patient or specimen forming the cornerstone of diagnosis. However, the pathologist is no longer limited to the H&E; there are a wide variety of special studies available to evaluate pathologic processes, from simple histochemical stains to global gene expression patterns. Pathologists are now clinical cell biologists. Familiarity with the types of special studies available is important as the initial processing of the gross specimen may limit the types of studies that can be performed.
Almost all histochemical stains are suitable for formalin-fixed tissues. Common stains and their uses are listed in Table 7-1. However, numerous other types of stains and modifications are used and pathologists must be aware of individual laboratory practices.
TABLE 7–1 HISTOCHEMICAL STAINS
| STAIN | COMPONENTS STAINED | POSSIBLE USES AND COMMENTS |
|---|---|---|
| AFOG (acid fuschin orange G; modified Masson’s trichrome) | Evaluation of renal biopsies | |
| Alcian blue | Sometimes used to identify mucosubstances in mesotheliomas or intestinal metaplasia. Affected by pH. Hyaluronidase digestion can be used to identify hyaluronic acid. | |
| Alcian blue/PAS | Demonstrates both acid and neutral mucins | |
| Alcian yellow | Identification of H. pylori in gastric biopsies | |
| Acid-fast bacilli stains (Fite-Faraco, Ziehl-Neelson, Kinyoun) | Identification of mycobacteria. Modifications are used to demonstrate M. leprae or Nocardia. Carnoy’s fixed tissues cannot be used and B-5 is suboptimal. Slides must be examined under oil. | |
| Alizarin red S | Calcium – orange red, polarizes | Identifies calcium in tissues |
| Bile | Bile – dark green on a yellow background | Identification of bile |
| Bodian’s | Neural tumors, identification of axons | |
| Chloroacetate esterase (Leder; CAE) | ||
| Congo red | Detection of amyloid. Immunoperoxidase studies can be used to identify specific types. Overstaining can result in false positives. | |
| Dieterle | ||
| Diff Quik (a modified Giemsa stain) | Evaluation of chronic gastritis | |
| Elastic stains (Verhoeff–van Gieson) | Identification of arteries and veins, vasculitis, invasion of lung tumors into visceral pleura, abnormal elastic fibers in elastofibromas | |
| Fibrin (see Phosphotungstic acid hematoxylin or Mallory PTAH) | To demonstrate fibrin in renal biopsies | |
| Fontana-Masson | ||
| Giemsa (May-Grunwald) | ||
| Gram (Brown-Hopps, Brown-Brenn) | Identification of bacteria, some cases of actinomycetes, Nocardia, coccidioidomycosis, blastomycosis, cryptococcosis, aspergillosis, rhinosporidiosis, and amebiasis | |
| Grimelius | Evaluation of neuroendocrine tumors (largely replaced by the use of immunohistochemistry for chromogranin) | |
| Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) | Standard stain for the routine evaluation of tissues | |
| Iron (colloidal iron) | ||
| Jone’s silver methenamine | Basement membrane – dark maroon to black | Evaluation of renal biopsies |
| Melanin bleach | ||
| Methyl green-pyronin Y | ||
| Mucicarmine (Mayer) | Identification of adenocarcinomas, identification of Cryptococcus | |
| Oil red O | Requires frozen sections (lipids are dissolved by most fixatives or during processing). Tissue fixed in formalin can be used if tissue is frozen. | |
| Periodic acid – Schiff (PAS) | Classification of tumors with glycogen (e.g., Ewing’s/PNET, rhabdomyosarcoma, renal cell carcinoma), glomerular diseases (BM), identification of adenocarcinomas (mucin), fungal diseases (especially in argentophic areas – neutrophils and debris), spironolactone bodies in adrenal adenomas treated with this drug | |
| Periodic acid – Schiff with diastase digestion (PAS-D) | As above except glycogen that has been digested will not be stained | |
| Phosphotungstic acid hematoxylin (Mallory PTAH) | ||
| Reticular fibers (Gomor’s reticulin, Gordon and Sweets, Snook) | Bone marrow (myelophthisis), liver (fibrosis, veno-occlusive disease), carcinoma vs. sarcoma (reticular network) (but largely replaced by IHC) | |
| Silver stain (Grocott methenamine–silver nitrate – GMS) | ||
| Steiner | Evaluation of infectious diseases | |
| Sulfated Alcian blue | Identification of amyloid in cardiac biopsies | |
| Toluidine blue | Mast cell diseases, chronic cystitis | |
| Trichrome (Gomori, Masson) | Liver (fibrosis) | |
| Trichrome - modified | Evaluation of myocardial biopsies | |
| Von Kossa calcium | Demonstration of phosphate and carbonate radicals with calcium in tissues, identification of malakoplakia (Michaelis-Gutmann bodies) | |
| Warthin Starry | Infectious lesions (including syphilis, cat scratch fever, and bacillary angiomatosis) | |
| Wright’s | Blood smears |
The WebPath section of the University of Utah site (http://library.med.utah.edu/webpath) has useful descriptions of special stains and illustrative photographs.
The development of methods to detect antigens on tissue sections with antibodies was a major advance in surgical pathology. Immunohistochemical (IHC) studies are most frequently used for the following purposes:
A differential diagnosis is generated after examination of the H&E-stained slides. IHC is then used to gain evidence for or against diagnostic possibilities. “Trolling” cases through an immunohistochemistry laboratory by ordering numerous antibody studies without a clear reason in mind is more likely to lead to misguided diagnosis due to aberrant immunoreactivity than to provide an unexpected correct diagnosis.
There are no absolute rules for immunoreactivity in cells and tissues. Aberrant immunoreactivity or loss of immunoreactivity is occasionally observed for all antibodies, either due to biologic variability (e.g., occasional keratin-positive melanomas) or technical factors (e.g., impure antibodies, cross-reaction with other antigens, failure to preserve antigenicity). Thus, immunohistochemical markers are used most effectively as panels of markers with interpretation based on an immunohistochemical profile.
Tissue is often dislodged from normal glass slides during the treatments required for IHC. Thus, slides must be coated (e.g., with glue, poly-L-lysine, gelatin, albumin) or special commercial slides must be used. If slides are being prepared by another laboratory, the type of glass slide to be used must be specified.
There are numerous variables that can affect antigenicity. The most common are listed below. Each laboratory must optimize its procedures for each antibody used. Studies on tissues or slides not prepared in the routine fashion for a laboratory must be interpreted with caution.
Controls are essential for the appropriate interpretation of immunohistochemical studies and ensure that all steps of this complicated procedure have been performed adequately.
