Pharmacologic Management

image Nonopioids, including acetaminophen (Tylenol, Paracetamol) and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), are suitable for mild to moderate pain (Table 7-4). Opioids are needed for moderate to severe pain (Table 7-5). A combination of the two analgesics acts on the pain system on two levels: nonopioids primarily act at the peripheral nervous system and opioids primarily act at the central nervous system. This approach provides increased analgesia without increased side effects. Several combinations, such as acetaminophen with codeine, may have increasing doses of the opioid but a constant dose of the nonopioid (Table 7-6). Before increasing the opioid, it may be preferable to increase the nonopioid component, for example, adding one regular-strength acetaminophen tablet (325 mg) to acetaminophen 300 mg with codeine 15 mg (Tylenol No. 2) before advancing to acetaminophen 300 mg with codeine 30 mg (Tylenol No. 3) or codeine 60 mg (Tylenol No. 4). However, if this approach is not successful, pain management will require a stronger opioid (see Table 7-5).

TABLE 7-4

NONSTEROIDAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS (NSAIDs) APPROVED FOR CHILDREN*

image

note: Newer formulations of NSAIDs selectively inhibit one of the enzymes of cyclooxygenase (COX-2, which is responsible for pain transmission) but do not inhibit the other (COX-1). Inhibition of COX-1 decreases prostaglandin production, which is necessary for normal organ function. For example, prostaglandins help maintain gastric mucosal blood flow and barrier protection, regulate blood flow to the liver and kidneys, and facilitate platelet aggregation and clot formation. Theoretically, the COX-2 NSAIDs provide similar analgesic and antiinflammatory benefits with fewer gastric and platelet side effects than the nonselective agents. COX-2 NSAIDs are approved for use in patients >18 years of age.

*All NSAIDs in this table (except acetaminophen) have significant antiinflammatory, antipyretic, and analgesic actions. Acetaminophen has a weak antiinflammatory action, and its classification as an NSAID is controversial. Patients respond differently to various NSAIDs; therefore changing from one drug to another may be necessary for maximum benefit. Acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) is also an NSAID but is not recommended for children because of its possible association with Reye syndrome. The NSAIDs in this table have no known association with Reye syndrome. However, caution should be exercised in prescribing any salicylate-containing drug (e.g., choline magnesium trisalicylate) for children with known or suspected viral infection. Side effects of ibuprofen, naproxen, and tolmetin include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, gastric ulceration, bleeding nephritis, and fluid retention. Acetaminophen and choline magnesium trisalicylate are well tolerated in the gastrointestinal tract and do not interfere with platelet function. NSAIDs (except acetaminophen) should not be given to patients with allergic reactions to salicylates. All the NSAIDs should be used cautiously in patients with renal impairment.

Data from Lacy CF: Lexi-Comp’s drug information handbook 2009-2010, ed 18, Hudson, Ohio, 2009, Lexi-Comp, Inc.

TABLE 7-5

DOSAGE OF SELECTED OPIOIDS FOR CHILDREN

image

IM, Intramuscular; IV, intravenous; PCA, patient-controlled analgesia.

note: Published tables vary in suggested doses that are equianalgesic to morphine. Clinical response is criterion that must be applied for each patient; titration to clinical response is necessary. Because there is not complete cross-tolerance among these drugs, it is usually necessary to use a lower than equianalgesic dose when changing drugs and to retitrate to response.

caution: Recommended doses do not apply to patients with renal or hepatic insufficiency or other conditions affecting drug metabolism and kinetics.

*caution: Doses listed for patients with body weight <50 kg (110 lb) cannot be used as initial starting doses in infants <6 months of age. For nonventilated infants <6 months, the initial opioid dose should be about image to image of the dose recommended for older infants and children. For example, morphine could be used at a dose of 0.03 mg/kg instead of the traditional 0.1 mg/kg.

Actiq is indicated only for management of breakthrough cancer pain in patients with malignancies who are already receiving and are tolerant to opioid therapy, but it can be used for preoperative or preprocedural sedation and analgesia.

caution: Codeine doses above 65 mg often are not appropriate because of diminishing incremental analgesia with increasing doses but continually increasing constipation and other side effects. Dosages are from McCaffery M, Pasero C: Pain: a clinical manual, ed. 2, St. Louis, 1999, Mosby.

§For morphine, hydromorphone, and oxymorphone, rectal administration is an alternate route for patients unable to take oral medications, but equianalgesic doses may differ from oral and parenteral doses because of pharmacokinetic differences.

imageMeperidine is not recommended for continuous pain control (e.g., postoperatively) because of risk of normeperidine toxicity.

Initial dose is 10%-25% of equianalgesic morphine dose. Parenteral Dolophine is no longer available in the United States.

**caution: Doses of aspirin and acetaminophen in combination with opioid or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug preparations must also be adjusted to patient’s body weight. Daily dose of acetaminophen should not exceed 75 mg/kg, or 4000 mg.

Data from Acute Pain Management Guideline Panel: Acute pain management: operative or medical procedures and trauma: clinical practice guideline, AHCPR Pub. No. 92-0032, Rockville, Md, 1992, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services; Berde C, Ablin A, Glazer J, et al: American Academy of Pediatrics Report of the Subcommittee on Disease-Related Pain in Childhood Cancer, Pediatrics 86(5 pt 2):820, 1990.

TABLE 7-6

COANALGESIC ADJUVANT DRUGS

image

image

bid, Twice a day; hs, at bedtime; IV, intravenous; NSAIDs, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs; PO, by mouth; prn, as needed; q, every; tid, three times a day.

imageSkill—Calculating Safe Dosages for Children

imagePediatric Drug Dosage Calculations

Oxycodone is available without a nonopioid in an immediate release and a controlled release preparation (OxyContin). The oxycodone dose can be safely increased without the risk of toxicity from excessive acetaminophen use. Actions of various opioids differ. Morphine is considered the gold standard for the management of severe pain. When morphine is not a suitable opioid, drugs such as hydromorphone (Dilaudid) and fentanyl (Sublimaze) are effective substitutes. Although fentanyl is used as an anesthetic in the operating room, it is classified as an analgesic. It can be safely administered by nurses by the intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), transmucosal, and transdermal routes (Algren, Gursoy, Johnson, et al, 1998; Golianu, Krane, Galloway, et al, 2000).

image NURSING ALERT

The optimum dosage of an analgesic is one that controls pain without causing undesirable side effects. This usually requires titration, the gradual adjustment of drug dosage (usually by increasing the dose) until optimum pain relief without excessive sedation is achieved. Dosage recommendations are only safe initial dosages (see Tables 7-5 and 7-6), not optimum dosages.

Several drugs, known as coanalgesics or adjuvant analgesics, may be used alone or with opioids to control pain symptoms and opioid side effects. Drugs frequently used to relieve anxiety, cause sedation, and provide amnesia are diazepam (Valium) and midazolam (Versed); however, these drugs are not analgesics and should be used to enhance the effects of analgesics, not as a substitute for analgesics. Other adjuvants include tricyclic antidepressants (e.g., amitriptyline, imipramine) and antiepileptics (e.g., gabapentin, carbamazepine, clonazepam) for neuropathic pain (see Table 7-6), stool softeners and laxatives for constipation, antiemetics for nausea and vomiting, diphenhydramine for itching, steroids for inflammation and bone pain, and dextroamphetamine and caffeine for possible increased pain and sedation (Table 7-7) (McCaffery and Pasero, 1999).

TABLE 7-7

MANAGEMENT OF OPIOID SIDE EFFECTS

image

image

image

hs, At bedtime; IV, intravenous; PO, by mouth; PR, by rectum; prn, as needed; q, every; tid, three times a day.

The use of placebos to determine whether the patient is having pain is unjustified and unethical; a positive response to a placebo, such as a saline injection, is common in patients who have a documented organic basis for pain. Therefore the deceptive use of placebos does not provide useful information about the presence or severity of pain. The use of placebos can cause side effects similar to those of opioids, can destroy the patient’s trust in the health care staff, and raises serious ethical and legal questions. The American Society of Pain Management Nursing has issued a position statement against the use of placebos to treat pain (McCaffery and Pasero, 1999).

Children (except infants younger than about 3 to 6 months) metabolize drugs more rapidly than adults. Younger children may require higher doses of opioids to achieve the same analgesic effect. Therefore the therapeutic effect and duration of analgesia vary. Children’s dosages are usually calculated according to body weight, except in children with a weight greater than 50 kg (110 lb), where the weight formula may exceed the average adult dose. In this case the adult dose is used.

A reasonable starting dose of opioid for infants under 6 months who are not mechanically ventilated is one fourth to one third of the recommended starting dose for older children. The infant is monitored closely for signs of pain relief and respiratory depression. The dose is titrated to effect. Because tolerance can develop rapidly, large doses may be needed for continued severe pain (McCaffery and Pasero, 1999). If pain relief is inadequate, the initial dose is increased (usually by 25% to 50% if pain is moderate, or by 50% to 100% if pain is severe) to provide greater analgesic effectiveness. Decreasing the interval between doses may also provide more continuous pain relief. A major difference between opioids and nonopioids is that nonopioids have a ceiling effect, which means that doses higher than the recommended dose will not produce greater pain relief. Opioids do not have a ceiling effect other than that imposed by side effects; therefore larger dosages can be safely given for increasing severity of pain.

Parenteral and oral dosages of opioids are not the same. Because of the first-pass effect, an oral opioid is rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and is partially metabolized in the liver before reaching the central circulation. Therefore oral dosages must be larger to compensate for the partial loss of analgesic potency to achieve equianalgesia (equal analgesic effect). Conversion factors (Table 7-8) for selected opioids must be used when a change is made from IV (preferred) or IM to oral. Immediate conversion from IM or IV to the suggested equianalgesic oral dose may result in a substantial error. For example, the dose may be significantly more or less than what the child requires. Small changes ensure small errors. Several routes of analgesic administration can be used (Box 7-3), and the most effective and least traumatic route of administration should be selected.

BOX 7-3

ROUTES AND METHODS OF ANALGESIC DRUG ADMINISTRATION

Oral

Oral route preferred because of convenience, cost, and relatively steady blood levels

Higher dosages of oral form of opioids required for equivalent parenteral analgesia

Peak drug effect occurring after 1 to 2 hours for most analgesics

Delay in onset a disadvantage when rapid control of severe or fluctuating pain is desired

Sublingual, Buccal, or Transmucosal

Tablet or liquid placed between cheek and gum (buccal) or under tongue (sublingual)

Highly desirable because more rapid onset than oral route

• Produces less first-pass effect through liver than oral route, which normally reduces analgesia from oral opioids (unless sublingual or buccal form is swallowed, which occurs often in children)

Few drugs commercially available in this form

Many drugs can be compounded into sublingual troche or lozenge.*

• Actiq—Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate in hard confection base on a plastic holder; indicated only for management of breakthrough cancer pain in patients with malignancies who are already receiving and are tolerant to opioid therapy, but can be used for preoperative or preprocedural sedation and analgesia

Intravenous (IV) (Bolus)

Preferred for rapid control of severe pain

Provides most rapid onset of effect, usually in about 5 minutes

Advantage for acute pain, procedural pain, and breakthrough pain

Needs to be repeated hourly for continuous pain control

Drugs with short half-life (morphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone) preferable to avoid toxic accumulation of drug

IV (Continuous)

Preferred over bolus and intramuscular injection for maintaining control of pain

Provides steady blood levels

Easy to titrate dosage

Subcutaneous (SC) (Continuous)

Used when oral and IV routes not available

Provides equivalent blood levels to continuous IV infusion

Suggested initial bolus dose to equal 2-hour IV dose; total 24-hour dose usually requires concentrated opioid solution to minimize infused volume; use smallest gauge needle that accommodates infusion rate

Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA)

Generally refers to self-administration of drugs, regardless of route

Typically uses programmable infusion pump (IV, epidural, SC) that permits self-administration of boluses of medication at preset dose and time interval (lockout interval is time between doses)

PCA bolus administration often combined with initial bolus and continuous (basal or background) infusion of opioid

Optimum lockout interval not known but must be at least as long as time needed for onset of drug

• Should effectively control pain during movement or procedures

• Longer lockout provides larger dose

Family-Controlled Analgesia

One family member (usually a parent) or other caregiver designated as child’s primary pain manager with responsibility for pressing PCA button

Guidelines for selecting a primary pain manager for family-controlled analgesia:

• Spends a significant amount of time with the patient

• Is willing to assume responsibility of being primary pain manager

• Is willing to accept and respect patient’s reports of pain (if able to provide) as best indicator of how much pain the patient is experiencing; knows how to use and interpret a pain rating scale

• Understands the purpose and goals of patient’s pain management plan

• Understands concept of maintaining a steady analgesic blood level

• Recognizes signs of pain and side effects and adverse reactions to opioid

Nurse-Activated Analgesia

Child’s primary nurse designated as primary pain manager and is only person who presses PCA button during that nurse’s shift

Guidelines for selecting primary pain manager for family-controlled analgesia also applicable to nurse-activated analgesia

May be used in addition to basal rate to treat breakthrough pain with bolus doses; patient assessed every 30 minutes for need for bolus dose

May be used without a basal rate as a means of maintaining analgesia with around-the-clock bolus doses

Intramuscular

note: Not recommended for pain control; not current standard of care

Painful administration (hated by children)

Tissue and nerve damage caused by some drugs

Wide fluctuation in absorption of drug from muscle

Faster absorption from deltoid than from gluteal sites

Shorter duration and more expensive than oral drugs

Time consuming for staff and unnecessary delay for child

Intranasal

Available commercially as butorphanol (Stadol NS); approved for those older than 18 years of age

Should not be used in patient receiving morphinelike drugs because butorphanol is partial antagonist that will reduce analgesia and may cause withdrawal

Intradermal

Used primarily for skin anesthesia (e.g., before lumbar puncture, bone marrow aspiration, arterial puncture, skin biopsy)

Local anesthetics (e.g., lidocaine) cause stinging, burning sensation

Duration of stinging dependent on type of “caine” used

To avoid stinging sensation associated with lidocaine:

• Buffer the solution by adding 1 part sodium bicarbonate (1 mEq/ml) to 9 to 10 parts 1% or 2% lidocaine with or without epinephrine (see Evidence-Based Practice box, p. 210)

Normal saline with preservative, benzyl alcohol, anesthetizes venipuncture site

Same dose used as for buffered lidocaine (see Evidence-Based Practice box, p. 210)

Topical or Transdermal

EMLA (eutectic mixture of local anesthetics [lidocaine and prilocaine]) cream and anesthetic disk or LMX4 (4% lidocaine cream)

• Eliminates or reduces pain from most procedures involving skin puncture

• Must be placed on intact skin over puncture site and covered by occlusive dressing or applied as anesthetic disc for 1 hour or more before procedure (see Evidence-Based Practice box, p. 207)

Lidocaine-tetracaine (Synera, S-Caine)

• Apply for 20 to 30 minutes

• Do not apply to broken skin

LAT (lidocaine-adrenaline-tetracaine), tetracaine-phenylephrine (tetraphen)

• Provides skin anesthesia about 15 minutes after application on nonintact skin

• Gel (preferable) or liquid placed on wounds for suturing

• Adrenaline not for use on end arterioles (fingers, toes, tip of nose, penis, earlobes) because of vasoconstriction

Transdermal fentanyl (Duragesic)

• Available as patch for continuous pain control

• Safety and efficacy not established in children younger than 12 years of age

• Not appropriate for initial relief of acute pain because of long interval to peak effect (12 to 24 hours); for rapid onset of pain relief, give an immediate-release opioid

