Chapter 40 The pelvic floor
Perineal injury has occurred during childbirth throughout the ages and various methods and materials were used by accoucheurs in an attempt to restore the integrity of severely traumatized tissue. The earliest evidence of extensive perineal injury sustained during childbirth exists in the mummy of Henhenit, a Nubian woman aged approximately 22 years, from the harem of King Mentuhotep II of Egypt, 2050 BC (Derry 1935, Graham 1950, Magdi 1949). Despite the fact that maternity care has greatly improved over the past decade, women continue to suffer the consequences of pelvic floor damage resulting from childbirth.
The development of the upright posture in humans has been the dominant factor in the evolution of the pelvic floor (Benson 1992). Its main function is to provide support for the pelvic and abdominal organs and it must be strong to oppose the forces of gravity and increases in abdominal pressure. Childbirth is a known source of pelvic floor damage, causing muscle weakness, incontinence, and prolapse of the pelvic organs.
The midwife must have a sound understanding of the structure and function of the pelvic floor in order to apply this knowledge to minimize any associated morbidity during the process of childbirth.
The ischial spines are key landmarks in understanding the location and structure of the pelvic floor. They lie laterally, in a plane which spans the pelvic cavity where many important parts of the pelvic floor are attached (Benson 1992). The soft tissues, which form the pelvic floor, fill the outlet of the bony pelvis forming a ‘sling’, which is higher posteriorly (Verralls 1993). In the female, the urethra, vagina, and rectum pass through its structures. It consists of the following six layers extending from the pelvic peritoneum above to the skin of the vulva, perineum, and buttocks below:
This forms a smooth covering over the uterus and fallopian tubes. Anteriorly it forms the uterovesical pouch and covers the upper surface of the bladder. Posteriorly it forms the pouch of Douglas. Laterally it covers the fallopian tubes and forms the broad ligaments, which do not act as supports.
This connective tissue fills the space between the pelvic organs lining the pelvic cavity walls. Its function is to provide support for the organs, whilst at the same time allowing them to move within the limits of normal function (Verralls 1993). In areas where extra support is needed, it thickens to form the pelvic ligaments:
This is formed mainly from symmetrically paired muscles, varying in thickness, collectively known as the levator ani. They arise at the inner circumference of the true pelvis from the white line of the obturator fascia and decussate midline between the urethra, vagina, and rectum. The muscle fibres pass downwards and backwards and are inserted medially into the upper vagina, perineal body, anal canal, anococcygeal body, coccyx, and lower borders of the sacrum.
The main function is to provide a strong sling to support the pelvic organs and to counteract any increase in the intra-abdominal pressure during coughing and laughing. When the levator ani is contracted, the pelvic floor and perineum are lifted upwards – an important mechanism to maintain continence.
The deep muscles are named after the corresponding fused bones of the innominate bone (pubis, ilium and ischium) (Fig. 40.1):
Figure 40.1 Muscles of the pelvic floor seen in the female perineum.
(From Principles of Anatomy and Physiology, 7th edn, by Tortora, G.J. and Grabowski, S.R.
Blood supply is via the pudendal arteries and branches of the internal iliac artery, and the venous drainage is via corresponding veins. Lymphatic drainage is via the inguinal and external internal iliac glands and the nerve supply is via the third and fourth sacral nerves.
These are less important than the levator ani muscles; but contribute to the overall strength of the pelvic floor and likely to be damaged during vaginal delivery (Fig. 40.1):
This is a triangular-shaped structure consisting of muscular and fibrous tissue, situated between the vagina and the anal canal, with the ischial tuberosities laterally. Each side of the triangle is approximately 3.5 cm in length: the base is the perineal skin and the apex points inwards. This is an integral part of the pelvic floor, since it is the central point where the levator ani and most of the superficial muscles unite. Blood is supplied by the pudendal arteries and venous drainage is into the corresponding veins. Lymph drains into the inguinal and external iliac glands. The nerve supply is derived from the perineal branch of the pudendal nerve.
During pregnancy, the hormone relaxin softens the pelvic muscles and ligaments, allowing them to stretch during parturition to allow the passage of the term infant. After delivery, the pelvic floor is able to contract back to resume its original supporting function in a surprisingly short time, because of its remarkable elasticity.
