Chapter 32 Confirming pregnancy and care of the pregnant woman
After reading this chapter, you will be able to:
This chapter focuses upon the care and services provided and delivered to women during the antenatal period from the point at which a woman believes she may be pregnant to the onset of labour. During this period, pregnant women experience major physiological and psychological changes facilitating adaptation and preparation for birthing and transition to parenting (Coad & Dunstall 2005, Stables & Rankin 2005). Midwives are key professionals who deliver care to the women and their families. They work in partnership with women to assess women’s individual needs and to plan and implement the most appropriate care.
Many women of childbearing age who are sexually active may suspect that they are pregnant, especially if their menstrual period is delayed and/or other symptoms of pregnancy, such as nausea or vomiting, are experienced. Often, many women say that they ‘just feel different’. Women may choose to confirm their pregnancy either by using a home pregnancy test or by seeking diagnosis through their midwife or general practitioner (GP). Confirmation of pregnancy is established by a detailed history and a clinical examination based on the signs and symptoms of pregnancy, resulting from the physiological alteration in the body’s systems and organs. These include amenorrhoea; breast changes and tenderness; nausea and vomiting; increased frequency of micturition; enlargement of the uterus; and skin changes. These signs and symptoms become obvious to the woman as her pregnancy advances, but as some of these symptoms and signs may be found in other conditions not associated with pregnancy, it is important that the midwife is aware of these conditions, as she may need to refer the woman for further investigations or specialist advice.
Reflective activity 32.1
When you next undertake a ‘booking’ interview, discuss with the woman, and, if appropriate, her partner:
Signs and symptoms of pregnancy may be considered as presumptive, probable and positive, as illustrated in Table 32.1.
Following implantation of the fertilized ovum, the endometrium undergoes decidual change and normally menstruation does not occur throughout pregnancy.
Amenorrhoea almost invariably accompanies pregnancy and, in a sexually active woman who has previously menstruated regularly, can be considered to be due to pregnancy unless this is disproved. However, the possibility of secondary amenorrhoea should be considered.
Discomfort, tenderness or tingling and a feeling of fullness of the breasts may be noticed as early as the third or fourth week of pregnancy, as the blood supply to the breasts increases.
These are common symptoms, with nausea affecting about 70% to 85% of pregnant women and vomiting approximately 50% (Gadsby et al 1993, Lacroix et al 2000, Whitehead et al 1992). Of the women who experience nausea, only a small percentage experience it in the morning but many suffer from it throughout the day. Vomiting, however, is also a feature of a variety of conditions, such as gastroenteritis, urinary tract infection and hydatidiform mole, and these should be ruled out.
These may decrease, and, for some women, cease altogether. The mean duration of nausea is about 34.6 days and in about 50% of women it lasts until 14 weeks’ gestation (Lacroix et al 2000).
The enlarged uterus is just palpable above the symphysis pubis at about 12 weeks. Other reasons for an enlarged uterus include tumours such as ovarian cysts or fibroids. Ascites may be mistaken for a pregnant uterus.
Pigmentation of the skin occurs and is especially pronounced in brunettes. Areas of increased pigmentation include the nipples and areola; the linea nigra, which is the line of pigmentation from the symphysis pubis to the umbilicus; and, rarely, chloasma, which is sometimes referred to as the ‘mask of pregnancy’ (see website). The nipples become more prominent and Montgomery’s tubercles are visible on the areola.
The breasts may begin to secrete colostrum, which persists throughout pregnancy and for the first few days after delivery until milk is produced. A secondary areola may appear in brunettes.
The first fetal movements may be felt by primigravidae at 19+ weeks and by multigravidae at 17+ weeks. The time scale over which fetal movements are first felt by the mother ranges from 15 to 22 weeks in primigravidae and from 14 to 22 weeks in multigravidae (O’Dowd & O’Dowd 1985). Quickening, often described as ‘flutters’, or a feeling of ‘bubbles coming to the surface’ rather than recognizable movements, is an unreliable indicator of gestational age as sometimes these feelings can be attributed to flatulence.
For 90% of women, nausea and vomiting have usually diminished by 22 weeks’ gestation (Lacroix et al 2000). The secondary areola, if not already present, may appear. The fundus of the uterus is normally palpated just below the umbilicus.
The fundus can be felt just above the umbilicus and the fetal parts and movements may be felt on abdominal palpation. The fetal heart sounds may be heard with a fetal stethoscope and at 24 weeks the fetus is considered to be capable of an independent existence.
The fundus continues to rise until 36 weeks, when it reaches the xiphisternum and remains at that level until the fetal head engages. Braxton Hicks contractions, painless irregular uterine contractions, may be palpated from about 16 weeks and these persist until the end of pregnancy.
When engagement occurs from 36 weeks, the fundus descends slightly, causing, together with the increased flexion of the fetus, a relief of pressure which is experienced by the woman in the form of ‘lightening’. This may not occur in multigravidae as the head often does not engage until labour is established. This lightening allows the woman to breathe with more comfort; however, the descent of the head may cause pressure on the bladder, resulting in increased frequency of micturition.
It is now uncommon to undertake a vaginal examination in early pregnancy; however, if performed, the following signs of pregnancy may be observed:
Although there are many physical changes experienced by the woman which might suggest pregnancy, there are a number of positive signs that will confirm pregnancy:
Chorionic tissue, which later forms the placenta, starts producing the hormone human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), which is excreted in the urine. This hormone is usually detected in the urine from the time of the first missed period. Immunological tests depend on the detection of hCG in the urine. Pregnancy tests fall into three categories with varying sensitivities to hCG:
Figure 32.2 The principle of the wick test as used in dipstick and cassette devices.
(From Wheeler 1999.)
Up to 40 types of laboratory test kit are available in the UK (Wheeler 1999). These have a wide range of different sensitivities, from 20 to 1000 IU/L of hCG.
