The movement impairment of tibiofemoral hypomobility (TFHypo) syndrome is associated with a limitation in the physiologic motion of the knee. The limitation may result from degenerative changes in the joint or from the effects of prolonged immobilization. OA of the knee may contribute to TFHypo syndrome, although not all individuals with OA have TFHypo syndrome. The diagnosis of tibiofemoral rotation should be considered if a patient has radiographic evidence of OA but no limitation in knee ROM.
Individuals with the diagnosis of TFHypo syndrome report knee pain located deep in the joint and often describe their pain as vague. Symptoms are typically increased with weight-bearing activities, such as walking, standing, and stair ambulation, and are relieved with rest. Reports of stiffness after prolonged periods of rest are common. The most common diagnoses used by a referring physician include OA and knee contracture.
During assessment of standing alignment, the patient often demonstrates knee flexion; however, individuals with OA may demonstrate genu varum or genu valgus. The knee joint may also appear to be enlarged or show signs of inflammation/swelling. In addition to assessing knee alignment, alignment of the hip and foot should also be assessed.
During single-leg stance on the involved limb, the patient may demonstrate poor hip and trunk control, which is evidenced by pelvic tilt or trunk lateral bending. This is often described as a positive Trendelenburg sign121 or a gluteus medius limp when severe (notable lateral trunk flexion over involved side). The patient may also demonstrate poor balance requiring upper extremity support for performance.
During sitting knee extension, the patient may demonstrate decreased knee extension ROM. Careful observation of this movement is recommended. Some patients demonstrate co-contraction of the lower extremity muscles, particularly quadriceps and hamstrings, while attempting to extend the knee. If co-contraction is occurring, the limb moves slowly and the patient appears to be using a great deal of effort. If co-contraction is suspected, a cue to reduce effort of the activity often results in ease of the motion and a reduction in symptoms. Passively extending the patient’s knee while the patient is sitting in a chair with a backrest will provide information about hamstring length and stiffness.
Patients with TFHypo syndrome demonstrate a reduction of ROM in flexion and extension. Limitations in knee ROM may be due to impaired arthrokinematics and/or reduced muscle extensibility, therefore assessment of joint flexibility, accessory motions, and muscle extensibility is recommended. Often, end-range of motion is painful. Patients with TFHypo syndrome associated with OA may report a decrease in their end-range pain with repeated passive motion. Patients with osteoarthritic changes of the joint may demonstrate a capsular pattern, defined as a loss in flexion ROM that is greater than the loss of extension.122 Recently, however, the validity of using this pattern to detect individuals with OA has been called into question.123,124
Decreased extensibility of the hip flexors, hamstrings, and ankle plantarflexors may also be associated with the TFHypo syndrome.
Common muscle impairments include poor performance of the gluteal musculature, hip lateral rotators, gastrocnemius, and quadriceps. As described previously, co-contraction of the quadriceps and hamstrings may be visible during exercise or performance of functional activities. Co-contraction has been shown to increase joint contact pressures that may result in increased injury to the joint surfaces.125,126
Patients with TFHypo syndrome demonstrate reduced knee ROM throughout their functional activities. During ambulation, there is a reduction of knee excursion in both flexion and extension. Often the knee is maintained in flexion throughout the entire gait cycle. The patient may also demonstrate a decreased stride length and decreased push-off.
While descending stairs, the patient may demonstrate reduced knee flexion excursion on the stance limb. This reduced excursion is not solely the result of reduced joint flexibility but may be an impaired movement strategy caused by muscle co-contraction. The patient demonstrates co-contraction of the lower extremity muscles127 that often results in an increase in symptoms and effort. Follow-up instruction to “let go” of the musculature often results in an improvement in symptoms.
Reduced knee flexion is also seen as the patient moves from a sitting position to standing. Sufficient knee flexion is required to move the tibia anteriorly to bring the patient’s center of mass (COM) over their feet. When the anterior movement of the tibia is reduced, the patient compensates with increased hip and trunk flexion to advance their COM anteriorly.
Patients with TFHypo syndrome present with a physiologic limitation of knee motion, typically in knee flexion and knee extension. They also demonstrate a limitation of knee joint excursion during functional activities such as gait and stair ambulation. The observed limitation in ROM may be due to limitations in joint flexibility and muscle extensibility or an impaired motor recruitment pattern.
Treatment for this syndrome includes first educating the individual on correcting the postural habits and movements that may be contributing to the movement impairment.
The primary objectives of a treatment program include the following:
The patient is instructed in functional activities and an exercise program to address the associated movement impairments. All patients should be encouraged to participate in regular fitness activities to maintain current weight or reduce weight if the patient is overweight or obese.
It is often difficult for patients with TFHypo syndrome to change alignment immediately; however, correct alignment should be encouraged.
In the early stages of rehabilitation, compensatory modifications may be needed to accommodate the lack of ROM or to prevent increased pain. As the patient’s ROM and pain improves, the performance of functional activities should focus on teaching the components of ideal motion. If it is determined that the limitation in ROM is structurally fixed, then compensatory techniques should be provided.
During gait, the patient is instructed to use a “rolling” heel-to-toe gait pattern. This modification’s intent is to improve the shock absorption contribution of the foot and encourage improved push-off. If the patient is experiencing severe pain or demonstrates a significant malalignment, such as genu varum, an assistive device should be recommended to redistribute the forces on the affected knee. See the information on the use of a cane in the “Functional Activities” section for “Tibiofemoral Rotation with Varus Syndrome.”
To rise from a sitting position to standing, the patient should be instructed to slide forward to the edge of the chair. Once at the front of the chair, the patient should position the feet about hip-width apart and slightly posterior to the knees. If knee flexion is significantly limited, the patient may keep the affected knee comfortably extended while placing the unaffected foot appropriately. The patient is instructed to lean forward at the hips to be sure his or her center of mass is moved forward over his or her base of support. The patient is also encouraged to contract the quadriceps and gluteals and avoid femoral adduction when rising from the chair.
When transitioning from standing to a sitting position, the patient is instructed again to contract the gluteals and quadriceps and slowly lower themself into the chair. Individuals with significant limitations or pain may need to begin practicing these movements with a higher seat surface and use their upper extremities on the armrests to assist with pushing up from the seat and lowering into the seat. Performance of sit-to-stand may be progressed by reducing the use of the upper extremities and lowering the height of the seat.
Patients with TFHypo syndrome often have a high severity of symptoms with stair ambulation. Please see the “Treatment” section in the “Tibiofemoral Rotation with Valgus Syndrome” section for methods to reduce symptoms with stair ambulation. If the patient demonstrates co-contraction during the stair descent, cues to “let go” or relax their musculature often results in a reduction of symptoms.
Activities the patient performs throughout the day that may contribute to the patient’s symptoms should be addressed. For example, patients often report increased stiffness and pain after prolonged sitting. They should be instructed to decrease the amount of time that the knee is maintained in one position. They can accomplish this by rising from the chair every 20 to 30 minutes and walking or flexing and extending the knee if the situation will not allow rising from their chair, such as during a business meeting or class.
Fitness activities should be addressed as soon as possible. The appropriate level of activity demand should be assessed. In the early rehabilitation stages, the patient should begin with non–weight-bearing or reduced weight-bearing activities such as swimming, water exercises, and stationary biking without resistance. As the patient improves, weight bearing should be gradually increased. Using a StairMaster or elliptical cross-trainer can serve as a good transition to walking. While initiating strengthening exercises, it is safer for the patient to begin with high repetitions of relatively low resistance; high levels of resistance are not encouraged because of the high levels of compressive forces through the joint.
The patient should be provided with a home exercise program and instruction on the appropriate response to exercise. Specific exercises should be provided to increase ROM and improve lower extremity muscle strength and muscle extensibility.
Exercises to improve muscle performance, including strengthening and motor recruitment of the hip musculature, are described in detail in the treatment description of TFRVal syndrome. Patients with TFHypo syndrome may also benefit from strengthening of the gastrocnemius muscle, beginning with elastic band resistance and progressing to weight-bearing heel raises. Other muscles that should be considered are the abdominals and the quadriceps, if appropriate.
Historically, quadriceps strengthening has been recommended for patients with knee OA, based on the theory that the quadriceps provide shock absorption at the knee. A recent trial involving patients with knee OA demonstrated that pain can be decreased with the implementation of a strengthening program.128 However, epidemiological studies specific to knee OA have shown that increased quadriceps strength can actually accelerate the progression of OA in knees with malalignment16,18,20 or laxity.20 One must consider the compressive forces that the quadriceps can add to a joint before administering aggressive quadriceps strengthening activities. We recommend that therapeutic exercises to hypertrophy the quadriceps be avoided in patients with malalignment or laxity of the knees. However, the functional performance of the quadriceps may be enhanced through proper performance of functional activities such as sit-to-stand, stand-to-sit, step-up and step-down, and partial wall squats.
Exercises to improve the extensibility of the hip flexors, gastrocnemius, and hamstrings are also prescribed.22 To improve the extensibility of the hip flexors, the following exercises may be provided: hip and knee extension in supine (heel slide) with the opposite hip held passively flexed to the chest, knee flexion in prone, and hip lateral rotation in prone to specifically stretch the TFL-ITB. To improve the extensibility of the gastrocnemius, the patient may be instructed to perform ankle dorsiflexion in sitting with the knee extended or ankle dorsiflexion in standing. Hamstring extensibility may be increased with knee extension in sitting (see Figure 7-40).
Accessory and physiologic mobilizations may be used to reduce pain and increase ROM. If the patient is having pain at rest, a distraction mobilization can be taught to the patient for independent use at home. A trial of gentle distraction should be performed to determine if this technique will be appropriate. For the home technique, the patient sits with the knees at 90 degrees, with the lower leg dangling. A small pillow or rolled-up towel is used to elevate the thigh so that the foot is off the floor. A small weight or shoe, approximately 1 to 2 pounds, is applied to the distal limb (Figure 7-32). Patient allows the leg to dangle up to 10 minutes to help relieve discomfort. This may be performed as often as needed to relieve pain.
Figure 7-32 Home program for distraction mobilization to reduce pain. Patient is instructed to place light weight or heavy shoe, approximately 1 to 2 pounds, to the distal limb. Patient allows the leg to dangle up to 10 minutes to help relieve discomfort. This may be performed as often as needed to relieve pain.
Bracing may be considered for patients who continue to have symptoms that are limiting their function. Braces range from the simple neoprene sleeve thought to provide warmth and possible improvement in proprioception to customized unloader braces to redistribute forces in the knee. If prescribing a brace, the therapist must consider the patient’s goals and motivation, as well as the anthropomorphic characteristics for adequate fit. We recommend a trial of a relatively inexpensive, easy-to-apply brace first. If symptoms are not affected, then a custom brace might be considered.
Finally, neuromuscular training may also improve function of the lower extremity. Activities in Box 7-2 may need to be modified for the patient’s skill level. A program developed for nonoperative ACL has been modified for use in the older individual and has preliminary evidence indicating success.104
Knee extension (Kext) syndrome is described as knee pain associated with quadriceps dominance or stiffness that results in an excessive pull on the patella, patellar tendon, or tibial tubercle. This movement system syndrome may be associated with poor performance of the hip extensors. The Kext syndrome has a subcategory of patellar superior glide (KextSG). Although both conditions are a result of quadriceps stiffness, the structures that are involved are related to the location of relative stiffness/flexibility. In KextSG syndrome, the patellar tendon and surrounding retinacula are relatively more flexible than the quadriceps, therefore when the quadriceps contracts, the patellar is displaced superiorly in the trochlear groove. Excessive stresses may be placed on the patellofemoral joint or patella tendon as the patella is pulled superiorly. In Kext syndrome, the patella is thought to be relatively stable and therefore the strain may be placed on the structures superior to the patella. Because the movement impairments of the two conditions are similar, they are described concurrently; movement impairment of Kext syndrome is described and information specific to KextSG syndrome is highlighted.
