Chapter 19 Developmental theories

Sue Nagy

KEY TERMS

LEARNING OUTCOMES

Mastery of content will enable you to:

Define the key terms listed.

Describe biophysical developmental theories under the categories of genetic theory, non-genetic cellular theories and the physiological theories of ageing.

Describe and compare the psychosocial theories proposed by Freud, Erikson and Havighurst.

Describe Piaget’s theory of cognitive development.

Discuss how Kohlberg built on Piaget’s stages of moral development.

Discuss Gilligan’s criticism of Kohlberg’s moral developmental stage theory.

Apply developmental theories when planning interventions in the care of clients.

This chapter is concerned with explanations of the way we grow and develop throughout our life spans. When we understand the demands on our patients because of the rate and manner of their growth and development, physically, socially and psychologically, we are better placed to help them to achieve their optimal health status and support them during periods of illness. We are also able to provide developmentally and culturally appropriate care for our patients.

Developmental theories have been described that help nurses to use critical-thinking skills when asking how and why people respond as they do. From the diverse set of theories included in this chapter, the complexity of human behaviour is obvious. No one theory successfully describes human growth and development in all of its complexity. Theorists themselves demonstrate their own values and beliefs in their focus and the subjects chosen for their work. They work within a cultural and historical context. It is important to keep this in mind when applying theories. Current trends in developmental research focus more on the dynamics and processes of change and transition, and less on content or a static or still view of life at a particular stage. Keeping abreast of trends in research in psychosocial disciplines is important for nurses if they are to be at the cutting edge of health research and practice innovation.

Growth and development is not a linear process, as most theories suggest they are, but multidimensional. The theories included are meant to be the basis of a meaningful observation of an individual’s pattern of growth and development. All theories require validation through research to become fact. They are, however, valuable guidelines for understanding important human processes that can allow nurses to begin to anticipate human behaviours and responses in specific health situations.

Growth versus development

First, it is important to be aware of the difference between growth and development. Growth refers to the quantitative changes that can be measured and compared with norms, for example taking the height and weight of a paediatric client and comparing the measurements with standardised growth charts. Development implies a progressive and continuous process of change leading to a state of organised and specialised functional capacity, for example a child’s progression from rolling over to crawling to walking. Another example of development is the transition a child makes from the very concrete thinking of a young child to the ability of the adolescent to understand ideas and concepts.

Theories of growth and development

Without necessarily being aware of doing so, we frequently use theories to guide our behaviour in our daily lives. Theories are not just best guesses; they are based on information from our existing knowledge and previous experiences. For example, I have a theory that if I drive my car through a red light there can be three possible outcomes. First, I may have an accident, crashing into another car or pedestrian; second, I may be fined and lose demerit points on my licence; or third, I may be lucky and get away with it without an accident or getting caught. This is a simple theory based on what normally happens in a specific circumstance and the logical possibilities. Such a theory can be used to guide the way we behave, taking into account the likelihood of each outcome so that a favourable one is more likely. In the example above, knowing the chances of each outcome of driving through a red light may guide us to make a sensible and informed decision. Of course there are many other factors that will influence such decisions, such as if we are affected by alcohol, in a great hurry, and so on.

Theories are, therefore, series of logically connected hypotheses based on evidence about particular situations which allow us to explain and predict potential outcomes. The example of the red light is not a very complex situation compared with a theory about the kind of conditions required for a child to develop into a physically, emotionally and socially healthy adult. Complex situations require more-complicated theories with many propositions. Some of these theories are the subject of this chapter. Nurses who have a good understanding of growth and development at different ages can provide invaluable assistance to patients, children and caregivers.

When we try to understand what a person needs to develop into the best adult he or she can be and to maintain that state throughout adulthood, we have a very complex situation with multiple factors feeding into it. To understand the formation of human personality requires not just one but many theories about each aspect of its development. These aspects include personality and physical and cognitive abilities, as well as a person’s ability to make ethical decisions that affect the wellbeing of others. Understanding how people develop psychosocially, physically, cognitively and morally is tremendously important for nurses because we meet people when they are often facing some of the crisis points in their lives. The way they deal with these crises can have ramifications for the rest of their lives. Sensitive and knowledgeable support from healthcare professionals can help people negotiate these crises more effectively.

Theories of human growth and development were developed through systematic observations of people as they went about their daily lives. There are, however, several caveats that we should bear in mind when applying such theories to specific situations. First, while theories are built upon layers of evidence, they apply in many but not absolutely all circumstances. Second, it is very difficult to be certain of developmental predictions because it is often impossible to undertake systematic research to test them, partly because it is not possible to compare results with control groups. Third, it is important to keep in mind that it is not possible for any theorist to observe people from all cultures, so that the theories are necessarily culturally based and their propositions may not be universally applicable. Indeed, attempts to generalise across cultures inevitably give rise to erroneous conclusions. For example, Australia and New Zealand are multicultural societies and as nurses we will care for people from diverse backgrounds which are beyond the experience of the nurses caring for them. Having said this, we know that people are more similar than different, so developmental theories can often provide a useful guide about what to expect at various stages of life—providing they are not applied too rigidly. In this chapter we consider theories about the four major areas of human development: biophysical, psychosocial, cognitive and moral.

Biophysical development

Biophysical development is concerned with the way our bodies change physically over time. In the following sections we look at theories about how children develop as they grow and how adults change as they age.

As infants grow into adults, their physical changes can be measured. Such measurements can then be compared with those that normally occur, known as ‘established norms’. In such a way the progress of a child’s maturation can be monitored. For example, a child who reaches the age of 12 months and is still not able to sit unaided is not progressing in a ‘normal’ manner, as the majority of infants can do this by the age of 6 months. Such a child should be investigated to find out what is preventing normal development.

Gesell’s theory of development

Arnold Gesell (1880–1961) was a psychologist and doctor who initially studied intellectually handicapped children. He soon came to realise that to understand abnormal development, it is necessary to first understand the process of normal development. Gesell (1948) was one of the first to describe biophysical development based on his observations of children and, as a consequence, he developed norms for the typical age at which children reach developmental milestones. Such milestones included motor development, personal hygiene tasks, the expression of emotions, interpersonal relations, and play. These norms are still used as primary sources of information for childhood development.