Positive controls consisting of tissues known to be immunoreactive should be included each time an antibody is used for a test case. Internal positive controls should always be evaluated when present, as they control not only for the technique used but also for the antigenicity of the tissue under investigation. The immunoperoxidase table lists normal cells that are generally immunoreactive for each antibody. Some laboratories have used vimentin as a control for immunogenicity as almost all tissue should demonstrate positivity.5 Given the wide and non-specific distribution of vimentin, smooth muscle alpha actin may be more useful in this context as pericytes, vascular smooth muscle, and myoepithelial cells present in most tissues are immunoreactive.
Examples of internal controls:
Negative controls usually consist of replacing the primary antibody with non-immune animal serum diluted to the same concentration as the primary antibody. No positive reaction should be present. If multiple primary antibodies are used reactive with different target antigens, then they may serve as negative controls for each other. Although the best negative control would be to use antibody preabsorbed against the target antigen, this is rarely practical in a diagnostic laboratory. Diagnostic slides should also be evaluated for internal negative controls. Aberrant immunoreactivity of tissues that should not be positive is indicative that the immunoreactivity is nonspecific and the study should not be used for interpretation.
The following features must be taken into consideration when evaluating studies:
Antigens are present in specific sites. Some antigens may be present in more than one location or be extracellular.
Nonspecific positivity should be suspected when immunoreactivity is present in atypical locations:
Examples of the normal location of antigens are shown in Figure 7-1.
Immunoreactivity of tumor cells must be distinguished from immunoreactivity of normal entrapped cells (e.g., desmin [+] skeletal muscle cells infiltrated by tumor, S100 [+] Langerhans cells in tumors, smooth muscle alpha actin [+] blood vessels, etc.). Plasma cells have large amounts of cytoplasmic immunoglobulin and can react nonspecifically with many antibodies.
Some weak immunoreactivity may be present as a nonspecific finding. It is important to compare positive cells with control slides and with normally nonimmunoreactive cells to determine whether the immunoreactivity is significant.
In some cases, the number of positive cells may be important as a criterion for positivity or as a prognostic marker (e.g., markers of proliferation such as Ki-67, HER2/neu). In other cases, rare weakly positive cells must be distinguished from intermingled normal cells or just nonspecific immunoreactivity.
Specific criteria for evaluating IHC have been developed for a few antibodies (see Tables 7-12 to 7-16). However, criteria do not exist for most antibodies or are not universally used by all pathologists. The significance of immunoreactivity varies with the type of lesion, the antibody, and the specific assay. Strong positivity in the majority of cells is easily interpreted as positive. As the number of positive cells decreases, and the intensity of immunoreactivity weakens, the lower threshold of a “positive” result becomes more difficult to determine.
Alkaline phosphatase chromogens (red color) fade over time. DAB (a brown color) is more permanent. This is not a problem in evaluating current pathology specimens. However, if slides are reviewed after a period of time, some chromogens may fade and once positive results may appear to be negative.
The following tables include information from the literature as well as the personal experiences of the staff at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Because of the many differences in specific antibodies, laboratory assays, and criteria for considering a result “positive,” results may vary for different institutions. The results have been divided into five categories for general markers and four categories for hematopathology markers. Note that “%” refers to the number of tumors reported to be positive, not the number of cells positive within a tumor (Table 7-2).
TABLE 7–2 EVALUATION OF POSITIVITY OF IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL STUDIES
![]() |
The actual markers used to evaluate a case will depend upon the differential diagnosis based on the H&E appearance. In some cases, an initial panel, which is often used for typical cases, has been suggested. Not all markers listed would be used for all cases and some markers are included to indicate when they would not be useful for distinguishing the tumors listed in the table.
POSITIVE is defined as the presence of immunoreactive cells and NEGATIVE as the absence of immunoreactive cells. Unfortunately, “positive” has also been used in some studies to mean “absence of immunoreactivity” when this finding supports a diagnosis. For example, the absence of SMAD4 (DPC4) has been reported as a “positive” result for pancreatic carcinoma, as this marker is absent in the majority of these tumors. This method of reporting results becomes confusing as “positive” and “negative” are dependent on the expected diagnosis. It is preferable to report the findings (positive = immunoreactivity present; negative = immunoreactivity absent) and then interpret them as supporting, or not supporting, the diagnoses in the differential diagnosis.
The combination of these two cytokeratins have been found to be useful to divide carcinomas into four main groups (Ck7+/Ck20+, Ck7+/Ck20-, Ck7-/Ck20+, Ck7-/Ck20-).
In Tables 7-3 to 7-7, other commonly used antibodies have been included to show differences within each group. The most useful additional antibodies will depend on the specific differential diagnosis.6-8
TABLE 7–3 PREDOMINANTLY CK7+/CK20+
![]() |
TABLE 7–4 NO DOMINANT CK7/CK20 PATTERN OR PATTERN UNKNOWN
![]() |
TABLE 7–5 PREDOMINANTLY CK7+/CK20−
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
TABLE 7–7 PREDOMINANTLY CK7−/CK20–
![]() |
![]() |
See Table 7-9.
TABLE 7–9 SPINDLE CELL/SOFT TISSUE LESIONS/SARCOMAS
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Pathologists frequently receive specimens with metastatic tumors. Often, the site of origin is known to the clinician, but this information is not provided to the pathologist. A good clinical history is frequently more successful for correct classification than a battery of studies.
The Ck7/Ck20 pattern is generally helpful to narrow down the potential site of origin of carcinomas (see Tables 7-3 to 7-7). Additional studies can then be used to identify specific types of carcinoma.
The most important tumors to identify are those with specific therapeutic treatments for cure or palliation (Table 7-10).10
See Table 7-11.
TABLE 7–11 POORLY DIFFERENTIATED TUMORS
| TYPE OF TUMOR | IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL MARKER | COMMENTS |
|---|---|---|
| Carcinoma | Broad spectrum keratins AE1/AE3 or PANK (MNF-116) | |
| Melanoma | S100 protein | |
| Lymphoma | Leukocyte common antigen (LCA) |
Hormone receptors are routinely determined on all invasive breast carcinomas and DCIS. ER and PR are weak prognostic markers and are more useful to predict the likelihood of response to hormonal therapies.
Many different methods are currently used to report the results of IHC studies for ER and PR. One method that has been used in multiple studies is the Allred score method (Table 7-12).
Patients with carcinomas that scored 3 (<1% of cells with intermediate intensity or 1% to 10% of cells with weak intensity) or above had improved disease-free survival when treated with endocrine therapy.11 Patients with carcinomas with a total score of 2 (<1% weakly positive cells) had a survival rate similar to ER-negative carcinomas (total score of 0).