Home pregnancy tests have a more consistent range of sensitivity, from 25 to 50 IU/L, take from 1 minute to obtain a result, appear easy to use and manufacturers claim a 99% accuracy rate. However, an American meta-analysis of the efficiency, sensitivity and specificity of tests highlighted that the diagnostic efficiency of home pregnancy tests is affected by the characteristics of the users (Bastian et al 1998). False negative results arose from testing before the recommended number of days from the last menstrual period, or from a failure to read or follow the instructions. Therefore, a negative result in a woman who does not menstruate within a week should be treated with caution. The test should be repeated and laboratory confirmation sought if doubt of pregnancy exists.
The advantages of using home pregnancy tests are that they can confirm pregnancy in the privacy of the home. This enables a woman to be the first to have the information and it provides a quick result at an early point in the pregnancy. However, given the varying sensitivities of home and laboratory tests, it is possible that a woman may receive a positive diagnosis of pregnancy using a home pregnancy test and a negative result from a laboratory test. This may cause anxiety and confusion. If this happens, the midwife needs to ask the laboratory which test they are using and its sensitivity. A repeat test may then be requested, to confirm pregnancy. It is also possible that spontaneous miscarriage could have occurred between the two tests.
Following confirmation of pregnancy, women are encouraged to contact their midwife or doctor to commence their antenatal care.
This is a phantom or false pregnancy and may occur in women with an intense desire to become pregnant. Amenorrhoea will be present. The woman will complain of all the subjective symptoms of pregnancy, usually in a bizarre order; the abdomen may be distended and the breasts may secrete a cloudy liquid. However, she is not pregnant. The signs on which a certain diagnosis of pregnancy can be made – namely, palpation of the fetus or hearing the fetal heart – are not present. Referral to a psychologist or psychiatrist may be required.
Over the past two centuries, antenatal services have seen major developments in terms of their provision and delivery. Contemporary antenatal services have quality at their heart, with patient safety, patient experience and effectiveness of care as their central tenets (DH 2008). All women seek a healthy outcome to their pregnancy; they want high-quality, personalized care coupled with greater information so that they can make informed choice about the place and nature of their care and are more in control of the care that they receive (Redshaw et al 2007).
The UK maternity services aim to provide a world-class service to women and their families, with the overall vision for the services to be flexible and individualized. Services should be designed to fit around the needs of the woman, baby and family circumstances, with due consideration being given to factors that may render some women and their families to become vulnerable and disadvantaged. Pregnancy is a normal physiological process for the majority of women. Women and their families need support to have as normal a pregnancy and birth as possible, with medical intervention being offered only if it is of benefit. However, in some circumstances, both midwifery and obstetric care are indicated and care should be based on providing good clinical and psychological outcomes for the woman and her baby (DH 2007a, DH & DfES 2004, NICE 2008).
The overall purpose of antenatal care is to work with women to improve and maintain maternal and fetal health by monitoring the progress of pregnancy to confirm normality and detect any deviation early so that corrective care can be provided. The aims of antenatal care are to:
It is important that women seek professional healthcare early in pregnancy – that is, within the first 12 weeks of pregnancy (HM Treasury 2007, Lewis 2007, NICE 2008) – so that they can obtain and use evidence-based information to plan their pregnancy and to benefit from antenatal screening and health promotion activities (DH 2007a, DH & DfES 2004, NICE 2008). With early information about the available models of antenatal care, women, in partnership with healthcare professionals, can make decisions about the most appropriate pathway of their care best suited to their personal, social and obstetric circumstances.
Where women seek care at a later stage in pregnancy, they will have reduced access to antenatal care. It is likely that the woman will have reduced options in terms of antenatal screening tests. Some investigations, such as serum screening for Down syndrome (see Ch. 26), are accurate only if carried out at specific times, in this case between 15 and 18 weeks. Early detection of these conditions enables further investigations, such as ultrasound scan or amniocentesis, to be carried out at the optimum time.
Early access to antenatal care enables healthcare professionals to obtain baseline measures, facilitating accurate monitoring of the effect of physiological changes on vital systems and organs of the body and early detection of any complications. For example, the recording of the blood pressure in the first trimester of pregnancy provides a baseline against which the physiological changes in the blood pressure can be assessed. In some cases, complications may have already arisen by the time the woman seeks antenatal care.
The woman should be able to choose whether her first contact in pregnancy is with a midwife or her GP (DH 2007a). That said, antenatal services vary; in many parts of the UK, the first point of contact for maternity services is the woman’s GP (CHAI 2008, Redshaw et al 2007), but services are working towards the midwife being the first point of contact in the community setting.
To achieve the principles of antenatal care, pregnant women require evidence-based information. Evidence suggests that women desire accurate and timely information about pregnancy and childbirth so that they can develop their knowledge and understanding of pregnancy, childbirth and related issues, enabling them to make informed decisions about the care they want and prefer (Bharj 2007, Kirkham & Stapleton 2001, Mander 2001, Singh & Newburn 2000). Women need information which is based upon current evidence that is clearly understood and in a format they can easily access. When offering information, healthcare professionals must take into account the requirements of women who have physical and sensory learning disabilities and women whose competence in speaking and reading English is low, exploring appropriate ways of exchanging meaningful information.
Midwives are key healthcare professionals who work with women to support them to make informed choices regarding preferred arrangements for antenatal care, place of birth and postnatal care. Midwives should be friendly, kind, caring, approachable, non-judgemental, have time for women, be respectful, good communicators, providing support and companionship (Bharj & Chesney 2009, Nicholls & Webb 2006). These attributes are essential for the development of the woman–midwife relationship. Many worldwide studies highlight that all women perceive the woman–midwife relationship to be central to their pregnancy, childbirth and postnatal experiences (Anderson 2000, Bharj 2007, Davies 2000, Edwards 2005, Kirkham 2000, Lundgren & Berg 2007, Walsh 1999). Midwives therefore play an essential role in the life of women during their most significant period and have the power to either augment or mar women’s experiences of pregnancy and childbirth.
