CHAPTER 15 Impression Materials and Procedures for Removable Partial Dentures

Chapter Outline

Impression materials used in the various phases of partial denture fabrication may be classified as rigid, thermoplastic, or elastic substances. Rigid impression materials are those that set to a rigid consistency. Thermoplastic impression materials are those that become plastic at higher temperatures and resume their original form when cooled. Elastic impression materials are those that remain in an elastic or flexible state after they have set and have been removed from the mouth.

Although rigid impression materials may be capable of recording tooth and tissue details accurately, they cannot be removed from the mouth without fracture and reassembly. Thermoplastic materials cannot record minute details accurately because they undergo permanent distortion during withdrawal from tooth and tissue undercuts. Elastic materials are the only ones that can be withdrawn from tooth and tissue undercuts without permanent deformation and therefore are used generally for making impressions for removable partial dentures, immediate dentures, crowns, and fixed partial dentures when tooth and tissue undercuts and surface detail must be recorded with accuracy.

Rigid Materials*

Plaster of Paris

One type of rigid impression material is plaster of Paris, which has been used in dentistry for over 200 years. Although all plaster of Paris impression materials are handled in approximately the same manner, the setting and flow characteristics of each manufacturer’s product will vary. Some are pure and finely ground with only an accelerator added to expedite setting within reasonable working limits. Others are modified impression plasters to which binders and plasticizers have been added to permit limited border manipulation while the material is setting. These do not set as hard or fracture as cleanly as pure plaster of Paris and therefore cannot be reassembled with as much accuracy if fracture occurs.

Plaster of Paris was once the only material available for removable partial denture impressions, but now elastic materials have completely replaced the impression plasters in this phase of prosthetic dentistry. It can be used for making accurate transfers of abutment castings or copings in the fabrication of fixed restorations and internal attachment dentures and for making rigid indexes and matrices for various purposes in prosthetic dentistry. Modified impression plasters may be used to record maxillomandibular relationships.

Metallic Oxide Paste

A second type of rigid impression material is metallic oxide paste, which is usually some form of a zinc oxide–eugenol combination. A number of these pastes are available; however, they are not used as primary impression materials and should never be used for impressions that include remaining natural teeth. They also are not to be used in stock impression trays.

Metallic oxide pastes are manufactured with a wide variation of consistencies and setting characteristics. For convenience, most of them are dispensed from two tubes; this enables the dentist to dispense and mix the correct proportion from each tube on a mixing slab. The previously prepared tray for the edentulous ridge segments is loaded and positioned in the mouth with or without any attempt at border molding. Border molding with metallic oxide impression pastes is not advisable because wrinkles will occur if movement is permitted at the time the material reaches its setting state.

As with all impression techniques, the accuracy of the primary impression and of the impression tray has a great influence on the final impression. Some metallic oxide pastes remain fluid for a longer period than do others, and some manufacturers claim that border molding is possible. In general, however, all metallic oxide pastes have one thing in common with plaster of Paris impression materials: they all have a setting time during which they should not be disturbed and after which no further border molding is effective.

Metallic oxide pastes, which are rigid substances, can be used as secondary impression materials for complete dentures and for extension base edentulous ridge areas of a removable partial denture if a custom impression tray has been properly designed and attached to the removable partial denture framework (see Chapter 16).

Metallic oxide pastes can also be used as an impression material for relining distal extension denture bases and may be used successfully for this purpose if the original denture base has been relieved sufficiently to allow the material to flow without displacement of the denture or the underlying tissues.

Thermoplastic Materials*

Modeling Plastic

Like plaster of Paris, modeling plastic is among the oldest impression materials used in prosthetic dentistry. This material is most often used for border correction (border molding) of custom impression trays for Kennedy Class I and Class II removable partial denture bases. It is manufactured in several different colors, each color being an indication of the temperature range at which the material is plastic and workable. A common error in the use of modeling plastic is that it is often subjected to higher temperatures than intended by the manufacturer. It then becomes too soft and loses some of its favorable working characteristics. If a temperature-controlled water bath is not used, a thermometer should be used to maintain the water temperature. If modeling plastic is softened at a temperature above that intended by the manufacturer, the material becomes brittle and unpredictable. Also, there is the ever-present danger of burning the patient when the temperature used in softening the modeling plastic is too high.