About 80% of DCIS cases are positive for ER using the same method of scoring. Women with ER-positive DCIS were shown to experience fewer local recurrences, contralateral recurrences, and distant recurrences when treated with tamoxifen (NSABP B24 study).
With optimization of IHC using newer antigen retrieval methods, 99.2% of carcinomas will have scores of 0, 7, or 8.12 Therefore, many laboratories report results as positive or negative. The value of further subdividing cases by percent positive cells, H-score, or image analysis for either prognosis or to predict response to tamoxifen has not been demonstrated. Intensity of immunoreactivity is difficult to evaluate as most cases show strong reactivity with optimal assay methods and most carcinomas show considerable variability in intensity.
A possible method for reporting results is shown in Table 7-13. The same system can be used for reporting progesterone receptor results. The use of both ER and PR may be helpful for determining the likelihood of response to tamoxifen, as has been shown with data using the biochemical assay (Table 7-14). Presumably, the presence of the ER-regulated gene product PR is more predictive of an intact ER regulatory pathway.
TABLE 7–14 RESPONSE TO TAMOXIFEN
| STATUS OF CARCINOMA | % OF CARCINOMAS | % OF PATIENTS RESPONDING TO TAMOXIFEN |
|---|---|---|
| ER+ PR+ | 63% | 75% to 80% |
| ER+ PR– | 15% | 25% to 30% |
| ER– PR+ | 5% | 40% to 45% |
| ER– PR– | 17% | <10% |
Recent national guidelines for reporting ER and PR have been released and should be consulted for additional information about performing and interpreting these studies (Hammond ME, et al, American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations for Immunohistochemical Testing of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer, J Clin Oncol 2010 Apr 19).False negative results, and to a lesser extent, false positive results, can also be problems. False negative results may be due to a large number of causes including:
Most cases of false negativity can be suspected, as the normal breast tissue will also be negative. In such cases, the assay should be repeated on the same block, a different block from the same case, or blocks from another case, if available. If the normal tissue remains negative, the possibility of loss of antigenicity in the tissue can be mentioned in the report.
False positive results are quite unusual, as the antibody should not crossreact with other antigens.
The HER2/neu immunoreactivity scoring system in Table 7-15 was recommended by an expert panel.13 Other panel suggestions:
Only membrane immunoreactivity is scored. Marked cytoplasmic immunoreactivity may make interpretation difficult. FISH studies may be preferred for such cases (Table 7-16).
| RESULT | CRITERIA | comment |
|---|---|---|
| Positive for amplification | >6.0 gene copies or >2.2 ratio | |
| Equivocal for amplification | 4.0 to 6.0 genes or 1.8 to 2.2 ratio | Guidelines suggest counting additional cells for FISH, retesting, or performing IHC |
| Negative for amplification | <4.0 genes or <1.8 ratio |
Patients with a ratio of 2.0 or greater have been eligible for Herceptin trials.
In >90% of carcinomas with protein overexpression, the HER2/neu gene has been amplified. In 3% to 5% of cases, protein overexpression can occur due to other mechanisms. In <5% of cases, there may be gene amplification without protein overexpression. In general, there is a 20% to 40% response to Herceptin alone in patients with cancers showing gene amplification by FISH, and <5% of patients respond if the gene is not amplified. Therefore, FISH studies may be helpful for cases with 2+ positivity or difficult to interpret cases (e.g., with variable positivity or cytoplasmic positivity).
Well- and moderately differentiated lobular carcinomas are rarely positive (<5%). However, in some cases there may be edge enhancement of individual tumor cells that may be difficult to interpret. FISH studies may be helpful.
In rare cases, DCIS overexpresses HER2/neu but the accompanying invasive carcinoma does not. This is a source of potential false positive results for IHC or FISH.
Myoepithelial markers can be useful for the evaluation of breast lesions (Table 7-17):
TABLE 7–17 MYOEPITHELIAL MARKERS IN BREAST CARCINOMA
![]() |
See Table 7-18.
TABLE 7–18 EPIDERMAL LESIONS OF THE NIPPLE AND PAGET DISEASE AT OTHER SITES
![]() |
See Table 7-19.
TABLE 7–19 BREAST CARCINOMA IN MALES VERSUS METASTATIC PROSTATE CARCINOMA
![]() |
See Table 7-20 and Fig. 7-2.
TABLE 7–20 SIGNET RING CELL CARCINOMAS OF THE STOMACH AND BREAST (LOBULAR CARCINOMA)
![]() |
Figure 7–2 Metastatic lobular carcinoma of the breast can morphologically resemble primary signet ring cell gastric carcinomas. Both typically lack e-cadherin expression. In addition, lobular breast carcinomas can be clinically occult or can present as distant metastases many years after the initial presentation. Signet ring cells associated with breast carcinoma more commonly have a central mucin vacuole with a targetoid appearance (cell A). Gastric signet ring cells usually have many small vacuoles giving the cytoplasm a foamy appearance (cell B). These criteria are not reliable in distinguishing these two carcinomas. However, the presence of the first type of signet ring cell in a biopsy from the gastrointestinal tract should raise the possibility of metastatic breast carcinoma.14 The majority of lobular breast carcinomas will be ER positive, and this is a reliable marker to exclude gastric carcinoma. In the minority of ER-negative cases, PR, GCDFP, MUC1, CDX2, and Hep Par may be helpful markers.15
See Table 7-21.
TABLE 7–21 FIBROBLASTIC/MYOFIBROBLASTIC LESIONS OF THE BREAST
![]() |
See Table 7-22.
TABLE 7–22 OVARIAN CARCINOMA VERSUS MESOTHELIOMA
![]() |
See Table 7-23.
TABLE 7–23 PRIMARY OVARIAN CARCINOMA VERSUS METASTATIC CARCINOMAS
![]() |
See Table 7-24.
TABLE 7–24 ENDOCERVICAL CARCINOMA VERSUS ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA
![]() |
See Table 7-25.
TABLE 7–25 ENDOMETRIAL STROMAL SARCOMA VERSUS LEIOMYOSARCOMA
![]() |
See Table 7-27.
TABLE 7–27 METASTATIC ADENOCARCINOMAS IN THE ABDOMEN
![]() |
See Table 7-29.
TABLE 7–29 HEMANGIOBLASTOMA VERSUS METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA
![]() |
See Table 7-30.
TABLE 7–30 TUMORS OF GERM CELLS AND SEX-CORD STROMAL TUMORS
![]() |
See Table 7-32.
TABLE 7–32 TUMORS OF BLADDER, PROSTATIC, AND RENAL ORIGIN
![]() |
See Table 7-33.