Prolonged, repeated or extreme stretching of the pelvic floor muscles may cause permanent damage, resulting in loss of tone and elasticity. If these muscles fail to support the pelvic organs, prolapse results, though this may not manifest until later life when postmenopausal oestrogen deficiencies may predispose to muscle weakness (Haadem et al 1991). (For long term effects, please see website.)
Anterior perineal trauma is any injury to the labia, anterior vagina, urethra, or clitoris and is associated with less morbidity.
Posterior perineal trauma is any injury to the posterior vaginal wall, perineal muscles, or anal sphincters (external and internal) and may include disruption of the rectal mucosa.
Perineal trauma may occur spontaneously during vaginal birth or through intentional surgical incision (episiotomy) by the midwife or obstetrician to increase the diameter of the vulval outlet and facilitate delivery.
Over 85% of women who have a vaginal birth will sustain some form of perineal trauma (McCandlish et al 1998) and up to 69% of these will require stitches (McCandlish et al 1998, Sleep et al 1984).
Rates will vary considerably according to individual practices and hospital policies throughout the world, illustrated by wide variations in episiotomy rates internationally from 8% in the Netherlands, 13% in England and 43% in the USA, to 99% in the Eastern European countries (Graham & Graham 1997, Graves 1995, Statistical Bulletin 2003, Wagner 1994).
Certain intrapartum interventions or alternative forms of care may also affect the rate and extent of perineal trauma; including continuous support during labour, delivery position, epidural anaesthesia, style of pushing, restricted use of episiotomy and ventouse delivery (Kettle 1999, 2001).
Perineal trauma occurs during spontaneous or assisted vaginal delivery and is usually more extensive after the first vaginal birth (Sultan et al 1996). Women who have no visible damage may be subject to transient pudendal or peripheral nerve injury due to prolonged active pushing or pressure exerted by the fetal head on the surrounding structures (Allen et al 1990).
Associated risk factors include:
In the UK, approximately 23–42% of women will have perineal pain and discomfort up to 10–12 days following vaginal delivery and 7–10% of these women will continue to have long-term pain up to 18 months post partum (Glazener et al 1995, Gordon et al 1998, Grant et al 2001, McCandlish et al 1998, Mackrodt et al 1998, Sleep et al 1984).
In terms of sexual function, 62–88% of women will resume intercourse by 8–12 weeks postpartum, though 17–23% of women experience superficial dyspareunia at 3 months after delivery and 10–14% will continue to have pain at 12 months (Barrett et al 2000, Glazener 1997, Gordon et al 1998, Grant et al 2001, Kettle et al 2002, Mackrodt et al 1998).
Estimation of the extent of urinary and faecal incontinence is difficult because of under-reporting of these problems due to the sensitive nature of the complaint (Sultan et al 1996). One survey found that 15.2% of participating women (number 1782) reported stress incontinence which started for the first time within 3 months of the baby’s birth, and 75% of these still had problems over a year later (MacArthur et al 1993). Sleep & Grant (1987) and MacArthur et al (1997) found that up to 4% of women reported occasional loss of bowel control.
The midwife can contribute to reducing the extent and rate of perineal trauma by reviewing the woman’s lifestyle and giving appropriate advice regarding diet, smoking, exercise, and perineal massage. Being healthy and well nourished should ensure optimum condition of the perineal tissue prior to labour. Current evidence supports the use of antenatal perineal massage for preserving the integrity of the perineum, particularly in women having their first vaginal birth (Labrecque et al 2000, 2001). Women wishing to carry out this practice should be instructed to perform perineal massage from 34–35 weeks’ gestation for 5–10 minutes daily using sweet almond oil (Labrecque et al 1999, Shipman et al 1997).
Midwives should also instruct and encourage women to carry out regular antenatal pelvic floor exercises to strengthen the muscles in preparation for childbirth and to continue these excercises into the postnatal period to reinnervate and increase the pelvic floor muscle tone in order to reduce any associated morbidity such as stress incontinence (Mason et al 2001).
Tears usually extend downwards from the posterior and/or lateral vaginal walls, through the hymenal remnants, midline downwards towards the anal margin, in the weakest part of the stretched perineum. Occasionally, they occur in a circular direction, behind the hymenal remnants, extending bilaterally upwards towards the clitoris and detaching the lower third of the vagina from the underlying structures (Sultan et al 1994a). This complex trauma causes vast disruption to the perineal body and muscles but the perineal skin may remain intact, making it difficult to repair.