• Orders for “rescue doses” of an immediate-release opioid recommended for breakthrough pain, a flare of severe pain that breaks through the medication being administered at regular intervals for persistent pain

• Has duration of up to 72 hours for prolonged pain relief

• If respiratory depression occurs, possible need for several doses of naloxone

Vapocoolant

• Use of prescription spray coolant, such as Fluori-Methane or ethyl chloride (Pain-Ease); applied to the skin for 10 to 15 seconds immediately before the needle puncture; anesthesia lasts about 15 seconds

• Some children dislike cold; may be more comfortable to spray coolant on a cotton ball and then apply this to the skin

• Application of ice to the skin for 30 seconds found to be ineffective

Rectal

Alternative to oral or parenteral routes

Variable absorption rate

Generally disliked by children

Many drugs able to be compounded into rectal suppositories*

Regional Nerve Block

Use of long-acting local anesthetic (bupivacaine or ropivacaine) injected into nerves to block pain at site

Provides prolonged analgesia postoperatively, such as after inguinal herniorrhaphy

May be used to provide local anesthesia for surgery, such as dorsal penile nerve block for circumcision or for reduction of fractures

Inhalation

Use of anesthetics, such as nitrous oxide, to produce partial or complete analgesia for painful procedures

Side effects (e.g., headache) possible from occupational exposure to high levels of nitrous oxide

Epidural or Intrathecal

Involves catheter placed into epidural, caudal, or intrathecal space for continuous infusion or single or intermittent administration of opioid with or without a long-acting local anesthetic (e.g., bupivacaine, ropivacaine)

Analgesia primarily from drug’s direct effect on opioid receptors in spinal cord

Respiratory depression rare but may have slow and delayed onset; can be prevented by checking level of sedation and respiratory rate and depth hourly for initial 24 hours and decreasing dose when excessive sedation is detected

Nausea, itching, and urinary retention common dose-related side effects from the epidural opioid

Mild hypotension, urinary retention, and temporary motor or sensory deficits common unwanted effects of epidural local anesthetic

Catheter for urinary retention inserted during surgery to decrease trauma to child; if inserted when child is awake, anesthetize urethra with lidocaine


*For further information about compounding drugs in troche or suppository form, contact Professional Compounding Centers of America (PCCA), 9901 S. Wilcrest Drive, Houston, TX 77009; 800-331-2498; www.pccarx.com.

Data primarily from American Pain Society: Principles of analgesic use in the treatment of acute pain and chronic cancer pain, ed 4, Glenview, Ill, 1999, The Society; and McCaffery M, Pasero C: Pain: a clinical manual, ed 2, St Louis, 1999, Mosby.

TABLE 7-8

EQUIANALGESIA OF SELECTED ANALGESICS

image

note: When converting to oral oxycodone from oral morphine, an appropriate conservative estimate is 15-20 mg of oxycodone per 30 mg of morphine; however, when converting to oral morphine from oral oxycodone, an appropriate conservative estimate is 30 mg of morphine per 30 mg of oxycodone (McCaffery M, Pasero C: Pain: a clinical manual, ed. 2, St. Louis, 1999, Mosby).

*Oral medication with exception of fentanyl.

Data from Duragesic package insert, Janssen Pharmaceutical Products, Titusville, NJ, 2001.

Courtesy Betty R. Ferrell, PhD FAAN, 1999. Used with permission.

Preventive pain control is best provided through continuous IV infusion rather than intermittent boluses. If intermittent boluses are given, make certain the intervals between doses do not exceed the drug’s expected duration of effectiveness. For extended pain control with fewer administration times, drugs that provide longer duration of action (e.g., some NSAIDs, time-released morphine or oxycodone, methadone, levorphanol) can be used.

Continuous analgesia is not always appropriate, since not all pain is continuous. Frequently, temporary pain control or conscious sedation is needed to provide analgesia before a scheduled procedure. When pain can be predicted, the drug’s peak effect should be timed to coincide with the painful event. For example, with opioids the peak effect is approximately a half hour for the IV route; with nonopioids the peak effect occurs about 2 hours after oral administration. For rapid onset and peak of action, opioids that quickly penetrate the blood-brain barrier (e.g., IV fentanyl) provide excellent pain control.

Patient-Controlled Analgesia

A significant advance in the administration of IV, epidural, or subcutaneous analgesics is the use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). As the name implies, the patient controls the amount and frequency of the analgesic, which is typically delivered through a special infusion device. Children who are physically able to “push a button” (i.e., 5 to 6 years of age) and who can understand the concept of pushing a button to obtain pain relief can use PCA (Maxwell and Yaster, 2000). Although it is controversial, parents and nurses have used the IV PCA system for the child. Nurses can efficiently use the infusion device on a child of any age to administer analgesics to avoid signing for and preparing opioid injections every time one is needed (Fig. 7-7). When PCA is used as “nurse- or parent-controlled” analgesia, the concept of patient control is negated, and the inherent safety of PCA needs to be monitored. Research has reported safe and effective analgesia in children when the patient, parent, or nurse controlled the PCA (Algren, Gursoy, Johnson, et al, 1998; Maxwell and Yaster, 2000).

image

Fig. 7-7 Nurse programming a patient-controlled analgesia pump to administer analgesia.

PCA infusion devices typically allow for three methods or modes of drug administration to be used alone or in combination:

1. Patient-administered boluses that can be infused only according to the preset amount and lockout interval (time between doses). More frequent attempts at self-administration may mean the patient needs the dose and time adjusted for better pain control.

2. Nurse-administered boluses that are typically used to give an initial loading dose to increase blood levels rapidly and to relieve breakthrough pain (pain not relieved with the usual programmed dose).

3. Continuous basal rate infusion that delivers a constant amount of analgesic and prevents pain from returning during those times, such as sleep, when the patient cannot control the infusion.

As with any type of analgesic management plan, continued assessment of the child’s pain relief is essential for the greatest benefit from PCA. Typical uses of PCA are for controlling pain from surgery, sickle cell crisis, trauma, and cancer. Morphine is the drug of choice for PCA and usually comes in a concentration of 1 mg/ml (Table 7-9). Other options are hydromorphone (0.2 mg/ml) and fentanyl (0.01 mg/ml).

TABLE 7-9

SUGGESTED INTRAVENOUS PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA OPIOID INFUSION ORDERS

image

From Yaster M, Krance EJ, Kaplan RF, et al: Pediatric pain management and sedation handbook, St. Louis, 1997, Mosby.

Hydromorphone is often used when patients are not able to tolerate side effects such as pruritus and nausea from the morphine PCA (Algren, Gursoy, Johnson, et al, 1998; Maxwell and Yaster, 2000). Some physicians may still prescribe meperidine. However, meperidine is the least potent and shortest-acting of the synthetic opioids and the least effective in providing analgesia for severe pain. More important, it may increase the risk of seizures when administered chronically because of the excitatory effects on the nervous system of its metabolite, normeperidine. Some authors (Nadvi, Sarnaik, and Ravindranath, 1999) have argued that the incidence of meperidine-associated seizures is extremely small (0.4% of patients; 0.06% of admissions) and the risk of seizures should not dissuade clinicians from using this drug. However, the American Pain Society recommends that meperidine be reserved for brief treatment courses for patients who have reported and demonstrated its effectiveness, or who have allergies or uncorrectable intolerances to other opioids. Meperidine should not be used for longer than 48 hours or in dosages greater than 600 mg/24 hr (Max, Payne, Edwards, et al, 1999).

Epidural Analgesia

Epidural analgesia is used to manage pain in selected cases. Although an epidural catheter can be inserted at any vertebral level, it is usually placed into the epidural space of the spinal column at the lumbar or caudal level (Fig. 7-8). The thoracic level is usually reserved for older children or adolescents who have had an upper abdominal or thoracic procedure, such as a lung transplant. An opioid (usually fentanyl, hydromorphone, or preservative-free morphine, which is often combined with a long-acting local anesthetic such as bupivacaine or ropivacaine) is instilled via single or intermittent bolus, continuous infusion, or patient-controlled epidural analgesia. Analgesia results from the drug’s effect on opiate receptors in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, rather than the brain. As a result, respiratory depression is rare, but if it occurs, it develops slowly, typically 6 to 8 hours after administration (Golianu, Krane, Galloway, et al, 2000). Properly securing the epidural catheter with an occlusive dressing decreases the possibility of soiling or inadvertently displacing the catheter (Fig. 7-9). Careful monitoring of sedation level and respiratory status is critical to prevent opioid-induced respiratory depression. Assessment of pain and the skin condition around the catheter site are important aspects of nursing care (Golianu, Krane, Galloway, et al, 2000).

image

Fig. 7-8 Epidural analgesia catheter placement.

image

Fig. 7-9 Dressing covering site of epidural catheter.

Transmucosal and Transdermal Analgesia

Oral transmucosal fentanyl (Oralet) provides nontraumatic preoperative and preprocedural analgesia and sedation (Golianu, Krane, Galloway, et al, 2000). Fentanyl is also available as a transdermal patch (Duragesic). Although contraindicated for acute pain management, it may be used for older children and adolescents who have cancer pain or sickle cell pain or for patients who are opioid tolerant.

One of the most significant improvements in the ability to provide atraumatic care to children is the anesthetic cream LMX4 (a 4% liposomal lidocaine cream) or EMLA (a eutectic mixture of local anesthetics) (Abdelkefi, Abdennebi, Mellouli, et al, 2004; Choi, Irwin, Hui, et al, 2003; Egekvist and Bjerring, 2000; Gad, Olsen, Lysgaard, et al, 2005; Rogers and Ostrow, 2004; Santiago, Abad, Fernandez, et al, 2000; Uziel, Berkovitch, Gazarian, et al, 2003). The eutectic mixture (lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5%), whose melting point is lower than that of the two anesthetics alone, permits effective concentrations of the drug to penetrate intact skin (see Evidence-Based Practice box, p. 207, and Fig. 7-10). Transdermal patches such as Synera are effective methods to administer topical analgesia before painful procedures. A recent review of the evidence comparing these patches to EMLA is found in the Evidence-Based Practice box (p. 208).

image

Fig. 7-10 LMX is an effective analgesic before intravenous insertion or blood draw.

EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE

EMLA Versus LMX for Pain Reduction of Peripheral Intravenous Access in Children

Ask the Question

In children is EMLA (lidocaine and prilocaine) a better anesthetic cream than LMX (lidocaine) in reducing pain from peripheral intravenous (PIV) access?

Search for the Evidence

Search strategies

Search selection criteria included English language publications within past 5 years, research-based articles on children undergoing PIV access.

Databases used

PubMed, Cochrane Collaboration, MD Consult, Joanna Briggs Institute, National Guideline Clearinghouse (AHQR), TRIP Database Plus, PedsCCM, BestBETs

Critically Analyze the Evidence

GRADE criteria: Evidence quality moderate; recommendation strong (Guyatt, Oxman, Vist, et al, 2008)

Three studies were found that evaluated the two anesthetics for PIV access. All three were randomized control trials (level 1). All three studies found that a 30-minute application of LMX is as effective as a 60-minute application of EMLA for producing topical anesthesia for PIV access in children. None of the studies found PIV access difficulty was influenced by EMLA or LMX.

1. The two local anesthetics (EMLA versus LMX) were compared in a group of 120 children 5 to 17 years of age scheduled for venipuncture in two sites. No differences were found in patients’ perception of pain or parental and nurse observation scores (Eichenfield, Funk, Fallon-Friedlander, et al, 2002).

2. EMLA and LMX were compared in a group of 30 healthy children 7 to 13 years of age. Self-report measures showed no difference in reported pain when examining the two anesthetics (Kleiber, Sorenson, Whiteside, et al, 2002).

3. EMLA and LMX were compared in 60 children, 8 to 17 years of age, randomized to either LMX or EMLA. No differences were found between the groups. LMX caused less blanching (Koh, Harrison, Myers, et al, 2004).

Apply the Evidence: Nursing Implications

LMX offers several advantages: rapid onset of action, lower cost, and no risk of methemoglobinemia in children of all ages. Apply LMX for 30 minutes before establishing PIV access.

Nursing implications include the following:

• Age—More than 34 weeks of gestation

• Time of onset—30 minutes

• Duration—1 hour

• Removal—No more than 2 hours after application

• Multiple sites—Yes

• Use with abraded skin—No

• Impact on PIV access difficulty—None

• Do not use within 2 hours before vesicants

• Maximum area/dose—For children weighing less than 20 kg (44 lb), apply to area less than 100 cm2

• Cover with occlusive dressing

References

Eichenfield, LF, Funk, A, Fallon-Friedlander, S, et al. A clinical study to evaluate the efficacy of Ela-Max as compared with eutectic mixture of local anesthetics cream for pain reduction of venipuncture in children. Pediatrics. 2002;109(6):1092–1099.

Guyatt, GH, Oxman, AD, Vist, GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924–926.

Kleiber, C, Sorenson, M, Whiteside, K, et al. Topical anesthetics for intravenous insertion in children: a randomized equivalency study. Pediatrics. 2002;110:758–761.

Koh, JL, Harrison, D, Myers, R, et al. A randomized, double-blind comparison study of EMLA and ELA-Max for topical anesthesia in children undergoing intravenous insertion. Pediatr Anesthesiol. 2004;14:977–982.

EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE

Analgesic Patches: Synera to Decrease Pain During Painful Procedures

Terri L. Brown

Ask the Question

Do topical analgesic patches (e.g., lidocaine-tetracaine [Synera, S-Caine]) offer additional advantages (less time, ease of use, lower cost, higher effectiveness, decreased anxiety) in relieving pain during peripheral intravenous (PIV) cannulation in children compared with LMX (lidocaine) cream and buffered lidocaine via injection?

Search for the Evidence

Search strategies

English research-based publications on lidocaine-tetracaine patches for venipuncture without time limitation were included. Exclusions included epidural use, dermatologic procedures, and S-Caine Peel

Databases used

Cochrane Collaboration Database, Joanna Briggs Institute, National Guideline Clearinghouse (AHRQ), PubMed, SUMSearch, CINAHL, Scopus, Micromedex, UpToDate, BestBETs, manufacturer’s websites (Endo Pharmaceuticals, ZARS Pharma)

Critically Analyze the Evidence

GRADE criteria: Evidence quality strong; recommendation strong (Guyatt, Oxman, Vist, et al, 2008)

Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in children and two RCTs in adults have demonstrated that Synera is effective in inducing local anesthesia before PIV access. One RCT in adults concluded that Synera was as effective as EMLA in a much shorter timeframe with fewer adverse reactions (Sawyer, Febbraro, Masud, et al, 2009). The manufacturer reports 23 additional clinical trials (including one demonstrating safety in infants as young as 4 months), but these were not found in the search of published literature.

Pediatric studies

Synera reduced PIV cannulation pain and did not alter the success rate in a double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT of 45 children 3 to 17 years old in a suburban emergency center (Singer, Taira, Chisena, et al, 2008). Synera or a placebo patch was placed over the antecubital or hand vein. The median self-reported pain using a visual analog scale (VAS) or Wong-Baker faces scale in the Synera group was significantly lower than in the placebo group (p = 0.04). PIV cannulation success on the first attempt was similar in both groups (90% versus 85%).