TABLE 7–33 PROSTATE CARCINOMA VERSUS OTHER LESIONS
![]() |
See Table 7-36.
TABLE 7–36 DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF EPITHELIAL MESOTHELIOMA AND LUNG ADENOCARCINOMA
![]() |
Initial panel: AE1/AE3, calretinin, WT-1 (clone 6F-H2), CEA, Leu-M1, and TTF-1 with additional studies ordered in difficult cases.
Other antibodies generally reported as negative in epithelial mesotheliomas and positive in lung adenocarcinomas include the following: MOC-1, B72.3, Ber-EP4, and BG-8. Cytokeratins 5/6 are reported to be positive in mesotheliomas and negative in lung carcinomas. However, in our experience, these markers have proven less useful than the ones listed earlier. The use of EMA is controversial. Strong membrane positivity is characteristic of epithelial mesothelioma, whereas cytoplasmic positivity is characteristic of adenocarcinomas.
Less is known about the immunophenotype of pure sarcomatoid mesotheliomas. The spindle cells are positive for cytokeratin, but are less frequently positive for the other markers as compared to the epithelioid cells. Tumors that can, on occasion, resemble mesotheliomas are generally negative for cytokeratins, with the notable exceptions of some cases of angiosarcoma, epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, synovial sarcoma, epithelioid sarcoma, and leiomyosarcoma (see Table 7-9).16
See Tables 7-37 and 7-38.
![]() |
TABLE 7–38 DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF LUNG CARCINOMAS
| DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS | MOST USEFUL MARKERS |
|---|---|
| Adenocarcinoma vs. squamous cell carcinoma | Keratin 7, keratin 20, TTF-1, p63 |
| Small cell carcinoma vs. basaloid squamous cell carcinoma | P63, TTF-1 |
| Small cell carcinoma vs. carcinoid tumor | Mitoses, necrosis, amount of cytoplasm |
| Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma vs. carcinoid tumor | Mitoses, necrosis |
| Mucinous lung carcinoma vs. metastatic colon cancer | TTF-1, CDX2 (mucinous BAC can be focally positive for CDX2) |
| Lung carcinoma vs. metastatic breast carcinoma | TTF-1, compare ER/PR/HER2 pattern in primary breast carcinoma and lung tumor |
Amyloidosis (Greek for amylon = starch plus eidos = resemblance) is seen in many different clinical settings and is associated with many diseases. Pathologists can narrow down the differential diagnosis considerably to help guide clinical decision making. Finding an amyloid deposit in any tissue is similar to finding metastatic carcinoma in a lymph node – in both settings clinical information (e.g., history, physical examination, radiology studies, results of laboratory tests) is essential in arriving at the correct interpretation. A little immunohistochemistry and a lot of clinical judgment by the pathologist can help establish the cause with a greater degree of certainty.17
Finding and characterizing amyloid deposits:
See Tables 7-43 and 7-44.
TABLE 7–44 ALTERNATIVE NAMES FOR ANTIGENS
| LOOKING FOR? | FIND IT UNDER: |
|---|---|
| 1D5 | Estrogen receptor (G) |
| 6F/3D | Beta-amyloid |
| 12E7 | CD99 (G, H) |
| 34βE12 | Keratins (G) |
| 38.13 | CD77(H) |
| 70 kD NF | Neurofilaments (G) |
| 200 kD NF | Neurofilaments (G) |
| 903 | Keratins--34βE12 (G) |
| A (blood group antigen) | Blood group antigens (G) |
| A (Ig heavy chain alpha) | Heavy chain immunoglobulins (H) |
| A32 antigen | CD146 (G) |
| A103 | MELAN-A (G) |
| AAT | Alpha 1-antitrypsin (G, H) |
| ACH | Alpha-1 antichymotrypsin (H) |
| AE1/AE3 | Keratins (G) |
| AFP | Alpha-fetoprotein (G) |
| Alpha 1-antitrypsin | Alpha 1-antitrypsin (G, H) |
| Alpha 1-antichymotrypsin | Alpha 1-antichymotrypsin (H) |
| Alpha 1-fetoprotein | Alpha fetoprotein (G) |
| Alpha fetoprotein | Alpha fetoprotein (G) |
| Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase | AMACR (G) |
| Alpha smooth muscle actin | Alpha smooth muscle actin (G) |
| AMACR | AMACR (G) |
| Amyloid | Beta-amyloid (G) |
| Androgen receptor | Androgen receptor (G) |
| Apolipoprotein J | Clusterin (H) |
| AR | Androgen receptor (G) |
| B (blood group antigen) | Blood group antigens (G) |
| B1 | CD20 (H) |
| B2 | CD21 (H) |
| B4 | CD19 (H) |
| B72.3 | B72.3 (G) |
| bcl-1 | Cyclin D1 (H) |
| bcl-2 | bcl-2 (H, G) |
| B-cell specific activator protein | BSAP (H) |
| BER-EP4 | BER-EP4 (G) |
| BERH2 | CD30 (G, H) |
| Beta-amyloid | Beta-amyloid (G) |
| Beta-catenin | Beta-catenin (G) |
| Beta-2 microglobulin | Beta-2 microglobulin (G) |
| BG8 | BG8 (G) |
| B-HCG | Human chorionic gonadotropin (G) |
| BLA.36 | CD77 (H) |
| BL-CAM | CD22 (H) |
| Blood group antigens | Blood group antigens (G, H) |
| BR-2 | Gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (G) |
| BRST-2 | Gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (G) |
| C3b/C4bR | CD35 (H) |
| C5b-9 | C5b-9 (G) |
| c-kit | CD117 (G) |
| CA 15-3 | Epithelial membrane antigen (G, H) |
| CA 19-9 | CA 19-9 (G) |
| CA 27.28 | Epithelial membrane antigen (G, H) |
| CA 72-4 | B72.3 (G) |
| CA125 | CA125 (G) |