A cervical tear may result if an instrumental delivery (forceps or ventouse) is attempted before the cervix is fully dilated or the woman forcibly pushes the fetus through a cervix that is incompletely dilated (Oats & Abraham 2010).
Bleeding is usually very severe and will persist despite the uterus being well contracted. Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) resulting from a cervical tear must be managed appropriately and efficiently according to guidelines (NICE 2007), as mismanagement can cause maternal mortality (see Ch. 68). Once the maternal condition has been stabilized, a skilled operator must repair the cervical tear in a theatre with good lighting, appropriate assistance, and adequate anaesthesia.
Episiotomy is a surgical incision of the perineum made to increase the diameter of the vulval outlet during childbirth.
Straight, blunt-ended Mayo episiotomy scissors are usually used because it is thought that there is less risk of accidental damage to the baby, and haemostasis of the cut tissue is promoted by the crushing action as the incision is made. Some professionals favour the scalpel and feel that it minimizes trauma to the tissues which allows better healing of the perineal wound, though no data support the validity of either of these claims (Sleep et al 1989).
An episiotomy should not be carried out routinely during spontaneous vaginal birth, and should only be performed if there are specific clinical needs as documented below. It should not be offered routinely following previous third- or fourth-degree trauma.
Prior to performing the incision, informed consent must always be obtained from the woman and analgesia should always be administered, except in an emergency if there is acute fetal compromise (NICE 2007).
There are two main types of incision:
Figure 40.2 Diagrammatic representation of a right mediolateral episiotomy showing the muscles involved when the incision is made.
Reflective activity 40.1
Find out what the episiotomy rate is for spontaneous vaginal deliveries in the maternity unit where you are working.
An episiotomy must only be made when the presenting part is distending the perineal tissues; otherwise it will fail to accelerate delivery and excessive bleeding may occur.
The following are not absolute, and clinical discretion must always be used:
NB: There is no scientific evidence to support the routine procedure of episiotomy to prevent intracranial haemorrhage in preterm deliveries (Woolley 1995).
NB: The risks are clearly increased with a high episiotomy rate.
Prior to performing the episiotomy, the midwife must prepare the delivery trolley and equipment according to the practice policies and guidelines of the individual employing policies. Safety glasses and gloves must be worn during all obstetric procedures, to protect the operator against HIV and hepatitis infection. The woman’s dignity and comfort must be maintained throughout the procedure (see Table 40.1). There is some debate about the incision to be used – please see website.
Table 40.1 Procedure for mediolateral episiotomy
Action | Rationale |
---|---|
1. Explain the procedure and indications to the woman and her partner | 1. To reassure the woman and confirm consent |
2. Place the woman in a comfortable position with her legs open | 2. To ensure that the whole perineal area is accessible |
3. Cleanse the perineal area using the agreed aseptic technique | 3. To minimize infection |
4. Place the index and middle fingers into the vagina between the presenting part and perineum. Insert the needle fully into the perineal tissue starting at the centre of the fourchette and directing it midway between the ischial tuberosity and anus | 4. To protect the baby from accidental damage |
5. Draw back the plunger of the syringe prior to injecting 5–10 mL of local anaesthetic, 1% lidocaine, slowly into the tissue as the needle is withdrawn | 5. To check that the lidocaine is not accidentally injected into a blood vessel and to provide effective anaesthesia to facilitate a pain-free incision |
6. Insert the middle and index fingers into the vagina and gently pull the perineum away from the presenting fetal part | 6. To protect the presenting fetal part from accidental damage |
7. Perform the incision when the presenting part has distended the perineum | 7. To minimize pain and blood loss |
8. Insert the open scissors between the two fingers and make the incision in one single cut | 8. To ensure a straight cut, minimize severe perineal damage and facilitate optimum anatomical realignment |
9. Perform the incision – it should extend at least 3–4 cm into the perineum. The incision should start midline from the centre of the fourchette and then extend outwards in a mediolateral direction, avoiding the anal sphincter(s). Withdraw the scissors carefully |
9. To increase the vulval outlet and facilitate delivery |
10. Control delivery of the presenting part and shoulders | 10. To prevent sudden expulsion of the presenting part and extension of the episiotomy incision |
11. Apply pressure to the episiotomy incision between contractions if there is a delay in delivering the baby | 11. To control bleeding from the wound |
12. Thoroughly inspect the vagina and perineum, including a rectal examination, following completion of the third stage | 12. To identify the extent of trauma prior to repair |
There seems to be no consensus as to the recommended episiotomy rate. The World Health Organization suggests that an episiotomy rate of 10%, for normal deliveries, would be ‘a good goal to pursue’ (WHO 1996).