Patients with Kext syndrome report symptoms superior to the patella in structures such as the quadriceps or quadriceps tendon. In contrast, patients with KextSG syndrome report symptoms in the peripatellar region or the infrapatellar region and may involve the patellofemoral joint structures or the patellar tendon and the patellar tendon attachment sites, including the patellar inferior pole and tibial tuberosity. In patients with either syndrome, symptoms are aggravated with activities that require repetitive or forceful knee extension such as jumping. Patients are often athletes such as runners, football linemen, and volleyball players. Common diagnoses used by referring physicians include patellar tendinopathy (often called jumper’s knee), quadriceps strain, and Osgood-Schlatter disease.
One impairment that might be associated with KextSG syndrome is patella alta. Researchers have identified a clear association between patella alta and increased lateral displacement and lateral tilt of the patella, particularly with a quadriceps contraction.129-131 Such patellar instability can occur with patella alta because the patella rests superior to the femoral lateral condyle, which typically prevents excessive lateral patellar glide.
In addition, patella alta may also be associated with anterior knee pain or chondromalacia in the absence of patellar instability.132-136 One potential mechanism underlying the anterior knee pain associated with patella alta is a decrease in contact area between the patella and the femur, which has been demonstrated by Ward and his colleagues.137,138 Because physical stress to biological tissue is defined as the force per unit area, any decrease in the size of the contact area at a particular joint would increase the stress on that joint, potentially leading to degenerative changes and pain.
Current evidence for the treatment of patella alta is limited to surgical intervention.131,134,136 In this chapter, we provide a conservative treatment approach for patella alta as related to the diagnosis of knee extension.
The patient with Kext syndrome or KextSG syndrome may demonstrate a swayback posture with a posterior pelvic tilt. Overdevelopment of the quadriceps musculature may be apparent. In addition, patients with KextSG syndrome often demonstrate patella alta as described by Insall38 (Figure 7-33).
During hip and knee flexion in stance (partial squat), the patient with Kext syndrome often shifts the body weight posteriorly, keeping the tibia perpendicular to the floor (Figure 7-34). The secondary test for this movement is to instruct the patient to shift the body weight anteriorly and allow the tibia to advance forward over the foot (Figure 7-35). If symptoms are reduced, Kext syndrome should be suspected. If KextSG syndrome is suspected (pain located peripatellar or inferior to the patella), the partial squat test may be repeated as the examiner places an inferior glide on the patella. If symptoms are decreased compared to the primary test, KextSG syndrome is supported.
While performing the two-joint hip flexor length test,88 knee extension may be observed when the involved limb is lowered into hip extension. If the knee extension persists when the hip is brought into abduction, rectus femoris stiffness is implicated. If the patient reports pain during the test, the test may be repeated while the examiner places an inferior glide on the patella. If symptoms decrease, then KextSG syndrome is supported. The patient with Kext (without superior glide) will likely report an increase in symptoms if an inferior glide is placed on the patella, which would place additional stress on the structures superior to the patella.
During knee flexion in prone, patients with KextSG or Kext syndrome will demonstrate a short or stiff rectus femoris and may report pain at the end of their motion. For symptoms in the peripatellar or inferior patellar region, an inferior glide is placed on the patella during the test. A decrease in symptoms with this secondary test supports KextSG syndrome as the diagnosis. Similar to the two-joint hip flexor length test, an increase in symptoms with the inferior glide would implicate Kext syndrome (without superior glide) as the diagnosis.
The McConnell test120 for patellofemoral pain may be modified to confirm KextSG syndrome. In sitting, the patient performs an isometric quadriceps contraction against resistance at 120, 90, 60, 30, and 0 degrees of knee flexion. If the patient’s pain is produced or increased during any of the contractions, the test is performed again with a manual correction by the examiner. To assess for KextSG syndrome, the examiner places an inferior glide on the patella and asks the patient to again perform the isometric contraction. If the pain is decreased, the patellofemoral joint is implicated as the source of symptoms and KextSG syndrome is implicated as the movement system diagnosis.
Patients with KextSG syndrome may demonstrate reduced accessory motion for inferior glide of the patella.
Patients with KextSG syndrome or Kext syndrome demonstrate a short or stiff quadriceps during prone knee flexion or the two-joint hip flexor length tests.
Patients with KextSG syndrome or Kext syndrome often demonstrate poor performance of the gluteus maximus and hamstrings. Quadriceps musculature may compensate for the reduced performance of the hip extensors. The imbalance between the quadriceps and the hip extensors may result in an increased demand on the quadriceps to perform activities that involve extension of the lower extremity.
The quadriceps may be short or have increased stiffness due to hypertrophy. In patients with KextSG syndrome, the quadriceps are relatively more stiff than the patellar tendon and the surrounding patellar retinacula and therefore the patella is pulled superiorly excessively. This relative stiffness/flexibility may be observed in a number of tests such as the two-joint hip flexor length test and prone knee flexion.
During assessment of movements, such as walking and running, patients with Kext syndrome and KextSG syndrome demonstrate decreased knee flexion excursion, particularly between heel strike and foot flat. Reduced knee flexion excursion may also be seen while landing from a jump. While landing from a jump, the knees should flex to assist in absorbing the forces associated with the landing. Patients with Kext or KextSG syndrome often lack this knee flexion and land with a stiff knee, which may be the result of the inability of the quadriceps to elongate appropriately during the landing.
Similar to the partial squat test described earlier, the patient keeps the body weight shifted posteriorly during a step-up or squatting activity. This position may reduce the contribution of the hip extensors and increase the need for quadriceps participation. The increased quadriceps participation may result in an increased load on the patellofemoral joint or peripatellar structures.
Kext and KextSG syndromes presents with stiffness of the quadriceps musculature often associated with quadriceps hypertrophy and activities that require repetitive knee extension. The two syndromes differ primarily in location of the structures in which the relative stiffness/flexibility is occurring, thus setting up those structures for injury. KextSG syndrome, the more common of the two, occurs because the quadriceps muscles pull the patella superiorly, resulting in injury in the peripatellar or infrapatellar region. Pain can be reduced by stabilizing the patella in an inferior direction during the aggravating activities. Kext syndrome is less common and often presents as a strain to the quadriceps musculature or the quadriceps tendon.
The primary objectives of a treatment program for Kext syndrome and KextSG syndrome include the following:
Treatment for this classification includes educating the patient in correcting the postural habits and movements that may be contributing to the movement impairment and thus the pain problem. The patient is provided with a general description of the impairment, including dominance/stiffness of the quadriceps and reduced performance of the hip extensors. Then, specific instruction for alignment and functional activities is provided and practiced by the patient. The patient is also instructed in exercises that will address the associated muscle impairments. Treatment described is appropriate for both Kext syndrome and KextSG syndrome, unless otherwise noted.
Functional activities that contribute to the movement impairment must be addressed. The functional activity that is most bothersome to the patient should be addressed first, followed by the activities in which the patient spends the most time such as work or school activities. In this chapter, we cover those activities that are useful for most patients; however, the therapist is encouraged to use the principles of the movement system to address functional activities that may not be described in this chapter.
If the patient reports increased symptoms during sitting, he or she should be instructed to reduce the amount of knee flexion while sitting. As symptoms improve, the patient may gradually increase the amount of flexion. If superior patellar glide is contributing, the patient may be instructed to perform a manual inferior glide to the patella to decrease symptoms and to decrease quadriceps stiffness.
During gait, the patient is encouraged to improve push-off. The patient may also benefit from cues to shift their body weight slightly forward.
To rise from a sitting position to standing, the patient should be instructed to slide forward to the edge of the chair. Once at the front of the chair, the patient should position the feet about hip-width apart and slightly posterior to the knees. The patient is instructed to flex forward at the hips to shift the COM over their feet. The patient should then contract his or her gluteals when rising from the chair while making sure the tibia advances forward over the foot.
Similar to rising from a chair, the patient should be instructed in flexing at the hip and shifting the tibia anteriorly to bring the center of mass over the foot. As the patient rises up the step, he or she should use the gluteals to lift the body weight up and forward to ascend stairs. If the patient is unable to ascend or descend stairs without an increase in symptoms, compensatory methods may need to be provided. Please see the “Functional Activities” section in the “Tibiofemoral Rotation with Valgus Syndrome” section for methods to reduce symptoms with stair ambulation.
Patients with Kext syndrome and KextSG syndrome often participate in fitness, weight training, or sporting activities. These activities may need to be modified to reduce symptoms and reduce quadriceps hypertrophy. If the person participates in weight training, quadriceps strengthening activities should be reduced, and activities to target the gluteals and hamstrings should be substituted. It is important to remember that when a muscle hypertrophies through strengthening, the stiffness of the muscles also increases.
The patient’s aerobic activities may be modified by reducing the intensity to a level appropriate for the patient’s stage for rehabilitation. The intensity is then increased gradually as the patient’s symptoms improve.
If the patient participates in jumping activities on a regular basis, jumping activities should be addressed. The patient should be instructed in achieving sufficient knee flexion during landing and to perform a soft landing. The patient should begin to practice the new strategy at low intensity levels, including small jumps and low impact landing. As the patient improves, the technique may be progressed to higher intensity jumps and landings if symptoms are not aggravated.
Exercises to improve the performance of the gluteus maximus include prone hip extension with the knee flexed, weight shifting, standing on one leg, hip extension in standing with resistance, lunges, and squats. Care should be taken not to increase the patient’s knee symptoms with any of these exercises, particularly lunges and squats, which will incorporate quadriceps participation. The appropriate level of exercise depends on the stage for rehabilitation and the gluteus maximus strength.
Exercises to improve the extensibility of the quadriceps should also be prescribed. We recommend prone knee flexion or the two-joint hip flexor length test position. During all stretching exercises, the patient should have good abdominal support to avoid pelvic anterior tilt or transverse rotation. Patients with KextSG syndrome need to stabilize the patella during these stretches to prevent superior glide and isolate the stretch to the quadriceps. Stabilization of the patella may be accomplished by manual assistance of another person or through taping (Figure 7-36).
Figure 7-36 Horseshoe taping technique: To assist stabilization of the patella in patients with knee extension with patellar superior glide (KextSG) syndrome.
If prone knee flexion is prescribed, the patient should flex the knee only as far as he or she can without increased pain. In addition, the therapist needs to be sure the movement of the patella is not restricted by pressure against the supporting surface. In some cases, a folded towel needs to be placed under the thigh so the patella is able to move inferiorly during knee flexion.
Taping and patellar mobilization may be useful in patients with KextSG syndrome. We have developed a method to reduce the pull of the quadriceps on the patellar tendon and tibial tubercle (see Figure 7-36). Patients who participate in activities that involve repetitive jumping should be taught to reinforce the taping technique, because the taping may loosen with the repetitive jumping stresses. Patellar inferior glides and mobilization with movement may be used to help improve the patellar positioning. Based on the concept proposed by Mulligan,139 a mobilization for KextSG syndrome was developed. While in the sitting position, the patient performs knee extension and flexion. During the eccentric flexion phase, the patient performs a manual inferior glide of the patella.