| CA19-9 | CA19-9 (G) |
| Calcitonin | Calcitonin (G), Hormones (G) |
| Caldesmon | Caldesmon (G) |
| Calgranulin | MAC 387 (G) |
| CALLA | CD10 (G, H) |
| CALP | Calponin (G) |
| Calponin | Calponin (G) |
| Calprotectin | MAC 387 (G) |
| Calretinin | Calretinin (G) |
| CAM5.2 | Keratins (G) |
| Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 | CA19-9 (G) |
| Carcinoembryonic antigen | Carcinoembryonic antigen (G) |
| CD1a | CD1a (H) |
| CD2 | CD2 (H) |
| CD3 | CD3 (H) |
| CD4 | CD4 (H) |
| CD5 | CD5 (G, H) |
| CD7 | CD7 (H) |
| CD8 | CD8 (H) |
| CD10 | CD10 (G, H) |
| CD11b | CD11b (H) |
| CD11c | CD11c (H) |
| CD13 | CD13 (H) |
| CD15 | CD15 (G, H) |
| CD16 | CD16 (H) |
| CD19 | CD19 (H) |
| CD20 | CD20 (H) |
| CD21 | CD21 (H) |
| CD22 | CD22 (H) |
| CD23 | CD23 (H) |
| CD25 | CD25 (H) |
| CD30 | CD30 (G, H) |
| CD31 | CD31 (G) |
| CD33 | CD33 (H) |
| CD34 | CD34 (G, H) |
| CD35 | CD35 (H) |
| CD38 | CD38 (H) |
| CD43 | CD43 (H) |
| CD44v3 | CD44v3 (G) |
| CD45 | CD45 (H) |
| CD45RA | CD45RA (H) |
| CD45Ro | CD45Ro (H) |
| CD56 | CD56 (H) |
| CD57 | CD57 (G) |
| CD61 | CD61 (H) |
| CD68 | CD68 (G, H) |
| CD74 | CD74 (H) |
| CDw75 | CDw75 (H) |
| CD77 | CD77 (H) |
| CD79a | CD79a (H) |
| CD79b | CD79b (H) |
| CD95 | CD95 (H) |
| CD99 | CD99 (G, H) |
| CD117 | CD117 (G) |
| CD141 | CD141 (G) |
| CDX | CDX (G) |
| CDKN2 | p16 (G) |
| CDP | Gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (G) |
| CEA | Carcinoembryonic antigen (G) |
| c-erbB2 | HER-2/neu (G) |
| Chromogranin A | Chromogranin A (G) |
| c-kit | CD117 (G) |
| CLA | CD45 (H) or HECA-452 (H) |
| CLDN1 | Claudin (G) |
| Clusterin | Clusterin (H) |
| Collagen IV | Collagen IV (G) |
| Common acute leukemia antigen | CD10 (G, H) |
| Complement lysis inhibitor | Clusterin (H) |
| CR1 | CD35 (H) |
| Cyclin D1 | Cyclin D1 (H) |
| Cystic fibrosis antigen | MAC 387 (G) |
| D (Ig heavy chain delta) | Heavy chain immunoglobulins (H) |
| DBA.44 | DBA.44 (H) |
| Desmin | Desmin (G) |
| DF3 | Epithelial membrane antigen (G, H) |
| DPB | CD45RA (H) |
| E2 antigen | CD99 (G, H) |
| EBERS | Epstein-Barr virus (G, H) |
| EBNA | Epstein-Barr virus (G, H) |
| E-cadherin | E-cadherin (G) |
| EGFR | EGFR (G) |
| EM ACT | HHF-35 (G) |
| EMA | Epithelial membrane antigen (G) |
| E-MEL | HMB-45 (G) |
| Endothelial cell antigen | HECA-452 (H) |
| Ep-CAM | BER-EP4 (G) |
| Epidermal growth factor receptor | EGFR (G) |
| Epithelial membrane antigen | Epithelial membrane antigen (G, H) |
| Epithelial specific antigen | BER-EP4 (G) |
| Epstein-Barr virus | Epstein-Barr virus (G, H) |
| ER | Estrogen receptor (G) |
| erbB2 | HER-2/neu (G) |
| ESA | BER-EP4 (G) |
| Estrogen receptor | Estrogen receptor (G) |
| Ewing’s sarcoma marker | CD99 (G, H) |
| Factor VIII related antigen | Factor VIII (G) |
| FVIII:RAg | Factor VIII (G) |
| Factor XIIIa | Factor XIIIa (G) |
| Fascin | Fascin (H) |
| Fast myosin | Myosin heavy chain (G) |
| Fibronectin | Fibronectin (G) |
| Fli-1 | Fli-1 (G) |
| FMC7 | FMC7 (H) |
| FMC 29 | CD99 (G, H) |
| Friend leukemia integrin-site 1 | Fli-1 (G) |
| FVIII:g | Factor VIII (G) |
| G (Ig heavy chain gamma) | Heavy chain immunoglobulins (H) |
| Gal-3 | Galectin-3 (G) |
| Galectin-3 | Galectin-3 (G) |
| Gastrin | Hormones (G) |
| GCDFP | Gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (G) |
| GFAP | Glial fibriallary acidic protein (G) |
| Glial fibrillary acidic protein | Glial fibriallary acidic protein (G) |
| Glucagon | Hormones (G) |
| Glucose transporter 1 | GLUT-1 (G) |
| GLUT-1 | GLUT-1 (G) |
| GPIIIa | CD61 (H) |
| gp80 | Clusterin (H) |
| gp200 | RCC (G) |
| GPA | Glycophorin A (H) |
| Granzyme B | Granzyme B (H) |
| Gross cystic disease fluid disease-15 | Gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (G) |
| H (blood group antigen) | Blood group antigens (G) |
| H222 | Estrogen receptor (G) |
| Hb | Hemoglobin (H) |
| HBME-1 | HBME-1 (G) |
| h-caldesmon | Caldesmon (G) |
| H-CAM | CD44v3 (G) |
| HCG | Human chorionic gonadotropin (G) |
| HCL | DBA.44 (H) |
| HBME-1 | HBME-1 (G) |
| Heavy chain immunoglobulins | Heavy chain immunoglobulins (H) |
| HECA-452 | HECA-452 (H) |
| Hematopoietic progenitor cell, class 1 | CD34 |
| Hemoglobin | Hemoglobin (H) |
| HepPar-1 | HepPar-1 (G) |
| Hepatocyte paraffin-1 | HepPar-1 (G) |
| HER-2/neu | HER-2/neu (G) |
| HHF-35 | HHF-35 (G) |
| HHV8 | HHV8 (H) |
| HLA-DR | HLA-DR (H) |
| HMB-45 | HMB-45 (G) |
| HMFG | Epithelial membrane antigen (G, H) |
| hMLH1 | hMLH1 (G) |
| hMSH2 | hMLH1 (G) |
| HNK-1 | CD57 (G) |
| HP1 | HepPar-1 (G) |
| HPCA-1 | CD34 (G, H) |
| HPL | Human placental lactogen (G) |
| HuLy-m6 | CD99 (G, H) |
| Human chorionic gonadotropin | Human chorionic gonadotropin (G) |
| Human herpes virus 8 | HHV8 (G, H) |
| Human mutL homologue 1 | hMLH1 (G) |
| Human mutS homologue 2 | hMLH1 (G) |
| Human placental lactogen | Human placental lactogen (G) |
| IL-2 receptor | CD25 (H) |
| Inhibin-alpha subunit | Inhibin-alpha subunit (G) |
| Insulin | Hormones (G) |
