CHAPTER 26 Root Morphology and Instrumentation Implications

Marilyn Beck, Lynn Bergstrom Bryan

Competencies

image Discuss significance of root morphology and positioning in the alveolar bone to root instrumentation.
image Describe the roots of each of the permanent teeth in terms of numbers, shapes, and characteristic landmarks.
image Explain how the contour of the cementoenamel junction, root morphology in both horizontal and vertical directions, furcation location, and root concavities influence instrument adaptation on root surfaces.
image State the importance of tooth alignment to instrument adaptation on root surfaces.
image Describe variations in root structure that may affect the process of care.

Various instruments (e.g., the periodontal probe, Nabers probe, dental explorer) are used for assessing root surface characteristics. Current periapical and vertical bitewing radiographs placed on the view box provide information on root number, shape, and alterations; furcation location; bone height and contour; and calculus, caries, and defective restorations that may influence instrumentation.

An anatomically correct model of the dentition with transparent gingiva is helpful for visualizing anatomy of individual roots and their positioning within the alveolar processes. Models and Table 26-1 can be used for review. See Chapters 17 and 24 for a review of periodontal assessment and assessment instruments.

TABLE 26-1 Characteristics of Roots

Maxillary Arch See Figure 26-17, A
Central Incisor
One cone-shaped root
Does not have prominent root concavities
Most prominent cementoenamel junction (CEJ) curvature toward incisal on mesial surface
Lingual surface is smaller than facial
because proximal surface tapers toward the lingual surface
Cervical cross-section is a “rounded” triangle in shape
Flat mesial surface
Root is approximately one and one third times the length of the crown
Tooth No. 8
image Figure 26-1

(Courtesy former Department of Dental Hygiene, Marquette University.)

Lateral Incisor
One cone-shaped root
May have a palatogingival groove
Lateral root is rounder
Lateral root longer than central root
Tooth No. 7
image Figure 26-2

(Courtesy former Department of Dental Hygiene, Marquette University.)

Canine
One long cone-shaped root
Generally has proximal root concavities
Distal crest of curvature in the crown may hinder access to the mesial surface of the first premolar
Root length is one and a half times the length of the very long crown
Tooth No. 6
image Figure 26-3

(Courtesy former Department of Dental Hygiene, Marquette University.)

First Premolar
Two roots, F and L (may have only one)
Prominent mesial root concavity that extends apically from the mesial contact on the crown
Bifurcated in cervical third to half
Elliptic in shape in cervical cross-section; narrow facial and lingual root surfaces, broad proximal surfaces
Root is approximately one and three fourths times the length of the crown
Tooth No. 5
image Figure 26-4

(Courtesy former Department of Dental Hygiene, Marquette University.)

Second Premolar
One root
Mesial concavity not as pronounced as in first premolar (may be prominent)
Elliptic in cross-section; broad proximal surfaces Root is approximately one and one third times the length of the crown
Tooth No. 4
image Figure 26-5

(Courtesy former Department of Dental Hygiene, Marquette University.)

First Molar
Three roots, mesiobuccal, distobuccal, and palatal
Palatal root is longest and extends out beyond the lingual surface of the crown (lingual root concavity on its palatal surface)
Root concavities may be present on the mesiobuccal and palatal roots and also on furcal surfaces
Mesiobuccal and distobuccal roots may appear as a “pair” with their apices curved toward each other; look like pliers
Mesiobuccal root has a mesial concavity
Furcations are an the facial, mesial, and distal aspects and begin gradually before the entrance, which is located near the junction of the cervical and middle third of the root
The root trunk on the mesial surface is the shortest and on the distal surface is the longest
Mesial furcation is located more toward the lingual aspect
Roots are one and three fourths the length of the crown
Tooth No. 3
image Figure 26-6

(Courtesy former Department of Dental Hygiene, Marquette University.)

Second Molar
Three roots: mesiobuccal, distobuccal, and palatal
Longer root trunk than first molar
Roots are closer together with more distal orientation
Less interradicular bone than on first molar
Tooth No. 2
image Figure 26-7

(Courtesy former Department of Dental Hygiene, Marquette University.)