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT, a 20-minute application of the S-Caine Patch was effective in lessening pain in 64 children scheduled for vascular access at two centers (Sethna, Verghese, Hannallah, et al, 2005). Synera was developed under the name of S-Caine Patch and renamed at time of U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval. The pain patch significantly reduced pain compared with placebo (median Oucher scores of 0 versus 60; p <0.001); 59% of children in the pain patch group reported no pain compared with 20% in the placebo group. Investigator estimations of pain and independent observer ratings also favored the S-Caine Patch (p <0.001). Mild skin erythema (<38%) and edema (<2%) occurred with similar frequencies between the groups.

Cost-effectiveness

In a decision model on cost-effectiveness of topical and inhalation analgesics during PIV cannulation in the pediatric emergency setting, Pershad, Steinberg, and Waters (2008) concluded that the lidocaine-tetracaine (S-Caine) patch ranked fifth out of eight agents. Costs included the cost of the agent plus costs associated with time in the emergency department. Additional variables considered were peak onset time, PIV cannulation success rate, and mean reduction in VAS scores. Seventeen RCTs involving 1287 children were included in the cost analysis. Researchers found “the needle-free jet injection of lidocaine device [J-Tip®] had the lowest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, followed by intradermal injection of buffered lidocaine; lidocaine iontophoresis; nitrous oxide inhalation analgesia; a heated lidocaine and tetracaine patch; sonophoresis with lidocaine cream, 4%; lidocaine cream alone, 4% [LMX®]; and use of a eutectic mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine cream [EMLA®]” (Pershad, Steinberg, and Waters, 2008).

Apply the Evidence: Nursing Implications

• Synera use during PIV cannulation in children 3 years and older decreases pain.

• Do not use in children with a sensitivity to lidocaine, tetracaine, para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA), or amide or ester-type anesthetics. Use with caution in patients with hepatic impairment or receiving class I antiarrhythmic drugs (such as tocainide and mexiletine). Do not apply to broken skin.

• Use immediately after opening pouch, since patch begins to heat once removed from pouch. To ensure proper heating without thermal injury, do not cut the patch or remove any layers of the patch and ensure the holes on the patch are not covered by clothing.

• Do not keep the patch on longer than 20 to 30 minutes.

• There are limited data to support the safety of applying multiple patches simultaneously or sequentially. Follow the distributor’s recommendations to not apply multiple patches.

• As with all transdermal patches containing medication, after use fold adhesive together and dispose of used patches in a location out of the reach of children.

• Do not use in magnetic resonance imaging suite.

References

Guyatt, GH, Oxman, AD, Vist, GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924–926.

Pershad, J, Steinberg, S, Waters, T. Cost-effectiveness analysis of anesthetic agents during peripheral intravenous cannulation in the pediatric emergency department. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162(20):952–961.

Sawyer, J, Febbraro, S, Masud, S, et al. Heated lidocaine/tetracaine patch (Synera™, Rapydan™) compared with lidocaine/prilocaine cream (EMLA®) for topical anaesthesia before vascular access. Br J Anaesthesia. 2009;102(2):210–215.

Sethna, NF, Verghese, ST, Hannallah, RS, et al. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate S-Caine Patch™ for reducing pain associated with vascular access in children. Anesthesiology. 2005;102(2):403–408.

Singer, AJ, Taira, BR, Chisena, EN, et al. Warm lidocaine/tetracaine patch versus placebo before pediatric intravenous cannulation: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;52(1):41–47.

In some situations there is not enough time for topical preparations like LMX or EMLA to take effect, and refrigerant sprays such as ethyl chloride and fluorimethane can be used (Reis and Holubkov, 1997). When sprayed on the skin, these sprays vaporize, rapidly cool the area, and provide superficial anesthesia. Hospital formularies may have other products with lidocaine, prilocaine, or amethocaine topical preparations that require less time for application.

The intradermal route is sometimes used to inject a local anesthetic, typically lidocaine, into the skin to reduce the pain from a lumbar puncture, bone marrow aspiration, or venous or arterial access. One problem with the use of lidocaine is the stinging and burning that initially occur. However, the use of buffered lidocaine with sodium bicarbonate (see Evidence-Based Practice box, p. 210) reduces the stinging sensation (Wong and Pasero, 1997a, 1997b). Warming the lidocaine to 37° C (98.6° F) may accomplish the same effect (McCaffery and Pasero, 1999). A needle-free injection system also be can used to provide intradermal anesthesia (see Evidence-Based Practice box, p. 209).

EVIDENCED-BASED PRACTICE

Buffered Lidocaine for Pain Reduction During Peripheral Intravenous Access in Children

Angela Morgan

Ask the Question

In children is buffered lidocaine an appropriate anesthetic for reducing pain during peripheral intravenous (PIV) access?

Search for the Evidence

Search strategies

Search criteria included English publications within the past 5 years, research-based articles (level 3 or lower) on children undergoing PIV access. Two of the articles reviewed were more than 5 years old but were included based on the limited literature in this area.

Databases used

PubMed, Cochrane Collaboration, MD Consult, Joanna Briggs Institute, National Guideline Clearinghouse (AHQR), TRIP Database, PedsCCM, BestBETs

Critically Analyze the Evidence

GRADE criteria: Evidence quality strong; recommendation strong (Guyatt, Oxman, Vist, et al, 2008)

A review of the literature revealed 10 studies evaluating buffered lidocaine given before PIV access from 1991 through 1999 (Murphy, 2000). Four of the studies were specific to pediatrics. Findings from the pediatric studies support buffered lidocaine as a pain reduction measure in children before PIV access.

• A randomized trial consisting of 69 subjects ranging from 4 to 17 years of age (61% female) evaluated buffered lidocaine versus LMX (liposomal lidocaine cream) before PIV access. Results showed both interventions decreased pain and no significant differences in pain levels between the buffered lidocaine and LMX groups. The LMX group stated that the pain came with the removal of the occlusive dressing from the site (Luhmann, Hurt, Shootman, et al, 2004).

• Fein, Boardman, Stevenson, and colleagues (1998) evaluated buffered lidocaine versus no pain control measures in a group of 99 children requiring PIV access in the emergency department (ED). PIV access without buffered lidocaine was significantly more painful than PIV access with buffered lidocaine.

• Sacchetti and Carraccio (1996) evaluated subcutaneous lidocaine versus no pain control measures in 110 children under 2 years of age before PIV access in the ED. No significant differences in pain levels were found in the groups. A weakness to this trial was that it was not blinded or randomized.

• A clinical trial of 59 children requiring PIV access in the ED evaluated the use and nonuse of subcutaneous lidocaine before PIV access. PIV access without lidocaine was significantly more painful than PIV access with lidocaine regardless of catheter size. Trial weaknesses included a small sample size with wide confidence levels and no randomization (Klein, Shugerman, Leigh-Taylor, et al, 1995).

Apply the Evidence: Nursing Implications

Buffered lidocaine

• Age—More than 2 years

• Time of onset—Immediate

• Duration—1 hour

• Multiple sites—Yes

• Use with abraded skin—No

• Impact on PIV access difficulty—Possibility of some vasoconstriction

• Do not use within 2 hours before vesicants

• Dose—0.1 to 0.5 ml buffered 1% lidocaine, to a maximum of 0.45 ml/kg/dose; can repeat dose after 2 hours

• Consideration—An “extra stick” and ineffective buffered lidocaine administration may result in pain during both local administration and PIV access. Expertise in administering buffered lidocaine is an important factor related to its effectiveness.

References

Fein, JA, Boardman, CR, Stevenson, S, et al. Saline with benzyl alcohol as intradermal anesthesia for intravenous line placement in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1998;14(2):119–122.

Guyatt, GH, Oxman, AD, Vist, GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924–926.

Klein, EJ, Shugerman, RP, Leigh-Taylor, K, et al. Buffered lidocaine: analgesia for intravenous line placement in children. Pediatrics. 1995;95(5):709–712.

Luhmann, J, Hurt, S, Shootman, M, et al. A comparison of buffered lidocaine versus ELA-Max before peripheral intravenous catheter insertions in children. Pediatrics. 2004;113(3 Pt 1):217–220.

Murphy, R. Prior injection of local anaesthetic and the pain and success of intravenous cannulation, 2000. available at www.bestbets.org. [(accessed March 2005)].

Sacchetti, AD, Carraccio, C. Subcutaneous lidocaine does not affect the success rate of intravenous access in children less than 24 months of age. Acad Emerg Med. 1996;3(11):1016–1019.

EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE

Needle-Free Injection System: J-Tip to Administer Buffered Lidocaine

Terri L. Brown

Ask the Question

In pediatrics, are needle-free injection systems (e.g., J-Tip) effective and safe in relieving pain during peripheral intravenous (PIV) cannulation?

Search for the Evidence

Search strategies

English language research-based publications on jet injectors for delivery of lidocaine during PIV cannulation without time limitation were included. Exclusions included dental products, insulin, growth factor, and medications other than lidocaine.

Databases used

Cochrane Collaboration Database, Joanna Briggs Institute, National Guideline Clearinghouse (AHRQ), PubMed, SUMSearch, CINAHL, Scopus, UpToDate, BestBETs, manufacturers’ or distributors’ websites (National Medical Products, Bioject, and Injex)

Critically Analyze the Evidence

GRADE criteria: Evidence quality strong; recommendation strong (Guyatt, Oxman, Vist, et al, 2008)

Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in children reached favorable conclusions using J-Tip to administer buffered lidocaine for pain prevention during PIV cannulation. Two of the studies found J-Tip superior in pain prevention to LMX (lidocaine cream) or EMLA (a eutectic mix of lidocaine and prilocaine) and no different in the success rate of PIV access on first attempt.

J-Tip with 0.2 ml 1% buffered lidocaine provided greater anesthesia than a 30-minute application of LMX in children ages 8 to 15 years undergoing 22-gauge or 24-gauge PIV catheter insertion (Spanos, Booth, Koenig, et al, 2008). Seventy children in a tertiary care pediatric emergency department self-reported pain using a visual analog scale (VAS) before and after PIV cannulation. Blinded observer VAS scores from videotapes were also assigned for pain at jet injection and PIV catheter insertion. Subject VAS scores were significantly different immediately after PIV catheter insertion (17.3 for J-Tip versus 44.6 for LMX, p <0.001). Blinded reviewer VAS scores were not statistically significant (21.7 for J-Tip versus 31.9 for LMX, p = 0.23). Researchers also concluded that J-Tip did not alter the insertion site or affect the success of PIV success on first attempt and that multiple injections could be performed if necessary without causing lidocaine toxicity.

J-Tip with 0.25 ml of 1% buffered lidocaine provided greater anesthesia than application of 2.5 g of EMLA in a study of 116 children ages 7 to 19 years undergoing PIV catheter insertion (Jimenez, Bradford, Seidel, et al, 2006). The subjects’ self-report median pain ratings of PIV cannulation using a 0 to 10 VAS were 0 for J-Tip and 3 for EMLA (p = 0.0001 for patients receiving EMLA ≥60 minutes before cannulation; and p = 0.0013 for those receiving EMLA <60 minutes before). Additionally, more scores were favorable for the J-Tip application (84% reported no pain at the time of injection) compared with EMLA application (61% reported pain at time of Tegaderm dressing removal; p = 0.004). No significant differences were found in the number of PIV attempts. The cost of the J-Tip ($2.10) was less than the cost of EMLA ($2.80) at the study facility. J-Tip makes a popping sound when activated, and investigators provided an additional J-Tip for each subject to see and hear how it worked before actual use, if desired.

J-Tip with 0.2 ml of 1% buffered lidocaine was no more effective than jet-delivered placebo (preservative-free normal saline) during PIV cannulation, but may provide superior analgesia compared with no local anesthetic pretreatment (Auerbach, Tunik, and Mojica, 2009). In phase I, 150 children 5 to 18 years of age received either J-Tip (0.2 ml of buffered 1% lidocaine) or jet-delivered placebo (0.2 ml of preservative-free normal saline) 60 seconds before PIV cannulation in an emergency department. Subjects reported pain on injection and on PIV cannulation using a 100-mm color analog scale. In phase II, 47 children described the effect of using the jet device. The mean needle insertion pain score for jet lidocaine, 28 mm, was similar to the mean score for placebo, 34 mm, and lower than the no device group, 52 mm. Most patients reported they would request this device for future PIV access. Providers’ ratings of their ability to visualize veins and the patient cooperation were similar in all three groups.

Cost-effectiveness

In a decision model on cost-effectiveness of topical and inhalation analgesics during PIV cannulation in the pediatric emergency setting, Pershad, Steinberg, and Waters (2008) concluded that J-Tip had the lowest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of eight agents. Costs included the cost of the agent plus costs associated with time in the emergency department. Additional variables considered were peak onset time, PIV cannulation success rate, and mean reduction in VAS scores. Additional agents included were intradermal injection of buffered lidocaine, lidocaine iontophoresis, nitrous oxide inhalation analgesia, Synera (lidocaine-tetracaine patch), Sonosite (sonophoresis with lidocaine cream), LMX, and EMLA. Seventeen RCTs involving 1287 children were included in the cost analysis.

Apply the Evidence: Nursing Implications

• J-Tip with 0.2 ml of buffered lidocaine 1% decreases pain during PIV insertion.

• Wait 1 minute after administration before attempting PIV insertion.

• Do not use in children with a known hypersensitivity to lidocaine or other amide-type local anesthetics such as prilocaine, mepivacaine, bupivacaine, or etidocaine.

References

Auerbach, M, Tunik, M, Mojica, M. A randomized, double-blind controlled study of jet lidocaine compared to jet placebo for pain relief in children undergoing needle insertion in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16(1):1–6.

Guyatt, GH, Oxman, AD, Vist, GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924–926.

Jimenez, N, Bradford, H, Seidel, KD, et al. A comparison of a needle-free injection system for local anesthesia versus EMLA® for intravenous catheter insertion in the pediatric patient. Anesth Analgesia. 2006;102(2):411–414.

Pershad, J, Steinberg, S, Waters, T. Cost-effectiveness analysis of anesthetic agents during peripheral intravenous cannulation in the pediatric emergency department. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162(20):952–961.

Spanos, S, Booth, R, Koenig, H, et al. Jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine versus topical ELA-Max for anesthesia before peripheral intravenous catheterization in children: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008;24(8):511–515.

Timing of Analgesia

The right timing for administering analgesics depends on the type of pain. For continuous pain control, such as for postoperative or cancer pain, a preventive schedule of medication around the clock (ATC) is effective. The ATC schedule avoids the low plasma concentrations that permit breakthrough pain. If analgesics are administered only when pain returns (a typical use of the prn, or “as needed,” order), pain relief may take several hours. This may require higher doses, leading to a cycle of undermedication of pain alternating with periods of overmedication and drug toxicity. This cycle of erratic pain control also promotes “clock watching,” which may be erroneously equated with addiction. Nurses can effectively use prn orders by giving the drug at regular intervals, since “as needed” should be interpreted as “as needed to prevent pain,” not “as little as possible.”

Monitoring Side Effects

Both NSAIDs and opioids have side effects, although the major concern is with those from opioids (Box 7-4). Respiratory depression is the most serious complication and is most likely to occur in sedated patients. The respiratory rate may decrease gradually or respirations may cease abruptly; lower limits of normal are not established for children, but any significant change from a previous rate calls for increased vigilance. A slower respiratory rate does not necessarily reflect decreased arterial oxygenation; an increased depth of ventilation may compensate for the altered rate. If respiratory depression or arrest occurs, be prepared to intervene quickly (see Nursing Care Guidelines box).