Episiotomy has been described as the unkindest cut, but with limited evidence about use and efficacy, has been introduced into maternity care in the UK (see website).
Major variations in current national rates indicate uncertain justification for this practice (Audit Commission 1997).
Some argue that episiotomy causes more pain, weakens pelvic floor structures, interferes with breastfeeding and increases sexual problems (Greenshields & Hulme 1993, Kitzinger & Walters 1981). Others argue that episiotomy reduces the incidence of severe perineal trauma and prevents overstretching of pelvic floor muscles, so reducing the risk of stress incontinence and uterine prolapse (Donald 1979, Flood 1982). However, research carried out by Klein et al (1994) found that women who delivered with an intact perineum or spontaneous perineal tear had less pain, stronger pelvic floor muscles, and better sexual function when compared to those with an episiotomy, at 3 months postpartum.
Midwives should restrict the use of episiotomy to specific fetal and maternal indications. Previous randomized controlled trials comparing restricted to liberal use of episiotomy found that a restricted policy is associated with lower rates of posterior perineal trauma, less suturing, and reduction in pain and healing complications (Carroli & Belizan 2001). This results in a lower rate of maternal morbidity and may have significant cost-saving implications for suture materials (Carroli & Belizan 2001, Sleep et al 1984).
In the UK, the theory and technique of perineal repair has been included in the midwifery curriculum since 1983 (Silverton 1993). By 1986, midwives were repairing perineal trauma in over 60% of consultant units in England and Wales (Garcia et al 1986), thus achieving increased continuity of care, prompt sensitive repair, and increased job satisfaction.
The ideal suture material should cause minimal tissue reaction and be absorbed once it has served its purpose of holding the tissue in apposition during the healing process (Taylor & Karran 1996). Well-aligned perineal wounds heal by primary intention with minimal complications, usually within 2 weeks of suturing. However, if the stitches remain in the tissues for longer than this period, they act as a foreign body and may impair healing, causing irritation. Local infection of the stitches will prolong the inflammatory phase and cause further tissue damage, which will delay collagen synthesis and epithelialization (Flanagan 1997).
Perineal repair using absorbable synthetic material, such as polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) or polyglycolic acid (Dexon), reduces short-term pain, though long-term effects are less clear and there are some concerns regarding the need to remove sutures up to 3 months after delivery (Kettle & Johanson 2001).
Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) – carried out by Gemynthe et al (1996), McElhinney et al (2000) and Kettle et al (2002) – compared rapidly absorbed polyglactin 910 (Vicryl Rapide) to standard polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) and found no overall difference in short-term perineal pain between groups, but a significant reduction in the need for suture removal up to 3 months following childbirth with the rapidly absorbed material. Two of the trials (Gemynthe et al 1996, Kettle et al 2002) found a significant reduction in ‘pain when walking’ at 10–14 days postpartum. One trial (McElhinney et al 2000) reported a reduction in superficial dyspareunia at 3 months postpartum. This evidence suggests that Vicryl Rapide is the ideal suture material for perineal repair (NICE 2007).
The arguments for recommended suture techniques for primary repair of perineal trauma are given on the website.
Two RCTs compared suturing the vagina and perineal muscles, leaving the perineal skin unsutured, to the conventional method of suturing the vagina, perineal muscles and skin (Gordon et al 1998, Oboro et al 2003). The UK study found no significant difference in perineal pain at 10 days postpartum between groups (Gordon et al 1998), though the Nigerian study indicated a reduction in perineal pain at 48 hours, 14 days, 6 weeks, and 3 months following birth when the skin was left unsutured (Oboro et al 2003).
Two small trials looked at the use of tissue adhesive for closure of perineal skin following second-degree tear or episiotomy (Adoni & Anteby 1991, Rogerson et al 2000). Both trials claim that this method is effective, but the results must be interpreted with caution owing to the poor methodological design of these studies and the small number of participants included.