Gesell’s (1948) observations led him to believe that although each child’s pattern of growth and development is unique, it remains genetically based. Environmental (including cultural) factors can support and modify the pattern, but do not generate it. Through his observations he learned that maturation has a fixed developmental sequence in all humans. For example, most children will learn how to crawl before they learn how to walk, but not every child develops those skills at exactly the same time. Gesell pointed out clearly that the environment does play a part in the development of a child, but it does not have any part in the sequence of development. Gesell believed that a child could not be pushed to develop faster than that child’s unique timetable.

Gesell’s norms have made an enormous contribution to our understanding of child development and provide a base for both parents and professionals to know what to expect of children at various ages. However, it is important to keep in mind that he developed his norms based on observations of children in New Haven, United States. These children may not be typical of other cultures, such as Arabic, Australian Aboriginal or Māri children.

There are many other theories of biophysical development, but each falls into one of three categories: the genetic theories of ageing, non-genetic cellular theories and the physiological theories of ageing (Table 19-1).

TABLE 19-1 BIOPHYSICAL THEORIES OF DEVELOPMENT

THEORY CATEGORY SPECIFIC THEORIES
Genetic theories—how DNA molecules transfer information that determines function and life span of cells Programmed cell death
Radiation influence on DNA molecule
Error theory of ageing
Non-genetic cellular theories— how changes in the molecules and structural elements impair a cell’s effectiveness Wear-and-tear theory
Cross-linking theory
Free radical theory
Physiological theories of ageing—theories related to the performance of a single organ or impairment of the physiological control mechanisms Kilojoule intake and effect on ageing
Effect of stress on immune system
Effect of stress alone on the body

Genetic theories of ageing

The genetic theories of ageing try to answer such questions as ‘Why do people with long-lived parents and grandparents live longer than people whose parents die before the age of 50?’ Such differences may be explained by genetic inheritance (such as a tendency towards the production of high cholesterol) or learned behaviours (such as lifestyle) or a combination of both.

Genetic theories explain how DNA molecules transfer information via the formation of proteins, which determines the function and life span of specific cells (Cavanaugh, 1993; Eliopoulos, 1999). This programmed cell death is a function of physiological processes that cause cells to trigger processes in other cells and self-destruct. It is unknown how such processes are triggered. Considerable research is being conducted that explores this theory of ageing (Eliopoulos, 1999).

One DNA theory looks at how exposure to radiation shortens the life span. Laboratory studies have shown that animals have a shortened life span when exposed to non-lethal doses of radiation. It is felt that this can occur in humans, which is supported by the fact that ultraviolet light causes wrinkling of the skin and promotes skin cancer.

The error theory of cellular ageing looks at how errors in the genetic code can occur during the process of transporting DNA information in the production of the protein and enzyme molecules required by the cell (Cavanaugh, 1993; Eliopoulos, 1999). When these errors occur, the altered protein or enzyme synthesis leads to defective cellular structure and function.

Non-genetic cellular theories

Non-genetic cellular theories look at the cellular level (as opposed to that of DNA) and how changes that take place in the molecules and structural elements of cells impair their effectiveness (Cavanaugh, 1993; Eliopoulos, 1999). The wear-and-tear theory works on the premise that our bodies just ‘wear out’. This theory can explain some specific processes of ageing (such as osteoarthritis) that contribute to ageing, but it does not explain general ageing.

Cross-linking theory finds that certain proteins within human cells interact with molecules to form cross-links that alter the physical and chemical properties of the molecules involved. These molecules then no longer function in the same way as they did before. Cross-links accumulate over time. These processes occur in arteries, muscles and skin tissues and account for age-related changes in the body.

The free-radical theory proposes that ageing is due to unstable molecules that are highly reactive chemicals causing cellular damage and thereby impairing the functioning of the organ. The rate of the formation of these free-radicals is accelerated by radiation but inhibited by the presence of antioxidants, lathyrogens, prednisolone and penicillamine. This theory has spurred research in the inhibitory properties of the antioxidants (especially vitamins A, C and E) and how these vitamins counteract the effects of free-radicals, thereby extending life. Research so far has shown insufficient evidence about the usefulness of antioxidants in the treatment of certain conditions such as dementia (Birks and Grimley 2009; Isaac and others, 2008) and motor neuron disease (Orrell and others, 2007).

Physiological theories of ageing

Physiological theories of ageing look at either the breakdown in the performance of a single organ or the impairment of the physiological control mechanisms (Cavanaugh, 1993; Eliopoulos, 1999). Under this category various theories relate to single organs or metabolic processes being tested, such as how many kilojoules one consumes. Reducing kilojoules appears to lower the risk of premature death and slow down the normative age-related changes (Edwards and others, 2010), which is supported by the facts we currently know about the problems caused by obesity, high cholesterol levels and vitamin deficiencies.

The effect of stress, alone or in combination, on the immune system is the basis of two theories of ageing. Some theorists suggest that alterations in the effectiveness of the immune system are responsible for ageing. The body may lose its ability to distinguish its own proteins from foreign ones, and will attack and destroy its own tissues. The second immunological theory proposes that as the body ages it is less able to fight off infection, which is felt to be a factor in the development of chronic diseases such as cancer, diabetes and cardiovascular disease (see Chapter 42).

image

FIGURE 19-1 A retired couple enjoying fishing together.

From Sorrentino S 1999 Assisting with patient care. St Louis, Mosby.

The biophysical theories all attempt to describe the processes of why our bodies mature and age. No one theory explains every aspect of ageing, but each one can add to our understanding. Gesell went as far as to propose that it is our biological body that determines our behavioural development. The psychosocial theories look at the process of development from a very different perspective, and as such add even further to our understanding of ageing processes.

Psychosocial theory

A number of psychologists conducted systematic and careful observations of children and adults and from these they put together various psychosocial theories about the development of human behaviour. Many theorists have devoted their entire lifetime to the development of a consistent understanding of how we become successful human beings. Human behaviour is extremely complex and therefore difficult to capture within one theory, so different theorists have tended to focus on different aspects such as psychosexual, psychological, cognitive and moral development (Table 19-2). Each of these theorists believed that as we grow we progress through a series of sequential stages. As each stage is negotiated, the child’s personality increases in maturity.

TABLE 19-2 COMPARISON OF MAJOR DEVELOPMENTAL THEORIES

image image image

Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalytical model of psychosexual development

The first person to provide a structured and complex theory of personality development was Sigmund Freud (1856–1939). Freud was a psychologist who practised in Europe. He developed his theory based on systematic observation of his patients and it is still very influential today. Terms such as ‘denial’ and ‘repression’ were introduced by Freud. His work provided the basis for the development of the discipline of psychology.