Reflective activity 32.2
Reflect upon the discussions you have had, or have observed, with women during the initial visit. Do you think that you provided sufficient information for the woman to make informed decisions about patterns of antenatal care, home birth and who she would wish to see during the antenatal period?
There are a wide range of models of care operating across the UK because of the geographical and demographic variations (Green et al 1998, Wraight et al 1993). The organization of maternity services varies throughout the UK. The maternity and obstetric units are formed as a part of larger district or regional general hospitals and the maternity and midwifery services are normally provided through such units and are integrated within the community and hospital. Midwifery units are designed and staffed according to the birth rates, therefore, the sizes of the units are variable dependent on the birth rates. Some NHS hospitals provide tertiary maternity and neonatal services for part of the regions. Generally, midwifery staff are employed by an acute maternity unit and may work either in the community or in the hospital, or, in some models of care, in both.
There are four different birth settings: ‘consultant-led obstetric units’ (CLU), ‘midwifery-led units’ (MLU), ‘home’, and ‘free-standing maternity units’ (FMU) (Hall 2003) (for choices of place of birth, see Ch. 34). CLUs are usually attached to the district or regional units and deliver care both for women who have complex healthcare needs and for those with no complications of pregnancy, labour and birth. CLUs are staffed by midwives and obstetricians. Women are normally referred to an obstetrician who becomes the lead professional for the duration of their childbirth continuum. Women with complex healthcare needs may access all their care in the antenatal, intranatal and postnatal period within these settings.
Some women with less complex healthcare needs may access some of their care in the hospital setting and some in the community setting. Some women who have had uncomplicated pregnancies and who are at low risk of developing complications during labour and/or birth choose to labour and birth within a CLU with a midwife as lead professional rather than an obstetrician. A full range of obstetric facilities (such as anaesthesia, surgery, blood transfusion and neonatal intensive care) are readily available in CLUs.
MLUs, sometimes known as ‘low-risk maternity units’ (Hall 2003), are often located close to, but separate from, CLUs. These units normally aim to provide care to women with uncomplicated pregnancies; the women, however, have to meet the criteria for the unit throughout pregnancy, labour and birth. MLUs are staffed predominantly by midwives, although they may be jointly run by midwives and GPs. If a deviation from normal is detected during pregnancy, labour or birth, the woman will be referred to an obstetrician, or, if appropriate, a GP, and may have to transfer place of care to the CLU. Normally, women access the majority of their antenatal care in the community setting with minimal care in the hospital setting.
Women may choose to have their babies at home instead of a hospital setting (see Ch. 34). Each of the midwifery units in the UK has its own arrangements for providing a home birth service and its own guidelines and attitudes towards these. The provision of this service depends on local resources, local practices and policies, and the beliefs, skills and commitment of individual practitioners providing the service. Women who choose to have a home birth are normally given care in the community by the lead professional who may be either a midwife or GP. In circumstances where the maternity needs of the woman cannot be managed in the home setting, then she and/or her baby is transferred to the nearest CLU.
The purpose of the FMUs is to offer a ‘home-like’ environment within an institutional setting. The philosophy and the kind of care offered by an FMU are very similar to those of the MLUs and the main difference is that the FMU is geographically situated away from the CLU. Generally, women who access care at these settings have to fit in with the guidelines and protocols of these units and are normally those women who are less likely to require interventions. Should an intervention be required for a woman, a decision will need to be made about transferring to the CLU.
To meet the maternity needs of the local populations, two things have happened concomitantly in some areas of England. The move to centralize maternity services has seen a number of mergers and, at the same time, there have appeared a small number of new community units or birth centres to provide a limited service for women who would otherwise have to travel long distances to have their babies in large obstetric units (for example, see Kirkham 2003).
Maternity services for women in the NHS are normally provided by a multiprofessional team comprising community midwives, GPs, and hospital-based midwives or doctors in the antenatal period and usually by hospital-based midwives or doctors in the intrapartum period (unless they have a home birth) and by midwives and the GPs in the postnatal period. However, many maternity units are maximizing a multiprofessional approach to service provision and delivery and are collaborating with other relevant healthcare professionals to develop a multi-agency integrated care pathway, involving shared care, for example, with the drug and alcohol treatment services. This collaborative approach to care has improved the experience and outcome for women and babies.
A variety of approaches to team midwifery are emerging; they strive to provide choice and continuity and these include team midwifery normally based in the community, one-to-one midwifery practice care for women (Green et al 1998, Page et al 2000), that is, a complete episode of care from the booking interview to transfer to the health visitor following birth, including intrapartum care. Other approaches include caseload midwifery, or, as it is sometimes referred to, midwifery group practice. This comprises a small number of midwives organized into a team who are responsible for the delivery of full range of maternity care (SNMAC 1998). The midwives in the team are each responsible for approximately 30–40 women in a year.
While many parts of the UK have some sort of team arrangement for providing maternity services, these teams may vary from two or three midwives to over 30. There is no agreed definition of teams (RCM 2000, SNMAC 1998, Wraight et al 1993) though teams are responsible for providing care in the hospital setting, community settings, or both. There are four possible options of care:
The type of care offered is dependent on the health needs of the woman and local practices and protocols. Where women do not have any perceived complications in the antenatal and intrapartum period, they may choose to have all their care in the community setting or a mixture of both community and hospital. However, those women who have or develop complications in pregnancy or the intrapartum period access services in the hospital setting.