Perineal tears and episiotomies are repaired under aseptic conditions with a good source of light and the mother in a comfortable position so that the trauma can be easily visualized. Lithotomy poles to support the woman’s legs during the repair are unnecessary and might bring back ‘locked in’ memories of sexual abuse, making the woman feel helpless and out of control (Walton 1994). Also, leg restraints (lithotomy poles) cause flexion and abduction of the woman’s hips which results in excessive stretching of the perineum, causing the episiotomy or tear to gape (Borgatta 1989). Apart from being uncomfortable for the woman, this can make the trauma difficult for the operator to realign and suture. There is no need to use a tampon.
Table 40.2 Procedure for continuous method of perineal repair
Action | Rationale |
---|---|
1. Explain the procedure to the woman and her partner | 1. To reassure the woman and confirm consent |
2. Check maternal baseline observations and PV blood loss | 2. To ensure that the woman’s general condition is stable prior to commencing the repair |
3. Assess the extent of perineal trauma | 3. To ensure the repair is not beyond the operator’s level of competence |
4. Ensure that the woman is in an appropriate position | 4. To ensure that the whole perineal area is accessible |
5. Cleanse the vulva and perineal area. Drape the area with a sterile lithotomy towel | 5. To minimize risk of infection |
6. Identify anatomical landmarks. These may include hymenal remnants and tissue of different colour | 6. To aid the operator to correctly align and approximate the traumatized tissue NB: Misalignment may cause long-term morbidity such as dyspareunia |
7. Draw back the plunger of the syringe prior to injecting 10–20 mL of local anaesthetic, 1% lidocaine, slowly into the traumatized tissue, ensuring even distribution | 7. To check that the lidocaine is not accidentally injected into a blood vessel and to provide effective anaesthesia to facilitate a pain-free repair |
8. Identify the apex of the vaginal trauma and insert the first stitch 5–10 mm above this point | 8. To ensure haemostasis of any bleeding vessels that may have retracted beyond the apex |
9. Suture posterior vaginal trauma using a loose continuous non-locking stitch. Continue to the hymenal remnants taking care not to make the stitches too wide | 9. To appose the edges of traumatized vaginal mucosa and muscle without causing shortening or narrowing of the vagina |
10. Ensure that each stitch reaches the trough of the traumatized tissue | 10. To close dead space, achieve haemostasis and prevent paravaginal haematoma formation |
11. Visualize the needle at the trough of the trauma each time it is inserted | 11. To prevent sutures being inserted through the rectal mucosa NB: A recto-vaginal fistula may form if this occurs |
12. Bring the needle through the tissue underneath the hymenal ring and continue to repair the deep and superficial muscles using a loose continuous stitch | 12. To realign the perineal muscles, close the dead space, achieve haemostasis and minimize the risk of haematoma formation |
13. Reverse the stitching direction at the inferior aspect of the trauma and place the stitches loosely in the subcutaneous layer, approximately 5–10 mm apart | 13. To appose skin edges and complete the perineal repair |
14. Do not pull the stitches too tight | 14. To prevent discomfort from overtight sutures if reactionary oedema and swelling occur |
15. Complete the subcutaneous repair to the hymenal ring, swing the needle under the tissue into the vagina and complete the repair using a terminal loop knot | 15. To secure the stitches |
16. Inspect the repaired perineal trauma | 16. To ensure the trauma has been sutured correctly and that haemostasis has been achieved Check that there is no excessive bleeding from the uterus |
17. Insert two fingers gently into the vagina | 17. To confirm that the introitus and vagina have not been stitched too tightly |
18. Perform a rectal examination | 18. To confirm that no sutures have penetrated the rectal mucosa |
19. Cleanse and dry the perineal area. Apply a sterile pad | 19. To minimize infection |
20. Check and record that all swabs, needles and instruments are correct | 20. To confirm that all equipment and materials used are complete and accounted for |
21. Place the woman in the position of her choice | 21. To ensure that the woman is made comfortable following the procedure |
22. Complete the appropriate documentation | 22. To fulfil statutory requirements and to provide an accurate account of the repair |
If the woman has a working epidural, it may be topped up to provide effective perineal area anaesthesia instead of injecting local anaesthetic. Khan & Lilford (1987) recommend that even if an epidural is used, the perineal wound should be infiltrated with normal saline or local anaesthetic to mimic tissue oedema and prevent overtight suturing.
Prior to performing the repair, the midwife must prepare the suturing trolley and check equipment according to individual employing authorities’ practice guidelines. The woman’s comfort and dignity must be maintained throughout the procedure.
The area should be cleaned according to the individual unit’s guidelines; however, a study by Calkin (1996) found that tapwater was just as effective as chlorhexidine antiseptic.