The most commonly used modeling plastic for corrected impressions of extension base areas is the red (red-brown) material, in cake form, that softens at about 132° F. It should never be softened at temperatures much above this. Neither it nor any other modeling plastic should be immersed in the water bath for an indefinite period. It should be dipped and kneaded until soft and subjected to no more heat than necessary before the tray is loaded and it is placed in the mouth. Then it may be flamed with an alcohol torch for the purpose of border molding, but it should always be tempered by being dipped back into the water bath before its return to the mouth to avoid burning the patient. The modeling plastic then may be chilled using a water spray before removal from the mouth, although this is not necessary if care is used in removing the impression. During sectional flaming and border molding, the modeling plastic should be chilled in ice water after each removal from the mouth; then it may be trimmed with a sharp knife without danger of fracture or distortion.

Red, gray, and green modeling plastics are obtainable in stick form for use in border molding an impression or an impression tray. The green material is the lowest fusing of the modeling plastics. The red and gray sticks have a higher and broader working range than do the cakes of like color so they may be flamed without harming the material. The gray material in stick form is preferred by some dentists for border molding because of its contrasting lighter color. The choice between the use of green and gray sticks is purely optional and entirely up to the dentist.

Some dentists still prefer to use modeling plastic as a secondary impression material to record edentulous ridges in removable partial denture fabrication. When this is done, it is generally used only as a means of building up the underside of the denture before the tissues are recorded with some secondary impression material (see Chapter 16).

Impression Waxes and Natural Resins

A second group of thermoplastic impression materials consists of those impression waxes and resins commonly spoken of as mouth-temperature waxes. The most familiar of these have been the Iowa wax (Kerr Co., Romulus, MI) and the Korecta waxes (D-R Miner Dental, Concord, CA), all of which were developed for specific techniques.

Knowledge of the characteristics of mouth-temperature waxes is important if they are to be used correctly.

The Iowa wax was developed for use in recording the functional or supporting form of an edentulous ridge. It may be used as a secondary impression material or as an impression material for relining the finished removable partial denture to obtain support from the underlying tissues. The mouth-temperature waxes lend themselves well to all relining techniques as they will flow sufficiently in the mouth to avoid displacement of tissues. As with any relining technique, it is necessary that sufficient relief and venting be provided to give the material the opportunity to flow.

The difference between impression wax and modeling plastic is that impression waxes have the ability to flow as long as they are in the mouth and thereby permit equalization of pressure and prevent displacement. The modeling plastics flow only in proportion to the amount of flaming and tempering that can be done outside of the mouth; this does not continue after the plastic has approached mouth temperature. The principal advantage of mouth-temperature waxes is that, given sufficient time, they permit a rebound of those tissues that may have been forcibly displaced.

The impression waxes also may be used to correct the borders of impressions made of more rigid materials, thereby establishing optimum contact at the border of the denture. All mouth-temperature wax impressions have the ability to record border detail accurately and include the correct width of the denture border. They also have the advantage of being correctable.

Mouth-temperature waxes vary in their working characteristics. They are designed primarily for impression techniques that attempt to record the tissues under an occlusal load. In such techniques, the occlusion rim or the arrangement of artificial teeth is completed first. Mouth-temperature wax is then applied to the tissue side of the denture base, and the final impression is made under functional loading by using various movements to simulate functional activity. These mouth-temperature materials also may be used successfully in open-mouth impression techniques. Iowa wax will not distort after removal from the mouth at ordinary room temperatures, but the more resinous waxes must be stored at much lower temperatures to avoid flow when they are out of the mouth. Resinous waxes are not ordinarily used in removable partial denture impression techniques except for secondary impressions.

Elastic Materials*

Reversible Hydrocolloids

Reversible (agar-agar) hydrocolloids, which are fluid at higher temperatures and gel on reduction in temperature, are used primarily as impression materials for fixed restorations. They demonstrate acceptable accuracy when properly used; however, the reversible hydrocolloid impression materials offer few advantages over the irreversible (alginate) hydrocolloids when used as a removable partial denture impression material. Present-day irreversible hydrocolloids are sufficiently accurate for making master casts for removable partial dentures. However, border control of impressions made with these materials is difficult.

Irreversible Hydrocolloids

Irreversible hydrocolloids are used for making diagnostic casts, orthodontic treatment casts, and master casts for removable partial denture procedures. Because they are made of colloid materials, neither reversible nor irreversible hydrocolloid impressions can be stored for any length of time, but must be poured immediately.

These materials have low tear strength, provide less surface detail than other materials (e.g., mercaptan rubber base), and are not as dimensionally stable as other materials. They can, however, be used in the presence of moisture (saliva); are hydrophilic; pour well with stone; have a pleasant taste and odor; and are nontoxic, nonstaining, and inexpensive. The combination reversible-irreversible hydrocolloids have demonstrated a tendency to separate and should be used with that understanding. The hydrocolloids can be acceptably disinfected with a spray solution of 2% acid glutaraldehyde, stored in 100% humidity, and poured within 1 hour.