Increasingly there are developments where the NHS is collaborating with the local authority to offer maternity services from children’s centres. In addition to this, some midwives are seconded to specialist outreach services, particularly Sure Start (integrated health, education and welfare support services for children under 4 and their families) and smoking cessation services.
In many areas, antenatal day assessment units have been developed to provide outpatient care. In circumstances where complications arise, such as moderate pregnancy-induced hypertension, the pregnant women can be referred to the antenatal assessment unit, where her and her baby’s health may be assessed and monitored. Referral to such units can be made by the women themselves, by midwives or by other healthcare professionals.
A domiciliary in and out scheme (DOMINO scheme) is offered in some areas for women who wish for community-based care (Wardle et al 1997). Within this model, antenatal care is delivered by a community midwife as it would be for a home birth. The community midwife provides care at home during labour, and continues care when the woman is transferred into hospital for birth. Following birth, the woman and her baby, when healthy, are transferred home with postnatal care provided by the community midwife.
Independent midwives are currently in the minority, delivering around 500 births per year in the UK. The midwives are self-employed and offer themselves for service to individual women. Their education and governance is the same as that of any other practising midwife within the UK and within the same regulatory body and with Supervision of Midwives. The main differences are that they set up their protocols for practice, using evidence-based practice, and usually offer a home birth service, meeting women’s individual requirements; and usually practise in small groups of two or three or in some cases single-handedly. Some midwives have honorary contracts with their local hospitals and offer a DOMINO service, though where midwives are unable to secure contracts, when a woman booked with them requires medical services, the independent midwife can only accompany her to hospital as a friend or doula.
During pregnancy, women need unbiased information to consider where they wish to give birth. This is discussed in more detail in Chapter 34. The most common place of birth continues to remain the hospital setting and the rate of home births has not changed significantly over the past few decades, despite calls for increasing women’s choice in the place of birth (DH 2007a). Although the rate of home birth remains low, there are marked geographical variations. This appears to depend on midwives and doctors supporting the idea of healthy women having their babies at home. Where this was the case, the numbers of women having home births increased (Sandall et al 2001).
Historically, irrespective of their personal needs, individual risk status or parity, all pregnant women were encouraged to routinely attend an antenatal clinic every 4 weeks up to 28 weeks’ gestation, then 2-weekly up to 36 weeks, and then weekly thereafter. Evidence in the 1980s suggested that healthy women were at no greater risk of maternal or perinatal mortality if they attended fewer antenatal visits than the historical pattern of care (Hall et al 1985) and in 1982 the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) recommended that maternity care providers should reduce the number of antenatal visits for women who do not have any complications of pregnancy from the historical pattern of 14–16 visits for all women to five to seven visits for multiparous women and eight or nine visits for primiparous women (RCOG 1982). This recommendation was not widely implemented until it was reiterated in the ‘Changing childbirth’ report (DH 1993), where it was suggested that many existing maternity care practices, such as the frequency and timing of antenatal care, had continued as a result of tradition and ritual rather than as a result of evidence of effectiveness. More recently, the NICE guidance (2008) recommended that for nulliparous women with uncomplicated pregnancies, ten antenatal appointments ‘should be adequate’, and that for parous women with uncomplicated pregnancies, seven antenatal appointments ‘should be adequate’. However, 25% of women have reported receiving fewer than the recommended number of antenatal visits (CHAI 2008). Whilst it is acknowledged that a reduction in the frequency of antenatal appointments does not result in an increase in adverse biological maternal and perinatal outcomes (Villar et al 2001), it is not clear whether a reduction in the frequency of antenatal visits affects women’s satisfaction with antenatal care and the social support that they may require. Nevertheless, it is essential that the number of antenatal visits should be tailored to meet women’s individualized health needs instead of attending antenatal appointments in a ritualistic pattern.
Throughout the childbearing period, all women should be provided with the opportunity to discuss issues and to ask questions (NICE 2008). To enable women to make informed choices about their care, midwives need to work in partnership with women and their families to develop and maintain relationships based upon effective communication skills, empathy and trust (Berry 2007). To communicate effectively and discuss matters fully with women, antenatal appointments need to be structured in such a way as to ensure the woman has sufficient time to make informed decisions (NICE 2008) and midwives need to develop the knowledge required to ensure they are able to offer up-to-date, consistent, evidence-based information and clear explanations, using terminology that women and their families are able to understand. Adjustments may need to be made to ensure that women with additional communication needs are able to access information in a format they are able to understand. This may include using interpreters, online resources or DVDs as well as leaflets and books to support discussions.
The first antenatal visit and taking of the woman’s history may occur in the woman’s home, a health centre or GP surgery, or at the first visit to the hospital antenatal clinic. If a combined approach is taken, this will reduce the visits that the woman may have to make.
Women may feel apprehensive at their first visit, especially if they have not previously met the midwives or medical staff. Good communication skills and a non-judgemental attitude are important to enable women to feel at ease in discussing very intimate personal details. A warm, friendly greeting and a pleasant, comfortable environment can also help to put women at their ease. Whilst many women may be rather apprehensive at the first visit, young teenagers, women who are less proficient in speaking English and those who are unhappy about their pregnancy may feel especially vulnerable. Interpreters are required for women who have limited fluency in speaking English and, where possible, such women should be given information in formats that enable them to access and understand the information easily – for example, written information in their own language, audiovisual tapes or in braille. In many large cities where the number of teenage pregnancies is high, special ‘teenagers’ clinics’ or clubs may be provided to meet their particular needs.
Whatever the background of the woman, or her reactions to her pregnancy, building a positive relationship with her is one of the midwife’s most important aims during this first antenatal visit. This provides a foundation upon which the trust between a midwife and a woman will be built during the rest of the pregnancy. The woman needs open communication with a midwife who is well informed and committed to supporting her as an individual, encouraging the development of mutual respect, trust and partnership (Nicholls & Webb 2006, Redshaw et al 2007). There is growing evidence of women’s views of the maternity services that consistently highlights the importance of the quality of the women’s relationship with their midwife and the importance of this relationship in their satisfaction levels (CHAI 2008, Redshaw et al 2007).