A 28-year-old male triathlete is referred to physical therapy for evaluation and treatment of left knee pain. He reports left knee pain for 5 months that was located immediately posterior to the patella. His pain began after a recent marathon. He stated that he had no pain during or after the race. He took the recommended rest after the marathon, then approximately 3 weeks after the marathon, he began to increase his running mileage in preparation for his next triathlon. After running a set of intervals, he noticed a sharp pain behind the left kneecap. He had used ibuprofen and ice with minimal relief. At the time of the examination, the patient rated his pain as a 2/10 at rest that increased to 6/10 with running. His symptoms do not appear to increase with cycling or swimming. His KOS-ADL119 score is 76%, and KOS-Sports score is 71%. No imaging was performed.
The patient is 6 feet 3 inches and weighs 210 pounds with a fit appearance. In stance, the patient’s alignment was unremarkable.
During a partial squat, the patient reports an increase in knee pain. No movement faults are noted. For the secondary test, the partial squat is repeated while the examiner placed a manual patellar glide in the medial direction. The patient reports an increase in knee pain similar to the previous test. The examiner asks the patient to repeat the test while the examiner placed a manual glide in the inferior direction. The patient reports no pain with the test.
Accessory motions of the patellofemoral joint were limited in the inferior direction. The patient reports no change in symptoms with the accessory motions.
During the two-joint hip flexor length test, the patient demonstrated a short rectus femoris on the left. As the hip was extended, the knee extended and the patient reports an increase in his symptoms. With a manual glide of the patella in the inferior direction, the patient reports a decrease in his pain compared to the first performance. Hamstrings are short and stiff.
Using manual muscle testing, the left hip lateral rotators are 4+/5, the gluteus maximus is 4−/5, the iliopsoas is 4/5, and the posterior gluteus medius is 4+/5. Hamstring and quadriceps are strong (5/5); however, the patient reports an increase in his pain when resistance is applied to the quadriceps.
The rectus femoris was relatively more stiff than the patellofemoral joint causing superior glide of the patella during rectus femoris length tests.
The patient reported tenderness with palpation along the medial and lateral patellar facets. There was no tenderness along the tibiofemoral joint line. The McConnell test120 and the patellofemoral grind test52,120 for patellofemoral pain were positive. During the McConnell test, the patient reported pain when resistance is applied with the knee in 60 degrees of flexion. This pain is alleviated with a manual inferior glide. All ligamentous and meniscal tests were negative.
The patient reports an increase in his symptoms during a stair ascent. As he pushed off of the step with the involved limb, he kept his trunk vertical and did not flex forward at the hip. Cues to lean forward and use his gluteals to push up to the next step resulted in decreased symptoms with the step. Gait was unremarkable. During landing from a jump, he demonstrates reduced knee flexion excursion, giving a stiff knee appearance.
The diagnosis is KextSG syndrome, and the stage for rehabilitation is Stage 2. His prognosis is good to excellent. Positive moderators include his young age, overall good health, high motivation to return to his activities, and his ability to change the movement impairments with instruction only. Negative moderators include his high activity level.
The patient was seen once per week for 2 weeks, then once every other week for 2 weeks for a total of 4 visits over 7 weeks. Treatment included instruction in correct performance of functional activities, including his sporting activities. He was also instructed in a home exercise program to improve performance of the hip extensors and hip lateral rotators as well as exercises to increase the extensibility of the rectus femoris and hamstrings.
During the first visit, the patient was instructed in shifting his COM forward over the feet during functional activities such as sit-to-stand and ascending stairs. This was accomplished by leaning forward and dorsiflexing the ankle to advance his tibia anteriorly over the foot. He was then instructed to use his gluteals while extending the lower extremity to raise his body weight up to the next step.
To improve performance of the hip lateral rotators and posterior gluteus medius, sidelying hip abduction/lateral rotation with the hip and knee extended was prescribed. To improve gluteus maximus performance, prone hip extension with the knee flexed was prescribed. To accomodate rectus femoris stiffness, he performed this exercise with pillows under his hips to allow greater hip motion. He was instructed to perform the exercises one time per day. He was instructed to perform 3 sets, each set to fatigue. The repetitions depended on his ability to perform the exercise correctly. He was also instructed to stop all of the exercises that he was using to increase quadriceps strength such as resisted knee extension, lunges and squats. He was encouraged instead to substitute gluteal strengthening activities such as hip extension.
To improve extensibility of the rectus femoris, the two-joint hip flexor test position was used as a stretching technique. He was instructed to extend the hip toward the surface of the mat. Once the hip was in the final position, the patient was instructed to flex the knee. The patient was unable to perform the stretch without an increase in symptoms, so the examiner applied the taping method in Figure 7-36 to assist. With the tape applied, the patient could perform the stretch without discomfort behind the patella. He also reported feeling a good stretch in the quadriceps muscles. An alternative stretch, knee flexion in prone, was provided for the times that he could not be taped. He was instructed to flex the knee through the ROM that did not increase his pain.
Regarding his fitness program, the patient was encouraged to continue with cycling and swimming according to his training schedule. For the running component, he was encouraged to avoid interval training that involved sprints for 2 weeks. During these 2 weeks, the distance he runs should be limited to a distance that does not increase his symptoms by more than 2 points. For example, if he rated his pain at rest as 2/10 and increased to 5/10 after the run, he should reduce his distance during the next run. He was encouraged to continue using ice as needed.
The patient was also instructed in how to apply the tape appropriately. He was instructed to at minimum wear the tape during stretching and during his runs. He was encouraged to wear the tape throughout the day if possible.
At his second visit, 1 week later, the patient reported 80% compliance with the exercises and 70% compliance with the functional activity corrections. He reported that his worst pain in the last week was 2/10 after sitting for a prolonged time at a conference. He stated that the tape was helpful and discovered that he could run longer distances if the tape was in place. He demonstrated correct performance of the exercises, therefore the exercises were progressed. Sidelying hip abduction/lateral rotation and prone hip extension were progressed to standing hip abduction/lateral rotation and standing hip extension using resistance. The patient’s gym had a pulley resistance system, so he was instructed in the proper performance of the exercises using the pulley system.
He demonstrated proper performance of the two-joint hip flexor length stretch; however, he reported that he had some difficulty finding an appropriate place to perform the stretch. He would like to be able to perform the stretch before and after runs outside. He was instructed in a method to perform the stretch in a half-kneeling position (Figure 7-37). He was encouraged to maintain proper trunk alignment during performance of the stretch.
Figure 7-37 The two-joint hip flexor length stretch in half-kneeling position. May be performed in Stage 3 of rehabilitation. The patient is instructed to use the ground to prevent superior glide of the patella while performing the stretch. For patient comfort, this stretch should not be performed on a hard surface. The patient is instructed to maintain proper trunk alignment by using abdominal contraction to prevent lumbar extension and to avoid leaning forward.
On review of functional activities, such as sit-to-stand and stair ambulation, the patient was able to demonstrate the activities independently. He reported that he no longer had pain with stairs, although he was surprised when he had an increase in pain after prolonged sitting. With follow-up questioning, the patient revealed that he did not wear the tape on the day of the conference because he felt it was not needed. To address this relative stiffness/flexibility, the patient was instructed in a self-mobilization using inferior glide of the patella during knee flexion. He was instructed to perform this as often as he could throughout the day, particularly during the days he was sitting for a prolonged period of time.
At 5 weeks, the patient reported that he had no pain at rest or with his training runs. He stated that he had not used tape in the last 2 weeks and felt ready to begin interval training again. He demonstrated independence is his home program and functional activities. He was instructed in how to progress his resistance training for the hip musculature and encouraged to continue performing the stretches on a consistent basis. The strengthening and stretching routine that he typically performed before his injury was reviewed and suggestions were provided. For example, during his hamstring stretch, he demonstrated increased lumbar flexion. He was instructed to avoid lumbar flexion to isolate the stretch to the hamstrings and to avoid unnecessary stress to the lumbar spine.
The examiner agreed that he could initiate his interval training. The patient was encouraged to apply tape during the first few sessions. If he had no increase in symptoms, then he could try a session without tape.
At the time of his last visit, 7 weeks later, the patient reported that he had returned to his preinjury training status without tape. Function was also improved as demonstrated by 100% on both KOS-ADL119 and KOS-Sports scores. He continued to perform his stretching and resistance activities. He also reported beginning a yoga class, which he felt was helpful; however, he wanted to be sure if that was appropriate. Given the patient’s inherent stiffness and high activity level, a regular stretching program would be appropriate. The examiner reviewed the poses that the patient was performing and educated him on how to modify particular poses to avoid increased stress to the joints.
Knee hyperextension (Khext) syndrome is described as knee pain associated with an impaired knee extensor mechanism. Dominance of the hamstrings and poor performance of gluteus maximus and quadriceps muscles result in hyperextension of the knee placing excessive stresses on the knee. Differentiating Khext syndrome from TFR syndrome can be a challenge; therefore tests to rule out TFR syndrome should be performed before providing the Khext syndrome diagnosis.
Patients report pain located in the peripatellar region or tibiofemoral joint that is aggravated during prolonged standing or with activities that involve rapid knee extension such as swimming or kicking during martial arts. Race walkers also demonstrate Khext syndrome as they repetitively hyperextend their knee to maintain prolonged foot contact during their sport. Common diagnoses used by referring physicians include patellofemoral pain syndrome and fat pad syndrome, also called Hoffa’s disease.140
The articles that are available related to Khext syndrome are limited to describing the effect of knee alignment on structures of the knee. Loudon et al24 provided a thorough review of the relationship of knee hyperextension alignment and tissue injury. Extension of the knee is not limited by bony anatomy, thus the soft tissues of the posterior knee are primarily responsible for the resistance needed to prevent the knee from further extension. Based on the anatomy and principles of biomechanics, a reasonable assumption is that prolonged knee hyperextension during standing or repetitive hyperextension during gait could result in increased tensile stresses on the ACL and the soft tissues of the posterior knee, as well as compressive stresses on the anterior structures such at the fat pad.141
There are a few studies that demonstrate a direct association between knee hyperextension and injury. In a prospective study of female soccer players, Myer et al142 reported that knee hyperextension alignment increases the odds of sustaining an ACL injury by fivefold. In a case-control study, Loudon et al143 used conditional step-wise logistic regression to find a significant correlation between knee hyperextension alignment and ACL injury. There is also evidence that women with hyperextension of the knee may have reduced knee joint position sense that may reduce the individual’s ability to control end-range knee extension movements.144
Although knee hyperextension alignment is implicated in knee injury and pain, an individual with Khext syndrome can demonstrate signs of hyperextension during other tests such as gait and stair ambulation. The diagnosis of Khext syndrome should not be given based on alignment alone.
Individuals with Khext syndrome often demonstrate knee extension greater than 5 degrees in standing (Figure 7-38). They may also demonstrate a swayback posture with a posterior pelvic tilt and ankle plantarflexion. Correction of the standing alignment may result in a decrease in the patient’s symptoms.
Patients in this category may demonstrate a general joint hypermobility as assessed by the Beighton index145; however, this is not a requirement. Some patients appear to have general laxity of the ligaments, yet their Beighton index is relatively low. The patient may demonstrate knee extension PROM that is greater than 10 degrees; however, in acute flare-ups of the condition, the patient may actually demonstrate a reduction in knee extension compared to the uninvolved side. This is thought to be a protective mechanism to reduce stresses to the injured structures.
The patient may have a short or stiff gastrocnemius; however, these limitations are not seen in all patients with Khext syndrome. Hamstring shortness is often associated with this syndrome.