Mercaptan Rubber–Base Impression Materials

The mercaptan rubber–base (Thiokol) impression materials can also be used for removable partial denture impressions and especially for secondary corrected or altered cast impressions. To be accurate, the impression must have a uniform thickness that does not exceed 3 mm (image inch). This necessitates the use of a carefully made individual impression tray of acrylic-resin or some other material possessing adequate rigidity and stability. Those materials that are highly cross-linked (medium and heavy body) do not recover well from deformation and should not be used when large or multiple undercuts are present. For example, when large numbers of teeth with natural tooth contours that display multiple undercuts remain, these materials will be subjected to clinically significant distortion upon withdrawal. The long-term dimensional stability of these materials is poor because of water loss after setting. The material must be held still during the impression-making procedure because it does not have a snap set; it should be allowed to rebound for 7 to 15 minutes after it is removed from the mouth and should then be poured immediately. Many of these materials have an unpleasant odor and can stain clothes. These materials are moderately inexpensive, have high tear strength and long working and setting times (8 to 10 minutes), and can be disinfected in liquid, cold-sterilizing solutions. The accuracy of mercaptan rubber base is acceptable for making impressions for removable partial dentures; however, as with hydrocolloid impression materials, certain precautions must be taken to avoid distortion of the impression. Mercaptan rubber–base impression materials do have an advantage over hydrocolloid materials in that the surface of an artificial stone poured against them is of a smoother texture and therefore appears to be smoother and harder than one poured against a hydrocolloid material. This is probably so because the rubber material does not have the ability to retard or etch the surface of the setting stone. Despite their accuracy, this has always been a disadvantage of all hydrocolloid impression materials. The fact that a smoother surface results does not, however, preclude the possibility of a grossly inaccurate impression and stone cast resulting from other causes. Rubber-base impression materials possess a longer setting time than the irreversible hydrocolloid materials and lend themselves better to border molding in adequate supporting trays.

Polyether Impression Materials

Polyether impression material is an elastic-type material, as are the polysulfide and silicone materials. These materials have demonstrated good accuracy in clinical evaluations and are thixotropic, which provides good surface detail and makes them useful as a border molding material. It should be noted, however, that these materials are not compatible with the addition reaction silicone impression materials and should not be used to border mold custom trays when the silicone impression materials are to be used as the final impression material. The polyethers are also hydrophilic, which produces good wetability for easy cast forming.

The polyethers have low to moderate tear strength and much shorter working and setting times, which can limit the usefulness of the material. The flow characteristics and flexibility of the polyether materials are the lowest of any of the elastic materials. These characteristics can limit the use of polyethers in removable partial denture impression procedures. The stiffness of the material can result in cast breakage when removal of the cast from a custom tray is attempted. These materials have a higher permanent deformation than the addition reaction silicones. Some have an unpleasant taste, and because the material will absorb moisture, it cannot be immersed in disinfecting solutions or stored in high humidity for any extended period of time. The materials should be poured within 2 hours; however, manufacturers claim that if the impression is kept dry, clinically acceptable casts can be poured for up to 7 days.

Silicone Impression Materials

The silicone impression materials are more accurate and easier to use than the other elastic impression materials. The condensation silicones have a moderate (5 to 7 minutes) working time that can be altered by adjusting the amount of the accelerator. They have a pleasant odor, moderately high tear strength, and excellent recovery from deformation. These materials can be used with a compatible putty material to form fit a custom tray. Silicone impression materials are hydrophobic, which can make cast formation a problem. These materials can be disinfected in any of the disinfecting solutions with no alteration in accuracy. Ideally, these materials should be poured within 1 hour.

The addition reaction silicones are the most accurate of the elastic impression materials. They have less polymerization shrinkage, low distortion, fast recovery from deformation, and moderately high tear strength. These materials have a working time of 3 to 5 minutes, which can be easily modified with the use of retardants and temperature controls. They are available in both hydrophilic and hydrophobic forms, have no smell or taste, and also come in putty form, to assist in form fitting the impression tray at chairside. Most of the addition reaction silicones are available in automixing devices, can be poured up to 1 week after impression making with acceptable clinical results, and are stable in most sterilizing solutions. Sulfur in latex gloves and in ferric and aluminum sulfate retraction solution may inhibit polymerization. Many of the hydrophobic types are difficult to pour with stone, and adhesion to acrylic-resin trays is not good. The putties for these materials have a relatively short shelf life, and they are more expensive than the other elastic impression materials.

Impressions of the Partially Edentulous Arch

An impression of the partially edentulous arch must record accurately the anatomic form of the teeth and surrounding tissues. This is necessary so that the prosthesis may be designed to follow a definite path of placement and removal and so that support, stability, and retention derived from the abutment teeth may be precise and accurate.