Third Molar
Root morphology varies greatly; may be three rooted, roots may be fused and may have accessory roots
 
Mandibular Arch See Figure 26-17, B
Central and Lateral Incisor
Very similar
One cone-shaped root
Cervical cross-section is elliptic in shape with very narrow facial and lingual surfaces and broader proximal surfaces
Frequently have very shallow root concavities on proximal surfaces
Root is one and a half times the length of the crown
Tooth No. 25
image Figure 26-8

(Courtesy former Department of Dental Hygiene, Marquette University.)

  Tooth No. 26
image Figure 26-9

(Courtesy former Department of Dental Hygiene, Marquette University.)

Canine
One cone-shaped root
Cervical cross-section is ovoid in shape with small lingual surface
Proximal root concavities are present
Root length is about one and a half times the length of the crown
Occasionally the root apex is bifurcated into a facial and a lingual root
Tooth No. 27
image Figure 26-10

(Courtesy former Department of Dental Hygiene, Marquette University.)

First Premolar
One cone-shaped root
Cervical cross-section may be elliptic or ovoid in shape
Facial and lingual root surfaces convergemarkedly toward the apex
May have root concavities deep on distal surface
Root length is one and two thirds the length of the crown
Tooth No. 28
image Figure 26-11

(Courtesy former Department of Dental Hygiene, Marquette University.)

Second Premolar
One cone-shaped root
Cervical cross-section may be elliptic or ovoid in shape
Mandibular premolars may have proximal root concavities
Root length is one and two thirds the length of the crown
Tooth No. 29
image Figure 26-12

(Courtesy former Department of Dental Hygiene, Marquette University.)

First Molar Tooth No. 30
Two roots: mesial and distal, which is narrower
Furcations on facial and lingual surface, facialconcavity before the furcation begins just apical to the CEJ
Short root trunk, about 3 mm on the facial surface, one fourth the length of root trunk; longer on lingual surface
Large interradicular area
Proximal and furcal concavities on mesial root, furcal concavity on distal root
Roots are one and three fourths times the length of the crown
Cervical enamel projections may be present
image Figure 26-13

(Courtesy former Department of Dental Hygiene, Marquette University.)

Second Molar Tooth No. 31
Two roots: mesial and distal
Roots are likely to be closer together with a longer root trunk than first molar
Mesial root concavities are not as prominent as in first molar
Roots are one and three fourths times the length of the crown
Cervical enamel projections may be present
image Figure 26-14

(Courtesy former Department of Dental Hygiene, Marquette University.)

Third Molar
Root structure varies greatly
Typically has two roots
Roots are frequently shorter, fused, and dilacerated
 

I, Incisal; D, distal; M, mesial; L, lingual; F, facial; O, occlusal.

Knowing the length of the crown of a tooth is helpful in assessing the length of its root and the amount of attachment:

image Maxillary central and lateral incisor crowns are the longest in the dentition, being approximately ½ inch in length.
image Anterior crowns are approximately 2 to 3 mm longer than posterior crowns. Roots range from approximately 12 to 17 mm in length; incisor roots are the shortest, and canines are the longest.
image Proportionally, when the length of roots is compared with the length of crowns, molars have the longest roots (because of their short crowns), and maxillary incisors have the shortest.

Crowns of all mandibular posterior teeth are lingually inclined and make instrument placement more difficult.

GENERAL MORPHOLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS

See Table 26-1 (Figures 26-1 through 26-14) for specific information for each tooth.

Root Terminology

The anatomic root of a tooth is that part of the dentin covered by cementum and embedded in the alveolar bone; it begins at the cementoenamel junction. The end of the root is called the root apex, and the area surrounding the apex is the periapex. At the apex is an opening, the periapical foramen, where the blood vessels and nerves enter the pulp (root) canal.

Teeth have one, two, or three roots. Teeth with two or three roots have an unbranched portion called the root trunk. The area where the root trunk branches into two roots is the furcation or furca. The opening into the furcation is the furcation entrance (Figure 26-15). The most coronal portion of the furcation is the furcation roof, which is often more coronal than the furcation entrance. The area between the roots of a two- or three-rooted tooth is the interfurcal or interradicular area.

image

Figure 26-15 Root terminology: root trunk and furcation entrance.