BOX 7-4   SIDE EFFECTS OF OPIOIDS

General

Constipation (possibly severe)

Respiratory depression

Sedation

Nausea and vomiting

Agitation, euphoria

Mental clouding

Hallucinations

Orthostatic hypotension

Pruritus

Urticaria

Sweating

Miosis (may be sign of toxicity)

Anaphylaxis (rare)

Signs of Tolerance

Decreasing pain relief

Decreasing duration of pain relief

Signs of Withdrawal Syndrome in Patients with Physical Dependence

Initial Signs of Withdrawal

Lacrimation

Rhinorrhea

Yawning

Sweating

Later Signs of Withdrawal

Restlessness

Irritability

Tremors

Anorexia

Dilated pupils

Gooseflesh

Nausea, vomiting

image NURSING CARE GUIDELINES

Managing Opioid-Induced Respiratory Depression

If Respirations Are Depressed

Assess sedation level.

Reduce infusion by 25% when possible.

Stimulate patient (shake shoulder gently, call by name, ask to breathe).

Administer oxygen.

If Patient Cannot Be Aroused or Is Apneic

Initiate resuscitation efforts as appropriate.

Administer naloxone (Narcan):

• For children weighing less than 40 kg (88 lb), dilute 0.1 mg naloxone in 10 ml sterile saline to make 10 mcg/ml solution and give 0.5 mcg/kg.

• For children weighing more than 40 kg (88 lb), dilute 0.4-mg ampule in 10 ml sterile saline and give 0.5 ml.

Administer bolus by slow intravenous push every 2 minutes until effect is obtained.

Closely monitor patient. Naloxone’s duration of antagonist action may be shorter than that of the opioid, requiring repeated doses of naloxone.

note: Respiratory depression caused by benzodiazepines (e.g., diazepam [Valium] or midazolam [Versed]) can be reversed with flumazenil (Romazicon). Pediatric dosing experience suggests 0.01 mg/kg (0.1 ml/kg); if no (or inadequate) response after 1 to 2 minutes, administer same dose and repeat as needed at 60-second intervals for maximum dose of 1 mg (10 ml) (Yaster, Krance, Kaplan, et al, 1997).

Although respiratory depression is the most dangerous side effect, constipation is a common, and sometimes serious, side effect of opioids, which decrease peristalsis and increase anal sphincter tone. Prevention with stool softeners and laxatives is more effective than treatment once constipation occurs. Dietary treatment, such as increased fiber, is usually not sufficient to promote regular bowel evacuation. However, dietary measures, such as increased fluid and fruit intake, and physical activity are encouraged. Pruritus from epidural or IV infusion is treated with low doses of IV naloxone, nalbuphine, or diphenhydramine. Nausea, vomiting, and sedation usually subside after 2 days of opioid administration, although oral or rectal antiemetics are sometimes necessary.

Both tolerance and physical dependence can occur with prolonged use of opioids (see Community Focus box). Physical dependence is a normal, natural, physiologic state of “neuroadaptation.” When opioids are abruptly discontinued without weaning, withdrawal symptoms occur 24 hours later and reach a peak within 72 hours. Symptoms of withdrawal include signs of neurologic excitability (irritability, tremors, seizures, increased motor tone, insomnia), gastrointestinal dysfunction (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal cramps), and autonomic dysfunction (sweating, fever, chills, tachypnea, nasal congestion, rhinitis). Withdrawal symptoms can be anticipated and prevented by weaning patients from opioids that were administered for more than 5 to 10 days. Adherence to a weaning protocol to prevent or minimize withdrawal symptoms from opioids is required. A weaning flowsheet (Fig. 7-11, A) may be used to assess the efficacy of opioid weaning in neonates (Franck and Vilardi, 1995; Franck, Vilardi, Durand, et al, 1998). In older infants and young children (7 months to 10 years) the Withdrawal Assessment Tool–1 (Fig. 7-11, B) may be use to assess and monitor withdrawal symptoms in pediatric critically ill children who are exposed to opioids and benzodiazepines for prolonged periods (Franck, Harris, Soetenga, et al, 2008).

image

image

Fig. 7-11 A, Weaning flowsheet to monitor opioid weaning in neonates. B, Withdrawal assessment tool for infants and children. SBS, State behavioral scale. (A, Modified from Franck L, Vilardi J: Assessment and management of opioid withdrawal in ill neonates, Neonatal Netw 14[2]:39-48, 1995; B, © 2007 LS Franck and MAQ Curley. All rights reserved. Reprinted in Franck LS, Harris SK, Soetenga DJ, et al: The Withdrawal Assessment Tool–1 (WAT–1): an assessment instrument for monitoring opioid and benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms in pediatric patients, Pediatr Crit Care Med 9[6]:577, 2008. *From Curley MQ, Harris SK, Fraser KA, et al: State behavioral scale: a sedation assessment instrument for infants and young children supported on mechanical ventilation, Pediatr Crit Care Med 7(2):107-114, 2008.)

image COMMUNITY FOCUS

Fear of Opioid Addiction

One of the reasons for the unfounded but prevalent fear of addiction from opioids used to relieve pain is a misunderstanding of the differences between physical dependence, tolerance, and addiction. Health care professionals and the community often confuse addiction with the physiologic effects of opioids, when in reality these three events are unrelated.

The American Society of Addiction Medicine defines these three terms as follows:

Physical dependence on an opioid is a physiologic state in which abrupt cessation of the opioid, or administration of an opioid antagonist, results in a withdrawal syndrome. Physical dependence on opioids is an expected occurrence in all individuals who continuously use opioids for therapeutic or nontherapeutic purposes. It does not, in and of itself, imply addiction.

Tolerance is a form of neuroadaptation to the effects of chronically administered opioids (or other medications) that is indicated by the need for increasing or more frequent doses of the medication to achieve the initial effects of the drug. A person may develop tolerance both to the analgesic effects of opioids and to some of the unwanted side effects, such as respiratory depression, sedation, or nausea. Tolerance is variable in occurrence, but it does not, in and of itself, imply addiction.

Addiction in the context of pain treatment with opioids is characterized by a persistent pattern of dysfunctional opioid use that may involve any or all of the following:

• Adverse consequences associated with the use of opioids

• Loss of control over the use of opioids

• Preoccupation with obtaining opioids, despite the presence of adequate analgesia

Unfortunately, individuals who have severe, unrelieved pain may become intensely focused on finding relief. Sometimes behaviors such as “clock watching” make patients appear to others to be preoccupied with obtaining opioids. However, this preoccupation focuses on finding relief of pain, not on using opioids for reasons other than pain control. This phenomenon has been termed pseudoaddiction and must not be confused with real addiction.

Nurses must educate older children, parents, and health professionals about the extremely low risk of real addiction (<1%) from the use of opioids to treat pain. Infants, young children, and comatose or terminally ill children simply cannot become addicted because they are incapable of a consistent pattern of drug-seeking behavior, such as stealing, drug dealing, prostitution, and use of family income, to obtain opioids for nonanalgesic reasons.

Data from American Society of Addiction Medicine: Public policy statement on definitions related to the use of opioids for pain treatment, February 2001, available at www.asam.org/Pain.html (accessed December 8, 2009).

Tolerance occurs when the dose of an opioid needs to be increased to achieve the same analgesic effects that was previously achieved at a lower dose (see Community Focus box). Tolerance may develop after 10 to 21 days of morphine administration. Treatment of tolerance involves increasing the dose or decreasing the duration between doses. Treatment of physical dependence involves gradually reducing the dose over several days to prevent withdrawal symptoms, as follows (Max, Payne, Edwards, et al, 1999):

• Gradually reduce dose (similar to tapering of steroids).

• Give half of previous daily dose every 6 hours for first 2 days.

• Then reduce dose by 25% every 2 days. Continue this schedule until the patient reaches a total daily dose of 0.6 mg/kg of morphine (or equivalent). After 2 days on this dose, discontinue opioid.

• You may also switch to oral methadone, using one fourth of equianalgesic dose as initial weaning dose and proceeding as described above.

Parents and older children may fear addiction when opioids are prescribed. The nurse should address these concerns with assurance that any such risk is extremely low. It may be helpful to ask the question, “If you did not have this pain, would you want to take this medicine?” The answer is invariably no, which reinforces the solely therapeutic nature of the drug. It is also important to avoid making statements to the family such as “We don’t want you to get used to this medicine,” or “By now you shouldn’t need this medicine,” which may reinforce the fear of becoming addicted. Whereas both physical dependence and tolerance are physiologic states, addiction or psychologic dependence is a psychologic state and implies a “cause-effect” mode of thinking, such as “I need the drug because it makes me feel better.” Infants and children do not have the cognitive ability to make the cause-effect association and therefore cannot become addicted. The use of opioid analgesics early in life has not been demonstrated to increase the risk for addiction later in life. Nurses need to explain to parents the differences among physical dependence, tolerance, and addiction and allow them to express concerns about the use and duration of use of opioids. Infants and children, when treated appropriately with opioids, may be at risk for physical tolerance and physical dependence, but not psychologic dependence or addiction (McCaffery and Pasero, 1999).

Evaluation of Effectiveness of Pain Regimen

The response to therapy should be evaluated 15 to 30 minutes after each dose, and titration should continue to the highest achievable amount of relief (Max, Payne, Edwards, et al, 1999). In a retrospective study that examined the pain experience of children with sickle cell disease, evidence of pain relief from medications was documented for less than half (44.8%) of the patients in the emergency department (ED) (Jacob and Mueller, 2008). Even though The Joint Commission required documentation of pain assessments with vital signs, evidence of pain relief was not documented in 41.4% of the episodes. Titration methods in the ED or during the course of hospitalization, if used, were not reflected in the amount of medications received by the children (Jacob and Mueller, 2008; Jacob, Miaskowski, Savedra, et al, 2003a, 2003b).

In a study of nursing practice related to pain assessment and management in different pediatric specialty units, nurses noted complaints of pain, but seldom documented specific pain scores or responses to analgesics after administration (Jacob and Puntillo, 2000). Pain scores were not available before and after analgesics, and it was therefore not possible to conclude whether analgesics were effective. Nurses therefore need to evaluate and monitor pain in a timely fashion after administration of analgesic and titrate dosage to effect. Nurses also need to make recommendations for an alternate analgesic; for addition of another analgesic; or for a combination of analgesics, adjuvants, and nonpharmacologic strategies.

Consequences of Untreated Pain in Infants

Despite current research on the neonate’s experience of pain, infant pain often remains inadequately managed. The mismanagement of infant pain is partially the result of misconceptions regarding the effects of pain on the neonate and the lack of knowledge of immediate and long-term consequences of untreated pain. Infants respond to noxious stimuli through physiologic indicators (increased heart rate and blood pressure, variability in heart rate and intracranial pressure, and decreases in Sao2 and skin blood flow) and behavioral indicators (muscle rigidity, facial expression, crying, withdrawal, and sleeplessness) (Anand, Grunau, and Oberlander, 1997; Bildner and Krechel, 1996). The physiologic and behavioral changes, as well as a variety of neurophysiologic responses to noxious stimulation, are responsible for acute and long-term consequences of pain.

Several harmful effects occur with unrelieved pain, particularly when pain is prolonged. Pain triggers a number of physiologic stress responses in the body, and they lead to negative consequences that involve multiple systems. Unrelieved pain may prolong the stress response and adversely affect an infant’s or child’s recovery, whether it is from trauma, surgery, or disease. (See Research Focus box.)

image RESEARCH FOCUS

Deep Intraoperative Anesthesia

In a landmark study by Anand and Hickey (1992), 30 neonates received deep intraoperative anesthesia with high doses of the opioid sufentanil, followed postoperatively by an infusion of opioids for 24 hours, and 15 neonates received lighter anesthesia with halothane and morphine followed postoperatively by intermittent morphine and diazepam. The 15 neonates who received the lighter anesthesia and intermittent postoperative opioids had more severe hyperglycemia and lactic acidemia, and 4 postoperative deaths occurred in the group. The 30 neonates who received deep anesthesia had a lower incidence of complications (sepsis, metabolic acidosis, disseminated intravascular coagulation) and no deaths.

Poorly controlled acute pain can predispose patients to chronic pain syndromes. See Box 7-5 for a list of numerous complications of untreated pain in infants. A guiding principle in pain management is that prevention of pain is always better than treatment (Benjamin, Swinson, and Nagel, 2000). Pain that is established and severe is often more difficult to control. When pain is unrelieved, sensory input from injured tissues reaches spinal cord neurons and may enhance subsequent responses. Long-lasting changes in cells within spinal cord pain pathways may occur after a brief painful stimulus and may lead to the development of chronic pain conditions. Basbaum (1999a, 1999b) reported a series of studies that emphasize a distinct neurochemistry of acute and persistent pain and concluded that persistent pain is not merely a prolonged acute pain symptom of some other disease. Underlying physiologic mechanisms lead to the persistence of pain (Marx, 2004; Woolf and Salter, 2000).

BOX 7-5   CONSEQUENCES OF UNTREATED PAIN IN INFANTS

Acute Consequences

Periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage

Increased chemical and hormone release

Breakdown of fat and carbohydrate stores

Prolonged hyperglycemia

Higher morbidity for neonatal intensive care unit patients

Memory of painful events

Hypersensitivity to pain

Prolonged response to pain

Inappropriate innervation of the spinal cord

Inappropriate response to nonnoxious stimuli

Lower pain threshold

Potential Long-Term Consequences

Higher somatic complaints of unknown origin

Greater physiologic and behavioral responses to pain

Increased prevalence of neurologic deficits

Psychosocial problems

Neurobehavioral disorders

Cognitive deficits

Learning disorders

Poor motor performance

Behavioral problems

Attention deficits

Poor adaptive behavior

Inability to cope with novel situations

Problems with impulsivity and social control

Learning deficits

Emotional temperament changes in infancy or childhood

Accentuated hormonal stress responses in adult life

Anand and Hickey (1987) described additional responses of infants to painful stimuli from their own unpublished and other scientific studies. Chemical and hormonal responses were observed following noxious stimuli without the use of an anesthetic or analgesic. Such responses included increases in β-endorphin secretion (an endogenous opioid), plasma renin activity, plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine, catecholamines, growth hormone, glucagon, aldosterone, and other corticosteroids. The result of these chemical and hormonal increases includes the breakdown of fat and carbohydrate stores; prolonged hyperglycemia; and increased serum lactate, pyruvate, total ketone bodies, and nonesterified fatty acids. Such consequences can lead to a greater morbidity for neonates in the NICU. Several experimental studies revealed a significant decrease in these responses when adequate analgesia was used before the painful procedure. One study showed that the standardization of postoperative pain management strategies for infants in the NICU led to the following improvements: (1) decreased length of time to extubation, (2) decreased length of stay, (3) better fluid management, and (4) reduced side effects of opioids. The authors also noted improved pain management documentation, decreased cost, and decreased nursing time (Furdon, Eastman, Benjamin, et al, 1998) (see Atraumatic Care box).

ATRAUMATIC CARE

Use of Opioids and Extubation Practice

Traditional belief holds that the continued use of opioids for neonates in the postoperative period results in prolonged intubation. Consequently, traditional practice is to discontinue all opioids several hours before and after extubation, thus preventing pain relief. Furdon, Eastman, Benjamin, and colleagues (1998) found that continuous opioid infusion in infants without an underlying pulmonary or neurologic pathologic condition actually shortened the time to extubation and caused no problems of respiratory depression that required reintubation. Preliminary evidence suggests that the use of preemptive analgesia with a continuous infusion of low-dose morphine reduces the incidence of poor neurologic outcomes in preterm neonates who require ventilatory support.