The importance at the beginning of the interview is for the woman to establish confidence in the midwife, and so the purpose and process of the interview and issues such as confidentiality must be addressed initially. The woman needs to understand the midwife’s professional responsibilities, in terms of information which may be shared, and which may need to be discussed with other members of the team. Similarly, the midwife needs to ensure that a woman’s request that information is kept confidential is respected.
When the history is taken at home or in a community clinic, the woman is likely to be more at ease. If the interview takes place in the hospital, the midwife should prepare the interview room to be as pleasant and non-clinical as possible in order to facilitate communication and the development of a relationship of mutual trust. The midwife must also provide privacy and sufficient time for the interview, and make this clear to the woman.
During early pregnancy the woman may be experiencing nausea and fatigue and will appreciate not having to travel to attend a busy clinic amongst strangers. Any problems can usually be discussed in private and the midwife can give information and offer advice as appropriate. When other members of the family are present during this initial assessment, this gives the midwife the opportunity to meet them, but she should also be sensitive that there may be information that the woman considers private or confidential and would prefer not to discuss in their presence. Some time alone spent between the midwife and woman is essential and this should be facilitated.
The interview should be a two-way process of interaction between the woman and midwife. It involves assessment of the woman’s social, psychological, emotional and physical condition as well as obtaining information about the present and previous pregnancies, and the medical and family history. Care can then be planned in conjunction with the woman to meet her specific needs and wishes.
An antenatal booking interview should comprise more than merely recording an obstetric history; it should be about communicating information and promoting a relationship between the woman and the midwife (Methven 1982a, 1982b). Factors conducive to a more relaxed atmosphere and which promote communication should be considered, for example, the environment of the setting where the history is going to be taken, arrangements of the furniture in the room, body language and interpersonal skills. A few minutes spent by the midwife in introducing herself and talking informally enable the woman to settle down and relax before personal issues are discussed. A skilled midwife can elicit most of the information required from the woman in a pleasant conversational manner without the woman realizing that she is being closely questioned. Open rather than closed questions should be employed because these encourage free responses and promote two-way interaction between the woman and midwife. During the interview the midwife should be sensitive to the woman’s attitude to her pregnancy and, if possible, to that of her partner. Unusually adverse attitudes and body language should be noted and counselling and support given as required.
The woman’s full name, marital status, address, telephone number, age, date of birth, race, religion and occupation (and that of her partner) are accurately recorded. Information regarding the woman’s marital status is elicited to determine if the woman is in a stable relationship or if the woman is alone and may need additional support from the midwife and other agencies.
The woman’s ethnicity is ascertained because some medical and obstetric conditions are more likely to occur in certain ethnic groups and appropriate diagnostic tests are required. However, asking about ethnicity is complex (Dyson 2005) and midwives need to develop competence in accomplishing this sensitively. The religion of the woman is recorded because of the special requirements and rituals which may be practised and affect the mother and her baby. Occupation gives an indication of socioeconomic status. Women in socioeconomic groups IV and V (see website) may experience social and economic inequalities. These wider determinants of health coupled with poverty are most likely to adversely affect their or their fetus’s/baby’s health and clinical outcomes (Lewis 2007, Palmer et al 2008). The midwife needs to work with other agencies to provide the woman and her family with appropriate support to promote and improve her health.
The date of the first day of the last menstrual period (LMP) is ascertained, care being taken to check that this was the last normal menstrual period. Some women have a slight blood loss when the fertilized ovum embeds into the decidual lining of the uterus and many mistake this for the last period. Pregnancy has been assumed to last 280 days, and to overcome the irregularity of the calendar a working rule of thumb was devised by Naegele. By counting forwards 9 months and adding 7 days from the first day of the last normal menstrual period, it is possible to arrive at an estimated date of delivery (EDD); alternatively, count back 3 months and add 7 days. This method of calculating the EDD is known as Naegele’s rule. However, as February is a short month and the remaining months have 30 or 31 days, from 280 to 283 days may be added to the date of the LMP. Rosser (2000) states that it is unclear whether the length of pregnancy is affected by social, ethnic or obstetric factors. It is important to explain that it is quite normal for the actual day of delivery to be up to 2 weeks before or after the EDD.
Details of the woman’s menstrual history should be sought: the age at which menstruation began; the duration of the periods; and the number of days in the cycle. Conception occurs shortly after ovulation. With a regular cycle of about 28 days, the standard calculation is reasonably accurate to within a few days, provided that the woman knows the date of her last normal menstrual period.
In a 35-day cycle, however, ovulation would occur 21 days after the period; in a 21-day cycle, only 7 days after. Adjustments may be made, therefore, when the woman has a regular long or short cycle. If the cycle is long (for example, 33 days), the days in excess of 28 are added when calculating the EDD (Table 32.2). With a regular short cycle, such as 23 days, the number of days less than 28 is subtracted from the EDD.
Table 32.2 Calculation of the EDD
Cycle 28 days | Cycle 33 days | Cycle 23 days |
---|---|---|
LMP: 12 Aug 2010 | LMP: 12 Aug 2010 | LMP: 12 Aug 2010 |
+7 days +9 months | +7 days +5 days +9 months | +7 days −5 days +9 months |
EDD: 19 May 2011 | EDD: 24 May 2011 | EDD: 14 May 2011 |
The calculation is difficult if the woman does not know the date of her last menstrual period, cycles are irregular, or a normal cycle has not resumed since taking the oral contraceptive pill or following a previous birth. If the woman has a good idea of when conception occurred, the EDD can be calculated by adding 38 weeks to this date, or subtracting 7 days from 9 months.