The method of performing the repair is shown in Figure 40.3 and the rationale for each stage of the process is given in Table 40.2.
On completion of perineal repair, the woman should be given advice regarding:
These are usually superficial but can be very painful. Some practitioners do not recommend that these are sutured; however, if the trauma is bilateral, sometimes the lacerations heal together over the urethra, causing voiding difficulties.
The effects of not suturing deeper perineal trauma, such as second-degree tears or episiotomies, have not yet been robustly evaluated, though some practitioners appear to have adopted a non-suturing policy without reliable evidence to support their practice (see website).
Until robust evidence is available to support this controversial practice, midwives must be cautious about leaving trauma other than small first-degree tears unsutured unless it is the explicit wish of the woman. There is an urgent need for a large randomized controlled trial to be undertaken comparing non-suturing versus suturing of second-degree perineal trauma with long-term follow-up. Practice must be based upon scientific principles.
The reported incidence of clinically detectable anal sphincter injuries following childbirth ranges from 0.5% to 3% (Sultan et al 1994b, Tetzschner et al 1996), though the full extent of the problem is probably underestimated. Some third-degree tears may not be recognized following vaginal delivery (Andrews et al 2006, Groome & Paterson Brown 2000). Studies found that with increased vigilance and improvement in clinical skills, the detection of anal sphincter disruption could be vastly improved. If this type of trauma is not recognized after delivery, women can be left with long-term problems including incontinence of faeces and flatulence. Anal incontinence following anal sphincter injury varies between 7% and 59% (Goffeng et al 1998, Kamm 1994, Tetzschner et al 1996), but again may be higher due to non-reporting. In one study, only one-third of the participants with faecal incontinence had ever discussed their problem with a physician (Johanson & Lafferty 1996).
Midwives and medical staff must be aware of this type of trauma and be adequately trained to identify anal sphincter injuries when they occur (Fig. 40.4). (See website for associated risk factors.)
All perineal trauma must be thoroughly examined with the aid of a good light source and the extent of injury must be accurately documented in the hospital case notes. When assessing perineal injury after delivery, a rectal examination should be routinely performed to avoid missing anal sphincter trauma. If a third- or fourth-degree tear is suspected, it must be checked by an independent experienced practitioner.
For further information on third- and fourth-degree repair, please see website.
Litigation is a major concern for all practitioners; however, a competent midwife has little to fear if she works within the parameters of the employing authority’s policies and guidelines, and the midwives’ rules (NMC 2004). In an action for damages, practitioners may be held personally liable if it can be shown that they failed to exercise appropriate skills and work within their professional boundaries.
Conclusion
Mismanagement of perineal trauma has a major impact on women’s health and has significant implications for health service resources. Midwives must base their practice on current research evidence and be aware of problems associated with perineal trauma and repair. Careful identification and repair of trauma by a skilled practitioner may avoid problems. It is important that prompt sensitive treatment is provided for those women with problems in order to reduce the morbidity associated with perineal injury following childbirth.
Adoni A, Anteby E. The use of Histoacryl for episiotomy repair. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1991;98(5):446-478.
Allen RE, Hosker GL, Smith ARB, et al. Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neurophysiological study. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1990;97(9):770-779.
Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, et al. Occult anal sphincter injuries – myth or reality? BJOG. 2006;113(2):195-200.
Audit Commission. First class delivery: improving maternity services in England and Wales. London: Audit Commission; 1997.
Barrett G, Pendry E, Peacock J, et al. Women’s sexual health after childbirth. BJOG. 2000;107(2):186-195.
Benson JT. Female pelvic floor disorders: investigation and management. London: Norton Medical Books; 1992.
Borgatta L. Association of episiotomy and delivery position with deep perineal laceration during spontaneous delivery in nulliparous women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1989;160(2):294-297.
Calkin S. Chlorhexidine swabbing in labour. Modern Midwife. 1996;6(1):28-33.
Carroli G, Belizan J: Episiotomy for vaginal birth (Cochrane Review) The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, Oxford, 2001, Update Software.
Coats PM, Chan KK, Wilkins M, et al. A comparison between midline and mediolateral episiotomies. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1980;87(5):408-412.
Derry DE. Notes on five pelves of women of the eleventh dynasty in Egypt. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Empire. 1935;42(13):490-495.