Materials that could be permanently deformed by removal from tooth or tissue undercuts should not be used. The thermoplastic impression materials and metallic oxide pastes are therefore excluded for recording the anatomic form of the dental arch. Rubber-base materials that are highly cross-linked should not be used when large or multiple undercuts are present because these materials will be subjected to considerable distortion upon withdrawal. Plaster of Paris and modeling plastic are capable of recording tissue detail accurately, but they must be sectioned for removal and subsequently reassembled, which often leads to permanent deformation.

The introduction of hydrocolloids as impression materials was a giant step forward in dentistry. For the first time, impressions could be made of undercut areas with a material that was elastic enough to be withdrawn from those undercuts without permanent distortion. It permitted the making of a one-piece impression, which did not require the use of a separating medium, and was and still is an acceptably accurate material when handled properly.

The principal differences between reversible and irreversible hydrocolloids are as follows:

1. Reversible hydrocolloid converts from the gel form to a sol by the application of heat. It may be reverted to gel form by a reduction in temperature. This physical change is reversible.
2. Irreversible hydrocolloid becomes a gel via a chemical reaction as a result of mixing alginate powder with water. This physical change is irreversible.

Reversible hydrocolloid does have some disadvantages. It must be introduced into the mouth while warm enough to be a sol, and then it converts to an elastic gel on cooling. Therefore there is an ever-present danger of burning the tissues of the mouth—a burn that is painful and slow to heal. It requires warming and tempering equipment that is thermostatically controlled and necessitates the use of water-jacketed impression trays for cooling.

All hydrocolloids are dimensionally stable only during a brief period after removal from the mouth. If exposed to the air, they rapidly lose water content, with resulting shrinkage and other dimensional changes. If immersed in water, they imbibe water, with accompanying swelling and dimensional changes. All hydrocolloid impressions should be poured immediately, but if they must be stored for a brief period, they should be in a saturated atmosphere rather than immersed in water. This can be accomplished simply by wrapping the impression in a damp paper towel or sealing it in a plastic bag.

Hydrocolloids also exhibit a phenomenon known as syneresis, which is associated with the giving off of a mucinous exudate. This mucinous exudate has a retarding effect on any gypsum material, which results in a soft or chalky cast surface. Sometimes this is detected only by close examination of the impression after removal from the cast. Nevertheless, such a cast surface is inaccurate and ultimately will result in an inaccurate removable partial denture framework. Pouring the cast immediately and using some chemical accelerator, such as potassium sulfate, to counteract the retarding effect of the hydrocolloid can prevent this inaccuracy. All modern irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials have an accelerator incorporated into the powder and no longer need to be treated with a fixing solution.

Because no heat is used in the preparation of irreversible hydrocolloid, there is no danger of burning the patient. For this reason, the patient should be more relaxed and cooperative during the positioning of the tray. However, some disadvantages are associated with the use of irreversible hydrocolloid. This material gels by means of a chemical reaction that is accelerated by the warmth of the tissues, whereas reversible hydrocolloid gels from the tray in toward the tissues, because of the cooling action of the water that circulates through the tray. In the irreversible hydrocolloid, gelation first takes place next to the tissues, and any movement of the tray during gelation will result in internal stresses that are released on removal of the impression from the mouth. A distorted and therefore inaccurate impression results from an irreversible hydrocolloid impression that is not held immobile during gelation.

Another disadvantage of irreversible hydrocolloid is that it must be introduced into the mouth at approximately 70° F, which results in an immediate increase in the viscosity and surface tension of the material. Air bubbles are therefore harder to dispel, and it is inevitable that more air will be trapped in an irreversible impression than in a reversible impression. Every precaution must be taken to avoid the entrapment of air in critical areas.

Important Precautions to Be Observed in the Handling of Hydrocolloid Impressions

Some important precautions to be observed in the handling of hydrocolloid are as follows:

1. The impression should not be exposed to air because some dehydration will inevitably occur and result in shrinkage.
2. The impression should not be immersed in water or disinfectants because some imbibition will inevitably result, with an accompanying expansion.
3. The impression should be protected from dehydration by placing it in a humid atmosphere or wrapping it in a damp paper towel until a cast can be poured. To avoid volume change, this should be done within 15 minutes after removal of the impression from the mouth.
4. Exudate from the hydrocolloid has a retarding effect on the chemical reaction of gypsum products and results in a chalky cast surface. This can be prevented by pouring the cast immediately or by first immersing the impression in a solution of accelerator if an accelerator is not included in the formula.