An experience known as the windup phenomenon has been attributed to a decreased pain threshold and chronic pain. Central and peripheral mechanisms that occur in response to noxious tissue injury have been studied in an attempt to explain a prolonged neonatal response to pain characteristic of the windup phenomenon. After exposure to noxious stimuli, multiple levels of the spinal cord experience an altered excitability. This altered excitability may cause nonnoxious stimuli, such as routine nursing care and handling, to be perceived as noxious stimuli. The nonnoxious stimuli produce the same physiologic response to stress that noxious stimuli would produce, leading to chronic pain. Long-term exposure to chronic pain may be responsible for more biologic and clinical consequences in critically ill premature infants than acute pain (Anand, Grunau, and Oberlander, 1997).

Researchers have found that nerve damage resulting from tissue injury stimulates collateral nerve growth by surrounding undamaged nerves. This collateral growth is responsible for inappropriate innervation in the spinal cord, which processes information from the surrounding undamaged nerves (Anand, Grunau, and Oberlander, 1997). Based on evidence from a study of human infants and adult rats exposed to neonatal pain, additional long-term consequences of neonatal pain include potential emotional temperament changes in infancy or childhood, accentuated hormonal stress responses in adult life, a preference for alcohol, and decreased exploratory behaviors (Anand, Grunau, and Oberlander, 1997).

Consequences of a history of extremely low birth weight and early pain exposure that may be attributed to pain and environmental stress include increased prevalence of neurologic deficits, psychosocial problems, and neurobehavioral disorders. Additional sequelae include cognitive deficits, learning disorders, poor motor performance, behavioral problems, attention deficits, poor adaptive behavior, inability to cope with novel situations, problems with impulsivity and social control, and learning deficits (Anand, Grunau, and Oberlander, 1997).

The limited available knowledge with respect to the consequences of infant pain suggests serious potential deleterious effects of untreated pain (see Box 7-5). Prevention of acute pain and treatment of chronic pain have been documented as beneficial in reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with frequent exposure to pain in premature infants (Anand and Carr, 1989; Anand and Hickey, 1987, 1992). Nurses who care for infants and children should consider the potential acute and long-term effects of pain on their young patients and be advocates in treating and preventing pain.

Common Pain States in Children

Painful and Invasive Procedures

Several painful and invasive procedures require the administration of anesthetics and analgesics. For circumcision pain, caudal or penile blocks are employed before the procedure, then parents are instructed how to apply lidocaine gels for the first 24 to 36 hours after the circumcision. For open wounds, bupivacaine may be instilled with or without epinephrine onto the dressing applied to skin to minimize pain for up to 48 hours after the procedure. For graft donor sites, analgesia is maintained by using a foam dressing soaked with bupivacaine (0.25%, 2 mg/kg; 0.8 ml/kg) and applying it to the donor surface. A continuous infusion of 0.25% bupivacaine at 1 to 3 ml/hr via a standard 18-gauge epidural catheter is then curled on the outer or inner surface of the foam (Cousins and Power, 2003). Wound perfusion of bupivacaine is useful for iliac crest bone graft donor sites (used for alveolar bone grafting in some techniques of cleft palate repair). A standard 18-gauge epidural catheter is also used with a very low infusion rate (1 to 3 ml/hr) of bupivacaine. For minor and some intermediate procedures, the local anesthetic infiltration with bupivacaine is commonly used. Some examples of these procedures include surface wounds and tunneling procedures in the anesthetized child requiring inguinal surgery; insertion of ventriculoperitoneal shunts, central venous lines, or central venous catheter-reservoir systems; and similar procedures.

Procedural Sedation and Analgesia

Severe pain associated with invasive procedures and anxiety associated with diagnostic imaging can be managed with sedation and analgesia (Meredith, O’Keefe, and Galwankar, 2008). Sedation involves a wide range of levels of consciousness (Box 7-6). A thorough patient assessment is essential before procedural sedation. Key components to include in the patient history include:

BOX 7-6

LEVELS OF SEDATION

Minimal Sedation (Anxiolysis)

Patient responds to verbal commands.

Cognitive function may be impaired.

Respiratory and cardiovascular systems are unaffected.

Moderate Sedation (Previously Conscious Sedation)

Patient responds to verbal commands but may not respond to light tactile stimulation.

Cognitive function is impaired.

Respiratory function is adequate; cardiovascular system is unaffected.

Deep Sedation

Patient cannot be easily aroused except with repeated or painful stimuli.

Ability to maintain airway may be impaired.

Spontaneous ventilation may be impaired; cardiovascular function is maintained.

General Anesthesia

Loss of consciousness, patient cannot be aroused with painful stimuli.

Airway cannot be maintained adequately and ventilation is impaired.

Cardiovascular function may be impaired.

From Meredith JR, O’Keefe KP, Galwankar S: Pediatric procedural sedation and analgesia, J Emerg Trauma Shock 1(2):88-96, 2008.

Past medical history—Major illnesses such as asthma, psychiatric disorders, cardiac disease, hepatic or renal impairment; previous hospitalizations or surgeries; history of previous anesthesia or sedation.

Allergies—Opiates, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, local anesthetics, or others.

Current medications—Cardiovascular medications, central nervous system depressants. Use caution with chronic benzodiazepine and opiate users; administration of reversal agents may induce withdrawal or seizures.

Drug use—Narcotics, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, cocaine, and alcohol.

Last oral intake—For nonemergent cases, some guidelines recommend more than 6 hours for solid food and more than 2 hours for clear liquid.

Volume status—Vomiting, diarrhea, fluid restriction, urinary output, making tears.

A physical status evaluation using the ASA Physical Status Classification (Meredith, O’Keefe, and Galwankar, 2008) is documented before administering analgesia and sedation:

Class I—A normally health patient

Class II—A patient with mild systemic disease

Class III—A patient with severe systemic disease

Class IV—A patient with severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life

Class V—A moribund patient who is not expected to survive without the operation

To provide a safe environment for procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA), equipment should be readily available to prevent or manage adverse events and complications (Box 7-7). The patient should have an IV access for titration of sedation and analgesic medications and for administration of possible antagonists and fluids. Trained personnel (physician, registered nurse, respiratory therapist) whose sole responsibility is to monitor the patient (rather than performing or assisting with the procedure) should be present to monitor for adverse events and complications. Common medications used for PSA are found in Table 7-10.

BOX 7-7   PROCEDURAL SEDATION AND ANALGESIA EQUIPMENT NEEDS

• High-flow oxygen and delivery method

• Airway management materials: endotracheal tubes, bag valve masks, and laryngoscopes

• Pulse oximetry, blood pressure monitor, electrocardiography,* capnography*

• Suction and large-bore catheters

• Vascular access supplies

• Resuscitation drugs, intravenous fluids

• Reversal agents, including flumazenil and naloxone


*May be optional devices.

TABLE 7-10

PROCEDURAL SEDATION AND ANALGESIA AGENTS

image

ET, Endotracheal tube; IM, intramuscular; IN, intranasal; IV, intravenous; PR, per rectum; q, every; SC, subcutaneous.

Postoperative Pain

Surgery and traumatic injuries (fractures, dislocations, strains, sprains, lacerations, burns) generate a catabolic state as a result of increased secretion of catabolic hormones and lead to alterations in blood flow, coagulation, fibrinolysis, substrate metabolism, and water and electrolyte balance and increase the demands on the cardiovascular and respiratory systems (Cousins and Power, 2003). The major endocrine and metabolic changes occur during the first 48 hours after surgery or trauma. Local anesthetics and opioid neural blockade may effectively mitigate the physiologic responses to surgical injury.

Pain associated with surgery to the chest (e.g., repair of congenital heart defects, chest trauma) or abdominal regions (e.g., appendectomy, cholecystectomy, splenectomy) may result in pulmonary complications. Pain leads to decreased muscle movement in the thorax and abdominal area and leads to decreased tidal volume, vital capacity, functional residual capacity, and alveolar ventilation. The patient is unable to cough and clear secretions, and the risk for complications such as pneumonia and atelectasis is high. Severe postoperative pain also results in sympathetic overactivity, which leads to increases in heart rate, peripheral resistance, blood pressure, and cardiac output. The patient eventually experiences an increase in cardiac demand and myocardial oxygen consumption and a decrease in oxygen delivery to the tissues.

The basis for good postoperative pain control in children is preemptive analgesia. Preemptive analgesia involves administration of medications (e.g., local and regional anesthetics, analgesics) before the child experiences the pain or before surgery is performed so that the sensory activation and changes in the pain pathways of the peripheral and central nervous system can be controlled. Preemptive analgesia lowers postoperative pain, lowers analgesic requirement, lowers hospital stay, lowers complications after surgery, and minimizes the risks for peripheral and central nervous system sensitization that can lead to persistent pain (Cousins and Power, 2003).

A combination of medications (multimodal or balanced analgesia) is used for postoperative pain and may include NSAIDs, local anesthetics, nonopioids, and opioid analgesics to achieve optimum relief and minimize side effects. Opioids (see Table 7-5) administered ATC during the first 48 hours or administered via PCA (see Table 7-9) are commonly prescribed postoperatively. The duration of use is frequently limited to days, since the cause of pain usually resolves. The combination of the IV NSAID ketorolac and morphine using a PCA device is frequently prescribed after thoracic surgery. Morphine delivered by PCA leads to a lower total dosage of opioid analgesia when compared with the administration of intermittent doses of analgesic as required. After bowel surgery, a mixture of a local anesthetic (bupivacaine) and a low-dose opioid (fentanyl) delivered by epidural route improves the rate of recovery and minimizes the gastrointestinal effects (e.g., bowel stasis, nausea, vomiting). Once bowel function has been restored, oral opioids such as immediate release and controlled release preparations are preferred in older children. Controlled release opioids facilitate ATC dosing and improve sleep. They are also associated with a lower incidence of nausea, sedation, and breakthrough pain.

Burn Pain

Because burn pain has multiple components, involves repeated manipulations over the injured painful sites, and has changing pattern over time, it is difficult and challenging to control. Burn pain includes a constant background pain that is felt at the wound sites and surrounding areas. Burn pain is exacerbated (breakthrough pain) by movements such as changing position, turning in bed, walking, or even breathing. Areas of normal skin that have been harvested for skin grafts (donor sites) also are painful. Pain is commonly experienced with intense tingling or itching sensations when skin grafting is required. During the healing process, when the tissue and nerve regenerate, the necrotic tissue (eschar) is excised until viable tissue is reached. The healing process may last for months to years. Pain or paresthetic sensations (itching, tingling, cold sensations, etc.) may persist. In addition, discomfort may be associated with immobilization of limbs in splints or garments, as well as multiple surgical interventions such as skin grafting and reconstructive surgery (Choiniere, 2003).

Multiple therapeutic procedures are carried out during the course of treatment. These procedures (dressing changes, wound débridement and cleansing, physical therapy sessions) occur daily or even several times a day (see Chapter 27). Providing proper analgesia without interfering with the patient’s awareness during and after the procedure is the biggest challenge in the management of burn pain. Fentanyl or alfentanil has a major advantage over morphine because of the short duration. Fentanyl can prevent oversedation after the procedure. For less painful procedures, premedication with oral morphine, oral ketamine, or milder opioids 15 minutes before the procedure may be sufficient. Depending on the patient’s anxiety level, a benzodiazepine (e.g., lorazepam) before the procedure may be beneficial. For longer procedures, morphine is the mainstay of treatment. Some patients may require moderate to deep sedation and analgesia. Oral oxycodone with midazolam and acetaminophen, in addition to nitrous oxide, may be needed. IV ketamine administered at subtherapeutic doses has been one of the most extensively used anesthetics for burn patients. The dysphoria and unpleasant reactions associated with ketamine administration may be minimized with premedication with a benzodiazepine. If ketamine is used with either morphine or fentanyl, the regimen could have opioid-sparing actions and reduce the opioid-related side effects.

Psychologic interventions are helpful in the treatment of burn pain. These interventions include hypnosis, relaxation training (breathing exercises, progressive muscle relaxation), biofeedback, stress inoculation training, cognitive-behavioral strategies (guided imagery, distraction, coping skills), and group and individual psychotherapy. They can be used alone or in combination. All these techniques can help the patient relax and maintain a sense of control (Choiniere, 2003). A major disadvantage of these interventions is they require time and discipline and often patients are too stressed, fatigued, disoriented, or sick to engage in them.

Recurrent Headaches in Children

Recurrent headaches in children can be caused by several factors, including tension, dental braces, imbalance or weakness of eye muscles causing deviation in alignment and refractive errors, sequelae to accidents, sinusitis and other cranial infection or inflammation, increased intracranial pressure, epileptic attacks, drugs, obstructive sleep apnea, and rarely hypertension (see Chapter 37). Other causes may include arteriovenous malformations, disturbances in cerebrospinal fluid flow or absorption, intracranial hemorrhages, ocular and dental diseases, bacterial infections, and brain tumors.

Severe pain is the most disturbing symptom in migraine. Tension-type headache is usually mild or moderate, often producing a pressing feeling in the temples, like a “tight band around the head.” Continuous, daily, or near-daily headache with no specific cause occurs in a small subgroup of children. In epilepsy, headaches commonly occur immediately before, during, or after a seizure attack.

Treatment of recurrent headaches requires an understanding of the antecedents and consequences of headache pain. A headache diary can allow the child to record the time of onset, activities before the onset, any worries or concerns as far back as 24 hours before the onset, severity and duration of pain, pain medications taken, and activity pattern during headache episodes. The headache diary allows ongoing monitoring of headache activity, indicates the effects of interventions, and guides treatment planning.

Headache management involves two main behavioral approaches: (1) teaching patients self-control skills to prevent headache (biofeedback techniques and relaxation training), and (2) modifying behavior patterns that increase the risk of headache occurrence or reinforce headache activity (cognitive-behavioral stress management techniques). Biofeedback is a technology-based form of relaxation therapy and can be useful in assessing and reinforcing learning of relaxation skills such as progressive muscle relaxation, deep breathing, and imagery. Children as young as 7 years of age are able to learn these skills and with 2 to 3 weeks of practice are able to decrease the time needed to achieve relaxation.

To modify behavior patterns that increase the risk of headache or reinforce headache activity, the nurse instructs parents to avoid giving excessive attention to their child’s headache and to respond matter-of-factly to pain behavior and requests for special attention (Holden, Deichmann, and Levy, 1999). Parents learn to assess whether the child is avoiding school or social performance demands because of headache. Parents are taught to focus attention on adaptive coping such as the use of relaxation techniques and maintenance of normal activity patterns. When using cognitive-behavioral stress management techniques, the parents identify negative thoughts and situations that may be associated with increased risk for headache. The parent teaches the child to activate positive thoughts and engage in adaptive behavior appropriate to the situation.

Recurrent Abdominal Pain in Children

Recurrent abdominal pain (RAP) or functional abdominal pain is defined as pain that occurs at least once per month for 3 consecutive months, accompanied by pain-free periods, and is severe enough that it interferes with a child’s normal activities (see Chapter 18). Management of RAP is highly individualized to reflect the causes of the pain and the psychosocial needs of the child and family. A clear understanding of the child’s characteristics (anxiety, physical health, temperament, coping skills, experience, learned response, depression), child’s disability (school attendance, activities with family, social interactions, pain behaviors), environmental factors (family attitudes and behavioral patterns, school environment, community, friendships), and the pain stimulus (disease, injury, stress) is important in planning management strategies (Collins and Weisman, 2003).

