9 PATTERNS IN 21ST CENTURY LUNG INFECTIONS
In this chapter we describe CXR features that occur with:
Pneumonia: An acute lower respiratory tract infection together with new radiographic shadowing1.
The typical CXR patterns of bronchopneumonia and lobar pneumonia are described on pp. 32–35 and 42–44.
This refers to an atypical organism—usually Mycoplasma or Legionella. If this is considered to be likely then a macrolide antibiotic will be introduced.
Clinical/laboratory | CXR |
---|---|
This is usually acquired within the hospital. If the causative organism is Staphylococcus aureus then flucloxacillin is introduced. Several CXR features are not specific but are nevertheless suggestive of this organism:
Figure 9.3 Severe chest infection. The round lucent area adjacent to the left lower lobe consolidation is a pneumatocoele. Pneumatocoeles are distended air spaces that are characteristically transient—i.e. they disappear fairly quickly. Pneumatocoeles do not represent areas of cavitation. Staphylococcal pneumonia.
This may result from inhalation of gastric or oropharyngeal fluids, pus from infected sinuses, or inhalation of external fluid. If aspiration is the likely cause of the pneumonia then intravenous cephalosporin/metronidazole is added to the antimicrobial treatment. The following are suggestive of aspiration:
This can occur with an acute bacterial pneumonia. The most common causative organisms are Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Pseudomonas aeroginosa, Klebsiella, Escherichia coli. (See pp. 134–137 for tuberculosis.)
Figure 9.1 Child with a chest infection. Fluffy/confluent homogeneous shadowing in the left upper lobe. Lobar pneumonia. See pp. 42–44.
Figure 9.2 Chest infection. The linear and nodular shadows in both lower zones represent the typical pattern of a bronchopneumonia (see pp. 42–44). This was a viral pneumonia.
Pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is often suspected by the physician when a patient from a particular at-risk group (e.g. socio-economic/demographic) has minimal clinical symptoms and an abnormal CXR. If a patient is outside a generally accepted at-risk group then even a classic CXR PTB pattern may be misinterpreted and tuberculosis not considered.
It is important to recognise CXR patterns that raise the suspicion of PTB (Table 9.2). As a general rule, the distribution and position of PTB shadows differs between primary and post-primary disease.
Table 9.2 The most common CXR appearances.
![]() |
Pitfall. CXR changes in post-primary PTB have a strong predilection for the apical or posterior segments of the upper lobes and also for the apical segments of the lower lobes. Sometimes post-primary tuberculosis shadowing will occur in the anterior segment of an upper lobe or in a basal segment of a lower lobe. This distribution may lead to the assumption that the shadows are not due to PTB. However, an apparently atypical position for shadowing in post-primary disease is usually accompanied by shadowing in the classical segments. The message: if post-primary PTB is clinically possible you must always check out the classical segments on both the frontal and lateral CXRs3.
This represents haematogenous spread of the bacilli. It is most commonly associated with primary PTB but it can occur with post-primary PTB. The term “miliary” refers to the millet-seed appearance of the tiny nodules scattered throughout the lungs. To be truly miliary the small densities will all be of the same size (0.5–2.0 mm in diameter), sharply defined, and will usually involve the lung apices.
The visibility of these tiny nodules on the CXR is the result of superimposition of hundreds of the tiny foci one on top of another. If the number of foci are not yet in their hundreds and thousands then they will not be detectable. Consequently, a patient may have miliary PTB and yet the CXR may appear normal.
Figure 9.5 Classic patterns in post-primary PTB. Lung shadowing that favours the apical or posterior segments of an upper lobe (a); or involving the apical segment of a lower lobe (b, c).
Figure 9.6 Unilateral hilar lymph node enlargement (and, incidentally, the azygos node is also enlarged). Primary PTB.
Figure 9.8 Diffuse shadowing in both lungs with cavitation. A lateral CXR showed the apical segments of both lower lobes to be involved. Post-primary PTB. You might wish to remind yourself of the superior extent of both lower lobes on the reference images at the front of the book (p. viii.)
A recurring dilemma. A CXR shows PTB scarring—but are there any features to suggest that it could be active? Table 9.3 provides some guidelines which will help to make the assessment.
Table 9.3 Active or Inactive PTB?
Active | Probably inactive | Apply the precautionary principle: |
---|---|---|
Figure 9.10 Note the well-defined (“hard”) shadowing at the apex of the left lung with elevation of the left hilum. These features suggest old inactive PTB affecting the upper lobe.
Figure 9.11 Ill-defined shadowing at the right lung apex. Active post-primary PTB. NB: the lung apices are where tuberculous shadows commonly occur…and they can hide behind the overlapping ribs and clavicle. On this CXR compare and contrast the appearance of the right lung apex with the entirely normal left apex.
The Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) first appeared as a devastating epidemic during the 1980s. The cause of the syndrome is infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Affected patients are immunocompromised. Consequently they are vulnerable to secondary infection with other organisms. Debilitating and life-threatening lung infections (Table 9.4) are common.
Table 9.4 HIV-related lung infections.
![]() |
The CXR appearances are non-specific. They include: hilar and mediastinal lymph node enlargement; and/or nodular lung shadows; and/or areas of alveolar consolidation.
Figure 9.12 Young male. Breathless. Lower zone reticular densities create a basal ground glass (i.e. a rather hazy) appearance. PCP. This is an early CXR finding and is often very subtle. Rapid progress to extensive areas of alveolar consolidation usually occurs. (Incidental body piercing artefact through the right nipple.)
1. Hoare Z, Lim WS. Pneumonia: update on diagnosis and management. BMJ. 2006;332:1077-1079.
2. Woodhead M, Blasi F, Ewig S, et al. Guidelines for the management of adult respiratory tract infections. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:1138-1180.
3. Woodring JH, Vandiviere HM, Fried AM, et al. Update: The radiographic features of pulmonary tuberculosis. AJR. 1986;146:497-506.
4. O’Neil KM. The changing landscape of HIV-related lung disease in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Chest. 2002;122:768-771.