Step-by-Step Procedure for Making a Hydrocolloid Impression

The step-by-step procedure and important points to observe in the making of a hydrocolloid impression are as follows:

1. Select a suitable, sterilized, perforated or rim-lock impression tray that is large enough to provide a 4- to 5-mm thickness of the impression material between the teeth and tissues and the tray.
2. Build up the palatal portion of the maxillary impression tray with wax or modeling plastic to ensure even distribution of the impression material and to prevent the material from slumping away from the palatal surface (Figure 15-1A). At this time, it is also helpful to pack the palate with gauze that has been sprayed with a topical anesthetic. This will serve to anesthetize the minor salivary glands and mucous glands of the palate and thus prevent secretions as a response to smell or taste or to the physical presence of the impression material. If gelation occurs next to the tissues while the deeper portion is still fluid, a distorted impression of the palate may result, which cannot be detected in the finished impression. This may result in the major connector of the finished casting not being in contact with the underlying tissues. The maxillary tray frequently has to be extended posteriorly to include the tuberosities and the vibrating line region of the palate. Such an extension also aids in correctly orienting the tray in the patient’s mouth when the impression is made.
3. The lingual flange of the mandibular tray may need to be lengthened with wax in the retromylohyoid area or to be extended posteriorly, but it rarely ever needs to be lengthened elsewhere. Wax may need to be added inside the distolingual flange to prevent the tissues of the floor of the mouth from rising inside the tray (Figure 15-1B).
4. Place the patient in an upright position, with the arch to be impressed nearly parallel to the floor.
5. When irreversible hydrocolloid is used, place the measured amount of water (at 70°F) in a clean, dry, rubber mixing bowl (600-mL capacity). Add the correct measure of powder. Spatulate rapidly against the side of the bowl with a short, stiff spatula. This should be accomplished in less than 1 minute. The patient should rinse his or her mouth with cool water to eliminate excess saliva while the impression material is being mixed and the tray is being loaded.
6. In placing the material in the tray, avoid entrapping air. Have the first layer of material lock through the perforations of the tray or rim-lock to prevent any possible dislodgment after gelation.
7. After loading the tray, remove the gauze with the topical anesthetic and quickly place (rub) some of the impression material on any critical areas using your finger (areas such as rest preparations and abutment teeth). If a maxillary impression is being made, place the material in the highest aspect of the palate and over the rugae.
8. Use a mouth mirror or index finger to retract the cheek on the side away from you as the tray is rotated into the mouth from the near side.
9. Seat the tray first on the side away from you, next on the anterior area, while reflecting the lip, and then on the near side, with the mouth mirror or finger for cheek retraction. Finally, make sure that the lip is draping naturally over the tray.
10. Be careful not to seat the tray too deeply, leaving room for a thickness of material over the occlusal and incisal surfaces.
11. Hold the tray immobile for 3 minutes with light finger pressure over the left and right premolar areas. To avoid internal stresses in the finished impression, do not allow the tray to move during gelation. Any movement of the tray during gelation will produce an inaccurate impression. If, for example, you allow the patient or the assistant to hold the tray in position at any time during the impression procedure, some movement of the tray will be inevitable during the transfer and the impression will probably be inaccurate. Do not remove the impression from the mouth until the impression material has completely set.
12. After releasing the surface tension, remove the impression quickly in line with the long axis of the teeth to avoid tearing or other distortion.
13. Rinse the impression free of saliva with slurry water, or dust it with plaster, and rinse gently; then examine it critically. Spray the impression thoroughly with a suitable disinfectant and cover it immediately with a damp paper towel.
image

Figure 15-1 A, Maxillary impression tray with palatal portion built up with baseplate wax to prevent impression material from sagging away from palatal surface. B, Mandibular impression tray with periphery wax added to lingual flanges to prevent tissues of the floor of the mouth from rising inside the tray. The posterior end of the tray is extended with periphery wax to cover the retromolar pad regions.

A cast should be poured immediately into a disinfected hydrocolloid impression to avoid dimensional changes and syneresis. Circumstances often necessitate some delay, but this time lapse should be kept to a minimum. A delay of 15 minutes will satisfy the disinfection requirements and should not be deleterious if the impression is kept in a humid atmosphere.