Impairments of muscle strength and performance include poor performance of gluteus maximus and quadriceps. The gluteus maximus often tests weak during manual muscle testing (MMT) and demonstrates delayed recruitment during activities such as prone hip extension with the knee extended. The gluteus maximus should contract early in the motion of limb movement during prone hip extension. A notable delay in gluteus maximus contraction may indicate that the hamstrings are acting as the primary hip extensors for the hip movement. The quadriceps often tests strong during a MMT; however, the patient may display poor functional use of the quadriceps during activities such as a step-up or sit-to-stand as evidenced by the patient pulling his or her knees back to the body.
During gait, the patient may demonstrate hyperextension from heel strike through late stance. The patient may also demonstrate a prolonged foot flat, keeping their heel in contact with the floor longer than expected. Noyes et al146 described this gait pattern in patients with posterolateral ligament complex injuries; however, this pattern has been observed in symptomatic patients without documented ligamentous injury.
During a step-up, the patient demonstrates a faulty movement of pulling the knee back to the body, instead of shifting the body forward over the limb. This motion is achieved by using the hamstrings more than the quadriceps and gluteus maximus to extend the hip and the knee. Because the foot is anchored on the floor, hip extension performed by the hamstrings results in knee extension and therefore reduces the need to recruit the quadriceps to extend the knee.
Khext syndrome presents with the movement impairment of knee hyperextension during alignment, movement tests, and functional activities. A special note related to secondary tests for Khext syndrome is that patients with this syndrome often have a chronic condition that does not always modify immediately with secondary tests. The patient may need to try modifications for a period of time to see the effect. For example, the patient may report no change in symptoms with correction of standing alignment; however, if standing alignment is modified while at work, symptoms may improve dramatically.
Differentiating between Khext syndrome and tibiofemoral rotation syndrome can be challenging. If signs for both Khext syndrome and tibiofemoral rotation syndrome are observed, the therapist should follow treatment guidelines for tibiofemoral rotation syndrome, which provides treatment related to the rotation component and also addresses the hyperextension component. Khext syndrome should be reserved for those displaying the movement impairment in the sagittal plane only.
Treatment for this syndrome includes educating the individual in correcting the postural habits and movements contributing to the movement impairment and thus the pain problem. The patient is provided with a general description of the impairment and specific instruction for alignment and functional activities. Then the functional activities are practiced by the patient. The patient is also instructed in exercises that will address the associated muscle impairments.
First, the patient is educated in correction of posture and functional activities. To improve alignment between the femur and tibia, the patient is instructed to relax or unlock the knees to reduce hyperextension of the knee. If the patient stands in a posterior pelvic tilt, this should also be corrected. A mirror is useful during correction of the alignment. Patients often report that their position of hyperextension feels “normal,” and the correction feels as if their knees are too flexed as in a partial squat. The mirror reinforces the proper alignment of the knee.
During ambulation, the patient is encouraged to use a proper heel-to-toe gait pattern and to land softly on the heel at heel strike. The patient is also instructed to avoid knee hyperextension and hip hyperextension during the stance phase of gait cycle. Most patients with knee hyperextension have a delayed heel rise at push-off; therefore a helpful cue is to ask the patient to lift the heel a little earlier than usual. Another useful cue, as described by Noyes et al,146 is to walk with the knee slightly flexed.
During sit-to-stand and stairs, the patient is instructed to use the quadriceps and gluteus maximus to lift the body up and forward and to avoid pulling the knee(s) back to meet the body. The final position of the knee should be a neutral position not hyperextended. If the patient is unable to ascend or descend stairs without an increase in symptoms, compensatory methods may need to be provided. Please see the “Functional Activities” section the “Tibiofemoral Rotation with Valgus Syndrome” section for methods to reduce symptoms with stair ambulation.
Patients with Khext syndrome often report increased symptoms with prolonged standing. They should be instructed in correcting their alignment during stance and to reduce the amount of time that they stand in one position. They should be encouraged to change their activities as often as possible, including sitting, walking and leaning into a support surface. If they are in a situation that does not allow them to change their activity, weight shifting provides some temporary reduction in stresses on the knee.
If the patient does not have a fitness program, then a discussion is warranted to encourage a fitness program as a goal. If the person participates regularly in a fitness program, modification may be necessary. The patient’s aerobic activities may need to be modified by addressing the movement impairment and by reducing the intensity. The intensity level of the aerobic activity should be related to the patient’s stage for rehabilitation. For example, if the patient is a speed walker and the injury is Stage 1 for rehabilitation, the patient may be instructed to use a bike, walk in a pool, or start with a slower walking pace or shorter walking distance. The intensity is then gradually increased. As the patient’s symptoms improve, the patient should begin to increase the walking distance and then increase the speed.
Exercises to improve strength and performance of the gluteus maximus and quadriceps may be prescribed. To improve gluteus maximus performance, exercises, such as prone hip extension with the knee flexed, weight shifting, single-leg stance, and resisted hip extension, are prescribed. When performing prone hip extension with the knee flexed, the patient should have at least one pillow under the abdomen so that the exercise is performed from some hip flexion to neutral and not into hip hyperextension. Functional activities that can be used as exercise to improve gluteus maximus and quadriceps performance include sit-to-stand, wall sits, step-up/step-downs, lunges, and squats. Abdominal muscle exercises may also be appropriate if the patient demonstrates poor trunk and/or pelvic control.
Sitting knee extension with ankle dorsiflexion is an exercise that can be performed easily throughout the day to improve the extensibility of the hamstrings and gastrocnemius. The gastrocnemius can be stretched with prolonged passive ankle dorsiflexion in standing, and the hamstrings can be stretched with prolonged knee extension in the sitting position (see Figure 7-40). To properly stretch the hamstrings, be sure that the spine does not flex.
Taping may be useful in patients with knee hyperextension. The posterior X taping demonstrated in Figure 7-27 to treat TFRVal syndrome will also assist with preventing Khext syndrome. If the fat pad is very irritable, it may be helpful to try the unloading taping technique proposed by McConnell (Figure 7-39).
Neuromuscular training to improve proprioception, balance, and the ability to accommodate to perturbations is important (see Box 7-2). During neuromuscular training, the patient is instructed to limit the amount of knee hyperextension.
A 35-year-old female is referred to physical therapy for evaluation and treatment of left knee pain. She reports two previous bouts of similar pain that resolved fairly quickly without intervention. However, this episode began approximately 3 weeks ago and has not improved. The pain is located in the posterior aspect of her knee and just inferior to the patella deep in the joint. She has participated in competitive race walking for the past 3 years. Initially, her pain would only occur during races or when training, but the pain progressed to occurring with daily walking and stair ambulation. Her pain forced her to stop race walking approximately weeks ago, and she is very anxious to return to this activity. Her pain rating at the time of the initial visit was 3/10 with daily activities and increases to 6/10 if attempting to race walk. She describes her pain as a deep aching in the posterior knee that becomes sharper when race walking. Nothing seems to give her relief except taking Ibuprofen. Her KOS-ADL119 score is 51%, and KOS-Sports score is 40%. Radiographs show no abnormalities of the tibiofemoral or patellofemoral joint. She also states that she has a 2-year-old daughter who she tends to carry on her left hip. She was working part-time as a business consultant.
The patient is 5 feet 6 inches and weighs 135 pounds. In stance, the patient demonstrated tibial varum and genu recurvatum bilaterally; however, both faults were greater on the left compared to the right. She had a flat lumbar spine, posterior pelvic tilt, and hip joint hyperextension with a mild swayback alignment.
During single-leg stance on the left, the patient demonstrates increased knee hyperextension. The patient did not report an increase in pain, although she does express a feeling of instability compared to standing on the uninvolved limb. The patient also demonstrates a pelvic lateral tilt (Trendelenburg sign) during single-leg stance bilaterally; however, she demonstrated more tilt during single-leg stance on the left than on the right.
During a step-up onto a 12-inch stool, the patient kept her COM posterior to her base of support and snapped her knee back to her body using her hamstrings. She reported a mild increase in symptoms during this test. She was cued to lean forward to bring her COM over her foot, and to think about using her quadriceps and gluteals as she stepped up. She performed the step-up correctly by following the cues provided. She reported that her symptoms did not increase with the corrected method.
Knee extension PROM tested in supine is 15 degrees on the left and 10 degrees on the right. The patient’s tibiofemoral joints are mildly lax compared to normal, which was noted particularly during prone hip rotation testing, during which the leg motion was particularly evident.
Hamstring length is tested and found to be short bilaterally with 70 degrees passive straight leg raise. Gastrocnemius length was also short bilaterally, measuring 10 degrees ankle dorsiflexion with the knees flexed and 0 degrees with the knees extended.
On the left side, the gluteus maximus MMT reveals a grade of 4/5 and shows a delayed onset compared to the hamstrings during hip extension with the knee extended. The left quadriceps MMT grade is 5/5, although poor functional performance is suspected. For example, during a wall squat the left quadriceps fatigued more readily than the right, with notable muscle quivering after only 10 seconds. The posterior gluteus medius MMT grade is 4−/5 bilaterally.
The patient reports tenderness with palpation distal to the inferior pole of the patella in the region of the fat pad on the left. Mild tenderness is also noted on the posterolateral aspect of the knee. All ligamentous and meniscal tests are negative.
During sit-to-stand and stair ambulation, the patient demonstrates the tendency to pull her knees back to the body using her hamstrings, rather than keep her COM over her feet and use her quadriceps to extend her knees. Increased symptoms are elicited on the left after completing one flight of stairs. The patient is cued to lean forward and to get her shoulders over her feet while concentrating on not hyperextending her knees. Although she has some difficulty performing the stair ambulation correctly with these cues, the patient reports no aggravation of her symptoms. Gait deficits noted are knee hyperextension from heel strike through terminal stance with a delayed heel rise bilaterally. When cued to decrease the knee hyperextension and attempt an earlier heel rise, the patient has trouble trying to change her gait pattern and becomes a little frustrated. A bilateral hip drop is also noted during gait.
The diagnosis is Khext syndrome. The stage for rehabilitation is Stage 2. Her prognosis is good to excellent. Positive moderators include her fairly young age, overall good health, and high motivation to return to her activities. Negative moderators include her difficulty making corrections during alignment and functional activities and her anxiety about wanting to return to race walking, a sport that encourages knee hyperextension by demanding that one foot be in contact with the ground at all times.
The patient was seen twice per week for 2 weeks secondary to taping needs, then decreased to once per week for 4 weeks for a total of 8 visits over 6 weeks. Treatment included instruction in correct performance of functional activities, including speed walking. She was also instructed in a home exercise program to improve performance of the hip abductors, gluteus maximus, and quadriceps, along with exercises to increase the extensibility of the hamstrings, gastrocnemius, and soleus muscles. Although she reported pain only in the left knee, she was encouraged to perform the exercises bilaterally.
During the first visit, the patient was instructed to correct her standing alignment of knee hyperextension by relaxing her knees. A mirror was needed for visual feedback of her alignment. Her tendency at first was to excessively flex her knees, and she found it very difficult and tiresome to maintain normal alignment. Therefore it was decided to perform the posterior X taping technique to provide an external source of feedback to her when she would start to hyperextend her knees (see Figure 7-27). The patient was instructed to keep the tape on for 1 to 3 days if tolerated and to check her skin carefully when the tape was removed. Assuming there would be no skin reactions, the plan was for her to return at the end of the week to be re-taped.
She was instructed to try alternating the hip she used for carrying her child, instead of always holding her on the left. Holding her child on the left hip resulted in prolonged positioning of hip adduction and pelvic lateral tilt. This prolonged positioning may have contributed to her hip weakness and increased knee hyperextension on the left. The patient was instructed in performance of sit-to-stand, attempting to get her shoulders over her feet and prevent hyperextending her knees when completing the standing maneuver. This task was easier for her to correct than gait or stair climbing during the first session.