(Courtesy former Department of Dental Hygiene, Marquette University.)

When the junctional epithelium has migrated apically and there is clinical attachment loss, portions of the anatomic root are included in the definition of a clinical crown, the unattached portion of a tooth. The concept of cervical, middle, and apical thirds is one that is used when discussing root anatomy.

Cementoenamel Junction

The cementoenamel junction (CEJ) or cervical line is a structure that the dental hygienist must be able to identify subgingivally with an instrument. In health the CEJ is located within 1 mm of the free gingival margin and is slightly covered by free gingiva. The CEJ is the fixed landmark in the identification of the amount of attached gingiva. Subgingival identification of the CEJ is a competency that requires knowledge of root anatomy, development of tactile skill, and experience. Tactile, nonvisual indicators of the CEJ might include the following:

image Rougher texture of the root, as cementum is not as smooth as enamel.
image Location between the convex cervical third of a crown and the flatter root surface.
image Facial and lingual contours of the CEJ on anterior and premolar teeth are convex (Figure 26-16); on molars, the CEJ is much straighter.
image An apical dip of the CEJ, called the cervical enamel projection (CEP), may be present toward the furcation on molars.
image Proximal curvature of the CEJ is more pronounced on anterior than on posterior teeth.
On anterior teeth the curvature is V-shaped toward the incisal surface and more prominent on the mesial surface of incisors, especially the maxillary central incisor. (These areas are particularly difficult to instrument because of limited proximal access, which may contribute to incomplete deposit removal.)
image

Figure 26-16 Cementoenamel junction contours. A, Anterior teeth. B, Posterior teeth.

(Courtesy former Department of Dental Hygiene, Marquette University.)

Root Surface Texture

Surface textures of crowns and roots differ owing to different degrees of mineralization of enamel and cementum and how it is altered by oral biofilm, as follows:

image Enamel (anatomic crown) is analogous to glazed pottery—smooth, hard, and glassy when unaltered.
image Cementum (anatomic root) is not as smooth, hard, or glassy but is more porous. Cementum can be altered by:
Loss of periodontal attachment, plaque by-products, and unintentional injury by client or clinician
Root planing using ultrasonic instruments and curets
image Scaling instruments with pointed tips should not be used on root surfaces.
image During root planing, varying amounts of cementum are removed and dentin may be exposed, resulting in dentinal hypersensitivity (see Chapter 38).

Root Shapes

Roots of permanent teeth vary from one individual to another. For placement of instruments on root surfaces, the following are considered:

image Morphology of the individual root
image Position of the teeth in the alveolar bone
image Interference from crown contours
image Client’s periodontal status
image Instrument design

Teeth with One Root (see Table 26-1 and Figure 26-17)

All anterior teeth and maxillary second and mandibular premolars have one root. Characteristics of teeth with one root include the following:

image Cone shape with facial, lingual, and proximal surfaces converging (tapering) apically with different degrees of convergence
image Widest in the cervical third and tapering to a small apex
image Distal inclination from a facial (lingual)view
image Cervical cross-sections (i.e., crown cut off the root horizontally at CEJ) are triangular, ovid, or elliptic (see Figure 26-17, A and B):
Triangular: Appears to be three-sided with broad (equal) facial, mesial, and distal surfaces and a very narrow lingual surface. Proximal surfaces converge markedly to the lingual surface (e.g., maxillary central incisors). Proximal surfaces of roots that are narrower on the lingual than the facial surface (both triangular and ovoid root shapes in cervical section) are more readily instrumented from the lingual surface because there is more room.
Ovoid: Oval, “egg-shaped,” with facial surface broader than lingual surface; proximal surfaces are equal and broader than either facial or lingual surface (e.g., canines).
Elliptic: Proximal surfaces are relatively equal; facial and lingual surfaces are approximately the same size but smaller than the proximal surfaces. Root dimensions are broad from the facial and lingual view, and narrower from the mesial and distal view. Roots of mandibular incisors and maxillary premolars are elliptic in cervical cross-section.
image

Figure 26-17 Root shapes in cervical cross-section. A, Maxillary teeth: triangular, elliptic, and ovoid. B, Mandibular teeth: elliptic and ovoid.