| J5 | CD10 (G, H) |
| JOVI 1 | TCR (H) |
| K (Ig lighit chain kappa) | Light chain immunoglobulins (H) |
| Keratin 5/6 | Keratins (G) |
| Keratin 7 | Keratins (G) |
| Keratin 20 | Keratins (G) |
| Keratins | Keratins (G) |
| Ki-1 | CD30 (G, H) |
| Ki-67 | Ki-67 (G) |
| kip2 | p57 (G) |
| Kit | CD117 (G) |
| KP-1 | CD68 (G, H) |
| L (Ig light chain lambda) | Light chain immunoglobulins (H) |
| L1 antigen | MAC 387 (G) |
| L26 | CD20 (H) |
| L60 | CD43 (H) |
| Laminin | Laminin (G) |
| LCA | CD45 (H) |
| Leu 1 | CD5 (H) |
| Leu 2 | CD8 (H) |
| Leu 3 | CD4 (H) |
| Leu 5a + b | CD2 (H) |
| Leu 7 | CD57 (G, H) |
| Leu 9 | CD7 (H) |
| Leu16 | CD20 (H) |
| Leu 22 | CD43 (H) |
| Leukocyte common antigen | CD45 (H) |
| Leu-M1 | CD15 (G, H) |
| Light chain immunoglobulins | Light chain immunoglobulins (H) |
| LFA-2 | CD2 (H) |
| LMP-1 | Epstein-Barr virus (G, H) |
| LN1 | CDw75 (H) |
| LN2 | CD74 (H) |
| Lysozyme | Lysozyme (H, G) |
| M (Ig heavy chain mu) | Heavy chain immunoglobulins (H) |
| Mac-1 | CD11b (H) |
| MAC 387 | MAC 387 (G) |
| Mac-M | CD68 (G, H) |
| MART 1 | MELAN A (G) |
| Mast cell tryptase | Mast cell tryptase (H) |
| mb-1 | CD79a (H) |
| MCAM | CD146 (G) |
| ME491 | CD63 (G) |
| MELAN-A | MELAN-A (G) |
| Melanoma antigen recognized by T cells | MELAN-A (G) |
| Melanoma-associated antigen | CD63 (G) |
| Melanoma cell adhesion molecule | CD146 (G) |
| Melanoma-specific antigen | HMB-45 (G) |
| MELCAM (or Mel-CAM) | CD146 (G) |
| MIB-1 | Ki-67 (G) |
| MIC-2 | CD99 (G, H) |
| MLH1 | hMLH1 |
| MN-4 | CD146 (G) |
| MNF-116 | Keratin--Pan-K (G) |
| MPO | Myeloperoxidase (H) |
| MRF4 | Myf-4 (G) |
| MSA | HHF-35 (G) |
| MSH2 or MSH6 | hMLH1 |
| MTS1 | p16 (G) |
| MUC1 | Epithelial membrane antigen (G, H) |
| MUC18 | CD146 (G) |
| Muscle common actin | HHF-35 (G) |
| Muscle specific actin | HHF-35 (G) |
| My 7 | CD13 (H) |
| My 9 | CD33 (H) |
| Myeloperoxidase | Myeloperoxidase (H) |
| Myf-4 | Myf-4 (G) |
| MyoD1 | MyoD1 (G) |
| Myogenin | Myf-4 (G) |
| Myoglobin | Myoglobin (G) |
| Myosin heavy chain | Myosin heavy chain (G) |
| NCAM | CD56 (H) |
| Neprilysin | CD10 (G, H) |
| NEU N | NEU N (G) |
| Neurofilaments | Neurofilaments (G) |
| Neuron specific enolase | Neuron specific enolase (G) |
| NFP | Neurofilaments (G) |
| NKI-betab | HMB-45 (G) |
| NKI/C3 | CD63 (G) |
| NSE | Neuron specific enolase (G) |
| O13 | CD99 (G, H) |
| OC125 | CA125 (G) |
| Oct2 | Oct2 (H) |
| Octomer transcription factor | Oct2 (H) |
| p16 | p16 (G) |
| p27kip1 | p27kip1 (G) |
| p53 | p53 (G) |
| p57 | p57 (G) |
| p63 | p63 (G) |
| P504S | AMACR (G) |
| PAN-K | Keratins (G) |
| PAP | Prostate acid phosphatase (G) |
| PECAM-1 | CD31 (G) |
| PEM | Epithelial membrane antigen (G, H) |
| Perforin | Perforin (H) |
| PGM1 | CD68 (G, H) |
| PgR | Progesterone receptor (G) |
| PK antigen | CD77 (H) |
| Placental alkaline phosphatase | Placental alkaline phosphatase (G) |
| PLAP | Placental alkaline phosphatase (G) |
| Platelet glycoprotein IIIa | CD61 (H) |
| PMS2 | hMLH1 |
| Podoplanin | D2-40 |
| PR | Progesterone receptor (G) |
| PRAD1 | Cyclin D1 (H) |
| PrAP | Prostate acid phosphatase (G) |
| Prealbumin | Prealbumin (G) |
| Progesterone receptor | Progesterone receptor (G) |
| Prostate acid phosphatase | Prostate acid phosphatase (G) |
| Prostate specific antigen | Prostate specific antigen (G) |
| PSA | Prostate specific antigen (G) |
| QBEnd10 | CD34 (G, H) |
| Renal cell carcinoma marker | RCC (G) |
| ret | ret (G) |
| RCC | RCC (G) |
| rT3 | CD2 (H) |
| S-100 | S-100 (G) |
| S-Endo-1 | CD146 (G) |
| SGP-2 | Clusterin (H) |
| SMA | Alpha smooth muscle actin (G) |
| SM-ACT | Alpha smooth muscle actin (G) |
| Smad4 | DPC4 (G) |
| SM-MHC | Myosin heavy chain (G) |
| Somatostatin | Hormones (G) |
| SP40 | Clusterin (H) |
| Stem cell factor receptor | CD117 (G) |
| Synaptophysin | Synaptophysin (G) |
| Syndecan-1 | CD138 (H) |
| Synuclein-1 | Synuclein-1 (G) |
| T3 | CD3 (H) |
| T4 | CD4 (H) |
| T6 | CD1a (H) |
| T8 | CD8 (H) |
| T11 | CD2 (H) |
| T64 | Clusterin (H) |
| TAG-72 | B72.3 (G) |
| Tau | Tau (G) |
| T cell antigen receptor | TCR (H) |
| T cell intracellular antigen | TIA-1 (H) |
| TCR | TCR (H) |
| TdT | Terminal deoxytransferase (H) |
| TE | CD2 (H) |
| Terminal deoxytransferase | Terminal deoxytransferase (H) |
| TH | CD4 (H) |
| Thrombomodulin | CD141 (G) |
| Thyroglobulin | Thyroglobulin (G) |
| Thyroid transcription factor 1 | TTF-1 (G) |
| TIA-1 | TIA-1 (H) |
| TM | CD141 (G) |
| traf-1 | traf-1 (H) |
| Transthyretin | Prealbumin (G) |
| TRPM2 | Clusterin (H) |
| TTF-1 | TTF-1 (G) |
| TTR | Prealbumin (G) |
| Tumor-associated glycoprotein 72 | B72.3 (G) |
| Tumor necrosis factor receptor–associated factor | traf-1 (H) |
| UCHL-1 | CD45Ro (H) |
| UEA 1 | Ulex (G) |
| Ulex | Ulex (G) |
| Vimentin | Vimentin (G) |
| von Willebrand’s factor | Factor VIII (G) |
| VWF | Factor VIII (G) |
| Wilms’ tumor 1 protein | WT1 (G) |
| WT1 | WT1 (G) |
G, general markers; H, hematopathology markers.