Step-by-Step Procedure for Making a Stone Cast From a Hydrocolloid Impression

The step-by-step procedure for making a stone cast from the impression is as follows:

1. A more abrasive-resistant type IV stone should be used to form removable partial denture casts. Have the measured dental stone at hand, along with the designated quantity of room temperature water, as recommended by the manufacturer. A clean 600-mL rubber mixing bowl, a stiff spatula, and a vibrator complete the preparations. A No. 7 spatula also should be within reach.
2. First, pour the measure of water into the mixing bowl and then add the measure of stone. Spatulate thoroughly for 1 minute, remembering that a weak and porous stone cast may result from insufficient spatulation. Mechanical spatulation under vacuum is preferred. After any spatulation other than in a vacuum, place the mixing bowl on the vibrator and knead the material to permit the escape of any trapped air.
3. After removing the impression from the damp towel, gently shake out surplus moisture and hold the impression over the vibrator, impression side up, with only the handle of the tray contacting the vibrator. The impression material must not be placed in contact with the vibrator because of possible distortion of the impression.
4. With a small spatula, add the first cast material to the distal area away from you. Allow this first material to be vibrated around the arch from tooth to tooth toward the anterior part of the impression (Figure 15-2). Continue to add small increments of material at this same distal area, with each portion of added stone pushing the mass ahead of it. This avoids the entrapment of air. The weight of the material causes any excess water to be pushed around the arch and to be expelled ultimately at the opposite end of the impression. Discard this fluid material. When the impressions of all teeth have been filled, continue to add artificial stone in larger portions until the impression is completely filled.
5. The filled impression should be placed so that its weight does not distort the hydocolloid impression material. The base of the cast can be completed with the same mix of stone. The base of the cast should be 16 to 18 mm (image to image inch) at its thinnest portion and should be extended beyond the borders of the impression so that buccal, labial, and lingual borders will be recorded correctly in the finished cast. A distorted cast may result from an inverted impression.
6. As soon as the cast material has developed sufficient body, trim the excess from the sides of the cast. Wrap the impression and cast in a wet paper towel, or place it in a humidor, until the initial set of the stone has taken place. The impression is thus prevented from losing water by evaporation, which might deprive the cast material of sufficient water for crystallization. Chalky cast surfaces around the teeth are often the result of the hydrocolloid’s acting as a sponge and robbing the cast material of its necessary water for crystallization.
7. After the cast and impression have been in the humid atmosphere for 30 minutes, separate the impression from the cast. Thirty minutes is sufficient for initial setting. Any stone that interferes with separation from the tray must be trimmed away with a knife.
8. Clean the impression tray immediately while the used impression material is still elastic.
9. Trimming of the cast should be deferred until final setting has occurred. The sides of the cast then may be trimmed to be parallel, and any blebs or defects resulting from air bubbles in the impression may be removed. If this is a cast for a permanent record, it may be trimmed to orthodontic specification to present a neat appearance for demonstration purposes. Master casts and other working casts are ordinarily trimmed only to remove excess stone.
image

Figure 15-2 A, Stone is introduced at one posterior region of the impression, with care taken to trace the stone moving into each tooth as it rounds the arch. B, Additional stone is not needed until the stone has reached the opposite-most posterior tooth.

Possible Causes of an Inaccurate and/or a Weak Cast of a Dental Arch

The possible causes of an inaccurate cast are as follows:

1. Distortion of the hydrocolloid impression (a) by use of an impression tray that is not rigid; (b) by partial dislodgment from the tray; (c) by shrinkage caused by dehydration; (d) by expansion caused by imbibition (this will be toward the teeth and will result in an undersized rather than oversized cast); and (e) by attempting to pour the cast with stone that has already begun to set.
2. A ratio of water to powder that is too high. Although this may not cause volumetric changes in the size of the cast, it will result in a weak cast.
3. Improper mixing. This also results in a weak cast or one with a chalky surface.
4. Trapping of air, either in the mix or in pouring, because of insufficient vibration.
5. Soft or chalky cast surface that results from the retarding action of the hydrocolloid or the absorption of necessary water for crystallization by the dehydrating hydrocolloid.
6. Premature separation of the cast from the impression.
7. Failure to separate the cast from the impression for an extended period.

Individual Impression Trays

This chapter has previously dealt with making an impression in a rigid stock tray of the anatomic form of a dental arch for making a diagnostic cast, a working cast for restorations, or a master cast. There are times, however, when a stock tray is not suitable for making the final anatomic impression of the dental arch. Most tooth-supported removable partial dentures may be made on a master cast from such an impression. Some maxillary distal extension removable partial dentures with broad palatal coverage, particularly those for a Kennedy Class I arch, may also be made on an anatomic cast, but usually these necessitate the use of an individually made tray.

A stock tray must be sufficiently rigid to avoid distortion during the impression and cast forming procedures and should fit the mouth with about 4 to 5 mm clearance for the impression material without interfering with teeth or bordering tissues; otherwise an individual tray made of some acrylic-resin tray material should be used for the final anatomic impression.