Before any workup of the pain, the nurse informs the family that RAP is common in children and only 10% of children with RAP have an identifiable organic cause for their pain symptom. Medical workup is dictated by the child’s symptoms and signs in combination with knowledge about common organic causes of RAP. If an organic cause is found, it will be treated appropriately. Even if no organic cause is found, the nurse needs to communicate to the child and family a belief that the pain is real. Usually the abdominal pain goes away, but even if problems are identified, they may not be the actual cause and pain may persist, may be replaced by another symptom, or may go away on its own. The management plan includes regular follow-up at a 3- to 4-month intervals, a list of symptoms that call for earlier contact, and biobehavioral pain management techniques. The goal is to minimize the impact of the pain on the child’s activities and the family’s life (Collins and Weisman, 2003).

Case reports have demonstrated the effectiveness of implementing a time-out procedure, token systems, and positive reinforcement based on operant theory treatment modalities. Stress management and cognitive-behavioral strategies have also been successful. Parent training in how to avoid positive reinforcement of sick behaviors and focus on rewarding healthy behaviors is important. Over the course of several sessions, parents are educated about RAP, how to distinguish between sick and well behaviors, a reward system for well behaviors, and the importance of reinforcing relaxation and coping skills taught to children for pain management. Treatment may consist of a varying number of sessions over 1 to 6 months and may include various components such as monitoring symptoms, limiting parent attention, relaxation training, increasing dietary fiber, and requiring school attendance. Response rates are 25% without abdominal pain and 56% to 75% improvements in symptoms (Collins and Weisman, 2003). The use of cognitive-behavioral therapy has been documented to reduce or eliminate pain in children with RAP and highlights the involvement of parents in supporting their child’s self-management behavior. No negative side effects of symptom substitution occurred with the interventions. (See Research Focus box.)

image RESEARCH FOCUS

Recurrent Abdominal Pain

One study demonstrated that the combination of self-regulation and cognitive-behavioral interventions along with fiber intervention is more effective for treating recurrent abdominal pain (RAP) than using fiber alone (Weydert, Ball, and Davis, 2003).

Two studies evaluated the use of famotidine (See, Birnbaum, Schechter, et al, 2001) and pizotifen (Symon and Russell, 1995) for the treatment of abdominal pain. Famotidine is an H2-receptor antagonist that was given twice daily (0.5 mg/kg/dose). It was demonstrated to improve pain in 68% of children and decreased the peptic index score (composite score for nausea, vomiting, appetite loss, epigastric pain, weight loss, and nocturnal awakening). Pizotifen is a serotonin antagonist that was tested in 14 children given at 5 ml (0.25 mg) twice daily for 1 month. Patients who received pizotifen had fewer days of abdominal pain, a lower index of severity, and a lower index of misery when compared with those receiving a placebo. The only side effects noted were slight drowsiness and slight weight gain. Pizotifen is available worldwide but not approved for use in the United States.

Pain in Children with Sickle Cell Disease

A painful episode is the most frequent cause for ED visits and hospital admissions among children with sickle cell disease (see Chapter 35). The acute painful episode in sickle cell disease is the only pain syndrome in which opioids are considered the major therapy and are started in early childhood and continued throughout adult life. A source of frustration for patients and clinicians is that most current analgesic regimens are inadequate in controlling some of the most severe painful episodes. A multidisciplinary approach that involves both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic modalities (cognitive-behavioral intervention, heat, massage, physical therapy) is needed, but not often implemented. The goals of treatment of the acute episode may not be to take all the pain away, which is usually impossible, but to make the pain tolerable to the patient until the episode resolves and to increase function and patient participation in activities of daily living (Benjamin, Dampier, Jacox, et al, 1999; Max, Payne, Edwards, et al, 1999).

Patients coming to an ED for acute painful episodes usually have exhausted all home care options or outpatient therapy (Benjamin, Dampier, Jacox, et al, 1999; Max, Payne, Edwards, et al, 1999). The nurse should ask patients what the usual medication, dosage, and side effects were in the past; the usual medication taken at home; and medication taken since the onset of present pain. The patient may be on long-term opioid therapy at home and therefore may have developed some degree of tolerance. A different potent opioid or a larger dose of the same medication may be indicated. Because mixed opioid-agonist-antagonists (e.g., pentazocine, nalbuphine, butorphanol) may precipitate withdrawal syndromes, avoid these if patients were taking long-term opioids at home. A “passport” card with patient information about the diagnosis, previous complications, suggested pain management regimen, and name and contact information of the primary hematologist is helpful for parents and facilitates management of pain in the ED.

The patient is admitted for inpatient management of severe pain if adequate relief is not achieved in the ED (Benjamin, Dampier, Jacox, et al, 1999; Max, Payne, Edwards, et al, 1999). For severe pain, IV administration with bolus dosing and continuous infusion using a PCA device may be necessary. Patients requiring more than 5 to 7 days of opioids should have tapering doses to avoid the physiologic symptoms of withdrawal (dysphoria, nasal congestion, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, sweating, and seizures). Appropriate weaning of the PCA schedules start with reduction of the continuous infusion rate before discontinuation, while the patient continues to use demand doses for analgesia. Morphine-equivalent equianalgesic conversions may be used to convert continuous infusion rates to equivalent oral analgesics (see Table 7-8). Doses of long-acting oral analgesics, such as sustained release oral morphine, may also be used to replace continuous infusion dosing. The demand doses can be subsequently reduced if analgesia remains adequate.

Patients who are administered doses of opioids that are inadequate to relieve their pain, or whose doses are not tapered after a course of treatment, may develop iatrogenic pseudoaddiction, which resembles addiction (Elander, Lusher, Bevan, et al, 2004). Pseudoaddiction or clock-watching behavior may be resolved by communicating with patients to ensure accurate assessment, involving them in decisions about their pain management, and administering adequate opioid doses (Elander, Lusher, Bevan, et al, 2004).

Cancer Pain in Children

Pain in children with cancer is present before diagnosis and treatment and may resolve after initiation of anticancer therapy. However, treatment-related pain is common (see Table 7-11 and Research Focus box). Pain may be related to an operation, mucositis, a phantom limb, or infection. Pain can also be related to chemotherapy and procedures such as bone marrow aspiration, needle puncture, and lumbar puncture (Collins, Byrnes, Dunkel, et al, 2000). Tumor-related pain frequently occurs when the child relapses or when tumors become resistant to treatment. Intractable pain may occur in patients with solid tumors that metastasize to the central or peripheral nervous system. In young adult survivors of childhood cancer, chronic pain conditions may develop, including complex regional pain syndrome of the lower extremity, phantom limb pain, avascular necrosis, mechanical pain related to bone that failed to unite after tumor resection, and postherpetic neuralgia.

TABLE 7-11

CANCER PAIN IN CHILDREN

image

image RESEARCH FOCUS

Cancer-Related Pain

In one study of children with cancer, pain was the most prevalent symptom (84.4%) and was rated as moderate to severe (86.6%) and highly distressing (52.8%) (Collins, Byrnes, Dunkel, et al, 2000).

Oral mucositis (ulceration of the oral cavity and throat) may occur in 40% of patients undergoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy and in 76% of patients undergoing bone marrow transplant (Berger, Henderson, Nadoolman, et al, 1995). No present therapy adequately relieves the pain of these lesions. Antihistamines, local anesthetics, and opioids provide only temporary relief, may block taste perception, or may produce additional side effects such as lethargy and constipation. Initial treatment includes single agents (saline, opioids, sodium bicarbonate, hydrogen peroxide, sucralfate suspension, clotrimazole, nystatin, viscous lidocaine, amphotericin B, dyclonine) or mouthwash mixtures using a combination of agents (lidocaine, diphenhydramine, Maalox or Mylanta, nystatin). The mucositis after bone marrow transplantation may be prolonged, continuously intense, exacerbated by mouth care and swallowing, or worse during waking hours. The patient may be unable to eat or swallow. Morphine administered as a continuous infusion or delivered by PCA device may be required until mucositis is resolved (Collins and Weisman, 2003).

Other treatment-related pain includes (1) abdominal pain after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, which may be associated with acute graft-versus-host disease; (2) abdominal pain associated with typhlitis (infection of the cecum), which occurs when the patient is immunocompromised; (3) phantom sensations and phantom limb pain after an amputation; (4) peripheral neuropathy after administration of vincristine; and (5) medullary bone pain, which may be associated with administration of granulocyte colony–stimulating factor (Collins and Weisman, 2003) (see Research Focus box).

image RESEARCH FOCUS

Procedure-Related Cancer Pain

Almost 40% of all pain episodes in children with cancer may be attributed to procedures (Ljungman, Gordh, Sorensen, et al, 1999, 2000, 2001; Ljungman, Kreuger, Andreasson, et al, 2000).

Survivors of childhood cancer describe vivid memories of their experience with repeated painful procedures during treatment. These procedures include needle puncture for IM chemotherapy (l-asparaginase), IV lines, port access and blood draws, lumbar puncture, bone marrow aspiration and biopsy, removal of central venous catheters, and other invasive diagnostic procedures. Fear and anxiety related to these procedures may be minimized with parent and child preparation. The preparation starts with obtaining information from the parent about the child’s coping styles, explaining the procedure, and enlisting their support, followed by an age-appropriate explanation to the child. Topical analgesics (cold sprays, EMLA, amethocaine gels), as discussed previously, are effective in providing analgesia before needle procedures.

Lumbar puncture for administration of chemotherapy (cytarabine, methotrexate) and collection of cerebrospinal fluid may lead to a leak at the puncture site and low intracranial pressure (Collins and Weisman, 2003). Some children may experience postdural puncture headache, which may be treated by administering nonopioid analgesics and placing the patient in the supine position for 1 hour after the procedure. The pain related to bone marrow aspiration is due to the insertion of a large needle into the posterior iliac space and the unpleasant sensation experienced at the time of marrow aspiration. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (guided imagery, relaxation, music therapy, hypnosis), conscious sedation, and general anesthesia have been effective in decreasing pain and distress during the procedure.

If the patient is neutropenic (absolute neutrophil count <500/mm3), the antipyretic action of acetaminophen may mask a fever. In patients with thrombocytopenia (platelet count <50,000/mm3), who may be at risk for bleeding, NSAIDs are contraindicated. Morphine is the most widely used opioid for moderate to severe pain and may be administered via the oral (including sustained release formulations such as MS Contin and Kadian), IV, subcutaneous, epidural, and intrathecal routes. When dose-limiting side effects of morphine develop, hydromorphone has been reported to be effective in several studies of children with cancer (Drake, Longworth, and Collins, 2004) (see Research Focus box).

image RESEARCH FOCUS

Morphine Versus Hydromorphone

In a study of children and adolescents with mucositis after bone marrow transplantation, which compared morphine to hydromorphone using patient-controlled analgesia, hydromorphone was well tolerated and had a potency ratio of approximately 6:1 relative to morphine (Drake, Longworth, and Collins, 2004).

The most common clinical syndrome of neuropathic pain is painful peripheral neuropathy caused by chemotherapeutic agents, particularly vincristine and cisplatin, and rarely cytarabine (Collins and Weisman, 2003). After withdrawal of the chemotherapy, the neuropathy may resolve over weeks to months, or it may persist even after withdrawal. Neuropathic pain is associated with at least one of the following: (1) pain that is described as electric or shocklike, stabbing, or burning; (2) signs of neurologic involvement (paralysis, neuralgia, pain hypersensitivity) other than those associated with the progression of the tumor; and (3) the location of the solid organ cancer consistent with neurologic damage that could give rise to neuropathic pain. Dying children with cancer who experience neuropathic pain have higher baseline requirements of morphine and require more rapid increases of morphine than dying children without neuropathic pain (Dougherty and DeBaun, 2003). Children with neuropathic pain often require massive opioid infusion (>3 mg/kg/hr of IV morphine dose equivalent, or approximately 100-fold greater than standard starting infusion rates). An epidural or subarachnoid infusion may be initiated if the patient experiences dose-limiting side effects of opioids or if pain is resistant to opioids.

Tricyclic antidepressants (amitriptyline, desipramine) and anticonvulsants (gabapentin, carbamazepine) have demonstrated effectiveness in neuropathic cancer pain (see Research Focus box). The tricyclic antidepressants have many actions that could be involved in their pain-relieving effect and have been considered the mainstay of therapy for neuropathic pain (Sindrup, Otto, Finnerup, et al, 2005).

image RESEARCH FOCUS

Tricyclic Antidepressants to Treat Neuropathic Pain

Randomized controlled trials showed that 60% to 70% of patients with neuropathic pain achieve relief with tricyclic antidepressants (Sindrup, Otto, Finnerup, et al, 2005).

Klepstad, Borchgrevink, Hval, and colleagues (2001) reported the pain experience of a 12-year-old girl with severe neuropathic pain caused by a cervical spinal tumor. Two weeks after resection of the tumor, the child experienced increased pain in her neck, which was superficial and distributed in the dermatomes below the cervical medullary lesion. Touch provoked pain, and it did not decrease in intensity despite a subcutaneous infusion of morphine at 160 mg/24 hr. The child screamed from increased pain when her parents or siblings tried to comfort her with bodily contact. Pain was relieved after administration of 7.5 to 10 mg IV ketamine. Ketamine is an N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist, which has undesirable side effects (sedation, nausea, dissociative reactions, muteness, dizziness, and visual distortions) and short duration of action (Sang, 2000). After administration of ketamine, the child was able to tolerate touch without pain paroxysms. A continuous IV infusion was eventually initiated for convenience, and benzodiazepines were added to avoid the psychomimetic effects associated with ketamine.

More recently Finkel, Pestieau, and Quezado (2007) used subanesthetic doses of ketamine to treat 11 children and adolescents who were on high doses of opioids and had uncontrolled cancer pain. Ketamine appeared to improve pain control and to have an opioid-sparing effect. Members of a pain management consulting service directed and titrated the ketamine to address symptoms. The ketamine dosage range used (0.1 to 1 mg/kg/hr) was lower than that used for anesthetic purposes. Lorazepam (0.025 mg/kg/12 hr) was administered concurrently during ketamine treatment. Continuous monitoring included heart rate, noninvasive blood pressure, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation.

Although ketamine is frequently used to ensure analgesia and sedation during painful procedures in children, the long-term use of ketamine for the treatment of neuropathic pain in children has not been systematically studied and is not of clinical benefit for all patients (Klepstad, Borchgrevink, Hval, et al, 2001). In randomized studies of patients with chronic neuropathic pain, only some patients had a beneficial response to ketamine (Haines and Gaines, 1999; Max, Byas-Smith, Gracely, et al, 1995; Mitchell, 2001). Other N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists (dextromethorphan, memantine) are available for clinical use, but no reports on their use in children with neuropathic pain related to cancer have been documented.

Pain and Sedation in End-of-Life Care

Many patients at the end of life require doses of opioids that make them sedated but arousable as their disease progresses (cancer, human immunodeficiency virus, cystic fibrosis, neurodegenerative disease). Patients achieve comfort with a combination of opioids and adjuvant analgesics in most situations. Parents need reassurance that the opioids are treating pain but not causing the child’s death and that the child’s advancing disease is the cause of death.

A small group of patients have intolerable side effects or inadequate analgesia despite extremely aggressive use of medications to relieve pain and side effects. Continuous sedation may be a means of relieving suffering when there is no feasible or acceptable means of providing analgesia that preserves alertness. A continuing high-dose infusion of opioids along with sedation is prescribed to reduce the possibility that a child might experience unrelieved pain but be too sedated to report it. Sedation in these situations is widely regarded as providing comfort, not euthanasia. Clinicians and ethicists have a range of views regarding assisted suicide and euthanasia, but they all agree that no child or parent should choose death because of inadequate efforts to relieve pain and suffering (Berde and Collins, 2003).