The results of studies are incorporated into the surgical pathology report. The following information is included:
TABLE 7–46 CELLS, TUMORS, AND STRUCTURES WITH CHARACTERISTIC FINDINGS BY ELECTRON MICROSCOPY
See Tables 7-8, 7-9, 7-22, and 7-47 for additional information.
Ultrastructural details of tissues are lost rapidly. Therefore, fresh tissue must be fixed rapidly and well for EM. Tissues are usually fixed in special fixatives for EM to preserve lipids and glycogen (e.g., 2% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4).
Note: If tissue from a small biopsy is found to be nondiagnostic on H&E, any tissue saved for EM should be retrieved for examination by light microscopy.
A separate electron microscopy report is usually issued. The results should be incorporated into the final diagnosis.19
Frozen tissue is useful for staining (some antibodies only detect antigens in frozen tissue), enzyme studies (muscle biopsies), and to save tissue for DNA or RNA studies.
All specimens with a question of a lymphoproliferative disorder, sarcomas, unusual tumors, muscle biopsies.
Like immunoperoxidase studies, immunofluorescence (IF) detects antigens in tissues. However, because amplification of the signal is not used, it is better suited for precise localization of antigen/antibody complexes in tissues or for determining the deposition pattern of immune complexes (e.g., linear vs. granular). Thus, it is most useful for the investigation of diseases related to immune complex deposition such as glomerular diseases and bullous diseases of the skin.
Tissue for IF may be snap frozen (see instructions earlier) or stored in special fixatives for IF. If the specimen is not frozen, special care must be taken to ensure that the biopsy is kept moist in a sealed container.
Molecular genetic pathology is the newest subspeciality in pathology with board certification. Molecular diagnostics incorporates many types of techniques for the investigation of genetic alterations in cells and viruses (e.g., Southern blotting, PCR analysis, FISH). It has applications in three main areas:
These studies are especially helpful for hematolymphoid proliferations that are difficult to classify because of the frequent and characteristic rearrangements that occur in many of these disorders. Unlike cytogenetics, the cells need not be viable. However, it is preferable that the nucleic acids are relatively intact. Southern blot and RNA-based PCR (RT-PCR) assays are best performed on fresh or frozen tissues. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue is amenable to DNA-based PCR assays. Some fixatives (e.g., Bouin’s) cause extensive breakage of DNA and may preclude genetic analysis of the tissue.
Cytogenetic studies have been demonstrated to be useful in several areas important to pathology:
Cells may be cultured to perform complete karyotype analysis or tissues can be analyzed for specific chromosomal alterations by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).
FISH studies can be performed on cultured cells, cytology specimens, touch preparations, and paraffin-embedded tissues.
Tissue for karyotyping must be fresh, viable, and relatively sterile. However, tissue may be submitted even if it has not been handled under strictly sterile conditions (contamination is not usually a problem). If specimens are to be held overnight, the tissue should be minced (into 0.1 cm cubes) in a sterile specimen container, covered with culture medium, and held overnight in the refrigerator. Fluids may also be submitted for analysis (especially pleural effusions with a suspicion of mesothelioma).
The results of the cytogenetic analysis should be incorporated into the final diagnosis or reported separately (Tables 7-47 and 7-48).
The following features are suggestive of hereditary susceptibility to cancer:
Pathologists can aid in the detection of hereditary carcinomas by being aware of the types and pathologic characteristics of carcinomas associated with these syndromes. Patients with germline mutations are important to identify in order to:
Although the sporadic forms of cancers, in general, far outnumber cases associated with germline mutations, in some cases the appearance or site of a carcinoma is highly suggestive of a known syndrome and further investigation may be warranted.
Flow cytometers analyze populations of thousands of dissaggregated cells as they pass by stationary detectors. Cell size and cytoplasmic granularity can be measured as well as DNA content and the presence or absence of immunohistochemical markers added to the cell suspension. Newer techniques can analyze three or more features simultaneously to divide cells into unique populations. DNA content can be used to determine the number of cells in S-phase (a measure of proliferation - S-phase fraction). Because cells are not visualized by this technique, one must be sure to submit only lesional tissue.
Single cell suspensions are necessary for analysis. For fresh tissues, cells must be viable. Fresh tissue (approximately 0.3 to 0.5 cm3) is placed in a specimen container and kept moist with HBSS. Tissues can be held overnight in a refrigerator.
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections may also be used for DNA ploidy analysis by the Hedley method, although the results are not as satisfactory due to nuclear fragmentation.
Cytologic preparations of surgical specimens often add additional information.
Comparing cytology preparations and the corresponding surgical specimen is always a useful exercise in learning the comparative morphology of these techniques.
Specimen radiographs are often preferable over patient radiographs:
Calcifications can dissolve in formalin over several days. If the demonstration of calcifications is important (e.g., mammographically detected calcifications) it is preferable to process the tissue within 1 to 2 days. If processing is to be delayed, the tissue can be stored in ethanol.
Radiographic equipment is available in radiology departments and in some pathology departments. The specimen may be placed on a piece of wax paper (to keep the surfaces clean) lying on the film. Specimens can be radiographed after decalcification (not all calcium is removed) but best results are obtained on fresh undecalcified specimens. Lungs should not be inflated prior to radiography.