(Courtesy former Department of Dental Hygiene, Marquette University.)

In midroot sections, shapes of roots are generally the same as in cervical sections, though smaller.

Roots that are triangular or ovoid in cross-section have smaller lingual than facial surfaces because of proximal surface convergence (taper) toward the lingual surface. Cervical cross-section shapes may be altered by the presence of root concavities. The cervical half of a conical-shaped root has more than 50% of the root surface area because of the convergence of surfaces apically.

Teeth with Two or Three Roots (see Table 26-1)

For periodontal assessment and instrumentation, each root of a multirooted tooth must be treated individually—that is, a two-rooted tooth is like having two single-rooted teeth. In addition, the complexity of unbranched root trunks and furcas must be considered. Posterior teeth are more difficult to reach, and the clinician’s competence influences the therapeutic outcome. Characteristics of the teeth with more than one root are as follows:

image Maxillary first premolars
Generally have two roots (facial and lingual)
Furcations on the mesial and distal sides (Figure 26-18)
image Maxillary molars
Have three roots, mesiobuccal, distobuccal, and palatal (lingual)
Furcations on the buccal side between the mesiobuccal and distobuccal roots, on the mesial side between the mesiobuccal and palatal roots, and on the distal side between the distobuccal and palatal roots (Figure 26-19)
Radiographic assessment of the roots can be compromised owing to the complex root anatomy of the mesiobuccal, distobuccal, and palatal roots (radiographs show the image only from a facial or lingual view).
image Mandibular molars
Have two roots, mesial and distal
Furcations on the buccal and lingual surfaces between the mesial and distal roots (Figure 26-20)
Roots on second molars more likely to have longer root trunks, be closer together, and have more distal orientation.
image Cervical cross-sections of maxillary and mandibular molar roots are larger and more difficult to describe (see Figure 26-17).
Both may show slight depressions where furcations or proximal root concavities begin.
The root trunk of maxillary molars has more equal sides; appears somewhat rhomboidal in shape, with the more prominent “corner” being the mesiobuccal.
The root trunk of the mandibular molar is more rectangular in shape, with the mesial distal width being greater than the facial lingual width.
Generally, roots are elliptic in cervical cross-section after the furcation.
image

Figure 26-18 Mesial furcation on a maxillary first premolar.

(Courtesy former Department of Dental Hygiene, Marquette University.)

image

Figure 26-19 Furcations on a maxillary (first) molar.

(Courtesy former Department of Dental Hygiene, Marquette University.)

image

Figure 26-20 Furcations on a mandibular (first) molar.

(Courtesy former Department of Dental Hygiene, Marquette University.)

Furcations

Furcations generally begin as a shallow depression on the root trunk that gradually opens into a space between the roots; this opening may be too narrow for instruments. Initially, furcations can be felt by the working end of a dental explorer and then, as the space widens, by a Nabers probe. Furcations are very difficult to access with traditional scaling and root planing instruments, as their working ends are too large. Rather, precision thin and furcation inserts for ultrasonic instruments, microbladed and minibladed curets with smaller and narrower working ends, curets with extended shanks, and furcation curets are used to debride furcation areas (see Chapters 24, 25, and 28). A very narrow furcation entrance can be surgically enlarged with burs by a periodontist. Furcation characteristics are as follows:

image The more cervical the furcation, the more stable the tooth because of root divergence (separation).
image Furcations are generally more cervical on first molars; root trunks of first molars are shorter than root trunks of second or third molars.
image Furcations close to the CEJ are more likely to become involved with periodontal disease, though access for instrumentation is easier and therefore such disease has a more favorable post-therapy prognosis.
image Furcations close to the apex are less likely to result in furcation involvement, though instrument access is more difficult and post-therapy prognosis is less favorable.
image Furcation involvement occurs when there is a loss of attachment apical to the furcation and is classified according to extent (see Chapter 17, Table 17-5 for classification of furcations).