Women should be asked to note the date when fetal movements are first felt. Primigravidae normally become aware of fetal movements between 18 and 20 weeks, whereas multigravidae recognize the sensation a little earlier, between 16 and 18 weeks. This may be used to confirm the expected date of delivery, although with the widespread use of ultrasound in the UK, the gestational age is usually established during ultrasound examination (see Ch. 33). A dating ultrasound offered to a woman between 10 and 13 weeks of pregnancy normally measures the crown–rump length (CRL) and for pregnancies beyond 14 weeks the fetal gestational age is determined by the measurement of the head circumference or biparietal diameter (BPD) (NICE 2008).
Although the use of ultrasound to estimate gestational age is very useful, some women may find it distressing if there are discrepancies between the date estimated by Naegele’s rule and that given following ultrasound examination, especially those who are certain of the date of conception or who have a regular cycle and are certain of the date of the first day of their last menstrual period. In most cases it would be inappropriate to alter the expected date of delivery without the mother’s agreement, especially when there is less than 10–14 days’ discrepancy with the previously given date (Proud 1997).
Other pregnancy symptoms such as breast changes, nausea and vomiting, and increased frequency of micturition are noted. Nausea and vomiting may range from occasional slight nausea to frequent severe vomiting with ketosis, when immediate medical treatment is necessary (see Ch. 53). Any history of bleeding per vaginam since the last normal menstrual period is recorded and the woman is requested to seek medical attention immediately should further bleeding occur (see Ch. 54).
In the first trimester of pregnancy a woman is quite likely to feel tired, perhaps nauseated and generally rather off-colour. A caring, approachable midwife who provides support, encourages the woman to express any worries and ask questions, and gives clear information, can be a great help to the woman at this time.
It is necessary to ask about all previous pregnancies, including miscarriages or terminations of pregnancy. If the woman has had a miscarriage, she is asked at what stage in pregnancy it occurred, whether she knows of any possible cause, if she was transferred to hospital, and, if so, whether she needed either an operation to remove retained products of conception, or a blood transfusion, or both.
Similar questions are asked about terminations of pregnancy, including the reason for termination and how it was performed. Some women may not wish this information to be recorded in handheld notes and their autonomy should be respected; however, the information should be recorded within hospital notes, and the reasons for this discussed with the woman.
Details of all pregnancies, labours and puerperia are essential:
All pregnancies are dealt with in chronological order. If the history reveals any obstetric or paediatric complications and previous notes are not accessible, the information should be sought from the hospital where care was delivered.
This is a useful part of the interview, as this may be the first opportunity that the woman has had for reviewing and reflecting on her previous childbirth experiences, and this provides a forum for clarifying management of problems both previously and in the future.
This includes enquiry about any illness, operation or accident which could complicate pregnancy. It is necessary to ask by name about rheumatic fever; chorea; cardiac, respiratory and renal diseases; thyrotoxicosis; diabetes; hypertension; thromboembolic disorders; tuberculosis; epilepsy; and mental illness.
A history of mental illness, especially postnatal depression or puerperal psychosis, is of significance because such conditions may recur in a subsequent pregnancy. The woman is asked about infectious diseases of childhood and whether she has had rubella or been vaccinated against the disease. A blood test will confirm whether or not she is immune, and if non-immune, she is advised to avoid contact with the disease, as rubella virus, if contracted in pregnancy, can cross the placenta and cause fetal abnormality.
Operations on the uterus or the pelvic floor are significant. Following caesarean section or myomectomy, there may be a weakened uterine scar, especially if the wound was infected, and there is a slight risk that it could rupture during a subsequent pregnancy or labour. Women of childbearing age sometimes have to undergo extensive pelvic floor repair operations. If a woman has had a successful operation for the relief of stress incontinence, both the woman and the obstetrician will be concerned about the mode of delivery; sometimes, another vaginal delivery is considered inadvisable and caesarean section is planned.
Relevant accidents include those involving the spine and pelvis, particularly if a fracture has occurred and deformity resulted. Deformity of the spine or pelvis following poliomyelitis or congenital dislocation of the hip would cause similar concern, since in all these instances the bony pelvis may be asymmetrical and accordingly have a smaller capacity. Enquiry may be made about back pain or symphysis pubis dysfunction and appropriate support and advice given, and referral made if appropriate.
Details of any blood transfusions are important, including the reason and any adverse reactions.
It is important to ask the woman whether she is taking any drugs, because many drugs which are quite safe for the woman may have a teratogenic effect on the fetus. The woman should be informed about the risk of taking over-the-counter drugs without medical advice (NICE 2008).
Drug dependency in women of childbearing age is an increasing problem (Siney 1999) and it is important that the midwife ascertains whether the woman has previously taken or is currently taking prescribed drugs and/or drugs for ‘social or recreational’ use. The misused substances are likely to have a detrimental effect on the health of the woman and her fetus/baby; however, this is dependent on the type, dose and the route of the drug used. Women with drug dependency are at an increased risk of developing medical and obstetrical problems than are women who do not misuse drugs, and their babies are at an increased risk of neonatal complications (DH 1998, Hepburn 1993).
Women who misuse drugs may have a multitude of social, emotional, financial and sexual health problems that necessitate multi-agency involvement to try to minimize harm to themselves, their children and families. It is essential that the approach and attitude of the midwife is caring, non-judgemental and constructively helpful when discussing health needs and the support that can be offered to the woman; otherwise the woman may reject the help that the health and other specialist services can offer.