Donald I. Practical obstetric problems. London: Lloyd-Luke; 1979.
Flanagan M. Wound management. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1997.
Flood C. The real reasons for performing episiotomies. World Medicine. 1982;6:51.
Garcia J, Garforth S, Ayers S. Midwives confined? Labour ward policies and routines. Research and the Midwife Conference Proceedings. 1986:2-30.
Gemynthe A, Langhoff-Ross J, Sahl S, et al. New VICRYL formulation: an improved method of perineal repair? British Journal of Midwifery. 1996;4(5):230-234.
Glazener CM. Sexual function after childbirth: women’s experiences, persistent morbidity and lack of professional recognition. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1997;104(3):330-335.
Glazener CMA, Abdalla M, Stroud P, et al. Postnatal maternal morbidity: extent, causes, prevention and treatment. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1995;102(4):286-287.
Goffeng AR, Andersch B, Andersson M, et al. Objective methods cannot predict anal incontinence after primary repair of extensive anal tears. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 1998;77(4):439-443.
Gordon B, Mackrodt C, Fern E, et al. The Ipswich Childbirth Study: 1. A randomised evaluation of two stage postpartum perineal repair leaving the skin unsutured. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1998;105(4):435-440.
Graham H. Eternal Eve. London: William Heinemann Medical Books; 1950.
Graham ID, Graham DF. Episiotomy counts: trends and prevalence in Canada, 1981/1982 to 1993/1994. Birth. 1997;24(3):141-147.
Grant A, Gordon B, Mackrodat C, et al. The Ipswich Childbirth study: one year follow up of alternative methods of perineal repair. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;108(1):34-40.
Graves EJ. 1993 summary: National Hospital Discharge Survey. Advance Data. 1995;264:1-11.
Greenshields W, Hulme H. The perineum in childbirth: a survey of women’s experiences and midwifery practices. London: National Childbirth Trust; 1993.
Groome KM, Paterson-Brown S. Third degree tears. are they clinically underdiagnosed? Gastroenterology International. 2000;13(2):76.
Haadem K, Ling L, Ferno M, et al. Estrogen receptors in the external anal sphincter. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1991;164(2):609-610.
Johanson JF, Lafferty J. Epidemiology of faecal incontinence: the silent affliction. American Journal of Gastroenterology. 1996;91(1):33-36.
Kamm MA. Obstetric damage and faecal incontinence. Lancet. 1994;344(8924):730-733.
Keighley MRB, Radley S, Johanson R. Consensus on prevention and management of post-obstetric bowel incontinence and third degree tear. Clinical Risk. 2000;6:211-217.
Kettle C. Perineal tears. Nursing Times Clinical Monograph. London: Nursing Times Books, 1999.
Kettle C. Perineal care. In: BMJ clinical evidence – a compendium of the best available evidence for effective health care. London: BMJ Publishing; 2001.
Kettle C, Johanson RB: Absorbable synthetic vs catgut suture material for perineal repair (Cochrane Review), The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, Oxford, 2001, Update Software.
Kettle C, Hills RK, Jones P, et al. Continuous versus interrupted perineal repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after spontaneous vaginal birth: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2002;359(9325):2217-2223.
Khan GQ, Lilford RJ. Wound pain may be reduced by prior infiltration of the episiotomy site after delivery under spinal epidural anaesthetic. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1987;94(4):341-344.
Kitzinger S, Walters R. Episiotomy – physical and emotional aspects. London: National Childbirth Trust; 1981.
Klein MC, Gauthier RJ, Robbins JM, et al. Relationship of episiotomy to perineal trauma and morbidity, sexual function, and pelvic floor relaxation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1994;171(3):591-598.
Labrecque M, Eason E, Marcoux S, et al. Randomised controlled trial of prevention of perineal trauma by perineal massage during pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1999;180(3 pt 1):593-600.
Labrecque M, Eason E, Marcoux S. Randomised trial of perineal massage during pregnancy: perineal symptoms three months after delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2000;182(1 pt 1):76-80.
Labrecque M, Eason E, Marcoux S. Women’s views on the practice of perineal massage. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2001;108(5):499-504.
MacArthur C, Lewi M, Bick D. Stress incontinence after childbirth. British Journal of Midwifery. 1993;1(5):207-215.
MacArthur C, Bick D, Keighley MR. Faecal incontinence after childbirth. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1997;104(1):46-50.
