11

Long Bone Measurement

image

Imaging Methods

Long bone measurement to evaluate for limb length discrepancy may be accomplished by radiography, microdose digital radiography, ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).1 Radiographic methods are the orthoroentgenogram, scanogram, and teleoroentgenogram. Both the orthoroentgenogram and the scanogram require three precisely centered exposures at the hip, knee, and ankle joints and include the use of a radiopaque ruler taped to the table between the limbs. The image receptor (IR) size is the primary difference, with the orthoroentgenogram using a single IR that remains stationary while the table and the x-ray tube move to an unexposed section. The scanogram technique uses three separate IRs. The teleoroentgenogram is a single upright AP exposure of both limbs on a special long IR at an SID of at least 6 ft (180 cm). Digital imaging usually employs a hybrid of these traditional techniques by obtaining the three exposures centered at the hip, knee, and ankle joints with the patient standing upright. Digital postprocessing “stitches” the three images together for equally accurate measurements of the entire lower limbs with lower radiation dose than is used in the film-screen methods.1,2 Although studies are occasionally made of the upper limbs, radiography is most frequently applied to the lower limbs. This chapter explains patient positioning for the three joint exposures, as well as for CT scanograms.

Radiation Protection

Differences in limb length are common in children and may occur in association with various disorders. Patients with unequal limb growth may require yearly imaging evaluations. More frequent examinations may be necessary in patients who have undergone surgical procedures to equalize limb length. For these reasons, radiation protection is a primary consideration in imaging for long bone measurement. Gonad shielding is necessary, as are careful patient positioning, secure immobilization, and accurate centering of a closely collimated beam of radiation to prevent unnecessary repeat exposures. Microdose digital radiography yields the lowest dose but requires specialized equipment, which can be cost-prohibitive. MRI and US have promise as means to safely image for long bone measurement, with recent research demonstrating 99% accuracy and reliability for MRI measurements.1,3

Localization of Joints

For methods that require centering of the central ray above the joints, the following steps should be taken:

In all images made by a single x-ray exposure, the image is larger than the actual body part because the x-ray photons start at a small area on the target of the x-ray tube and diverge as they travel in straight lines through the body to the IR (Fig. 11-1). This magnification can be decreased by putting the body part as close to the IR as possible and using the maximum SID allowed by the equipment. For orthoroentgenography, a metal measurement ruler is placed between the patient's lower limbs, and three exposures are made on the same x-ray IR. The following steps are taken:

If the child holds the leg perfectly still while the three exposures are made, the true distance from the proximal end of the femur to the distal end of the tibia can be directly measured on the image, as follows:

Place a special metal ruler (engraved with radiopaque image-inch [1.3-cm] marks that show when an image is made) under the leg and on top of the table (see Fig. 11-2).

If the IR is placed in the Bucky tray and then is moved between exposures, as for a scanogram (see Fig. 11-2), calculate the length of the femur and tibia by subtracting the numeric values projected over the two joints obtained by simultaneously exposing the patient and the metal ruler.

Another method of measuring the length of the femurs and tibias is to examine both limbs simultaneously (Figs. 11-3 and 11-4):

The bilateral orthoroentgenographic method is reasonably accurate if the limbs are of almost the same length. When more than a slight discrepancy in limb length exists (Fig. 11-5), it is impossible to place the center of the x-ray tube exactly over both knee joints and make a single exposure or exactly over both ankle joints and make a single exposure. In such cases, the tube is centered midway between the two joints; however, this results in bilateral distortion because of the diverging x-ray beam. In Fig. 11-5, the measurement obtained for the right femur is less than the actual length of the bone, whereas the measurement of the left femur is greater than the true length. The following measure can be taken to correct this problem:

Computed Tomography Technique

Helms and McCarthy4 reported a method for using computed tomography (CT) to measure discrepancies in leg length. Temme et al5 compared conventional orthoroentgenograms with CT scans for long bone measurements. Both sets of investigators concluded that the CT scanogram is more consistently reproduced and that it causes less radiation exposure to the patient than the conventional radiographic approach. The CT approach is as follows:

The accuracy of the CT examination depends on proper placement of the cursor. Helms and McCarthy4 found that accuracy improved when the cursors were placed three times and the values obtained were averaged. These authors also reported that CT examinations used radiation doses that were 50 to 200 times less than those used with conventional radiography, while Sabharwal and Kumar1 reported the CT dose as 80% less than that of orthoroentgenograms. CT examination requires about the same amount of time as conventional radiography, and the costs are comparable.1