Freud’s theory is grounded in the belief that two internal biological forces (aggressive and sexual forces) essentially drive psychological change in the child. He defined ‘sexual’ somewhat broadly as anything that produces bodily pleasure (Freud, 1962). Sources of such pleasure develop at different ages—infants, for example, find pleasure mainly in the oral area from sucking. Freud described five stages, each of which he believed to be associated with the development of a sensual pleasurable zone.

Through these stages the components of personality develop. Freud believed that the functions of these components govern adult life. These components are the id, the ego and the superego. The id is the pleasure-seeking aspect of personality and is predominant in infancy. Infants are dominated by the desire to seek pleasure without the constraints of what is realistic or right. The ego represents the reality components mediating conflicts with the world when the person is driven by the id. The ego develops during childhood and helps us to judge reality accurately, to regulate impulses and to make good decisions. The third component, superego, performs inhibiting, restraining and prohibiting actions. Often referred to as the conscience, the superego is initially derived from the standards of outside social forces (parent, teacher). It starts to develop in childhood and continues during adolescence. An adolescent, for example, may be motivated to seek pleasure (id) from spending vast amounts of time in leisure activities. His sense of reality (ego) may constrain him because he recognises that other activities such as learning and homework also need to be done. His developing conscience (superego) may also restrain him because he wishes to contribute to the good of society by, for example, being a volunteer for ‘Clean up Australia Day’ or ‘Keep New Zealand Beautiful’.

Freud believed that the major motivation for behaviour is to achieve pleasure and avoid pain created by these aggressive and sexual forces. Maturational changes occur as these forces come into conflict with the reality of the world.

Freud’s five psychosexual developmental stages

STAGE 1: ORAL (BIRTH TO 12–18 MONTHS)

Initially sucking, oral satisfaction is not only vital to life, but also extremely pleasurable in its own right. The id—basic instinctual impulses to achieve pleasure—is the most primitive part of the personality and originates with the infant and forms the infant’s drive to seek oral pleasure.

Late in this stage, the infant begins to realise that the mother/parent is something separate from self. Disruption in the physical or emotional availability of the parent (e.g. mental disability, chronic illness, substance abuse) could have an impact on the infant’s development.

STAGE 2: ANAL (12–18 MONTHS TO 3 YEARS)

The focus of pleasure changes to the anal zone. Children become increasingly aware of the pleasurable sensations of this body region with interest in the products of their effort. This is the stage when the child is first asked to withhold pleasure to meet parental/societal expectations through the toilet-training process. The ego starts to develop during this stage when the child begins to realise that reality (such as parental expectations) must moderate pleasure-seeking.

STAGE 3: PHALLIC OR OEDIPAL (3–6 YEARS)

It is during this stage that the sexual organ gains prominence. According to Freud, the boy becomes more interested in the penis; the girl becomes aware of the absence of the penis. These are times of exploration and imagination as the child fantasises about the parent as the first love interest. Freud believed that sexual wishes are temporarily driven underground through the action of the developing superego, or conscience, during this stage.

STAGE 4: LATENCY (6–12 YEARS)

This is the stage in which Freud believed that the aggressive and sexual urges are submerged in the unconscious at the end of the oedipal stage, and channelled into productive activities that are socially acceptable. Latency was thought to be a time of minimal sexual interest or activity. Within the educational and social worlds of the child, there is much to learn and accomplish. This is where the child places energy and effort.

STAGE 5: GENITAL (PUBERTY TO ADULTHOOD)

This is Freud’s final stage; he did not formally continue his theory into adulthood. This is a time of turbulence when sexual urges re-emerge to be dealt with. Freud believed that the task of moving from the sexual attachment to the parent to the separation and emotional independence of the adult is difficult to achieve.

The goal of development as seen by Freud was the development of balance between the pleasures of the world and the domination of guilt and shame that comes from indulgence of these pleasures. The fully developed adult would have a strong sense of conscience that allowed the experience of pleasure within a clear appraisal of reality. Although Freud’s theory has been soundly criticised for gender and cultural biases, he gave other theorists a basis for their observations of psychosocial development.

Erik Erikson

Erikson (1902–1994) refined Freud’s theory and expanded it to include three stages of adult development which completed his theory of development across the life span. Erikson was born in Germany of a Jewish mother. When the Nazis came to power, he left for the United States where he spent most of his productive life. He was largely influenced by Freud but placed more emphasis on the social–cultural aspect of personality development rather than the psychosexual.

Erikson described eight stages of life, the first five coinciding with Freud’s stages (see Table 19-2). He believed that development is an evolutionary process based on sequencing biological, psychological and social events, and that social and cultural expectations compel the individual to establish equilibrium related to a specific developmental task at each developmental stage (Erikson, 1963, 1987). Each task is framed as opposing tendencies, such as the adolescent’s need to develop a sense of personal identity at a time when there are many confusing choices. A sense of identity is important for the adolescent to progress to adulthood and form satisfactory intimate relationships with others. Adolescents who are unable to develop a sense of identity tend to remain confused about who they are and how to relate to others. In such a way, each stage builds on the successful resolution of the previous developmental task and predisposes the person to be ready for the next task. Readiness for the task is necessary for success.

It is not necessary that the conflict is resolved entirely in the positive, but rather that on balance the outcome is positive. For example, for the toddler the positive aspect is the development of autonomy but this sense of autonomy must develop within the context of the toddler’s physical limitations. This exemplifies Erikson’s concept of balance.

Erikson’s eight stages of life

TRUST VERSUS MISTRUST (BIRTH TO 1 YEAR)

Starting with oral satisfaction, the infant learns to trust the caregiver. The caregiver is representative of the greater world. Trust is achieved when the infant will let the caregiver out of sight without undue distress. The infant has learned to trust not only others but also self. When infants’ needs are met consistently, they come to regard the world as generally a safe place. Neglect during infancy leads to the child becoming filled with mistrust—a negative feature. However, even the most cared-for infants experience occasional neglect when needs go unmet. The balanced outcome of this stage is that the person achieves a general trust with the ability to understand that all people are not equally trustworthy. In adult life, the person must have some scepticism to avoid being cheated by unsavoury people. Nurses can assist parents in helping their infants to successfully resolve this stage. For example, a parent may need guidance to understand the importance of a safe environment when meeting the child’s need to explore crawling before walking.