If the specimen is small, two exposures at different settings or at different angles may be useful. Lead sheets can be used to allow two exposures on one piece of film.
If the film is too dark (overexposed), the exposure is too high and a lower setting should be tried. If the film is too light (i.e., unexposed) the exposure is too low and a higher setting is indicated.
Special injection techniques with radiocontrast media are available for unusual specimens (e.g., a recipient lung with pulmonary hypertension, vascular ectasia of the bowel).
Labeled compounds are sometimes used to localize certain types of tumors (generally neuroendocrine) or sentinel lymph nodes. The patient is injected with the isotope prior to surgery and the surgeon uses a hand held probe to identify the labeled tissue. The amount of radioactivity in the tissue is small and generally does not pose a hazard to pathologists handling the tissue and does not need special disposal methods. However, each pathology department should consult with their radiation safety department to ensure appropriate handling of such tissues. In some cases, if a gross lesion is not present corresponding to the area of octreotide uptake, specimens can be imaged using a gamma camera.
The pathology department is a unique resource for researchers who need human tissues. The pathologist plays a key role as patient advocate and diagnostician in order to provide appropriate human tissues for biologic research. Most hospitals have a policy that allows the release of tissue for research if it would otherwise be discarded. Therefore, tissue is never provided for research until all necessary tissue has been taken for diagnosis. Tissue from primary diagnostic breast biopsies and open lung biopsies without gross lesions must not be given away. It is in the best interest of the patient that a pathologist evaluate the specimen rather than have tissue given away by nonpathologists who are not aware of what is needed for diagnosis.
The investigation of infectious disease by culture is complementary to its investigation by histologic sections (Tables 7-51 to 7-53).
TABLE 7–51 IDENTIFICATION OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
| CULTURE | HISTOLOGIC SECTIONS |
|---|---|
| Can be performed on aspirates, swabs, fluids, or tissues. | Requires surgical excision of tissues. |
| Cultures amplify the number of organisms present, allowing them to be recognized. | Organisms may be rare, or not seen in tissue sections. |
| The specific organism can be identified and tested for drug susceptibility. | Categories of organisms can be recognized but specific identification may not be possible. |
| Some organisms cannot be cultured. | Many organisms can be identified that will not grow in culture or that require long culture times (e.g., TB). |
| It may be difficult to exclude contamination for a positive culture. |
Tissue is kept as sterile as possible. Suture removal kits are a convenient source of sterile scissors and forceps. Serially section the specimen to determine if there are focal lesions. Place representative sections in a sterile specimen container making sure to retain a duplicate piece of tissue for histology. Label with the patient’s name and unit number, patient’s physician, type of specimen, collection date, and time of collection (required for Joint commission accreditation).
1. Werner M., Chott Fabiano A., Battifora H. Effect of formalin fixation and processing on immunohistochemistry. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:1016-1019.
2. Arber J.M., Arber D.A., Jenkins K.A., Battifora H. Effect of decalcification and fixation in paraffin-section immunohistochemistry. Applied Immunohistochem. 1996;4:241-248.
3. Fergenbaum J.H., Garcia-Closas M., Hewitt S.M., et al. Loss of antigenicity in stored sections of breast cancer tissue microarrays. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:667-672.
4. Wester K., Wahlund E., Sunderstrom C., et al. Paraffin section storage and immunohistochemistry: effects of time, temperature, fixation, and retrieval protocol with emphasis on p53 protein and MIB1 antigen. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2000;8:61-70.
5. Battifora H. Assessment of antigen damage in immunohistochemistry, the vimentin internal control. Am J Clin Pathol. 1991;6:669-671.
6. Chu P.G., Weiss L.M. Keratin expression in human tissues and neoplasms. Histopathology. 2002;40:403-439.
7. Gyure K.A., Morrison A.C. Cytokeratin 7 and 20 expression in choroid plexus tumors: utility in differentiating these neoplasms from metastatic carcinomas. Mod Pathol. 2000;13:638-643.
8. Wang N.P., Zee S., Zarbo R.J. Coordinate expression of cytokeratins 7 and 20 defines unique subsets of carcinomas. Appl Immunohistochem. 1995;3:99-107.
9. Mierau G.W., Berry P.J., Malott R.L., et al. Appraisal of the comparative utility of immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy in the diagnosis of childhood round cell tumors. Ultrastruct Pathol. 1996;20:507-517.
10. Varadhachary G.R., Abbruzzese J.L., Lenzi R. Diagnostic strategies for unknown primary cancer. Cancer. 2004;100:1776-1785.
11. Harvey J.M., et al. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1474-1481.
12. Collins L.C., Botero M.L., Schnitt S.J. Bimodal frequency distribution of estrogen receptor immunohistochemical staining results in breast cancer: an analysis of 825 cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 2005;123:16-20.
13. Wolff A.C., et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007;131:18-43.
14. Battifora H. Metastatic breast carcinoma to the stomach simulating linitis plastica. Applied Immunohistochem. 1994;2:225-228.
15. O’Connell F.P., Wang H.H., Odze R.D. Utility of immunohistochemistry in distinguishing primary adenocarcinomas from metastatic breast carcinomas in the gastrointestinal tract. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129:338-347.
16. Corson J.M. Pathology of mesothelioma. Thorac Surg Clin N Am. 2004;14:447-460.
17. Kebbel A., Rocken C. Immunohistochemical classification of amyloid in surgical pathology revisited. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30:673-683.
18. Cao Y., Karsten U., Milqers J. Imnunohistochemical characterization of a panel of 56 antibodies with normal human small intestine, colon, and breast tissues. Tumor Biol. 1998;19(Suppl 1):88-99.
19. Electron Microscopy of Tumors, Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology, Volume 20: the entire February 2003 issue is devoted to electron microscopy.
20. Lerone DH. Medically Important Fungi, 4th edition: a guide to identification, ASM Press, 2004.
21. Chandler F.W., Watts J.C. Pathologic Diagnosis of Fungal Infections. ASCP Press; 1987.
22. Nuovo G.J., Plaza J.A., Magro C. Rapid diagnosis of smallpox infection and differentiation from its mimics. Diag Mol Pathol. 2003;12:103-107.
23. Eyzaguirre E., Haque A.K. Application of immunohistochemistry to infections. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008;132:424-431.
24. McLaughlin-Drubin M.E., Munger K. Viruses associated with human cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1782:127-150.
25. Nuovo G.J. The utility of in situ-based methodologies including in situ polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis and study of viral infections,. Hum Pathol. 2007;38:1123-1136.
26. Slifka M.K., Hanifin J.M. Smallpox: the basics. Dermatol Clin. 2004;22:263-274.