It is important to know the expected location of a furcation in both horizontal and vertical directions. Horizontally, most furcations are located midway on the root trunk. The mesial furcation of a maxillary first molar is generally located more toward the lingual surface in a horizontal direction, and therefore instrumentation of the mesial furcation of this tooth is easier from the lingual approach (see Figure 26-19). Vertically, furcations on a maxillary premolar are in the apical third to half (see Figure 26-18). Furcations on a maxillary molar are near the junction of the cervical and middle thirds of the root (see Figure 26-19). Furcations on maxillary second and third molars are more apical; furcations on a mandibular first molar are apical to the cervical one fourth of the root, making this the shortest root trunk in the permanent dentition and the most likely to experience furcation involvement (see Figure 26-20). Furcations on the mandibular second and third molars are more apical than on the first mandibular molar.

Root Concavities

Root concavities are shallow vertical depressions on the surfaces of roots. They protect the tooth from forces that could rotate it in its alveolus, and provide more root surface area and direction for periodontal fiber attachment. Root concavities complicate root instrumentation and access and make it more difficult to place the cutting edge of the instrument on the root surface. Root concavities most frequently occur on proximal root surfaces (proximal root concavities) (see Figure 26-15). Maxillary first molars have a concavity on the lingual surface of the palatal root (lingual concavity) (see Figure 26-19). Molars may have root concavities on a surface of their root toward the furcation (furcal concavities).

Tooth Alignment

Assessment of the alignment of the teeth within an arch is essential to adapting instruments subgingivally. Tooth size, prominence of its crown, contact areas, and the convergence of root surfaces determine the amount of space and interproximal bone in both health and disease. In health the mandibular anterior teeth have the narrowest amount of space and bone because they are very narrow. In disease, if loss of bone is accompanied by gingival recession, there is more access for instrumentation. When teeth have insufficient space, crowding occurs, making instrument positioning difficult. Teeth with close or altered root proximity may have minimal or no proximal space and long proximal root contact, which may significantly influence oral hygiene, periodontal health, and subgingival instrumentation.

The position of teeth within the alveoli also is a factor in root instrumentation. Axial positioning is the relationship of an imaginary vertical line representing the long axis of a tooth in relationship to a horizontal plane. This concept is diagrammed in Figure 26-21. The functions of this positioning are to bring the maxillary and mandibular teeth into an interarch relationship that facilitates incision and mastication and distributes forces throughout the bones of the skull.

image

Figure 26-21 Axial positioning of the maxillary and mandibular teeth in an anterior and lateral view. The slant of the roots along their long axis is shown by vertical lines that have been extended to represent the direction of the slant in both faciolingual and mesiodistal directions.

(From Dempster WT, Adams WJ, Duddles RA: Arrangement in the jaws of the roots of the teeth, J Am Dent Assoc 67:779, 1963.)

Following the vertical lines in Figure 26-21, it is clear that in a faciolingual dimension the roots of all the teeth except the mandibular posteriors have a more lingual inclination than do the crowns. Mandibular posterior crowns are more lingually inclined than roots that are more facial in orientation, making plaque biofilm removal in this area especially difficult for clients.

Again following the vertical lines in Figure 26-21, in a mesiodistal dimension the roots of the canines, premolars, and molars have a distal inclination, which is more pronounced posteriorly. Roots of the incisors do not incline distally.

VARIATIONS IN ROOT FORM

Root alterations, anomalies, or abnormalities should be recognized and documented in the client record for instrumentation adaptations and subsequent client education.

Fused Roots, Fusion, and Concrescence

Molar roots may be fused together, especially second and third molar roots, and are a result of limited space during tooth development (Figure 26-22). Fused roots frequently can be observed on radiographs.

image

Figure 26-22 Fused roots on a mandibular and maxillary molar.

(Courtesy former Department of Dental Hygiene, Marquette University.)

Teeth may be joined together in an anomaly called fusion, in which two tooth buds fuse together during development and form one large tooth with a large crown and a single root that has two pulp canals. This needs to be confirmed by radiographs. Concrescence occurs when two adjacent teeth become joined by cementum after they have been formed.