AUTONOMY VERSUS SHAME AND DOUBT (1–3 YEARS)

Having developed a sense of trust in the adults in their lives, the growing child is now ready to develop a sense of their own abilities. They now realise, in part through bowel and bladder control experiences, that there is a choice of holding on or letting go and therefore begin to understand that they have a degree of control over their environment. In this way a sense of autonomy starts to develop. Understandably, toddlers may try to exert such control inappropriately over relationships, personal desires and manipulative objects such as toys. At this age children are sometimes willing to share toys, and cooperate some of the time but not all of the time and with some people but not others. Children, however, also learn that parents and society have expectations about these choices. The manner in which autonomy is regulated, with empathetic guidance and support from caregivers, has an impact on the achievement of successful control without loss of self-esteem. Harsh discipline can lead the child to doubt their abilities and feel a sense of shame. Extremely permissive approaches leave the child unable to test the limits of their abilities with the safety of a watchful adult.

Of course Erikson’s ideal of balance is important here, as the child needs to realistically assess their abilities and accept that there are limits to the degree of autonomy that a toddler can realistically achieve. Nurses can help caregivers understand the challenges of this developmental stage. They can model empathetic guidance that indicates support for and understanding of the tasks the child faces at this stage which will help the child develop a balanced sense of autonomy.

INITIATIVE VERSUS GUILT (3–6 YEARS)

This is a time of expanding physical and intellectual abilities (Figure 19-2). Having developed a realistic sense of their basic capabilities, the preschool-aged child can now build on these to make plans, set goals and reach achievements. In so doing, they begin to acquire a sense of initiative and so learn new ways of using their recently acquired skills. This sense of initiative can be observed in the games children play.

image

FIGURE 19-2 Play is therapeutic at any age and provides a means for release of tension and stress in the environment.

Image: Shutterstock/ZINQ Stock.

While playing, the child may come into conflict with another child which requires a response from an adult. This is the stage when the beginnings of a conscience (or superego) begin to emerge. If adults’ responses are too punitive, the child may be left with a feeling of guilt and initiative may be thwarted. Teaching cooperative behaviours to children can enhance their ability to meet developmental tasks. Informing parents of the changes that the preschooler is facing can help the family support the child’s development (Box 19-1). It is also important to help parents understand that it is still necessary to place limits on children’s initiative so that they can understand what is required of them by society.

BOX 19-1 NURSING DIAGNOSES—GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT

GROWTH, ALTERED, RISK OF

PRENATAL RISK FACTORS:

Altered nutrition

Substance use/abuse

INDIVIDUAL RISK FACTORS:

Caregiver and/or individual maladaptive feeding behaviours

Chronic illness

Substance abuse

ENVIRONMENTAL RISK FACTORS:

Deprivation

Poverty

Violence

CAREGIVER RISK FACTORS:

Abuse

Mental illness

Mental retardation

Severe learning disability

DEVELOPMENT, ALTERED, RISK OF

PRENATAL RISK FACTORS:

Substance abuse

Lack of, late or poor prenatal care

Poverty

INDIVIDUAL RISK FACTORS:

Congenital or genetic disorders

Brain damage (haemorrhage in postnatal period, shaken baby, abuse, accident)

Chronic illness

Failure to thrive

Inadequate nutrition

Behaviour disorders

Substance abuse

ENVIRONMENTAL RISK FACTORS:

Poverty

Violence

CAREGIVER RISK FACTORS:

Abuse

Mental illness

Mental retardation

Severe learning disability

INDUSTRY VERSUS INFERIORITY (6–11 YEARS)

Erikson believed that the adult’s attitudes towards work could be traced to successful achievement of this task (Erikson, 1963). School-aged children are eager to apply themselves to learning socially productive skills and tools. They learn to work and play with their peers. Lack of achievement occurs in part because children lack adult capacities; this may create a sense of inadequacy and inferiority for children as they judge their performance against unrealistic standards. Children need to be helped to understand what is reasonable for them to achieve. Take the example of a learning-disabled child struggling to learn to read. Because of a biological difference and the delayed achievement, this child may have difficulty avoiding a sense of inferiority. At this age, children need to be supported to understand where their talents lie and to achieve in those areas.

IDENTITY VERSUS ROLE CONFUSION (PUBERTY)

Dramatic physiological changes associated with sexual and aggressive drives mark this stage. There are also new social demands, opportunities and conflicts that relate to the emergent identity and separation from family. This is the milieu in which identity development begins. Alternatives are tried with the goal of achieving some perspective or direction to answer ‘Who am I?’ and ‘What kind of adult will I become?’ Acquiring a sense of identity is essential for making adult decisions such as choice of vocation or marriage partner. Each adolescent moves in their unique way into society as an interdependent member (Figure 19-3), and peers play a major role in the lives of adolescents (see Research highlight). To continue the example of adolescence, a person who is ready to develop an intimate relationship will be reasonably comfortable with the sort of person he/she is but is sufficiently malleable to be able to merge their identity with another and become a functioning couple.

image

FIGURE 19-3 Adolescents use being alone as a method of coping with stress. Healthcare professionals need to assess whether this method also indicates an attempt to cope with depression.

Image: Dreamstime/Dmiskv.

Nurses can provide education and anticipatory guidance for the parent about the changes and challenges to the adolescent. Nurses who understand the developing adolescent also recognise that adolescents need to be recruited as partners in their care. They are entitled to be consulted, along with their parents, about their progress and treatment.

CRITICAL THINKING

You are setting up an adolescent in-hospital unit. Knowing that identity development and self-esteem are critical developmental tasks for adolescents and that most are capable of abstract thinking, how would you ensure that the facilities and features of the built environment are adolescent-focused?

INTIMACY VERSUS ISOLATION (YOUNG ADULT)

Young adults, having developed a sense of identity, deepen their capacity to love others and care for them (Table 19-3). Successful intimate relations require the partners to develop a joint identity. Joint identity is difficult to achieve when the partners do not have a strong sense of who they are. If young persons have not achieved a sense of personal identity, they may experience feelings of isolation from others and the inability to form attachments. Their willingness to share, and mutually regulate their lives with another, marks the completion of this task.