Most stock or disposable removable partial denture trays are of the rim-lock or perforated varieties. Both are made in a limited selection of sizes and shapes. Wide selections of trays are available that can be used for partially edentulous patients, including trays for both bilateral and unilateral edentulous areas.

All of these trays have reinforced borders. Although a complete denture impression tray is, or should be, made of material that permits trimming and shaping to fit the mouth, the existence of a beaded border and the rigidity of a stock removable partial denture tray allow no trimming and little shaping. The resulting impression is often a record of border tissues distorted by an ill-fitting tray rather than an impression of tissues draping naturally over a slightly underextended impression tray.

An individual acrylic-resin tray, on the other hand, can be made with sufficient clearance for the impression material and can be trimmed just short of the vestibular reflections to allow the tissues to drape naturally without distortion. The removable partial denture borders may then be made as accurately as complete denture borders with equal advantages.

Although techniques have been proposed for making individual impression trays that incorporate plastic tubing for water-cooling reversible hydrocolloid impressions, the final anatomic impression usually will be made with irreversible hydrocolloid, mercaptan rubber, or silicone impression materials.

Technique for Making Individual Acrylic-Resin Impression Trays

The diagnostic cast is often adequate for preparation of the individual tray. However, if extensive surgery or extractions were performed after the diagnostic cast was made, a new impression in a rigid stock tray and a new cast must be made. The procedures for making the new cast are identical to those described previously.

A duplicate of the diagnostic cast, on which the individual tray can be fabricated, should be made because the cast on which an individual tray is made is often damaged or must be mutilated to separate the tray from the cast. Obviously the original diagnostic cast must be retained as a permanent record in the patient’s file. Several techniques may be used to make individual impression trays. One technique for making an individual maxillary tray is described in Figures 15-3 and 15-4. This format could be used for both autopolymerizing acrylic-resin and visible light-cured (VLC) acrylic-resin. The VLC custom tray materials are premixed sheet materials that, when polymerized, provide a highly stable, distortion-free custom impression tray that is ready to use in minutes. These materials are provided by the manufacturers in sheet forms of various sizes, thicknesses, and colors.

image image

Figure 15-3 A, Desired outline of the tray is drawn on the diagnostic cast. The tray must include all teeth and tissues that will be involved in the removable partial denture. B, One thickness of baseplate wax is adapted to the cast and is trimmed to the penciled outline, which is 2 to 3 mm short of the desired border. The posterior palatal seal region is not covered by wax but will be included in finished tray. Two thicknesses of baseplate wax cover the teeth. A window is created in the wax spacer over the incisal edges. C, A model release agent is painted on the stone surfaces of the cast that will be contacted by the resin. D, The visible light-cured (VLC) resin tray material is removed from the light-proof wrap and shaped to the desired outline in a uniform manner. E, A handle is added to provide a means to place and remove the tray, as well as to pass the tray from assistant to dentist. Its form should consider the lip length and need to manipulate the perioral region. F, Before the tray is placed in the curing oven, an air barrier coating is painted on the surface. The tray is then polymerized as per manufacturers’recommendations. G, As soon as the tray material has hardened, the tray is removed from the cast, and the wax spacer is removed from the rough tray. An acrylic-resin trimmer in the lathe is used to rough finish the tray. Holes are drilled through the tray, spaced approximately 4.5 mm apart. These holes will serve to lock the impression material in the tray. In addition, excess impression material is forced out of the holes when the impression is made, thereby minimally displacement of soft oral tissues. These two features will assist in correctly orienting the individualized impression tray in the mouth.

image image

Figure 15-4 A similar technique to the one used for fabrication of the maxillary tray in Figure 15-3 is used for the mandibular tray. A, Outline of the tray is penciled on a duplicate mandibular diagnostic cast. B, A single sheet of baseplate wax is adapted to the outline of the tray, and another sheet of baseplate wax is adapted over the teeth. A window is cut in the spacer to expose the incisal edges of the lower central incisors to serve as a stop in seating the tray. C, A model release agent is painted on regions of the cast to be in contact with the resin. D, A visible light-cured (VLC) tray material wafer is adapted over the cast and spacer. E, A handle is formed with excess tray material, as previously described. F, An air barrier coating is painted on the tray material and it is processed as described in Figure 15-3. G, Following processing, multiple holes are placed throughout the tray.