Accessory Roots

Accessory roots are extra roots. Sometimes the mandibular permanent canines are bifurcated into facial and lingual roots in the apical third (Figure 26-23). Maxillary first premolars can have three roots—two buccal and one lingual. Buccal roots are very thin, which makes treatment difficult if periodontal disease is present. Third molars sometimes have extra roots. Accessory roots may be assessed via radiographs and are instrumented only if the attachment level is apical to their occurrence.

image

Figure 26-23 Accessory roots on a mandibular canine and maxillary first premolar. DB, Distobuccal; F, facial; L, lingual; MB, mesiobuccal.

(Courtesy former Department of Dental Hygiene, Marquette University.)

Palatogingival Grooves (Palatoradicular Grooves)

A palatogingival groove (Figure 26-24) extends apically from the lingual concavity of the crown of a permanent maxillary incisor, usually the lateral incisor, onto the root, often resulting in an isolated, narrow pocket. This groove provides challenges in instrumentation, is highly plaque retentive, and is susceptible to periodontal disease.

image

Figure 26-24 Palatogingival groove on a maxillary lateral incisor.

(Courtesy Gay Derderian, BA, DDS, MSD, Marquette University School of Dentistry.)

Hypercementosis

Hypercementosis, the excessive formation of cementum in the apical third to half of the tooth after the tooth has erupted (Figure 26-25), may be caused by trauma, chronic inflammation of the pulp, or metabolic disturbances. It is assessed radiographically. If areas of hypercementosis are exposed with apical migration of the junctional epithelium, decisions about the extent of root instrumentation will be more difficult.

image

Figure 26-25 Hypercementosis.

(Courtesy former Department of Dental Hygiene, Marquette University.)

Cervical Enamel Projections

Cervical enamel projections (CEPs) are apical extensions of the CEJ toward the furcation of a molar (Figure 26-26). CEPs are classified by degree of extension, as follows:

image Grade I CEPs slightly extend toward the furcation and occur frequently.
image Grade II CEPs approach the area of root separation.
image Grade III CEPs extend into the furcation.
image Grade IV CEPs are the same as Grade III CEPs, plus the furcation is visible because of recession.
image

Figure 26-26 Cervical enamel projection on a mandibular first molar.

(Courtesy former Department of Dental Hygiene, Marquette University.)

Periodontal attachment loss is more likely in CEP areas because periodontal fibers do not form the same type of attachment to enamel as to cementum. Most isolated furcation involvements in otherwise healthy dentitions are found to be related to CEPs. A CEP can be removed surgically to expose dentin and facilitate reattachment of periodontal fibers.

Enamel Pearls

Enamel pearls, most frequently seen on maxillary molars, are “droplets” of enamel in the furcation area (Figure 26-27). They are thought to be due to a genetic error in the developing root sheath as it reaches the area of furcation. As periodontal fibers will not attach to enamel, enamel pearls may encourage periodontal disease. Exploration of an enamel pearl can sometimes be puzzling if it is not visible on radiographs, because it may feel like subgingival calculus.

image

Figure 26-27 Enamel pearls near the furcation of a maxillary molar.

(Courtesy former Department of Dental Hygiene, Marquette University.)

Dilaceration

Dilaceration is a sharp bend in the root surface caused by the displacement of the root during tooth development (Figure 26-28).

image

Figure 26-28 Dilaceration.

(Courtesy former Department of Dental Hygiene, Marquette University.)

See Procedure 26-1 on root morphology and implications for root instrumentation.

Procedure 26-1 ROOT MORPHOLOGY AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ROOT INSTRUMENTATION

ASSUMPTION

The clinician has mastered instrumentation procedures from Chapter 17, Periodontal and Risk Assessment; Chapter 24, Hand-Activated Instruments; and Chapter 25, Ultrasonic and Sonic Instrumentation.

Select ultrasonic insert and universal and area-specific curets for use on cementum and root surfaces.

STEPS

1. Make a mental image of the unseen portion of the tooth to be instrumented and the width and height of the adjacent alveolar bone.
2. Review periodontal parameters recorded on the periodontal assessment form.
3. Observe clinical and radiographic alignment of the tooth and adjacent teeth.