McCandlish R, Bowler U, van Asten H, et al. A randomised controlled trial of care of the perineum during second stage of normal labour. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1998;105(12):1262-1272.
McElhinney BR, Glenn DR, Dornan G, et al. Episiotomy repair: Vicryl versus Vicryl rapide. Ulster Medical Journal. 2000;69(1):27-29.
Mackrodt C, Gordon B, Fern E, et al. The Ipswich Childbirth Study: 2. A randomised comparison of suture materials and suturing techniques for repair of perineal trauma. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1998;105(4):441-445.
Magdi I. Obstetric injuries of the perineum. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Empire. 1949;49:697-700.
Marshall JE, Raynor MD. Advancing skills in midwifery practice. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2010.
Mason L, Glenn S, Walton I, et al. The instruction in pelvic floor exercises provided to women during pregnancy or following delivery. Midwifery. 2001;17(1):55-64.
Mikhailidis DP, Bauadas MA, Jeremy JY, et al. Cigarette smoking inhibits prostacycline formation. The Lancet. 1983;2(8350):627-628.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. Guideline No. 55. London: NICE, 2007.
Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC). Midwives rules and standards. London: NMC; 2004.
Oats JK, Abraham S. Llewellyn-Jones fundamentals of obstetrics and gynaecology, ed 9. London: Mosby; 2010.
Oboro VO, Tabowei TO, Loto OM, et al. Multicentre evaluation of the two-layered repair of postpartum perineal trauma. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2003;23(1):5-8.
Renfrew M, Hannah W, Albers L, et al. Practices that minimize trauma to the genital tract in childbirth: a systematic review of the literature. Birth. 1998;25(3):143-159.
Rogerson L, Mason GC, Roberts AC. Preliminary experience with twenty perineal repairs using Indermil tissue adhesive. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2000;88(2):139-142.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Shoulder dystocia. Green-top Guideline No 42. London: RCOG, 2005.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Management of third and fourth degree perineal tears following vaginal delivery. Green-top Guideline No 29 (revised version). London: RCOG, 2007.
Shipman M, Boniface D, Tefft M, et al. Antenatal perineal massage and subsequent perineal outcomes: a randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1997;104:787-791.
Silverton L. The art and science of midwifery. London: Prentice Hall; 1993.
Sleep J, Grant A, Garcia J, et al. West Berkshire perineal management trial. British Medical Journal. 1984;298(6445):587-690.
Sleep J, Grant A. Pelvic floor exercises in postnatal care. Midwifery. 1987;3(4):158-164.
Sleep J, Roberts J, Chalmers I. Care during the second stage of labour. In: Chalmers I, Enkin MW, Keirse MJNC, editors. Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989:1129-1141.
Statistical Bulletin. NHS maternity statistics England: 2001–2002. London: DH; 2003.
Sultan AH. Editorial: Obstetrics perineal injury and anal incontinence. Clinical Risk. 1999;5:193-196.
Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Bartram CI, et al. Perineal damage at delivery. Contemporary Review of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1994;6:8-24.
Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, et al. Third degree anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. British Medical Journal. 1994;308(6933):887-891.
Sultan AH, Monga AK, Stanton SL. The pelvic sequelae of childbirth. British Journal of Hospital Medicine. 1996;55(9):575-579.
Taylor I, Karran SJ, editors. Surgical principles. London: Oxford University Press, 1996, 28.
Tetzschner T, Sorenson M, Lose G, et al. Anal and urinary incontinence in women with obstetric anal sphincter rupture. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1996;103(10):1034-1040.
Thacker SB, Banta D. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature 1860–1880. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 1983;38(6):322-335.
Towler J. Cigarette smoking and its effects on wound healing. Journal of Wound Care. 2000;9(3):100-104.
Verralls S. Anatomy and physiology applied to obstetrics, ed 3. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1993.
Wagner M. Pursuing the birth machine: the search for appropriate birth technology. Camperdown: ACE Graphics; 1994. pp 165–174
Walton I. Sexuality and motherhood. Hale: Books for Midwives; 1994. p. 125
Woolley RJ. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: a review of the English-language literature since 1980. Part II. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 1995;50(11):821-835.
World Health Organization (WHO) Maternal and Newborn Health/Safe Motherhood Unit: (1996) Care in normal birth: a practical guide (report of a technical working group), Doc. No. WHO/FRH/MSM/96.24, Geneva, 1996, WHO, p. 29.