A technique for making an individual maxillary tray with light-polymerized resin is as follows:

1. Outline the extent of the tray on the cast with a pencil. The tray must include all teeth and tissues that will be involved in the removable partial denture.
2. Adapt one layer of baseplate wax over the tissue surfaces and two layers over the teeth of the cast to serve as a spacer for impression material. The wax spacer should be trimmed 2 to 3 mm short of the outline drawn on the diagnostic cast. Wax covering the posterior palatal seal area should be removed so that intimate contact of the tray and tissue in this region may serve as an aid in correctly orienting the tray when the impression is made. Expose portions of the incisal edges of the central incisors to serve as anterior stops when placing the tray in the mouth. Bevel the wax so that the completed tray will have a guiding incline that will help position the tray on the anterior stop. Other cast undercuts should be blocked out with wax or modeling compound. note: Adapt an additional layer of baseplate wax over the teeth if the impression is to be made in irreversible hydrocolloid. This step is not necessary if the choice of impression material is a rubber-base or silicone type of material.
3. Paint the exposed surfaces of the cast that may be contacted by the light-polymerized resin tray material with a model release agent (MRA) to facilitate separation of the polymerized tray from the cast.
4. Remove the VLC tray material from the light-proof pouch and carefully cut the desired length with a knife or scalpel. Adapt the VLC material to the cast and trim it with a knife. Be sure not to thin the material over the teeth or the posterior border area.
5. Attach a handle by molding excess VLC material into the desired shape and blend it into the tray material in the cast. With some materials, a paper clip or similar wire may be shaped and used to reinforce the handle. Alternatively, some manufacturers make prefabricated metal custom tray handles that may be easily adapted.
6. Place the cast with the adapted tray in the light polymerizing unit and process according to the manufacturer’s directions—usually a maximum of 1 minute.
7. Remove the cast from the unit and gently remove the tray from the cast. Peel the softened wax out of the tray while the wax is still warm.
8. Paint the entire impression tray with the manufacturer’s air barrier coating material and return the tray to the unit turnstile for additional polymerizing, tissue side up.
9. When the polymerizing cycle is completed, remove the tray from the unit and clean it with a brush and water.
10. Perfect the borders of the tray with rotary instruments (vulcanite burs, acrylic-resin trimmers, etc.), and slightly polish the external surface of the tray.
11. Place perforations (No. 8 bur size) in the VLC resin tray at 5-mm (image-inch) intervals, with the exception of the alveolar groove areas, if an irreversible hydrocolloid impression material is to be used (see Figures 15-3 and 4).
12. The finished tray must be sanitized and tried in the mouth so that any necessary corrections to the tray can be accomplished before the impression is made.

The technique for making an individual mandibular VLC resin tray follows the same procedures. The buccal shelf regions on the mandibular cast are not covered by the wax spacer because these areas provide the primary support for the mandibular removable partial denture (RPD) and serve as posterior stops in orienting the tray in the patient’s mouth. During impression making, these areas will permit selective placement of tissues in the mandibular stress-bearing areas.

If mercaptan rubber is to be used, perforations are not usually necessary to lock the material in the tray, as the adhesive provided by the manufacturer provides reliable retention, and some confinement of these materials is desirable. However, a series of perforations are necessary in the median palatal raphe and incisive papilla areas of the maxillary tray so that excess impression material will escape through them, thus providing relief of the tissues in this area. For the same reasons, perforations are placed in the alveolar groove of the mandibular tray. With the use of adhesives, the impression material is not easily removed from the tray should a faulty impression have to be remade, but this is an inconvenience common to all newer elastic materials and does not prevent reuse of the impression tray. Opaque elastic impression materials and adhesives can prevent the detection of undesirable pressure areas when an impression is evaluated.

Master casts made from impressions in individual acrylic-resin trays are generally more accurate than those made in rigid stock trays. The use of individual trays should be considered a necessary step in making the majority of removable partial dentures when a secondary impression technique is not to be used. Reasons and methods for making a secondary impression will be considered in Chapter 16.

Final impressions for maxillary tooth–supported removable partial dentures often may be made in carefully selected and recontoured rigid stock impression trays. However, an individual acrylic-resin tray is preferred in those situations in the mandibular arch when the floor of the mouth closely approximates the lingual gingiva of the remaining anterior teeth. Recording the floor of the mouth at the elevation it assumes when the lips are licked is important in selecting the type of major connector to be used (see Chapter 5). Modification of the borders of an individual tray to fulfill the requirements of an adequate tray is much easier than is the modification of a metal stock tray.

* Some of the historical parts of this discussion have been quoted or paraphrased from McCracken WL: Impression materials in prosthetic dentistry, Dent Clin North Am 2:671-684, 1958.

* Some of the historical parts of this discussion have been quoted or paraphrased from McCracken WL: Impression materials in prosthetic dentistry, Dent Clin North Am 2:671-684, 1958.

* Some of the historical parts of this discussion have been quoted or paraphrased from McCracken WL: Impression materials in prosthetic dentistry, Dent Clin North Am 2:671-684, 1958.