To improve the functional performance of the quadriceps, the patient was instructed in a wall squat exercise. She assumed a position of about 45 degrees hip and knee flexion and was instructed to start by maintaining the position for 15 seconds and to perform 5 repetitions. Each day she was to try to add 5 seconds onto her hold time during the first week. She was also cued to avoid hyperextending her knees when returning from the squat position to the hip and knee extended position.
To begin to improve the performance of her gluteus maximus, the patient was instructed to forward bend by hip flexion only with knees flexed and practice returning by contracting her gluteals to lift her upper body. She was also given the exercise of prone hip extension over 3 or 4 pillows to help place her in enough hip flexion so that her knee could stay relaxed in flexion as she extended her hip using her gluteus maximus. She was instructed to perform the exercise one time per day. She was instructed to perform 3 sets, each set to fatigue. The repetitions depended on her ability to perform the exercise correctly.
To improve the recruitment of the posterior gluteus medius, the patient was instructed in weight shifting. She was instructed to avoid pelvic tilting and knee hyperextension as she shifted. The patient had difficulty maintaining the appropriate pelvic position, so she was encouraged to place her hands on her ASIS to monitor the pelvic alignment. She was then able to perform the activity correctly. She was also encouraged to maintain the trunk in a neutral position and avoid sidebending. She was instructed to perform this exercise frequently throughout the day, if possible.
To address her limitations in hamstring extensibility, she was instructed to sit on the edge of a chair with one leg extended and to lean forward from her hips keeping her spine straight until she felt an appropriate stretch to her hamstrings. Because her knee would easily assume a hyperextended position, the patient had to make a conscious effort to keep the knee relaxed in slight flexion during the stretch (Figure 7-40). While stretching her hamstrings, she was also instructed to try to dorsiflex her ankle without toe extension to provide an additional stretch to her gastrocnemius. The patient was instructed in the typical standing wall stretch for the gastrocnemius as well.
Figure 7-40 Hamstring stretching. Proper performance of hamstring stretch provided to the patient. A, The patient sits on the edge of a chair with one leg extended. B, The patient then leans forward from the hips, keeping the spine straight until an appropriate stretch is felt.
At her second visit, she reported 75% compliance with the exercises and about 50% compliance with the functional activity corrections, which were still hard for her. She stated that the tape behind her knees was definitely helpful in relearning how to stand properly. She was able to wear the tape for 2 days and had no skin reaction, so she requested to have the tape applied again at that visit. Her symptoms had decreased to 2/10, and she reported less pain with stair ambulation.
She demonstrated correct performance of the exercises, therefore the exercises were progressed. With the wall squat, she was now able to sustain the position for 30 seconds before fatiguing. This exercise was progressed by having her place her right foot slightly in front of her left, forcing her to increase the load to her left quadriceps. Her weight shifting was progressed to single-leg stance with light upper extremity support and using all the previous cues. An additional exercise was given to her for the posterior gluteus medius. She was instructed in the side lying hip abduction/lateral rotation exercise. Two to three pillows were placed between her legs and her top leg was aligned in 10 to 20 degrees of hip and knee flexion. When the patient attempted to abduct her hip off the pillows, she reported feeling muscles working in her posterior thigh so it was determined that she was substituting with her hamstrings. With much verbal and manual cueing and specific palpation of her posterior gluteus medius, she was able to perform this exercise correctly. The patient was encouraged to start with five repetitions and progress toward ten, only if she could feel the muscle recruitment in the correct location. Because she was performing her prone hip extension exercise correctly, she was encouraged to add more repetitions.
The patient was re-taped and her gait deviations were addressed with the tape applied. The main cues given to her were to lean forward slightly while walking, take smaller strides and lift her heel earlier at terminal stance. Her attempts at these corrections were better than at her first visit, although she felt very awkward. The patient was instructed to continue with the other exercises, trying to be diligent about her hamstring stretching throughout the day.
At the fifth visit during the third week, taping was discontinued because the patient felt she was now able to control the knee hyperextension on her own. The patient reported 0/10 symptoms at that time with walking and with stair ambulation. She admitted to trying to race walk for a short distance but developed low level symptoms so she decided she was not quite ready. At this visit, she was progressed to level 3 of the posterior gluteus medius progression. She was now able to perform single-leg stance without any upper extremity support, so the activity was progressed by performing single-leg stance on an unstable surface starting with pillows and progressing to foam pads and a BOSU ball. She also began standing lunges and step-ups to strengthen her gluteals and quadriceps more functionally, monitoring her movement pattern to be sure she was not using her hamstrings to pull her knee back to her body.
During her sixth visit in the fourth week, she began to practice walking with increased speed while trying to still work on the specific gait cues she had now been practicing for a few weeks. As long as she did not go too fast, she was able to achieve some corrections and did not experience an increase in symptoms. She was progressed to playing catch with a weighted medicine ball while balancing on one leg on the BOSU ball. Also, she now added 5 pound weights in each hand while performing her lunges and step-ups.
The patient was seen for a total of 8 visits over 6 weeks. At her last visit, the patient reported that she could race walk for 1 mile without aggravating her symptoms, although she stated that she was not yet up to her previous speed. She reported that it was impossible to prevent the hyperextension as her speed increased. Since she was determined to continue participation in this sport, she was instructed to work on her gait corrections as much as possible throughout the rest of the day, when not race walking. Function was also improved as demonstrated by a KOS-ADL score of 93% and a KOS-Sports score of 84%. She was instructed to continue her home exercise program daily, if possible, even when she was totally pain-free with all activities and to think of it like “brushing her teeth.” It was explained to her that if she would stop the exercises, her pain would likely return after a period of time. The patient had no problem with this commitment, and she was discharged from physical therapy.
Patellar lateral glide (PLG) syndrome is described as knee pain as a result of an impaired patellar relationship within the trochlear groove. Patients with PLG syndrome have an imbalance between the vastus medialis oblique (VMO) and the vastus lateralis (VL) muscles that may place excessive compressive forces in the lateral patellofemoral joint and tensile forces on the medial joint structures. Shortness or stiffness of the TFL-ITB complex may also contribute to a lateral pull on the patella. A similar syndrome has been described by McConnell.87
Patients with PLG report peripatellar or retropatellar pain with activities such as stairs, running and squatting. They may also report an increase in symptoms with prolonged knee flexion when sitting, often called movie goers syndrome. PLG rarely occurs in isolation and is often a secondary diagnosis associated with a primary diagnosis of tibiofemoral rotation or knee hyperextension. Common diagnoses used by referring physicians include patellofemoral pain syndrome and patellar chondromalacia.
There is a large body of literature related to the relationship of the VMO and patellofemoral pain; however, the relationship has not been clearly established. A number of authors have reported that patients with patellofemoral pain demonstrate poor performance of the VMO when compared to those without symptoms.147-151 There are, however, others that report there is no difference in VMO performance between those with and without patellofemoral pain.152-155 The inconsistent findings demonstrate a need for classification by movement impairment. Subjects with patellofemoral pain are often included in these studies based on pain location; the movement impairment associated with the pain complaint is not considered. Patients with TFRVal syndrome and patients with PLG syndrome may report a similar pain in the peripatellar region, although they may display dissimilar movement impairments. A relationship between VMO performance and patellofemoral pain may exist in individuals with PLG syndrome but may not exist in individuals with TFRVal syndrome. Classification by movement impairments may assist in clarifying the research findings.
Clinical trials of treatment that incorporate VMO strengthening have demonstrated positive results102; however, the isolated treatment effects of VMO strengthening are not known. Often these clinical trials include additional treatments, such as stretching and taping, therefore it is difficult to determine the effectiveness of VMO strengthening alone. Recently, authors have demonstrated that increasing the VMO force can decrease the pressure on the lateral patellofemoral joint articular cartilage.156
The patient with PLG syndrome may demonstrate a lateral patellar tilt or lateral patellar glide.
During hip and knee flexion in stance (partial squat), the patient may report an increase in their symptoms; however, a movement impairment may not be apparent. A secondary test is performed by asking the patient to repeat the movement while the examiner places a medial glide on the patella. If symptoms are decreased compared to the primary test, PLG is supported.
Patients with PLG syndrome may report an increase in symptoms during the performance of the two-joint hip flexor length test.88 The test is then repeated while the examiner places a medial glide on the patella. If symptoms decrease, then PLG syndrome is supported. Symptoms may also be decreased by abducting the hip, therefore reducing the stretch on the TFL-ITB.
During knee flexion in prone, patients with PLG syndrome may report pain at the end of their motion. Decreased symptoms when a medial glide is placed on the patella supports the diagnosis of PLG syndrome. Similar to the two-joint hip flexor test, placing the hip into abduction reduces the stretch on the TFL-ITB, which may result in a decrease in the patient’s symptoms.
During knee extension in sitting, the examiner may observe sudden lateral movement of the patella near the end of the knee motion, a motion often referred to as a positive J-sign. This excessive lateral patellar motion may also be seen during an isometric quadriceps contraction.
A McConnell test120 for patellofemoral pain may be performed to assess for PLG syndrome. In sitting, the patient performs an isometric quadriceps contraction against the therapist’s resistance at 120, 90, 60, 30, and 0 degrees of knee flexion. If the patient’s pain is produced or increased during any of the contractions, the test is performed again with a manual correction by the examiner. To prevent patellar lateral glide, the examiner places a medial glide on the patella and the resisted test is repeated. If the pain is decreased, the patellofemoral joint is implicated as the source of symptoms and PLG syndrome is implicated as the movement impairment.
Patients with PLG syndrome may demonstrate reduced accessory motion for medial glide of the patella.
Patients may demonstrate short and/or stiff TFL-ITB and lateral patellar retinaculum. Though not common, sometimes a short and/or stiff gluteus maximus with attachment to the ITB may contribute to the lateral pull of the patella.
Although weakness of the VMO may contribute to PLG, clinical testing specific to the VMO is not possible. Other characteristics of muscle performance such as muscle timing or endurance have also been suspected to contribute to PLG. Muscle timing and endurance are also difficult to observe clinically. Laboratory measurements, such as electromyography (EMG), may assist in identifying an imbalance in the timing of contraction between the VMO and VL; however, EMG is often not practical in the clinic.
During performance of functional activities, observation of the movement impairment of PLG syndrome is often difficult; however, secondary tests can be used to support the diagnosis. For example, during activities such as sit-to-stand or step-up, a medial glide may be placed on the patella. If the patient’s symptoms are reduced compared to the primary test, then PLG syndrome is supported as the diagnosis.
Treatment for PLG syndrome includes educating the individual in correcting the postural habits and movements that may be contributing to the movement impairment and thus the pain problems. The patient is provided with a general description of the impairment and specific instruction for alignment and functional activities. The activities are then practiced by the patient. The patient is also instructed in exercises that will address the associated muscle impairments.
If a patient reports increased symptoms during sitting, the instruction is to reduce the amount of knee flexion while sitting. If the patient has a stiff or short gluteus maximus contributing to the stiffness of the ITB, resulting in PLG, the thighs should be slightly abducted initially. As symptoms improve, the thighs should be gradually adducted until the sitting position is normal and does not cause symptoms. Patients should be encouraged to get out of their chair and flex/extend their knee every 30 minutes to reduce the amount of time the knee is maintained in a flexed position. Patients should also limit the amount of time spent with their legs crossed.