General Characteristics of Roots and Their Implications for Instrumentation

4. Adapt instrument so that it follows the long axis of the root and the taper or convergence of root surfaces apically. For curets, use the terminal shank of the instrument as the guide to maintain parallelism. For periodontal probe and universal ultrasonic inserts, use working end to maintain parallelism.
5. Adapt instrument to the taper or convergence of the proximal surfaces toward the lingual surface. If the convergence of the proximal surfaces is pronounced as in maxillary anterior teeth and maxillary molars, approach more of the proximal surfaces from the lingual surface.
6. Adapt instrument so that it also accounts for the position of the tooth in the alveolar bone and the client's position in the chair.
7. Use multidirectional strokes, alternating horizontal, vertical, and oblique stroke directions.
8. Adapt instrument to the lingual inclination of mandibular posterior teeth by slightly angling instrument shank toward the lingual surface.
9. Use alternative instrument placement or an alternative instrument for very narrow spaces, e.g., posterior curet on an anterior tooth or rarely a scaler.

Root Morphology Instrumentation

Specific Characteristics of Roots and Their Implications for Instrumentation (see Table 26-1)

10. Adapt instrument to curvature of the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) on the proximal surface of anterior teeth by turning toe end of a curet or ultrasonic insert into the most incisal portion of it, which may be very narrow. The end of a scaler may be needed to access this area.
11. Adapt toe end of instrument's cutting edge to proximal root concavities with small overlapping strokes that are gradually channeled into the concave area from both facial and lingual approaches. If tooth has more than one root, adapt instrument similarly to the slight concave area approaching the furcation.
12. Adapt instrument into furcations.
12a. If there are (anatomic) concavities cervical to or with Class I furcation involvement, scale area with very small strokes and turn toe into concave area that marks the very initial stages of division.
12b. With Class II, III, or IV furcation involvement, instrument furcation area as if there were two or three distinct roots. If access is very limited, furcation or ultrasonic instruments can be used. Refer to the dentist of record when Class II or higher furcation involvement is found.

Variations

13. For concrescence, use toe end of curet to instrument area of junction of the roots.
14. For palatogingival groove, use toe end of a micro-, mini-, or extended-shank curet to access the groove.
15. Document in ink the completion of the services in the client's record under “Services Rendered,” and date the entry. For example: 08-24-10: No. 30 facial, Class II furcation present; ultrasonics and 11-14 Gracey used for full instrumentation of furcation; spoke with client at length regarding prognosis and need for follow-up treatment; no anesthesia; client tolerated well; reinforced OHI in area; referred to dentist of record. or 06-14-10: No. 3 Class II mesial furcation present, used ultrasonics and curets for full furcation instrumentation; access easiest from lingual aspect; reinforced OHI in area; advised on need for periodontal evaluation; referred to dentist of record.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Technical assistance in the preparation of the photographs for this edition by the Department of Dental Informatics at the Marquette University School of Dentistry is gratefully acknowledged.

CLIENT EDUCATION TIPS

image Educate clients about root morphology and related periodontal structures as a rationale for recommended self-care behaviors, products, and devices.
image Individualize oral self-care methods and appropriate adjunctive aids to client’s root morphology, oral health status, level of understanding, and capability.

LEGAL, ETHICAL, AND SAFETY ISSUES

image Root variations must be recorded in the client’s chart, discussed with the client, and accounted for in the plan of care as they influence treatment, referral, and self-care recommendations.
image Dental hygienists regularly renew and update their knowledge of root anatomy and instrumentation.

KEY CONCEPTS

image Root assessment, instrumentation, and management require thorough knowledge of root morphology.
image Periodontal assessment includes the identification of root anatomy and root surface characteristics before the development of the plan for care.
image Incisors, canines, and all of the premolars except the maxillary first premolars have one root.
image Approximately 60% of maxillary first premolars have two roots (one facial and one lingual), with furcations on the mesial and distal surfaces.
image Mandibular molars have two roots, one mesial and one distal, with furcations on the facial and lingual surfaces.
image Maxillary molars have three roots (mesiobuccal, distobuccal, and lingual), with mesial, facial, and distal furcations.
image Teeth with more than one root have a root trunk before root division.
image The division area is called the furca; a furcation entrance may be very narrow.
image The cementoenamel junction on posterior teeth has much less-pronounced curvatures on all surfaces.
image Cementum is not as hard as enamel; only instruments with a rounded toe should be used on it.
image Number and shape of the roots determine the selection and adaptation of assessment, scaling, and root planing instruments.
image Root surfaces converge (taper) apically; there is more root surface area in the cervical third than in the apical or middle thirds.
image More of the proximal surface of a single-rooted tooth with broader facial than lingual surfaces can be reached from the lingual approach because of the proximal convergence toward the lingual side.
image Horizontal and vertical location of the furcation determines selection and placement of instruments.
image Root surfaces may have shallow, longitudinal vertical depressions, which add curvature and dimension to instrumentation.
image Axial positioning of each individual tooth in its alveolus is considered when instruments are adapted on root surface.