Key Points

• Although the ability to measure pain in children has improved dramatically in recent years, assessment of pain in children continues to be complex and challenging.

• Behavioral assessment is useful for measuring pain in infants and preverbal children who do not have the language skills to communicate that they are in pain, or when mental clouding and confusion limit a child’s ability to communicate.

• Physiologic measures are not able to distinguish between physical responses to pain and other forms of stress to the body.

• The number of pain measurement tools that are available for use in infants and young children has increased dramatically and adds a layer of complexity to the assessment of pain in children.

• Important components of assessment include the onset of pain; pain duration or pattern; effectiveness of the current treatment; factors that aggravate or relieve the pain; other symptoms and complications concurrently felt; and interference with the child’s mood, function, and interactions with family.

• The administration of sucrose with and without nonnutritive sucking has a calming and pain-relieving effects for invasive procedures in neonates.

• One of the most significant improvements in the ability to provide atraumatic care to children is the anesthetic creams LMX or EMLA.

• Nonopioids, including acetaminophen (Tylenol, Paracetamol) and NSAIDs, are suitable for mild to moderate pain; opioids are needed for moderate to severe pain.

• Several drugs, known as coanalgesics or adjuvant analgesics, may be used alone or with opioids to control pain symptoms and opioid side effects.

• A significant advance in the administration of IV, epidural, or subcutaneous analgesics is the use of PCA.

• Although respiratory depression is the most feared side effect of opioids, constipation is a common, and sometimes serious, side effect, which decrease peristalsis and increase anal sphincter tone.

• Several harmful effects occur with unrelieved pain, particularly when pain is prolonged.

• Surgery and traumatic injuries (fractures, dislocations, strains, sprains, lacerations, burns) generate a catabolic state as a result of increased secretion of catabolic hormones and lead to alterations in blood flow, coagulation, fibrinolysis, substrate metabolism, and water and electrolyte balance, and increase the demands on the cardiovascular and respiratory systems.

• Because burn pain has multiple components, involves repeated manipulations over the injured painful sites, and has changing patterns over time, it is difficult and challenging to control.

• Treatment of recurrent headaches requires an understanding of the antecedents and consequences of headache pain.

• RAP or functional abdominal pain is defined as pain that occurs at least once per month for 3 consecutive months, accompanied by pain-free periods, and is severe enough that it interferes with a child’s normal activities.

• A painful episode is the most frequent cause for ED visits and hospital admissions among children with sickle cell disease.

• Pain is the most prevalent symptom reported by children with cancer.

• Injections from immunizations, IM antibiotics in the ED or physician’s office, and blood draws are common sources of pain in children.

• For nonpainful procedures such as radiologic imaging studies, several medications are used to sedate, minimize anxiety, and induce amnesia.

• Several painful and invasive procedures require the administration of anesthetics and analgesics.

References

Abbe, M, Simon, C, Angiolillo, A, et al. A survey of language barriers from the perspective of pediatric oncologists, interpreters, and parents. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006;47(6):819–824.

Abdelkefi, A, Abdennebi, YB, Mellouli, F, et al. Effectiveness of fixed 50% nitrous oxide oxygen mixture and EMLA cream for insertion of central venous catheters in children. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2004;43(7):777–779.

Algren, JT, Gursoy, F, Johnson, TD, et al. The effect of nitrous oxide diffusion on laryngeal mask airway cuff inflation in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 1998;8(1):31–36.

Ambuel, B, Hamlett, KW, Marx, CM, et al. Assessing distress in pediatric intensive care environments: the COMFORT scale. J Pediatr Psychol. 1992;17(1):95–109.

American Pain Society. Principles of analgesic use in the treatment of acute pain and chronic cancer pain, ed 4. Glenview, Ill: The Society; 1999.

Anand, KJ, Carr, DB. The neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, and neurochemistry of pain, stress, and analgesia in newborns and children. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1989;36(4):795–822.

Anand, KJ, Grunau, RE, Oberlander, TF. Developmental character and long-term consequences of pain in infants and children. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1997;6(4):703–724.

Anand, KJ, Hickey, PR. Halothane-morphine compared with high-dose sufentanil for anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in neonatal cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 1992;326(1):1–9.

Anand, KJ, Hickey, PR. Pain and its effects in the human neonate and fetus. N Engl J Med. 1987;317(21):1321–1329.

Barrier, G, Attia, J, Mayer, MN, et al. Measurement of postoperative pain and narcotic administration in infants using a new clinical scoring system. Anesthesiology. 1987;67(3A):A532.

Basbaum, AI. Distinct neurochemical features of acute and persistent pain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96(14):7739–7743.

Basbaum, AI. Spinal mechanisms of acute and persistent pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999;24(1):59–67.

Benjamin, LJ, Dampier, CD, Jacox, AK, et al. Guideline for the management of acute and chronic pain in sickle cell disease. Glenview, Ill: American Pain Society; 1999.

Benjamin, L, Swinson, G, Nagel, R. Sickle cell anemia day hospital: an approach for the management of uncomplicated painful crises. Blood. 2000;95:1130–1137.

Berde, C, Collins, J. Cancer pain and palliative care in children. In: Melzack R, Wall P, eds. s: Handbook of pain management. St. Louis: Churchill Livingstone, 2003.

Berger, A, Henderson, M, Nadoolman, W, et al. Oral capsaicin provides temporary relief for oral mucositis pain secondary to chemotherapy/radiation therapy. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1995;10(3):243–248.

Bernstein, B, Pachter, L. Cultural considerations in children’s pain. In: Schechter N, Berde C, Yaster M, eds. Pain in infants, children, and adolescents. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003.

Beyer, JE, Denyes, MJ, Villarruel, AM. The creation, validation and continuing development of the Oucher: a measure of pain intensity in children. J Pediatr Nurs. 1992;7(5):335–346.

Beyer, JE, Knott, CB. Construct validity estimation for the African-American and Hispanic versions of the Oucher scale. J Pediatr Nurs. 1998;13(1):20–31.

Beyer, JE, Turner, SB, Jones, L, et al. The alternate forms reliability of the Oucher pain scale. Pain Manage Nurs. 2005;6(1):10–17.

Bildner, J, Krechel, SW. Increasing staff nurse awareness of postoperative pain management in the NICU. Neonat Netw. 1996;15(1):11–16.

Blauer, T, Gerstmann, D. A simultaneous comparison of three neonatal pain scales during common NICU procedures. Clin J Pain. 1998;14(1):39–47.

Bohannon, A. Physiological, self-report, and behavioral ratings of pain in 3 to 7 year old African-American and Anglo-American children. Miami: University of Miami; 1995.

Breau, LM, MacLaren, J, McGrath, PJ, et al. Caregivers’ beliefs regarding pain in children with cognitive impairment: relation between pain sensation and reaction increases with severity of impairment. Clin J Pain. 2003;19(6):335–344.

Breau, LM, McGrath, PJ, Camfield, CS, et al. Psychometric properties of the Non-communicating Children’s Pain Checklist–Revised. Pain. 2002;99:349–357.

Bruera, E, Willey, JS, Ewert-Flannagan, PA, et al. Pain intensity assessment by bedside nurses and palliative care consultants: a retrospective study. Support Care Cancer. 2005;13(4):228–231.

Chambers, C. The role of family factors in pediatric pain. In: Finley GA, McGrath PJ, eds. Pediatric pain: biological and social context. Seattle: IASP Press, 2003.

Chambers, C, Craig, K. An intrusive impact of anchors in children’s faces pain scales. Pain. 1998;78:27–37.

Chambers, CT, Giesbrecht, K, Craig, KD, et al. A comparison of faces scales for the measurement of pediatric pain: children’s and parents’ ratings. Pain. 1999;83:25–35.

Choi, WY, Irwin, MG, Hui, TW, et al. EMLA cream versus dorsal penile nerve block for postcircumcision analgesia in children. Anesth Analg. 2003;96(2):396–399.

Choiniere, M. Pain of burns. In: Melzack R, Wall P, eds. Handbook of pain management. St. Louis: Churchill Livingstone, 2003.

Chorpita, BF, Yim, L, Moffitt, C, et al. Assessment of symptoms of DSM-IV anxiety and depression in children: a revised child anxiety and depression scale. Behav Res Ther. 2000;38(8):835–855.

Claar, RL, Walker, LS. Functional assessment of pediatric pain patients: psychometric properties of the functional disability inventory. Pain. 2006;121(1-2):77–84.

Cline, ME, Herman, J, Shaw, ER, et al. Standardization of the visual analogue scale. Nurs Res. 1992;41(6):378–380.

Cole, J, Jorgensen, K. Medical, developmental, and pharmacologic intervention: the essence of collaboration. Neonat Netw. 1997;16:56–58.

Collins, JJ, Byrnes, ME, Dunkel, IJ, et al. The measurement of symptoms in children with cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2000;19(5):363–377.

Collins, J, Weisman, S. Management of pain in childhood cancer. In: Schechter N, Berde C, Yaster M, eds. s: Pain in infants, children, and adolescents. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003.

Cousins, M, Power, I. Acute and postoperative pain. In: Melzack R, Wall P, eds. Handbook of pain management, St. Louis. Churchill Livingstone, 2003.

Dampier, C, Ely, B, Brodecki, D, et al. Characteristics of pain managed at home in children and adolescents with sickle cell disease by using diary self-reports. J Pain. 2002;3(6):461–470.

Dampier, C, Ely, B, Brodecki, D, et al. Home management of pain in sickle cell disease: a daily diary study in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2002;24(8):643–647.

Dougherty, M, DeBaun, MR. Rapid increase of morphine and benzodiazepine usage in the last 3 days of life in children with cancer is related to neuropathic pain. J Pediatr. 2003;142(4):373–376.

Drake, R, Longworth, J, Collins, JJ. Opioid rotation in children with cancer. J Palliat Med. 2004;7(3):419–422.

Egekvist, H, Bjerring, P. Effect of EMLA cream on skin thickness and subcutaneous venous diameter: a randomized, placebo-controlled study in children. Acta Dermatol Venereol. 2000;80(5):340–343.

Eland, JA, Banner, W. Analgesia, sedation, and neuromuscular blockage in pediatric critical care. In: Hazinski ME, ed. Manual of pediatric critical care. St. Louis: Mosby, 1999.

Elander, J, Lusher, J, Bevan, D, et al. Understanding the causes of problematic pain management in sickle cell disease: evidence that pseudoaddiction plays a more important role than genuine analgesic dependence. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004;27(2):156–169.

Ely, B, Dampier, C, Gilday, M, et al. Caregiver report of pain in infants and toddlers with sickle cell disease: reliability and validity of a daily diary. J Pain. 2002;3(1):50–57.

Fearon, I, Kisilevsky, BS, Hains, SM, et al. Swaddling after heel lance: age-specific effects on behavioral recovery in preterm infants. Develop Behav Pediatr. 1997;18:222–232.

Finkel, JC, Pestieau, SR, Quezado, ZM. Ketamine as an adjuvant for treatment of cancer pain in children and adolescents. J Pain. 2007;8(6):515–521.

Finley, GA, Chambers, CT, McGrath, PJ, et al. Construct validity of the parents’ postoperative pain measure. Clin J Pain. 2003;19(5):329–334.

Flores, G, Vega, LR. Barriers to health care access for Latino children: a review. Fam Med. 1998;30(3):196–205.

Flores, G, Abreu, M, Olivar, MA, et al. Access barriers to health care for Latino children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152(11):1119–1125.

Franck, LS, Harris, SK, Soetenga, DJ, et al. The Withdrawal Assessment Tool–1 (WAT-1): an assessment instrument for monitoring opioid and benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms in pediatric patients. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008;9(6):573–580.

Franck, LS, Vilardi, J. Assessment and management of opioid withdrawal in ill neonates. Neonat Netw. 1995;14(2):39–48.

Franck, LS, Vilardi, J, Durand, D, et al. Opioid withdrawal in neonates after continuous infusions of morphine or fentanyl during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Am J Crit Care. 1998;7(5):364–369.

Furdon, SA, Eastman, M, Benjamin, K, et al. Outcome measures after standardized pain management strategies in postoperative patients in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 1998;12(1):58–69.

Gad, LN, Olsen, KS, Lysgaard, AB, et al. Optimized use of EMLA cream in children—secondary publication: a randomized, prospective, controlled comparison of two application regimes. Ugeskr Laeger. 2005;167(4):404–407.

Gaina, A, Sekine, M, Chen, X, et al. Validity of child sleep diary questionnaire among junior high school children. J Epidemiol. 2004;14(1):1–4.

Gharaibeh, M, Abu-Saad, H. Cultural validation of pediatric pain assessment tools: Jordanian perspective. J Transcult Nurs. 2002;13(1):12–18.

Goldschneider, K, Anand, K. Long-term consequences of pain in neonates. In: Schechter N, Berde C, Yaster M, eds. Pain in infants, children, and adolescents. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003.

Golianu, B, Krane, EJ, Galloway, KS, et al. Pediatric acute pain management. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2000;47(3):559–587.

Goodenough, B, Addicoat, L, Champion, GD, et al. Pain in 4- to 6-year-old children receiving intramuscular injections: a comparison of the Faces Pain Scale with other self-report and behavioral measures. Clin J Pain. 1997;13(1):60–73.

Gray, L, Watt, L, Blass, E. Skin-to-skin contact is analgesic in healthy newborns. Pediatrics. 2000;105(1):110–111.

Hadden, KL, von Baeyer, CL. Pain in children with cerebral palsy: common triggers and expressive behaviors. Pain. 2002;99(1-2):281–288.

Hadjistavropoulos, HD, Craig, KD, Grunau, RE, et al. Judging pain in infants: behavioural, contextual, and developmental determinants. Pain. 1997;73(3):319–324.

Haines, DR, Gaines, SP. N of 1 randomised controlled trials of oral ketamine in patients with chronic pain. Pain. 1999;83(2):283–287.

Hannallah, RS, Broadman, LM, Belman, AB, et al. Comparison of caudal and ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks for control of post-orchiopexy pain in pediatric ambulatory surgery. Anesthesiology. 1987;66:832–834.

Hershey, AD, Powers, SW, Vockell, AL, et al. Development of a patient-based grading scale for PedMIDAS. Cephalalgia. 2004;24(10):844–849.

Hershey, AD, Powers, SW, Vockell, AL, et al. PedMIDAS: development of a questionnaire to assess disability of migraines in children. Neurology. 2001;57(11):2034–2039.

Hester, NO, Foster, RL, Jordan-Marsh, M, et al. Putting pain measurement into clinical practice. In: Finley, GA, McGrath, PJ, eds. Measurement of pain in infants and children, vol. 10. Seattle: International Association for the Study of Pain Press; 1998.

Hester, N, Foster, R, Kristensen, K. Measurement of pain in children: generalizability and validity of the pain ladder and poker chip tool. Adv Pain Res Ther. 1990;15:79–84.

Hicks, CL, von Baeyer, CL, Spafford, PA, et al. The Faces Pain Scale—Revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement. Pain. 2001;93(2):173–183.

Hodgkinson, K, Bear, M, Thorn, J, et al. Measuring pain in neonates: evaluating an instrument and developing a common language. Austral J Adv Nurs. 1994;12(1):17–22.