To rise from a sitting position to standing, the patient should be instructed to slide forward to the edge of the chair. Once at the front of the chair, the patient should position the feet about hip-width apart and slightly posterior to the knees. The patient is instructed to contract the quadriceps when rising from the chair. If this motion is painful, the patient may use the hands to assist by pushing up from the armrests of the chair.
Similar to rising from a chair, the patient should be instructed to use the quadriceps and gluteals to ascend the stairs. If the patient is unable to ascend or descend stairs without an increase in symptoms, compensatory methods may need to be provided. Please see the “Functional Activities” section in the “Tibiofemoral Rotation with Valgus Syndrome” section for methods to reduce symptoms with stair ambulation.
Recommendations related to fitness are provided in the “Functional Activities” section in the “Tibiofemoral Rotation with Valgus Syndrome” section.
The patient should be provided with a home exercise program and instruction on the appropriate response to exercise. Exercises specific to PLG syndrome to improve the performance of the quadriceps may be prescribed. We recommend the use of functional activities to improve quadriceps performance. Those exercises, in the order of difficulty beginning with least aggressive, are sit-to-stand transfers, step-ups, lateral step-ups, squats, lunges, and step-downs. Ekstrom et al157 demonstrated that lunges and lateral step-ups produced greater EMG activity in the VMO compared to other rehabilitation exercises. Biofeedback to improve timing or recruitment of the VMO may be a useful intervention102,158,159; however, more clinical studies are needed. In addition, we recommend avoiding open-chain resisted activities in the range of 0 to 45 degrees of flexion and closed-chain activities in the range of 60 to 90 degrees, since these ranges are thought to result in increased stresses to the patellofemoral joint.160
Exercises to improve the extensibility of the TFL-ITB should also be prescribed. We recommend prone knee flexion (either unilateral or bilateral) or stretching in the two joint-hip flexor length test position. During prone knee flexion, the patient should initially perform with the involved hip in abduction to reduce the pull of the ITB. As symptoms improve, the amount of hip abduction is reduced.
The two-joint hip flexor stretch position may be used as the patient’s symptoms improve. As the involved limb is lowered into extension, the hip should be allowed to abduct. Once the hip is in extension, the hip can then be adducted to add the stretch to the TFL-ITB. Assuming normal anatomy of the femoral lateral condyle, the patella will be secured within the trochlear groove prior to adding the stretch of the TFL-ITB.
Patients must not feel pressure or pain in the location of their symptoms during the stretches. If the symptoms occur, the patella is most likely being mobilized and the stretch will not be effective. Patients with PLG syndrome may need to stabilize the patella during these stretches. Stabilization of the patella may be accomplished by manual assistance of another person or through taping (Figure 7-41). During all stretching exercises, be sure that the patient has good abdominal support to avoid pelvic anterior tilt or rotation. Strengthening the muscles that are antagonists of the TFL-ITB, such as the posterior gluteus medius and gluteus maximus, may also help to improve TFL-ITB extensibility.
Figure 7-41 Taping technique. Taping to reduce patellar lateral glide as proposed by McConnell.87 The patella is pushed medially by the tester and strips of tape are placed along the patella, anchored around the medial hamstring muscle bulk.
Taping and patellar mobilization may be useful in patients with PLG syndrome. Taping to reduce patellar lateral glide as proposed by McConnell87 has had clinical success (see Figure 7-41). The evidence consistently supports that taping helps to reduce symptoms,87,161-165 although the mechanism behind the symptom reduction has not been determined. Many believe that tape is applied to either change the alignment of the patella or improve the performance of the VMO; however, the literature is mixed.161,166-172 Although the mechanism is not clear, taping is a safe and relatively convenient intervention that has had clinical success.
Patellar mobilizations in the medial direction may be used to help improve the extensibility of the lateral structures such as the patellar retinaculum and ITB. If the patient is in Stage 1 of rehabilitation, gentle mobilizations may be performed to reduce pain and to initiate mobility in the medial direction. As the patient’s symptoms subside, aggressive grades of mobilization should be used to increase extensibility. Patients may be instructed in self-mobilizations to perform along with their home exercise program.
Thus far, the focus of this chapter is on the identification and treatment of specific movement system syndromes for the knee. However, patients are commonly referred to physical therapy for rehabilitation of the knee after a surgical procedure or after an acute, traumatic knee injury. When a patient presents to therapy after either a surgical procedure or an acute knee injury, identification of a specific movement system syndrome using a thorough examination may not be possible because of pain, physician-imposed restrictions, or both. In such cases, the physical therapist must recognize the potential pathoanatomical structure(s) involved, perform a limited problem-centered examination to identify specific impairments, and provide treatment that is congruent with the stage for rehabilitation determined according to the guidelines outlined in Chapter 2.
In general, patients for which a movement system syndrome cannot be determined are classified as having a knee impairment, which is a broad term that encompasses a wide array of structural impairments or injuries. An exhaustive discussion of the potential knee injuries a physical therapist might treat and the surgical procedures after which a patient may be referred to physical therapy is beyond the scope of this text. However, to provide optimal care for the patient, the physical therapist must have a thorough understanding of the possible structures of the knee implicated for a particular injury and be familiar with common surgical procedures used by referring physicians. See the Chapter 7 Appendix for additional information regarding specific tissue properties of the structures of the knee, as well as treatment guidelines for each stage of rehabilitation.
Because the knee impairment classification is relatively nonspecific, the physical therapist should provide a source diagnosis, if possible, to guide treatment. Recall from Chapter 2 that if a movement system diagnosis cannot be determined, the diagnosis made by the physical therapist is based on the pathoanatomical structure involved, as identified by the physician; the procedure performed, if any; and the stage for rehabilitation. For example, if a patient presents to physical therapy 3 days after an ACL reconstruction, the diagnosis made by the physical therapist would likely be as follows: ACL tear, status/post ACL reconstruction, Stage 1. If the specific pathoanatomical structure cannot be determined or has not been specified by the physician, the classification of knee impairment should be used to identify the region of the body that is impaired, with an appropriate stage for rehabilitation.
As the patient progresses with physical therapy after an acute injury or surgical procedure, the physical therapist should attend to any underlying movement impairments that either develop or are identified with a more thorough examination. If a movement system syndrome can be determined, the physical therapist should use this diagnosis, with the appropriate stage for rehabilitation, to guide treatment relative to specific movement impairments. If no underlying movement impairment can be determined, the physical therapist should continue to progress treatment as tolerated according to the stage for rehabilitation associated with the source diagnosis provided.173,174
This chapter offers the reader the diagnostic framework to effectively evaluate and treat chronic, acute, and postsurgical knee pain. By specifically identifying movement impairments and considering the tissue characteristics of pathoanatomical structures in the knee, the physical therapist can be more readily prepared to provide optimal treatment and education to patients who present with knee pain than attempting to develop a program without identifying an underlying syndrome.
1 Willson JD, Davis IS. Lower extremity mechanics of females with and without patellofemoral pain across activities with progressively greater task demands. Clin Biomech. 2008;23(2):203-211.
2 Powers CM. The influence of altered lower-extremity kinematics on patellofemoral joint dysfunction: a theoretical perspective. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33(11):639-646.
3 Dierks TA, Manal KT, Hamill J, et al. Proximal and distal influences on hip and knee kinematics in runners with patellofemoral pain during a prolonged run. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38(8):448-456.
4 Noehren B, Davis I, Hamill J. ASB Clinical Biomechanics award winner 2006: prospective study of the biomechanical factors associated with iliotibial band syndrome. Clin Biomech. 2007;22(9):951-956.
5 Miller RH, Lowry JL, Meardon SA, et al. Lower extremity mechanics of iliotibial band syndrome during an exhaustive run. Gait Posture. 2007;26(3):407-413.
6 Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR, et al. Biomechanical Measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(4):492-501.
7 Chang A, Hayes K, Dunlop D, et al. Thrust during ambulation and the progression of knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(12):3897-3903.
8 Cerejo R, Dunlop DD, Cahue S, et al. The influence of alignment on risk of knee osteoarthritis progression according to baseline stage of disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;46(10):2632-2636.
9 Harris-Hayes M, Sahrmann SA, Norton BJ, et al. Diagnosis and management of a patient with knee pain using the movement system impairment classification system. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38(4):203-213.
10 Mascal CL, Landel R, Powers C. Management of patellofemoral pain targeting hip, pelvis, and trunk muscle function: 2 case reports. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33(11):647-660.
11 Crossley K, Bennell K, Green S, et al. Physical therapy for patellofemoral pain: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(6):857-865.
12 Selfe J, Richards J, Thewlis D, et al. The biomechanics of step descent under different treatment modalities used in patellofemoral pain. Gait Posture. 2008;27(2):258-263.
13 Hewett TE, Lindenfeld TN, Riccobene JV, et al. The effect of neuromuscular training on the incidence of knee injury in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27(6):699-706.
14 Gilchrist J, Mandelbaum BR, Melancon H, et al. A randomized controlled trial to prevent noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury in female collegiate soccer players. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(8):1476-1483.
15 Szoeke CEI, Cicuttini FM, Guthrie JR, et al. Factors affecting the prevalence of osteoarthritis in healthy middle-aged women: data from the longitudinal Melbourne Women’s Midlife Health Project. Bone. 2006;39(5):1149-1155.
16 Sharma L, Lou C, Cahue S, et al. The mechanism of the effect of obesity in knee osteoarthritis: the mediating role of malalignment. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43(3):568-575.
17 Kujala UM, Kettunen J, Paananen H, et al. Knee osteoarthritis in former runners, soccer players, weight lifters, and shooters. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38(4):539-546.
18 Sharma L, Song J, Felson DT, et al. The role of knee alignment in disease progression and functional decline in knee osteoarthritis [erratum appears in JAMA 286(7):792, 2001]. JAMA. 2001;286(2):188-195.
19 Sharma L, Lou C, Felson DT, et al. Laxity in healthy and osteoarthritic knees. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42(5):861-870.
20 Sharma L, Dunlop DD, Cahue S, et al. Quadriceps strength and osteoarthritis progression in malaligned and lax knees. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(8):613-619.
21 Cooper C, McAlindon T, Coggon D, et al. Occupational activity and osteoarthritis of the knee. Ann Rheum Dis. 1994;53(2):90-93.
22 Sahrmann SA. Diagnosis and treatment of movement impairment syndromes. St Louis: Mosby; 2002.
23 Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG, et al. Muscles: testing and function with posture and pain, ed 5. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
24 Loudon JK, Goist HL, Loudon KL. Genu recurvatum syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;27(5):361-367.
25 Neumann DA. Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system: foundations for physical rehabilitation. St Louis: Mosby; 2002.
26 Gray’s anatomy, ed 38. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone. 1999.
27 Oatis CA. Kinesiology: the mechanics and pathomechanics of human movement. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004.
28 Gajdosik CG, Gajdosik RL. Musculoskeletal development and adaptation. In: Campbell SK, Palisano RJ, Vander Linden DW, editors. Physical therapy for children. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1994.
29 Teichtahl AJ, Wluka AE, Cicuttini FM. Frontal plane knee alignment is associated with a longitudinal reduction in patella cartilage volume in people with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16(7):851-854.
30 Elahi S, Cahue S, Felson DT, et al. The association between varus-valgus alignment and patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43(8):1874-1880.
31 Cahue S, Dunlop D, Hayes K, et al. Varus-valgus alignment in the progression of patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(7):2184-2190.
32 Teichtahl AJ, Cicuttini FM, Janakiramanan N, et al. Static knee alignment and its association with radiographic knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006;14(9):958-962.
33 Tomaro J. Measurement of tibiofibular varum in subjects with unilateral overuse symptoms. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995;21(2):86-89.