CRITICAL THINKING EXERCISES

Root Identification Exercise

Materials: Autoclaved extracted permanent teeth with crowns sectioned off or, if available, anatomically accurate plastic specimens of permanent teeth with crowns cut off. (When natural specimens are used in this and all other exercises, personal protective equipment and infection control procedures are required.) Photographs may also be used for this exercise, but specimens are three dimensional. Refer to Table 26-1 for guidance.

1. Identify roots of the teeth and match them with their description.

Note: It is not possible to distinguish mandibular central from lateral incisor roots, or mandibular first from second premolar roots. For these, the identification of the root only as a mandibular incisor or mandibular premolar is the expectation. Sometimes it is also difficult to distinguish maxillary and mandibular canine roots.

Root Surface and Stroke Coverage Exercise

Materials: One permanent incisor and one permanent maxillary typodont or natural tooth; mechanical pencil; tray cover; and gauze square.

1. Identify tooth; with nondominant hand, hold it in correct orientation throughout this exercise.
2. In dominant hand, grasp mechanical pencil with traditional pen grasp. Fulcrum as necessary; accounting for crest of curvature, orient pencil lead to cervical third of the root. Assume a 6-mm pocket from the cementoenamel junction to the junctional epithelium.
3. Using the side of the pencil lead as a curet toe, “root plane” the facial surface of the root; use vertical, horizontal, oblique, overlapping and cross-hatching strokes.
4. Identify how each stroke covers (darkens) the surface. Which stroke direction is most successful? How does each stroke direction need to be approached? Are there adaptations that must be made for tooth anatomy? For pocket depth?
5. Observe stroke direction coverage, number of strokes, and length of time it takes to completely instrument the facial root surface.
6. Document and discuss your results and observations.
7. Repeat for the mesial, distal, and lingual sides of the tooth; pay special attention to the number of strokes, stroke direction, and adaptations necessary for line angles, root trunk, furcations, and concavities.
8. Repeat for one maxillary molar and one incisor tooth.

Root Surface Characteristic Exercise

Materials: Autoclaved extracted tooth with subgingival deposit, curets, dissecting microscope, tray cover, gauze square.

1. Observe the root of the tooth under the microscope.
2. Select one area of the root surface; remove the deposit with a curet.
3. Observe the root again, noting the residual deposit microscopically.
4. Root plane the area until it is smooth and hard.
5. Observe the root again; document observations.

Root Anatomy Exercise

Materials: Autoclaved extracted permanent maxillary and mandibular first molars or plastic typodont molars; black nail polish; glitter; black crayon; 11/12 and 13/14 area-specific curets; tray cover; gauze square.

Preparation: Paint the cervical third to half of the root to the distal half of the root surface, sprinkle glitter on the painted area (simulates deposit, altered cementum); color the mesial half of the root with crayon (simulates subgingival plaque).

1. Identify natural or plastic first molar, and hold it in the correct orientation. (May also reinsert the plastic molars into the typodont as an additional exercise.)
2. Select the appropriate curet for an area, and remove deposit from root trunk and roots.
3. Observe how each root is approached as if it were a single tooth, and how each of the surfaces needs to be approached.
4. Count number of strokes needed to remove the deposit.

Refer to the Procedures Manual where rationales are provided for the steps outlined in the procedure presented in this chapter.

Visit the image website at http://evolve.elsevier.com/Darby/Hygiene for competency forms, suggested readings, glossary, and related websites.