TABLE 19-3 ADULT DEVELOPMENTAL THEORISTS

ADULT STAGES (APPROXIMATE AGES) ERIKSON HAVIGHURST
Early early-adult (16–22 years)

Intimacy versus isolation:

Ability to form intimate relationships

Early adulthood stage:

Selecting a mate

Learning to live with a marriage partner

Starting a family

Rearing children

Getting started in an occupation

Late early-adult (22–34 years)  

Early adulthood stage:

Taking on civic responsibilities

Finding a congenial social group

Middle adult (34–60 years)

Adulthood:

Generativity versus stagnation, productivity and creativity

Middle age:

Assisting teenage children to become responsible adults

Achieving adult social and civic responsibility

Reaching and maintaining satisfactory performance in one’s occupation

Developing adult leisure-time activities

Relating to one’s spouse as a person

Accepting and adjusting to the physiological changes of middle age

Adjusting to ageing of parents

Late adult/old age (60–85 years) Integrity versus despair, disgust

Later maturity:

Adjusting to decreasing physical strength and health

Adjusting to retirement and reduced income

Adjusting to death of a spouse

Establishing an affiliation with one’s age group

Adopting and adapting social roles in a flexible way

Establishing satisfactory physical living arrangements

Young adulthood is the time to become fully participative in the community, enjoying adult freedom and the responsibility that goes with that freedom. Understanding the development needs of young adults will guide nurses in supporting patients in their obligations, which may relate to their education, occupation, partners or offspring.

GENERATIVITY VERSUS STAGNATION (MIDDLE AGE)

Following the successful development of an intimate relationship, the adult can focus on raising the next generation. The ability to sacrifice one’s own needs to care for others is possible with or without the production of offspring. The emphasis on independent achievement so prevalent in Western cultures can create a situation in which adults become too absorbed in their own success and neglect the needs of others. Adults at this stage are frequently at the peak of their careers (with its attendant demands), are often responsible for adolescent children and may also be responsible for ageing parents. Such responsibilities may be a source of stress, but also a source of great satisfaction. Illness that inhibits the discharge of these responsibilities may be a cause of considerable distress.

RESEARCH HIGHLIGHT
Research focus

The health of young people is increasingly being researched in Australia and the evidence found contributes methods of helping young people to successfully negotiate adolescence. One method that has become the focus of researchers is the development of helping skills in adolescent peers. These helping skills focus on supporting young people as they cope with their experiences of adolescence.

Abstract

Peer support is used frequently in addressing the health of young people. The Helping Friends program builds on existing peer helping networks in schools to improve the availability, accessibility and appropriateness of social and personal support. It increases young people’s knowledge of and access to referral options (in and out of school) and assists in the development of a safe and supportive school environment. Twenty-two schools in North Queensland, Australia participated in the program with many participating on several occasions. An evaluation of the Helping Friends program using the Social Provision Scale was undertaken to determine whether there was an increase in perceived social support as hypothesised. Results revealed small yet significant increases along subscales of the Social Provision Scale. Pre- and post-measures of helping skills and knowledge of helping topics also revealed a significant increase following students’ participation in training workshops. The results are discussed in terms of the efficacy of peer support programs for addressing the health needs of young people. The findings can be used to guide secondary schools in making decisions on the value of peer support programs and their application in school and out-of-school settings.

Evidence-based practice

The Helping Friends program has been effective in increasing knowledge of helping behaviour.

Peer influence is an important consideration in designing programs that target adolescent health.

Identifying respected friends and enhancing existing skills can reinforce the level of social support within and across peer groups.

Reference

Dillon J, Swinbourne A. Helping Friends: a peer support program for senior secondary schools. Aust e-J Adv Ment Health. 6(1), 2007. Online. Available at http://amh.e-contentmanagement.com/archives/vol/6/issue/1/article/3309/helpingfriends 2 Jul 2012.

CRITICAL THINKING

A 45-year-old male executive of a local corporation enters the emergency department with intense chest pain. Upon evaluation, it is determined that he has severe cardiovascular disease and requires open-heart surgery. His children, aged 13 and 17, and wife accompany him to the hospital. They have a very expensive lifestyle, and he is the sole earner for the family. His son is planning to enrol in an economics degree at university next year. After the client settles in his room, he asks for computer access to complete some work before surgery. How will the nurse help this client to change his lifestyle while understanding his developmental tasks?

INTEGRITY VERSUS DESPAIR (OLD AGE)

As the ageing process creates physical and social losses, the adult may also suffer loss of status and function, such as through retirement or illness. These external struggles are also met with internal struggles, such as the search for meaning in the life they have lived. Meeting these challenges creates the potential for growth and wisdom. Many older people review their lives with a sense of satisfaction, even with the inevitable mistakes. Others see themselves as failures, with marked contempt and disgust and the inevitable despair that comes from the realisation that it is now too late to achieve hoped-for goals.

Nurses are in positions of influence within their communities and can contribute to the valuing of people at all ages and stages. Erikson (1963) stated, ‘Healthy children will not fear life, if their parents have integrity enough not to fear death.’ Erikson did significant research during his academic career with varied cultural traditions and gender groups. He believed his theory to be widely applicable.

Robert Havighurst

Basing his ideas on Erikson’s work and his observation of mainly middle-class Americans, Robert Havighurst (1900–1991) was an educator who identified a series of essential tasks that need to be achieved throughout the life span (see Table 19-3) (Ashburn, 1978). We can see from our own experiences and from observing those of others that we tend to achieve certain goals at specific times of our lives. We learn to walk and talk as babies, to read and write as children, to form sexual partnerships during adolescence and adulthood, and so on. When we accomplish these tasks we develop a sense of mastery and satisfaction and this sets us up to achieve subsequent developmental tasks. Both Havighurst and Erikson provided explanations and structure for our observations.

Havighurst believed that the pressures to achieve these tasks, as well as social pressures, develop from our increasing physical maturity and our personal goals and aspirations. Developmental tasks require the individual to reconcile increasing physical maturity with skills such as walking, talking or eating. Cultural pressure creates the conditions necessary to learn social behaviours and ethical norms. For example, although an adolescent girl may be physically able to accomplish the task of having a child, the preparation and timing for the onset of parenthood can also be considered from a perspective of cultural pressure from both the youth and the adult cultures. The desire to have a child might also grow out of the individual’s personal aspiration to be a parent.

Havighurst believed that there are critical periods when the individual is most receptive to the learning necessary to achieve success in performing these tasks. In a similar way to Erikson, Havighurst believed that effective learning and achievement of tasks during one period leads to success with later tasks. Success leads to happiness and acceptance by society. Failure leads to unhappiness, disapproval by society and difficulty with later tasks. An example might be the struggle that adolescents might experience in preparing for a work career after having failed to develop fundamental skills in reading.

As an educator, Havighurst believed that schools have considerable responsibility for helping a child attain the success necessary to lead to achievement of later adult development. His theory is a structure of both non-recurrent tasks specific to a stage of development, such as learning to walk, and recurrent tasks that re-emerge in new ways, such as learning to get along with age-mates.