Smoking during pregnancy is a most significant contributing factor for poor health, poor clinical outcomes and health inequalities, increasing, for example, the risk of miscarriage, placental abruption, placenta praevia, preterm birth, perinatal death, sudden unexpected death in infancy, and congenital abnormalities such as development of cleft lip and cleft palate in babies (Ananth et al 1999, Castles et al 1999, DiFranza & Lew 1995, Shah & Bracken 2000, Wyszynski et al 1997). Therefore, reducing smoking in pregnant women is an area of priority for all (DH & DfES 2004). Midwives are ideally placed to give health promotion advice to the woman and her partner on the detrimental effects of smoking on the woman, fetus and newborn baby. The initial interview and antenatal visits are ideal times to discuss whether the woman smokes, the implications of this, and whether she would like to give up smoking (NICE 2008).
Women should be encouraged to either stop or reduce smoking during pregnancy. They should be provided with unbiased and evidence-based information, aiming to encourage them to stop smoking, rather than cause fear or stress. Discussion with women’s partners and enlisting their support in reducing smoking may also be beneficial. Women should be offered details of how to access local NHS Stop Smoking Services and the NHS pregnancy smoking helpline. Smoking cessation programmes in pregnancy – such as providing information on the effects of smoking, advantages of stopping, and strategies to stop, particularly with individual counselling – have shown a varied benefit in stopping smoking, increasing mean birthweight and reducing prematurity (Lumley et al 2000).
The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence is in the process of developing guidance on public health intervention aimed at stopping smoking in pregnancy and following childbirth (NICE 2009) that would further assist midwives and other healthcare professionals to access and utilize recommendations for good practice.
Alcohol has detrimental effects on the fetus (Gray & Henderson 2006). Women who consume high levels of alcohol before and during pregnancy and those who are alcohol dependent are more likely to have babies with varying forms of congenital abnormalities, often described as fetal alcohol syndrome (RCOG 2006).
The midwife should use the opportunity to take a history of alcohol use, assess the risk of alcohol dependence, or risk to the fetus from alcohol consumption, and advise and refer appropriately. There is no conclusive evidence regarding what is a safe amount of alcohol to drink during pregnancy and the advice given to the expectant mother should be based upon the current recommendation of NICE (2008). The NICE guidance recommends that women should be advised to avoid alcohol during pregnancy where possible. If they do choose to drink, they should not drink more than 1–2 UK units once or twice a week (1 unit equals half a pint of ordinary-strength lager or beer, or one shot [25 mL] of spirit; one small [125 mL] glass of wine is equal to 1.5 UK units). However, evidence suggests that getting drunk or binge drinking (that is, more than five standard drinks or 7.5 UK units on a single occasion) may be harmful to the baby (NICE 2008).
It is important to ask about the woman’s diet and nutritional intake. Advice should be tailored to her individual circumstances, taking into account her cultural, faith and socioeconomic background (see Ch. 17). General advice to all women should include the need for a well-balanced diet containing proteins (beans, pulses, lentils, meat and fish), dairy products (milk, cheese, yoghurt), fruit and vegetables, carbohydrates (bread, pasta, rice and potatoes) and fibre (wholegrain flour, wholegrain bread, and fruit and vegetables) (NICE 2008).
Pregnant women should be advised to avoid foods that may place their fetus at risk of Listeria monocytogenes infection, for example, unpasteurized soft cheeses and mould-ripened cheeses. Raw eggs and products containing raw eggs, such as mayonnaise, should be avoided because of the risk of salmonella infection, and undercooked meats and pâtés (which may be a source of Listeria, Escherichia coli and Toxoplasma) should also be avoided. Vegetable and salad foods should be washed prior to eating, and food should be stored at the correct temperature in the refrigerator and on the appropriate shelves to reduce the risk of infections such as listeriosis, E. coli and toxoplasmosis.
As high intakes (more than 10 times the recommended daily allowance) of retinol – the animal form of vitamin A – may be associated with congenital abnormality, the NICE (2008) recommendation is that foods containing vitamin A, such as liver and liver products, should be avoided. Women should be informed about the importance of vitamin D for their and their fetus’s health and encouraged to eat foods such as oily fish, eggs, nuts, meat and foods fortified with vitamin D.
The woman’s family medical history is important. Familial diseases such as hypertension and diabetes are sometimes discovered during routine antenatal examinations and it is useful to know the woman’s medical background. It is essential to know if any near relative has pulmonary tuberculosis, since the newborn child is very vulnerable to the infection and must be protected. Arrangements are made for the child to receive BCG vaccination before leaving hospital, as well as being segregated from the infected person.
As there is a familial tendency to produce twins, especially dizygotic twins, it is important to ask if there are twins in the family and, if so, whether they are monozygotic (identical) or dizygotic (non-identical) (Ch. 59).
The woman should be asked if there is any history of congenital abnormality in the family (Fig. 32.3) as she and her partner may need referral for genetic counselling (see Ch. 26). A number of diagnostic techniques are available for the diagnosis of congenital conditions in pregnancy and these may be discussed with the couple.
The midwife also carefully observes and enquires about the woman’s reaction to her pregnancy, whether she is happy about it and coping with the initial minor disorders, or appears anxious, tense and unhappy. Guiding the conversation in a skilful, relaxed, unhurried manner and active listening and interpretation of both verbal and non-verbal communications help to elicit the woman’s feelings and concerns. Appropriate support and help can then be offered.
It might appear that history taking is a lengthy procedure; however, in most cases it can be completed within 30–60 minutes, as the majority of clients are healthy young women who have never been seriously ill. This personal history provides a basis on which it is possible to assess the woman’s physical, psychological and emotional health and wellbeing and, to some extent, anticipate the outcome of her pregnancy. An important aspect of this time spent taking the history is that the midwife and woman can meet and develop the relationship which has such a fundamental influence on the woman’s subsequent experience of pregnancy and childbirth.
On completion, the midwife can make an holistic assessment of the woman that influences the discussion around her particular needs and wishes. The midwife gives clear, accurate information about the variety of services available to enable the woman to make informed choices. Only then can a care plan for pregnancy and childbirth be discussed, tailored and agreed to the woman’s individual needs. The woman should be given appropriate literature for her reference after her visit, such as The Pregnancy Book (DH 2007b). A future appointment may be made with the midwife and arrangements are made for any antenatal diagnostic tests to be undertaken.