34 Mahar SM, Livingston LA. Bilateral measurement of resting calcaneal stance position and tibial varum using digital photography and standardized positioning protocols. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2009;99(3):198-205.
35 Seber S, Hazer B, Kose N, et al. Rotational profile of the lower extremity and foot progression angle: computerized tomographic examination of 50 male adults. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120(5-6):255-258.
36 Schneider B, Laubenberger J, Jemlich S, et al. Measurement of femoral antetorsion and tibial torsion by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol. 1997;70(834):575-579.
37 Yoshioka Y, Siu DW, Scudamore RA, et al. Tibial anatomy and functional axes. J Orthop Res. 1989;7(1):132-137.
38 Insall J, Salvati E. Patella position in the normal knee joint. Radiology. 1971;101(1):101-104.
39 Lin YF, Lin JJ, Cheng CK, et al. Association between sonographic morphology of vastus medialis obliquus and patellar alignment in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38(4):196-202.
40 Grelsamer RP, Weinstein CH, Gould J, et al. Patellar tilt: the physical examination correlates with MR imaging. Knee. 2008;15(1):3-8.
41 Watson CJ, Propps M, Galt W, et al. Reliability of McConnell’s classification of patellar orientation in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1999;29(7):378-385.
42 Roach KE, Miles TP. Normal hip and knee active range of motion: the relationship to age. Phys Ther. 1991;71(9):656-665.
43 Nonaka H, Mita K, Watakabe M, et al. Age-related changes in the interactive mobility of the hip and knee joints: a geometrical analysis. Gait Posture. 2002;15(3):236-243.
44 Drews JE, Vraciu JK, Pellino G. Range of motion of the joints of the lower extremity of newborns. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 1984;4(2):49-63.
45 Waugh KG, Minkel JL, Parker R, et al. Measurement of selected hip, knee, and ankle joint motions in newborns. Phys Ther. 1983;63(10):1616-1621.
46 Broughton NS, Wright J, Menelaus MB. Range of knee motion in normal neonates. J Pediatr Orthop. 1993;13(2):263-264.
47 Schwarze DJ, Denton JR. Normal values of neonatal lower limbs: an evaluation of 1,000 neonates. J Pediatr Orthop. 1993;13(6):758-760.
48 Ekstrand J, Wiktorsson M, Oberg B, et al. Lower extremity goniometric measurements: a study to determine their reliability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982;63(4):171-175.
49 Rothstein JM, Miller PJ, Roettger RF. Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting: elbow and knee measurements. Phys Ther. 1983;63(10):1611-1615.
50 Roach KE, Miles TP. Normal hip and knee active range of motion: the relationship to age. Phys Ther. 1991;71(9):656-665.
51 Johnson LL, van Dyk GE, Green JRIII, et al. Clinical assessment of asymptomatic knees: comparison of men and women. Arthroscopy. 1998;14(4):347-359.
52 Hoppenfeld S. Physical examination of the spine and extremities. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange; 1976.
53 Markolf KL, Mensch JS, Amstutz HC. Stiffness and laxity of the knee—the contributions of the supporting structures. A quantitative in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58(5):583-594.
54 Markolf KL, Graff-Radford A, Amstutz HC. In vivo knee stability. A quantitative assessment using an instrumented clinical testing apparatus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(5):664-674.
55 Lundberg M, Messner K. Decrease in valgus stiffness after medial knee ligament injury. A 4-year clinical and mechanical follow-up study in 38 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1994;65(6):615-619.
56 Mills OS, Hull ML. Rotational flexibility of the human knee due to varus/valgus and axial moments in vivo. J Biomech. 1991;24(8):673-690.
57 Zhang LQ, Wang G. Dynamic and static control of the human knee joint in abduction-adduction. J Biomech. 2001;34(9):1107-1115.
58 Matsumoto H, Seedham BB, Suda Y, et al. Axis location of tibial rotation and its change with flexion angle. Clin Orthop. 2000;371:178-182.
59 Mossberg KA, Smith LK. Axial rotation of the knee in women. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1983;4(4):236-240.
60 Osternig LR, Bates BT, James SL. Patterns of tibial rotary torque in knees of healthy subjects. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1980;12:195-199.
61 Shoemaker SC, Markolf KL. In vivo rotatory knee stability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;164(2):208-216.
62 Buford WLJr, Ivey FMJr, Nakamura T, et al. Internal/external rotation moment arms of muscles at the knee: moment arms for the normal knee and the ACL-deficient knee. Knee. 2001;8:293-303.
63 Gollehon DL, Torzilli PA, Warren RF. The role of the posterolateral and cruciate ligaments in the stability of the human knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69(2):233-242.
64 Powers CM, Shellock FG, Pfaff M. Quantification of patellar tracking using kinematic MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1998;8(3):724-732.
65 Sikorski JM, Peters J, Watt I. The importance of femoral rotation in chondromalacia patellae as shown by serial radiography. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1979;61(4):435-442.
66 Novacheck TF. The biomechanics of running. Gait Posture. 1998;7(1):77-95.
67 Stansfield BW, Hillman SJ, Hazlewood ME, et al. Regression analysis of gait parameters with speed in normal children walking at self-selected speeds. Gait Posture. 2006;23(3):288-294.
68 Cupp T, Oeffinger D, Tylkowski C, et al. Age-related kinetic changes in normal pediatrics. J Pediatr Orthop. 1999;19(4):475-478.
69 Lafortune MA, Cavanagh PR, Sommer HJIII, et al. Three-dimensional kinematics of the human knee during walking. J Biomech. 1992;25(4):347-357.
70 Greenfield BH. Rehabilitation of the knee: a problem-solving approach. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 1993.
71 Grelsamer RP, McConnell J. The patella: a team approach. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers; 1998.
72 Delp SL, Hess WE, Hungerford DS, et al. Variation of rotation moment arms with hip flexion. J Biomech. 1999;32(5):493-501.
73 Lindsay DM, Maitland M, Lowe RC, et al. Comparison of isokinetic internal and external hip rotation torques using different testing positions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1992;16(1):43-50.
74 Schmitt LC, Fitzgerald GK, Reisman AS, et al. Instability, laxity, and physical function in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. Phys Ther. 2008;88(12):1506-1516.
75 Levinger P, Gilleard W. Tibia and rearfoot motion and ground reaction forces in subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome during walking. Gait Posture. 2007;25(1):2-8.
76 Ford KR, Myer GD, Hewett TE. Valgus knee motion during landing in high school female and male basketball players. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(10):1745-1750.
77 Pollard CD, Sigward SM, Powers CM. Gender differences in hip joint kinematics and kinetics during side-step cutting maneuver. Clin J Sport Med. 2007;17(1):38-42.
78 Sigward SM, Powers CM. The influence of gender on knee kinematics, kinetics and muscle activation patterns during side-step cutting. Clin Biomech. 2006;21(1):41-48.
79 Krosshaug T, Nakamae A, Boden B, et al. Estimating 3D joint kinematics from video sequences of running and cutting maneuvers—assessing the accuracy of simple visual inspection. Gait Posture. 2007;26(3):378-385.
80 Olsen OE, Myklebust G, Engebretsen L, et al. Injury mechanisms for anterior cruciate ligament injuries in team handball a systematic video analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(4):1002-1012.
81 Lee TQ, Yang BY, Sandusky MD, et al. The effects of tibial rotation on the patellofemoral joint: assessment of the changes in situ strain in the peripatellar retinaculum and the patellofemoral contact pressures and area. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001;38(5):463-469.
82 Lee TQ, Morris G, Csintalan RP. The influence of tibial and femoral rotation on patellofemoral contact area and pressure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33(11):686-693.
83 Hefzy MS, Jackson WT, Saddemi SR, et al. Effects of tibial rotations on patellar tracking and patello-femoral contact areas. J Biomed Eng. 1991;14(4):329-343.
84 Salsich GB, Perman WH. Patellofemoral joint contact area is influenced by tibiofemoral rotation alignment in individuals who have patellofemoral pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(9):521-528.
85 Myer GD, Ford KR, Brent JL, et al. Differential neuromuscular training effects on ACL injury risk factors in “high-risk” versus “low-risk” athletes. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord. 2007;8:39.
86 Cowan SM, Bennell KL, Crossley KM, et al. Physical therapy alters recruitment of the vasti in patellofemoral pain syndrome. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(12):1879-1885.
87 McConnell J. The management of chondromalacia patellae: a long term solution. Aust J Physiother. 1986;32:215-223.
88 Van Dillen LR, McDonnell MK, Fleming DA, et al. Effect of knee and hip position on hip extension range of motion in individuals with and without low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2000;30(6):307-316.
89 Harris-Hayes M, Wendl PM, Sahrmann SA, et al. Does stabilization of the tibiofemoral joint affect passive prone hip rotation range of motion measures in unimpaired individuals? A preliminary report. Physiother Theory Pract. 2007;23(6):315-323.
90 Winslow J, Yoder E. Patellofemoral pain in female ballet dancers: correlation with iliotibial band tightness and tibial external rotation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995;22(1):18-21.
91 Cichanowski HR, Schmitt JS, Johnson RJ, et al. Hip strength in collegiate female athletes with patellofemoral pain. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(8):1227-1232.
92 Fredericson M, White JJ, Macmahon JM, et al. Quantitative analysis of the relative effectiveness of 3 iliotibial band stretches. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(5):589-592.
93 Willson JD, Ireland ML, Davis I. Core strength and lower extremity alignment during single leg squats. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(5):945-952.
94 Willson JD, Binder-Macleod S, Davis IS. Lower extremity jumping mechanics of female athletes with and without patellofemoral pain before and after exertion. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(8):1587-1596.
95 Chan GN, Smith AW, Kirtley C, et al. Changes in knee moments with contralateral versus ipsilateral cane usage in females with knee osteoarthritis. Clin Biomech. 2005;20(4):396-404.
96 Farrokhi S, Pollard CD, Souza RB, et al. Trunk position influences the kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity of the lead lower extremity during the forward lunge exercise. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38(7):403-409.
97 Olivier N, Legrand R, Rogez J, et al. One-leg cycling versus arm cranking: which is most appropriate for physical conditioning after knee surgery? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(3):508-512.
98 Butler RJ, Barrios JA, Royer T, et al. Effect of laterally wedged foot orthoses on rearfoot and hip mechanics in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2009;33(2):107-116.
99 Gelis A, Coudeyre E, Hudry C, et al. Is there an evidence-based efficacy for the use of foot orthotics in knee and hip osteoarthritis? Elaboration of French clinical practice guidelines. Joint Bone Spine. 2008;75(6):714-720.
100 Collins N, Crossley K, Beller E, et al. Foot orthoses and physiotherapy in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome: randomised clinical trial. BMJ. 2008;337:a1735.
101 Franz JR, Dicharry J, Riley PO, et al. The influence of arch supports on knee torques relevant to knee osteoarthritis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;40(5):913-917.
102 Bizzini M, Childs JD, Piva SR, et al. Systematic review of the quality of randomized controlled trials for patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33(1):4-20.
103 Gross MT, Foxworth JL. The role of foot orthoses as an intervention for patellofemoral pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33(11):661-670.
104 Fitzgerald GK, Childs JD, Ridge TM, et al. Agility and perturbation training for a physically active individual with knee osteoarthritis. Phys Ther. 2002;82(4):372-382.
105 Fitzgerald GK, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L. The efficacy of perturbation training in nonoperative anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation programs for physical active individuals. Phys Ther. 2000;80(2):128-140.