His critics, however, believe that Havighurst’s theory is limited in its cultural application because it describes developmental milestones from the perspective of middle-class norms within the American culture. It would be difficult to fit all cultural or ethnic mores within this theoretical framework.

CRITICAL THINKING

A 76-year-old woman has just been diagnosed with breast cancer. She also has severe cardiovascular disease that limits her choices of treatment. Her oncologist has recommended a series of chemotherapy that her cardiologist believes would be fatal. Her family is urging her to do all that is recommended. The client, who is in good spirits despite her diagnosis, chooses palliative care. Based on her developmental stage, how can you help the family adjust to her choice?

Cognitive development theory

Jean Piaget’s theory of cognitive development

Jean Piaget (1896–1980), a Swiss biologist and philosopher, was most interested in the child’s development of cognitive organisation—how we think. He created a theory of cognitive development, which includes four periods and claims that children move through these specific periods at different rates but in the same sequence or order (Crain, 1992). His theory was built on years of observing children as they explored, manipulated and tried to make sense out of the world in which they lived. In Piaget’s theory (Piaget, 1954), external or internal forces did not shape thinking, although he acknowledged their presence in the process. Piaget’s theory includes four general periods of development with a number of stages within each (see Table 19-2).

Period I: Sensorimotor intelligence (birth to 2 years)

During a time of unparalleled changes, the infant develops the schema or action patterns for dealing with the environment, that basically consist of motor reactions to the environment as perceived through the infant’s senses. These schema may include hitting, looking, grasping or kicking. Schema gradually become self-initiated activities; for example, the infant learns that sucking achieves a pleasing result and generalises the action to suck fingers, blankets or clothing. Successful achievement leads to greater exploration, and exploration is essential for the child’s subsequent development.

When infants experience something, they tend to repeat it until they can intentionally carry out the action. They then learn to combine actions to achieve a purpose. For example, a child wishes to grab a toy but is blocked by the parent’s hand; the child then pushes the parent’s hand away and gets the toy. Later the child tries more than one action in a situation, such as exploring several ways to keep the water from flowing out of the bath.

Finally, the child seems to develop the ability to think before acting. Thinking is inferred in a situation where a child, being unsuccessful in achieving expected results from an action, pauses before trying something new. Moving from random acts to making choices with some thought behind them demonstrates the enormous achievements made during this developmental period.

Period II: Preoperational thought (2–7 years)

Period II is a time when children learn to think with the use of symbols and images. This requires that the child must reorganise thinking all over again. Play is the initial method of non-language use of symbols. Imitation and make-believe are ways to represent experience. During this period nurses can use play to help the child understand events that are taking place. The use of play materials such as thermometers, blood-pressure equipment and play needles allow children to communicate feelings about the healthcare procedures they experience. Language requires the relatively advanced use of symbolism that words represent objects and actions. As language develops, possibilities for thinking about the past or the future also develop. Children can now communicate about events with others.

Children are frequently egocentric in this period, in that they are unable to distinguish their perspective from that of another person. This egocentricity is illustrated by the way children of this age play, which is called ‘parallel play’. Parallel play can be observed as children engage in activities side-by-side without a common goal. One child might interfere with another’s play to fulfil their own need. This action may create conflict. While helping children resolve conflict, the nurse can assist children to learn to handle differences in their own ways. Later in this stage, children learn to cooperate with each other to play a game such as ‘mothers and fathers’. Such experiential learning complements the natural changes in thinking as children live with the responses of others to their actions.

Period III: Concrete operations (7–11 years)

Children achieve the ability to think systematically during Period III, but only when they can refer to concrete objects or activities; that is, experiences that can be seen, felt and tasted. They can now describe a process without actually performing it. At this time they are able to coordinate two concrete perspectives. In other words, they can appreciate the difference between their perspective and that of a friend. Children can begin to cooperate and share new information about the act they perform. At this stage the potential develops for play and relationships to become more complex, as the child begins to comprehend the nature of rules and their usefulness in regulating activities. Parents are now able to adjust their approaches to guide the child into helpful activities within the home, such as bargaining about chores in exchange for privileges (TV time, play with friends).

Period IV: Formal operations (11 years to adulthood)

The individual’s thinking moves to abstract and theoretical subjects in the formal operations period. Thinking can venture into such subjects as achieving world peace, finding justice and seeking meaning in life. Adolescents can organise their thoughts in their minds without needing concrete objects before them. They have the capacity to reason with respect to possibilities. New cognitive powers allow the adolescent to do more far-reaching problem solving that includes their futures and those of others. This type of thinking continues to mature in the adult years as experience is accumulated.

Piaget believed that the sequencing of these stages occurs for all children but that the rate of achievement may vary. He also theorised that this is true in all cultures. He acknowledged that biological maturation plays a role in this developmental theory, but believed that rates of development depend on the intellectual stimulation and challenge in the environment of the child.

CRITICAL THINKING

A 7-year-old boy has been diagnosed with immune-mediated diabetes. A nurse must begin the educational process for him and his family. Which developmental tasks must the nurse determine are already accomplished by the client and his family to design an effective educational program and meet the needs of a family now faced with a chronic illness in one of its members? Based on this boy’s cognitive development, how would the nurse teach him about his diabetes?

Moral development theory

Moral developmental theories try to explain ‘how individuals acquire moral values and how such values help guide the way those persons treat other people’ (Thomas, 1997). Although various psychosocial and cognitive theorists have discussed moral development within their respective theories, Piaget and Kohlberg are the two who have done the most to propose a theory of moral development (see Table 19-2).

Jean Piaget’s moral development theory

Piaget studied boys 5–13 years old from middle-class backgrounds. He noted that the child’s environment and the stage of cognitive development are both factors in the child’s moral development. Piaget noted that a natural shift in moral development occurs around the same time as the cognitive transition from preoperational to operational thought (Kurtines and Gewirtz, 1984). In his theory of moral development, Piaget termed his two stages heteronomous morality and autonomous morality. In the stage of heteronomous morality, children follow the rules set up by those in authority, such as their parents, teachers, clergy or police. When a person reaches the stage of autonomous morality, moral judgments are based on mutual respect for the rules and mutual regard for the person. The person at this stage starts to consider information related to the subjective intent in making moral judgments that involve others.