Holden, E, Deichmann, M, Levy, J. Empirically supported treatments in pediatric psychology: recurrent pediatric headache. J Pediatr Psychol. 1999;24:91–100.

Hu, Y, Zhang, G, Chen, Z. Evaluation of pain tolerance of children in Xinjiang, China, from analgesic measures for surgery (abstract). J Pain Symptom Manage. 1991;6:205.

Hu, Y, Zhang, G, Chen, Z. Pain after burn injuries among Chinese children: a further study on transcultural and ethnic differences of pain (abstract). J Pain Symptom Manage. 1991;6:155.

Jacob, E, McCarthy, KS, Sambuco, G, et al. Intensity, location, and quality of pain in Spanish-speaking children with cancer. Pediatr Nurs. 2008;34(1):45–52.

Jacob, E, Miaskowski, C, Savedra, M, et al. Changes in intensity, location, and quality of vaso-occlusive pain in children with sickle cell disease. Pain. 2003;102(1-2):187–193.

Jacob, E, Miaskowski, C, Savedra, M, et al. Management of vaso-occlusive pain in children with sickle cell disease. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2003;25(4):307–311.

Jacob, E, Mueller, BU. Pain experience of children with sickle cell disease who had prolonged hospitalizations for acute painful episodes. Pain Med. 2008;9(1):13–21.

Jacob, E, Puntillo, KA. Variability of analgesic practices for hospitalized children on different pediatric specialty units. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2000;20(1):59–67.

Johnston, CC, Stevens, B, Pinelli, J, et al. Kangaroo care is effective in diminishing pain response in preterm neonates. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157(11):1084–1088.

Jordan-Marsh, M, Yoder, L, Hall, D, et al. Alternate Oucher form testing gender, ethnicity and age variations. Res Nurs Health. 1994;17:111–118.

Joyce, BA, Schade, JG, Keck, JF, et al. Reliability and validity of preverbal pain assessment tools. Issues Comp Pediatr Nurs. 1994;17:121–135.

Keck, JF, Gerkensmeyer, JE, Joyce, BA, et al. Reliability and validity of the Faces and Word Descriptor Scales to measure procedural pain. J Pediatr Nurs. 1996;11(6):368–374.

Kovacs, M. Rating scales to assess depression in school-aged children. Acta Paedopsychiatr. 1981;46(5-6):305–315.

Klepstad, P, Borchgrevink, P, Hval, B, et al. Long-term treatment with ketamine in a 12-year-old girl with severe neuropathic pain caused by a cervical spinal tumor. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2001;23(9):616–619.

Krechel, SW, Bildner, J. CRIES: a new neonatal postoperative pain measurement score: initial testing of validity and reliability. Pediatr Anaesth. 1995;5:53–61.

Lawrence, J, Alcock, D, McGrath, P, et al. The development of a tool to assess neonatal pain. Neonat Netw. 1993;12(6):59–66.

Lenton, S, Stallard, P, Lewis, M, et al. Prevalence and morbidity associated with non-malignant, life-threatening conditions in childhood. Child Care Health Devel. 2001;27(5):389–398.

Ljungman, G, Gordh, T, Sorensen, S, et al. Lumbar puncture in pediatric oncology: conscious sedation vs. general anesthesia. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2001;36(3):372–379.

Ljungman, G, Gordh, T, Sorensen, S, et al. Pain variations during cancer treatment in children: a descriptive survey. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2000;17(3):211–221.

Ljungman, G, Gordh, T, Sorensen, S, et al. Pain in paediatric oncology: interviews with children, adolescents and their parents. Acta Paediatr. 1999;88(6):623–630.

Ljungman, G, Kreuger, A, Andreasson, S, et al. Midazolam nasal spray reduces procedural anxiety in children. Pediatrics. 2000;105(1 Pt 1):73–78.

Luffy, R, Grove, SK. Examining the validity, reliability, and preference of three pediatric pain measurement tools in African-American children. Pediatr Nurs. 2003;29(1):54–60.

Manworren, R, Hynan, L. Clinical validation of FLACC: Preverbal Patient Pain Scale. Pediatr Nurs. 2003;29(2):140–146.

Marx, J. Pain research: prolonging the agony. Science. 2004;305(5682):326–329.

Max, MB, Byas-Smith, MG, Gracely, RH, et al. Intravenous infusion of the NMDA antagonist, ketamine, in chronic posttraumatic pain with allodynia: a double-blind comparison to alfentanil and placebo. Clin Neuropharmacol. 1995;18(4):360–368.

Max, MB, Payne, R, Edwards, WT, et al. Principles of analgesic use in the treatment of acute pain and cancer pain. Glenview, Ill: American Pain Society; 1999.

Maxwell, L, Yaster, M. Perioperative management issues in pediatric patients. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2000;18(3):601–632.

McCaffery, M, Pasero, C. Pain clinical manual. St. Louis: Mosby.; 1999.

McGrath P, Hillier L, eds. Modifying the psychologic factors that intensify children’s pain and prolong disability. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003.

McGrath, PJ, Johnson, G, Goodman, JT, et al. The CHEOPS: a behavioral scale to measure postoperative pain in children. In: Fields H, Dubner R, Cervero F, eds. Advances in pain research and therapy. New York: Raven Press, 1985.

McGrath, PJ, Walco, GA, Turk, DC, et al. Core outcome domains and measures for pediatric acute and chronic/recurrent pain clinical trials: PedIMMPACT recommendations. J Pain. 2008;9(9):771–783.

Melzack, R. The McGill pain questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975;1:277–299.

Meredith, JR, O’Keefe, KP, Galwankar, S. Pediatric procedural sedation and analgesia. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2008;1(2):88–96.

Merkel, SI, Voepel-Lewis, T, Shayevitz, JR, et al. The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatr Nurs. 1997;23(3):293–297.

Miaskowski, C, Lee, K. Pain, fatigue, and sleep disturbances in oncology outpatients receiving radiation therapy for bone metastasis: a pilot study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1999;17(5):320–332.

Mitchell, AC. An unusual case of chronic neuropathic pain responds to an optimum frequency of intravenous ketamine infusions. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001;21(5):443–446.

Morin, C, Gibson, D, Wade, J. Self-reported sleep and mood disturbance in chronic pain patients. Clin J Pain. 1998;14(4):311–314.

Myers, C, Stuber, ML, Bonamer-Rheingans, JI, et al. Complementary therapies and childhood cancer. Cancer Control. 2005;12(3):172–180.

Nadvi, SZ, Sarnaik, S, Ravindranath, Y. Low frequency of meperidine-associated seizures in sickle cell disease. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1999;38(8):459–462.

Owens, JA, Spirito, A, McGuinn, M. The Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ): psychometric properties of a survey instrument for school-aged children. Sleep. 2000;23(8):1043–1051.

Palermo, TM. Impact of recurrent and chronic pain on child and family daily functioning: a critical review of the literature. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2000;21(1):58–69.

Palermo, TM, Kiska, R. Subjective sleep disturbances in adolescents with chronic pain: relationship to daily functioning and quality of life. J Pain. 2005;6(3):201–207.

Palermo, T, Valenzuela, D. Use of pain diaries to assess recurrent and chronic pain in children. Suffer Child. 2003;3:1–14.

Palermo, TM, Valenzuela, D, Stork, PP. A randomized trial of electronic versus paper pain diaries in children: impact on compliance, accuracy, and acceptability. Pain. 2004;107(3):213–219.

Perquin, CW, Hazebroek-Kampschreur, AA, Hunfeld, JA, et al. Chronic pain among children and adolescents: physician consultation and medication use. Clin J Pain. 2000;16(3):229–235.

Perquin, CW, Hazebroek-Kampschreur, AA, Hunfeld, JA, et al. Pain in children and adolescents: a common experience. Pain. 2000;87(1):51–58.

Puchalski, M, Hummel, P. The reality of neonatal pain. Adv Neonatal Care. 2002;2(5):233–244.

Reid, GJ, Lang, BA, McGrath, PJ. Primary juvenile fibromyalgia: psychological adjustment, family functioning, coping, and functional disability. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40(4):752–760.

Reis, E, Holubkov, R. Vapocoolant spray is equally effective as EMLA cream in reducing immunization pain in school-aged children. Pediatrics. 1997;100(6):e5.

Robieux, I, Kumar, R, Radhakrishnan, S, et al. Assessing pain and analgesia with a lidocaine-prilocaine emulsion in infants and toddlers during venipuncture. J Pediatr. 1991;118(6):971–973.

Rogers, TL, Ostrow, CL. The use of EMLA cream to decrease venipuncture pain in children. J Pediatr Nurs. 2004;19(1):33–39.

Rusy, L, Weisman, S. Complementary therapies for acute pediatric pain management. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2000;47(3):589–599.

Sang, CN. NMDA-receptor antagonists in neuropathic pain: experimental methods to clinical trials. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2000;19(1 Suppl):S21–S25.

Santiago, A, Abad, P, Fernandez, C, et al. Premedication with EMLA cream for ambulatory surgery in children. Ambu Surg. 2000;8(3):157.

Savedra, MC, Holzemer, WL, Tesler, MD, et al. Assessment of postoperation pain in children and adolescents using the adolescent pediatric pain tool. Nurs Res. 1993;42(1):5–9.

Savedra, MC, Tesler, MD, Holzemer, WL, et al. Pain location: validity and reliability of body outline markings by hospitalized children and adolescents. Res Nurs Health. 1989;12:307–314.

Schade, JG, Joyce, BA, Gerkensmeyer, J, et al. Comparison of three preverbal scales for postoperative pain assessment in a diverse pediatric sample. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1996;12(6):348–359.

Scott, PJ, Ansell, BM, Huskisson, EC. Measurement of pain in juvenile chronic polyarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1977;36(2):186–187.

See, MC, Birnbaum, AH, Schechter, CB, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of famotidine in children with abdominal pain and dyspepsia. Dig Dis Sci. 2001;46:985–992.

Sindrup, SH, Otto, M, Finnerup, NB, et al. Antidepressants in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005;96(6):399–409.

Stallard, P, Williams, L, Lenton, S, et al. Pain in cognitively impaired, non-communicating children. Arch Dis Child. 2001;85(6):460–462.

Stallard, P, Williams, L, Velleman, R, et al. The development and evaluation of the pain indicator for communicatively impaired children (PICIC). Pain. 2002;98(1-2):145–149.

Stevens, B. Development and testing of a pediatric pain management sheet. Pediatr Nurs. 1990;16(6):543–548.

Stevens, B, Johnston, C, Petryshen, P, et al. Premature Infant Pain Profile: development and initial validation. Clin J Pain. 1996;12:13–22.

Stevens, B, Yamada, J, Ohlsson, A. Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures (review), 2005. In Cochrane Neonatal Collaboration, available at www.thecochranelibrary.com. [(accessed November 30, 2009)].

Stinson, JN, Stevens, BJ, Feldman, BM, et al. Construct validity of a multidimensional electronic pain diary for adolescents with arthritis. Pain. 2008;136(3):281–292.

Stone, AA, Broderick, JE, Schwartz, JE, et al. Intensive momentary reporting of pain with an electronic diary: reactivity, compliance, and patient satisfaction. Pain. 2003;104(1-2):343–351.

Suraseranivongse, S, Montapaneewat, T, Manon, J, et al. Cross-validation of a self-report scale for postoperative pain in school-aged children. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005;88:412–418.

Sweet, S, McGrath, P. Physiological measures of pain. In: Finley GA, McGrath PJ, eds. Measurement of pain in infants and children. Seattle: IASP Press, 1998.

Symon, DN, Russell, G. Double blind placebo controlled trial of pizotifen syrup in the treatment of abdominal migraine. Arch Dis Child. 1995;72(1):48–50.

Taddio, A, Nulman, I, Koren, BS, et al. A revised measure of acute pain in infants. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1995;10(6):456–463.

Tarbell, SE, Cohen, IT, Marsh, JL. The Toddler-Preschooler Postoperative Pain Scale: an observational scale for measuring postoperative pain in children aged 1-5: preliminary report. Pain. 1992;50(3):273–280.

Tesler, MD, Savedra, MC, Holzemer, WL, et al. The word-graphic rating scale as a measure of children’s and adolescents’ pain intensity. Res Nurs Health. 1991;14:361–371.

Uziel, Y, Berkovitch, M, Gazarian, M, et al. Evaluation of eutectic lidocaine/prilocaine cream (EMLA) for steroid joint injection in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: a double blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial. J Rheumatol. 2003;30(3):594–596.

Van Cleve, L, Bossert, E, Beecroft, P, et al. The pain experience of children with leukemia during the first year after diagnosis. Nurs Res. 2004;53(1):1–10.

Van Cleve, L, Muñoz, C, Bossert, EA, et al. Children’s and adolescents’ pain language in Spanish: translation of a measure. Pain Manage Nurs. 2001;2(3):110–118.

Van Dijk, A, McGrath, PA, Pickett, W, et al. Pain prevalence in 9- to 13-year-old schoolchildren. Pain Res Manage. 2006;11(4):234–240.

Varni, JW, Seid, M, Rode, CA. The PedsQL: measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventory. Med Care. 1999;37(2):126–139.

Varni, JW, Thompson, KL, Hanson, V. The Varni/Thompson Pediatric Pain Questionnaire, part I, Chronic musculoskeletal pain in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Pain. 1987;28:27–38.

Vervoort, T, Goubert, L, Eccleston, C, et al. Catastrophic thinking about pain is independently associated with pain severity, disability, and somatic complaints in school children and children with chronic pain. J Pediatr Psychol. 2006;31(7):674–683.

Villarruel, AM, Denyes, MJ. Pain assessment in children: theoretical and empirical validity. Adv Nurs Sci. 1991;14(2):32–41.

von Baeyer, C, Hicks, C. Support for a common metric for pediatric pain intensity scales. Pain Res Manage. 2000;4(2):157–160.

Walker, LS, Greene, JW. The functional disability inventory: measuring a neglected dimension of child health status. J Pediatr Psychol. 1991;16(1):39–58.

Walters, A, Williamson, G. The role of activity restriction in the association between pain and depression: a study of pediatric patients with chronic pain. Child Health Care. 1999;28:33–50.

Weisman, S, Bernstein, B, Schechter, N. Consequences of inadequate analgesia during painful procedures in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152:147–149.

West, N, Oakes, L, Hinds, PS, et al. Measuring pain in pediatric oncology ICU patients. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 1994;11(2):64–70.

Weydert, J, Ball, T, Davis, M. Systematic review of treatments for recurrent abdominal pain. Pediatrics. 2003;111(1):1–3.

Wilkie, DJ, Holzemer, WL, Tesler, MD, et al. Measuring pain quality: validity and reliability of children’s and adolescents’ pain language. Pain. 1990;41(2):151–159.

Wong, DL, Baker, CM. Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales. Pediatr Nurs. 1988;14(1):9–17.

Wong, D, Pasero, CL. Reducing the pain of lidocaine. Am J Nurs. 1997;97(1):17–18.

Wong, D, Pasero, CL. Using local anesthetics to control procedural pain. Am J Nurs. 1997;97(1):17.

Woodgate, R, Yanofsky, R. A different perspective to approaching cancer symptoms in children. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004;26(3):800–817.

Woolf, CJ, Salter, MW. Neuronal plasticity: increasing the gain in pain. Science. 2000;288(5472):1765–1769.

Yaster, M, Krance, EJ, Kaplan, RF, et al. Pediatric pain management and sedation handbook. St. Louis: Mosby; 1997.