106 Hewett TE, Paterno MV, Myer GD. Strategies for enhancing proprioception and neuromuscular control of the knee. Clin Orthop. 2002;1(402):76-94.
107 Blanpied P, Carroll R, Douglas T, et al. Effectiveness of lateral slide exercise in an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation home exercise program. Phys Ther. 2000;30(10):609-611.
108 Louw Q, Grimmer K, Vaughan CL. Biomechanical outcomes of a knee neuromuscular exercise programme among adolescent basketball players: a pilot study. Phys Ther Sport. 2006;7(2):65-73.
109 Fitzgerald GK, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L. A decision-making scheme for returning patients to high-level activity with nonoperative treatment after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8(2):76-82.
110 Foroughi N, Smith R, Vanwanseele B. The association of external knee adduction moment with biomechanical variables in osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Knee. 2009;16(5):303-309.
111 Miyazaki T, Wada M, Kawahara H, et al. Dynamic load at baseline can predict radiographic disease progression in medial compartment knee OA. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;61:617-622.
112 Guo M, Axe MJ, Manal K. The influence of foot progression angle on the knee adduction moment during walking and stair climbing in pain free individuals with knee osteoarthritis. Gait Posture. 2007;26(3):436-441.
113 Jenkyn TR, Hunt MA, Jones IC, et al. Toe-out gait in patients with knee osteoarthritis partially transforms external knee adduction moment into flexion moment during early stance phase of gait: a tri-planar kinetic mechanism. J Biomech. 2008;16(5):591-599.
114 Lynn SK, Costigan PA. Effect of foot rotation on knee kinetics and hamstring activation in older adults with and without signs of knee osteoarthritis. Clin Biomech. 2008;23(6):779-786.
115 Chang A, Hurwitz D, Dunlop D, et al. The relationship between toe-out angle during gait and progression of medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(10):1271-1275.
116 Wang JW, Kuo KN, Andriacchi TP, et al. The influence of walking mechanics and time on the results of proximal tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(6):905-909.
117 Lindenfeld TN, Hewett TE, Andriacchi TP. Joint loading with valgus bracing in patients with varus gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;344:290-297.
118 Draper ER, Cable JM, Sanchez-Ballester J, et al. Improvement in function after valgus bracing of the knee. An analysis of gait symmetry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(7):1001-1005.
119 Irrgang JJ, Snyder-Mackler L, Wainner RS, et al. Development of a patient-reported measure of function of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80(8):1132-1145.
120 Magee DJ. Orthopedic physical assessment, ed 4. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2002.
121 Hardcastle P, Nade S. The significance of the Trendelenburg test. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67(5):741-746.
122 Cyriax J. Textbook of orthopaedic medicine I: diagnosis of soft tissue lesions, ed 8. London: Bailliere Tindall; 1982.
123 Bijl D, Dekker J, van Baar ME, et al. Validity of Cyriax’s concept capsular pattern for the diagnosis of osteoarthritis of hip and/or knee. Scand J Rheumatol. 1998;27(5):347-351.
124 Hayes KW, Petersen C, Falconer J. An examination of Cyriax’s passive motion tests with patients having osteoarthritis of the knee. Phys Ther. 1994;74(8):697-707.
125 Lewek MD, Rudolph KS, Snyder-Mackler L. Control of frontal plane knee laxity during gait in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004;12(9):745-751.
126 Lewek MD, Ramsey DK, Snyder-Mackler L, et al. Knee stabilization in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(9):2845-2853.
127 Childs JD, Sparto PJ, Fitzgerald GK, et al. Alterations in lower extremity movement and muscle activation patterns in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. Clin Biomech. 2004;19(1):44-49.
128 Jenkinson CM, Doherty M, Avery AJ, et al. Effects of dietary intervention and quadriceps strengthening exercises on pain and function in overweight people with knee pain: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2009;339:b3170.
129 Neyret P, Robinson AH, Le CB, et al. Patellar tendon length: the factor in patellar instability? Knee. 2002;9(1):3-6.
130 Escala J, Mellado J, Olona M, et al. Objective patellar instability: MR-based quantitative assessment of potentially associated anatomical features. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(3):264-272.
131 Simmons EJr, Cameron JC. Patella alta and recurrent dislocation of the patella. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;274:265-269.
132 Leung YF, Wai YL, Leung YC. Patella alta in southern China. A new method of measurement. Int Orthop. 1996;20(5):305-310.
133 Lancourt JE, Cristini JA. Patella alta and patella infera. Their etiological role in patellar dislocation, chondromalacia, and apophysitis of the tibial tubercle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975;57(8):1112-1115.
134 Brattstrom H. Patella alta in non-dislocating knee joints. Acta Orthop Scand. 1970;41(5):578-588.
135 Ahlback S, Mattsson S. Patella alta and gonarthrosis. Acta Radiol Diagn. 1978;19(4):578-584.
136 Al-Sayyad MJ, Cameron JC. Functional outcome after tibial tubercle transfer for the painful patella alta. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;396:152-162.
137 Ward SR, Terk MR, Powers CM. Patella alta: association with patellofemoral alignment and changes in contact area during weight-bearing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(8):1749-1755.
138 Ward SR, Powers CM. The influence of patella alta on patellofemoral joint stress during normal and fast walking. Clin Biomech. 2004;19(10):1040-1047.
139 Mulligan BR. Manual therapy: “NAGS”, “SNAGS”, “MWMs” etc, ed 3. Wellington, New Zealand: Plane View Press; 1995.
140 Metheny JA, Mayor MB. Hoffa disease: chronic impingement of the infrapatellar fat pad. Am J Knee Surg. 1988;1(2):134-139.
141 Jacobson JA, Lenchik L, Ruhoy MK, et al. MR imaging of the infrapatellar fat pad of Hoffa. Radiographics. 1997;17:675-691.
142 Myer GD, Ford KR, Paterno MV, et al. The effects of generalized joint laxity on risk of anterior cruciate ligament injury in young female athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(6):1073-1080.
143 Loudon JK, Jenkins W, Loudon KL. The relationship between static posture and ACL injury in female athletes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996;24(2):91-97.
144 Loudon JK. Measurement of knee-joint-position sense in women with genu recurvatum. J Sport Rehabil. 2000;9(1):15-25.
145 Ramesh R, Von Arx O, Azzopardi T, et al. The risk of anterior cruciate ligament rupture with generalised joint laxity. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(6):800-803.
146 Noyes FR, Dunworth LA, Andriacchi TP, et al. Knee hyperextension gait abnormalities in unstable knees: recognition and preoperative gait retraining. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24(1):35-45.
147 Cowan SM, Hodges PW, Bennell KL, et al. Altered vasti recruitment when people with patellofemoral pain syndrome complete a postural task. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(7):989-995.
148 Cowan SM, Bennell KL, Hodges PW, et al. Delayed onset of electromyographic activity of vastus medialis obliquus relative to vastus lateralis in subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(2):183-189.
149 Callaghan MJ, McCarthy CJ, Oldham JA. Electromyographic fatigue characteristics of the quadriceps in patellofemoral pain syndrome. Man Ther. 2001;6(1):27-33.
150 Cesarelli M, Bifulco P, Bracale M. Study of the control strategy of the quadriceps muscle in anterior knee pain. IEEE Trans Rehab Eng. 2000;8(3):330-341.
151 Owings TM, Grabiner MD. Motor control of the vastus medialis oblique and vastus lateralis muscles is disrupted during eccentric contractions in subjects with patellofemoral pain. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(4):483-487.
152 Karst GM, Willet GM. Onset timing of electromyographic activity in the vastus medialis oblique and vastus lateralis muscle in subjects with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome. Phys Ther. 1995;75(9):813-823.
153 Powers CM, Landel R, Perry J. Timing and intensity of vastus muscle activity during functional activities in subjects with and without patellofemoral pain. Phys Ther. 1996;76(9):946-955.
154 Sheehy P, Burdett RG, Irrgang JJ, et al. An electromyographic study of vastus medialis oblique and vastus lateralis activity while ascending and descending steps. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;27(6):423-429.
155 Mohr KJ, Kvitne RS, Pink MM, et al. Electromyography of the quadriceps in patellofemoral pain with patellar subluxation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;415:261-271.
156 Elias JJ, Kilambi S, Goerke DR, et al. Improving vastus medialis obliquus function reduces pressure applied to lateral patellofemoral cartilage. J Orthop Res. 2009;27(5):578-583.
157 Ekstrom RA, Donatelli RA, Carp KC. Electromyographic analysis of core trunk, hip, and thigh muscles during 9 rehabilitation exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(12):754-762.
158 Yip SL, Ng GY. Biofeedback supplementation to physiotherapy exercise programme for rehabilitation of patellofemoral pain syndrome: a randomized controlled pilot study. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20(12):1050-1057.
159 Kirnap M, Calis M, Turgut AO, et al. The efficacy of EMG-biofeedback training on quadriceps muscle strength in patients after arthroscopic meniscectomy. N Z Med J. 2005;118(1224):U1704.
160 Steinkamp LA, Dillingham MF, Markel MD, et al. Biomechanical considerations in patellofemoral joint rehabilitation. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21(3):438-444.
161 Bockrath K, Wooden C, Worrell T, et al. Effects of patella taping on patella position and perceived pain. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993;25(9):989-992.
162 Salsich GB, Brechter JH, Farwell D, et al. The effects of patellar taping on knee kinetics, kinematics, and vastus lateralis muscle activity during stair ambulation in individuals with patellofemoral pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002;32(1):3-10.
163 Gilleard W, McConnell J, Parson D. The effect of patellar taping of vastus medialis obliquus and vastus lateralis muscle activity in persons with patellofemoral pain. Phys Ther. 1998;78(1):25-32.
164 Powers CM, Landel R, Sosnick T, et al. The effects of patellar taping on stride characteristics and joint motion in subjects with patellofemoral pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997;26(6):286-291.
165 Warden SJ, Hinman RS, Watson MAJr, et al. Patellar taping and bracing for the treatment of chronic knee pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(1):73-83.
166 Crossley K, Cowan SM, Bennell KL, et al. Patellar taping: is clinical success supported by scientific evidence? Man Ther. 2000;5(3):142-150.
167 Ryan CG, Rowe PJ. An electromyographic study to investigate the effects of patellar taping on the vastus medialis/vastus lateralis ratio in asymptomatic participants. Physiother Theory Pract. 2006;22(6):309-315.
168 Bennell K, Duncan M, Cowan S. Effect of patellar taping on vasti onset timing, knee kinematics, and kinetics in asymptomatic individuals with a delayed onset of vastus medialis oblique. J Orthop Res. 2006;24(9):1854-1860.
169 Cowan SM, Hodges PW, Crossley KM, et al. Patellar taping does not change the amplitude of electromyographic activity of the vasti in a stair stepping task. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40(1):30-34.
170 Christou EA. Patellar taping increases vastus medialis oblique activity in the presence of patellofemoral pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004;14(4):495-504.
171 Pfeiffer RP, DeBeliso M, Shea KG, et al. Kinematic MRI assessment of McConnell taping before and after exercise. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(3):621-628.
172 MacGregor K, Gerlach S, Mellor R, et al. Cutaneous stimulation from patella tape causes a differential increase in vasti muscle activity in people with patellofemoral pain. J Orthop Res. 2005;23(2):351-358.
173 Maxey L, Magnusson J. Rehabilitation for the postsurgical orthopedic patient, ed 2. St Louis: Mosby; 2007.
174 Cioppa-Mosca J, Cahill JB, Cavanaugh JT, et al. Postsurgical rehabilitation guidelines for the orthopedic clinician. St Louis: Mosby; 2006.