Piaget first saw the child following, but not understanding, the rules. Children see these rules as fixed and handed down by adults or by God, so they cannot change them. Young children base their moral decisions on the extent of the consequences of the action, not necessarily on the action itself. For example, a young child will not eat a biscuit before supper not because the mother said not to or because the child can see that it is not good practice nutritionally, but because the child is afraid of the punishment that would result from disobedience.

Around 10 or 11 years of age, children’s cognitive ability matures and the rules children follow are understood within the context of community life and the interaction with those around them. Children understand that the rules can be changed if everyone agrees to change the rules. Moral maturity is the internalisation of the principles, the desire to weigh all the relationships and circumstances before making a decision. Rules are the tools that humans use to grease the wheels of social interaction.

Lawrence Kohlberg’s moral development theory

Kohlberg expanded on Piaget’s moral development theory during his graduate work in psychology at the University of Chicago, initially interviewing boys at ages 10, 13 and 16 years. Kohlberg felt that Piaget did not go far enough in the development of his stages. He developed his theory by presenting his research subjects with a series of moral dilemmas and analysing their responses. In this way, he identified six stages of moral development under three levels (Kohlberg, 1973, 1981). Kohlberg found a link between moral development and Piaget’s cognitive development: a child’s moral development did not advance if the child’s cognitive development did not also mature. Like Piaget, Kohlberg believed that we proceed in a sequential manner through the stages and do not skip stages. He also believed that not all individuals progress to the higher stages but may remain as adults in an earlier stage, particularly Stage 4. In this way, Kohlberg’s theory of moral development follows Piaget’s cognitive development theories (see Table 19-2).

Level I: Preconventional level

At Level I the person reflects on moral reasoning based on personal gain. This kind of reasoning closely correlates with Piaget’s first stage, in that the person’s moral reason for acting relates to the consequences the person believes will occur. These consequences can come in the form of punishment or reward. It is at this level that children may view illness as a punishment, for example for fighting with their siblings or not obeying their parents. The nurse must be aware of this thinking and reinforce to the child that they cannot become ill because of wrongdoing.

STAGE 1: PUNISHMENT AND OBEDIENCE ORIENTATION

In this first stage, the child’s response to a moral dilemma is unquestioning deference to authority (specifically their parents or caregivers) to avoid punishment. The child relies on authority to decide what is right, and in so doing avoids punishment. While children will test authority, they will ultimately follow their parents’ instructions such as refraining from hitting another child, to avoid being punished. If children are punished or if unpleasant things happen to them, they will tend to reason that they must have been guilty. Similarly, children at this age will believe that if other children are punished then they must have been naughty. The concept of justice has not begun to develop.

STAGE 2: INSTRUMENTAL RELATIVIST ORIENTATION

In the second stage, a child recognises there is more than one authority: a teacher may have a view different from that of the child’s parent, or a mother may have different views to a father. The decision to do something morally right is based on satisfying one’s own needs, and occasionally the needs of others. The child may play one authority off against another. Punishment is perceived not as proof of the child being wrong (as in Stage 1), but as something that one wants to avoid. Children at this stage will follow their parents’ rule about being home in time for dinner because they do not want to be confined to their room for the rest of the evening if they do not get home on time.

Level II: Conventional level

At Level II, the person sees moral reasoning based on their own personal internalisation of societal and others’ expectations. A person wants to fulfil the expectations of the family, group or nation and also develop a loyalty, actively maintain support and justify the order. Moral decision making at this level moves from ‘What’s in it for me?’ to ‘How will it affect my relationships with others?’ Nurses may observe this when family members make end-of-life decisions for their relatives; individual members may struggle with this moral dilemma. Grief support will involve an understanding of the level of moral decision making of each family member.

STAGE 3: GOOD BOY–NICE GIRL ORIENTATION

Stage 3 correlates with Piaget’s second stage of moral development. The individual wants to win approval and maintain the expectations of the immediate group. ‘Being good’ means to have good motives, show concern for others, and keep mutual relationships through trust, loyalty, respect and gratitude. One earns approval by ‘being nice’. A person in this stage may stay after school and do odd-jobs to win the teacher’s approval.

STAGE 4: SOCIETY-MAINTAINING ORIENTATION

Individuals expand their focus from a relationship with others to societal concerns in Stage 4. Moral decisions take into account this societal perspective. ‘Right’ behaviour is doing one’s duty, showing respect for authority and maintaining the social order. Adolescents may choose not to attend a party where they know alcohol will be served, not so much because they are afraid of getting caught but rather because they know that it can lead to unsocial behaviour and create problems for others.

Level III: Postconventional level

The person finds a balance between basic human rights & obligations and societal rules and regulations in this level. Individuals move away from moral decisions based on authority or conformity to groups to define their own moral values and principles. Individuals at this stage start to look at what an ideal society would be like.

STAGE 5: SOCIAL CONTRACT ORIENTATION

Having reached Stage 5, an individual may follow the societal law but recognises the possibility of changing the law to improve society. The individual also recognises that different social groups may have different values but believes that all rational people would agree on basic rights, such as liberty and life. Individuals at this stage make more of an independent effort to think out what society ought to value, rather than what is actually valued, as would occur in Stage 4. An individual at this stage recognises laws as social contracts that the citizens have agreed to uphold, but believes that there must be a mechanism to change unfair laws by democratic means (Crain, 1992).

STAGE 6: UNIVERSAL ETHICAL PRINCIPLE ORIENTATION

Stage 6 defines ‘right’ by the decision of conscience in accord with self-chosen ethical principles. These principles are abstract and appeal to logical comprehensiveness, universality and consistency (Kohlberg, 1981). For example, the principles of justice require the individual to treat everyone in an impartial manner, respecting the basic dignity of all people, and guide the individual to base decisions on an equal respect for all (Figure 19-4). Stage 5 emphasises the basic rights and the democratic process, whereas Stage 6 defines the principles by which agreements will be most just.

image

FIGURE 19-4 Adults must take responsibility for themselves.

Image: Shutterstock/wavebreakmedia ltd.

CRITICAL THINKING

A 12-year-old girl is admitted to the emergency department after being involved in a motor vehicle accident. She has suffered a fractured pelvis, a fractured tibia and has internal bleeding. She will need immediate surgery. No other person was injured in the accident. Taking into account her psychosocial, cognitive and moral development stages, list as many strategies as you can that healthcare professionals and her parents might use to help her through her hospitalisation and rehabilitation.

Nurses need to be aware of their moral reasoning level. Recognising their own moral developmental level is essential to helping clients clarify their own decisions without the nurse’s beliefs and values dominating the client’s decision-making process. Nurses may also find that the level of moral decision making influences decisions made by the healthcare team. This can be exemplified in the following scenario. The nurse is caring for a homeless person and believes that all clients deserve the same level of care. The case manager, being responsible for resource allocation, complains about the client’s length of stay and the amount of resources being expended on this one client. The nurse and the case manager are in conflict because of their different levels of moral decision making within their practices.

Further research on the part of Kohlberg made him question Stage 6, as he found that very few subjects consistently reasoned at this stage. He concluded that his research method of using moral dilemmas did not draw out differences between Stages 5 and 6. He termed Stage 6 a ‘theoretical stage’ and no longer scored individuals as achieving this stage in his research.

Kohlberg’s critics

Kohlberg constructed a systemised way of looking at moral development. He has been recognised as a leader in moral developmental theory, but he does have his critics. Many of the differences arise from the choice of research subjects, because he mainly based his views on observations of males with Western philosophical traditions and mainly used cross-sectional methods to observe development. In cross-sectional studies different children are observed at each age, so it is difficult to conclude that as a whole they followed a specific sequence. A child may not progress through the stages in order or may skip a stage, and this would not be detected.

Research attempting to support Kohlberg’s theory with individuals raised in the Eastern philosophies has found that those study participants never rose above Stages 3 or 4 of Kohlberg’s model. This does not necessarily mean they did not reach higher levels of moral development, but rather that his choices of research subjects did not allow a way to measure those raised within a different culture. Kohlberg has also been criticised for age and gender bias. Kohlberg himself in later studies found that Stage 5 might not be reached until adulthood (Kohlberg, 1981).

Gender bias was raised as a criticism by Carol Gilligan (1982), an associate and co-author with Kohlberg. Her research looked at moral development and concentrated on the differences that might be related to gender.

GILLIGAN’S ARGUMENT

Gilligan, a psychologist and researcher, started questioning the differences she observed in the way men and women approach and answer moral dilemmas. All developmental theories are subject to this gender bias, according to Gilligan, and it has been only recently that our society has researched and recognised the differences between men and women in the way they think and how they have been raised to make decisions.

Gilligan proposes that Kohlberg’s theory is biased in favour of men. She believes there may be parallel ways that men and women develop, with one not being superior to the other. Basic to Gilligan’s argument is the developmental difference in relationships and issues of dependency between women and men (Gilligan, 1982). Separation and individuation are critically tied to male development, as separation from the mother is essential for the boy in his development of masculinity. Girls do not need to separate from their mothers to achieve feminine identity; it is through this attachment to their mother that their identity is formed. Most developmental theories use achievement of increasing separation as a developmental norm. When women are measured against this norm as it relates to their need to maintain relationships, they are seen as failures or less evolved developmentally.

Male moral development may focus on logic, justice and social organisation, whereas female moral development focuses on interpersonal relationships. Interestingly, studies using Gilligan’s critique as the research design have been inconclusive. As a result, Gilligan’s position remains controversial (Cavanaugh, 1993).

KEY CONCEPTS

Nurses care for human beings at various developmental stages and during various transitions and life crises. Developmental theory provides a basis for nurses to assess and understand their clients’ behaviour and responses to various health issues and treatments.

Humans continue to face developmental tasks and transitions throughout their lives. Development does not end at adolescence; people grow and develop throughout their life.

Theory is a way to account for how and why people grow up as they do. Theories provide a framework and a way to clarify and organise existing observations to explain and try to predict human behaviour.

Growth refers to the quantitative changes that can be measured and compared with norms.

Development implies a progressive and continuous process of change leading to a state of organised and specialised functional capacity. These changes can be measured quantitatively, but are more distinctly measured in qualitative changes.

Biophysical development explores theories of why individuals age from a biological standpoint.

Cognitive development focuses on the rational thinking processes that include the changes in how children and adolescents perform intellectual operations.

Developmental tasks are age-related achievements, the success of which leads to happiness whereas failure may lead to unhappiness, disapproval and difficulty in achieving later tasks.

Developmental crisis refers to a person’s difficulty in meeting tasks of the current developmental period.

Socialisation is the interaction between individuals and their families, peers, significant communities and the broader society.

Psychosocial theories attempt to describe the development of the human personality with varying degrees of influence from internal biological forces and external societal/cultural forces.

Moral development attempts to define how moral reasoning matures for an individual.

ONLINE RESOURCES

The internet has many sites that can help you expand your understanding of the different theories of human development. Those listed below might be especially useful.

This site has a quiz which can help you check your understanding of human development: http://psychology.about.com/library/quiz/bl_dev_quiz.htm

This site has some interesting ideas on how to help ill children at various developmental stages: www.thehospice.org

REFERENCES

Ashburn SS. Selected theories of development. In: Schuster CS, Ashburn SS, eds. The process of human development: a holistic approach. Boston: Little, Brown, 1978.

Birks J, Grimley Evans J. Ginkgo biloba for cognitive impairment and dementia, Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003120.pub3. CD003120.

Cavanaugh JC. Adult development and aging, ed 2. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1993.

Crain W. Theories of development: concepts and applications, ed 3. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1992.

Edwards AG, et al. Life-long caloric restriction elicits pronounced protection of the aged myocardium: a role for AMPK. Mechanisms Ageing Dev. 2010;131(11–12):739–742.

Eliopoulos C. Manual of gerontologic nursing. St Louis: Mosby, 1999.

Erikson E. Childhood and society. New York: Norton, 1963.

Erikson E. The lifecycle completed. New York: Norton, 1987.

Freud S. Strachey J, ed. Three essays on the theory of sexuality. New York: Basic Books, 1962.

Gesell A. Studies in child development. New York: Harper, 1948.

Gilligan C. In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.

Isaac M, et al. Vitamin E for Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment, Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(3). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002854.pub2. CD002854.

Kohlberg L. Continuities in childhood and adult moral development revisited. In: Baltes PB, Schaie KW, eds. Life-span developmental psychology. New York: Academic Press, 1973.

Kohlberg L. The philosophy of moral development: moral stages and the idea of justice. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1981.

Kurtines WM, Gewirtz JL. Morality, moral behavior, and moral development. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1984.

Orrell RW, et al. Antioxidant treatment for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or motor neuron disease, Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(1). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002829.pub4. CD002829.

Piaget J. The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books, 1954.

Thomas RM. Moral development theories: secular and religious: a comparative study. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1997.