Domestic abuse during pregnancy is of major concern; it affects the physical and mental health and safety of the woman and her fetus. (This is discussed in Chapter 23 but a brief overview is given here as part of the antenatal care routine.) Pregnancy may trigger or exacerbate abuse (Mooney 1993), and this may result in injury, obstetric complications such as miscarriage, placental abruption, antepartum haemorrhage, preterm labour, intrauterine growth restriction and stillbirth (Cokkinides et al 1999, Janssen et al 2003), as well as maternal death (Lewis 2007).
All women should be routinely asked about domestic abuse (BMA 1998, RCM 1999, RCOG 1997).The midwife may be the first point of contact for possible help for a woman who is abused, and the opportunity to initiate questions that may lead to disclosure of abuse can arise at the booking interview or during subsequent antenatal care. Suspicion may arise where the woman is always accompanied by her partner, especially where he constantly answers questions and undermines her. In addition to having an understanding of domestic abuse, including the symptoms and signs of abuse, the midwife needs to be skilled in asking difficult questions (see Ch. 23). All women should be afforded an opportunity to disclose domestic abuse in a safe environment (NICE 2008). Women who experience domestic abuse should be offered information about the choices available to them and the resources to support them. Documentation of abuse should be made with the woman’s consent, but not in handheld records. Medical evidence of abuse may be needed should the case proceed to court. If the woman does not wish her disclosure to be recorded, her autonomy should be respected.
When the woman and midwife meet for an antenatal appointment, the midwife should greet the woman in a friendly manner, introduce herself, review with the woman the purpose of the appointment, and elicit from the woman any concerns or questions she may have regarding the wellbeing of herself or her fetus, or any other issues.
Antenatal appointments offer women opportunities to discuss and ask questions about their maternity care. They also provide the midwife with an opportunity to offer women information about pregnancy, health promotion and preparation for parenthood. Issues that should be discussed during the antenatal period include infant feeding, management of breastfeeding, care of the baby, vitamin K prophylaxis and newborn screening tests, as well as information about changes that the woman may experience during the postnatal period, including ‘baby blues’ and postnatal depression (NICE 2008).
Details of all discussions between the woman and the maternity care provider, including information discussed, advice offered and plans of care developed, should be agreed and then recorded in the woman’s handheld records, using terminology that the woman is able to understand.
Antenatal appointments may take place in a range of settings, such as the woman’s home, a GP surgery, hospital or children’s centre. Whilst easy access to the setting for women is essential, the midwife must carefully consider the environment in which the antenatal appointment will take place and ensure that women have the opportunity to discuss issues they regard as sensitive in a confidential manner.
An important area of discussion relates to the woman’s intended method of feeding (see Ch. 43). The woman should be asked about whether in previous pregnancies she commenced breastfeeding and for how long she fed her baby. It is useful to explore whether she had any difficulty last time and/or whether she is aware of the health benefits of breastfeeding for herself and her baby.
The difficulties that women have in breastfeeding can be overcome, and the rate and duration of breastfeeding increased, if the woman has access to evidence-based information and care (see Ch. 43). During the antenatal period, women should have the opportunity to discuss in detail with a midwife how successful breastfeeding can be initiated and maintained. This can include information on analgesia in labour, offering the baby skin-to-skin contact and an early opportunity to suckle following delivery, correct ‘latching’ and positioning, the value of breast milk, baby-led feeding (both day and night), rooming in, and the management of common breastfeeding problems. Midwives need to be aware, when discussing infant feeding, that ‘How do you intend to feed your baby – breast or bottle?’ is a loaded question and the two choices should never be offered as if they are equal. Many women are unaware of the risks associated with artificial feeding and need appropriate and accurate information on which to make an informed choice. For women who have decided to breastfeed, the values of breastfeeding should be reinforced, with positive encouragement of how they can succeed. For women who express a preference for artificial feeding, the reasons for their choice should be explored and information offered to support them to make an informed choice.
Many women are concerned about their weight during pregnancy. Maternal obesity is internationally recognized as being a major cause of maternal mortality and morbidity. In the UK, the Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH) report ‘Why mothers die 2000–2002’ (Lewis 2004) identified that 35% of women who had a pregnancy-related death were obese and that obesity is related to an increase in complications during pregnancy. To identify which women may be at increased risk of complications as a result of obesity, women’s body mass index (BMI) is calculated during the first antenatal appointment (see Box 32.1).
Box 32.1
Calculation of body mass index (BMI)
Example 1 Weight 57 kg (9 stone); height 1.68 m (5′ 6″):
Example 2 Weight 64 kg (10 stone); height 1.57 m (5′ 2″):
Example 3 Weight 76 kg (12 stone); height 1.57 m (5′ 2″)
BMI score | Category |
---|---|
<18.5 | Underweight |
18.5–24.9 | Normal |
25.0–29.9 | Overweight |
30.0–34.9 | Moderately obese |
35.0–39.9 | Obese |
≥40 | Severely obese |
Research has identified that risk factors for maternal obesity include health inequalities and socioeconomic deprivation (Heslehurst et al 2007). During the antenatal period it is essential that healthy nutrition and weight management are discussed with pregnant women. Referral to a dietician may be appropriate. Traditionally, women were weighed during each antenatal appointment; however, it is now recommended that repeated maternal weighing, as part of routine antenatal care, should not be undertaken (NICE 2008), although some women may express a preference to be weighed in order to monitor their weight.
At each antenatal visit, the woman’s blood pressure must be measured and a sample of her urine tested for protein (NICE 2008). These tests are performed to screen for hypertensive disorders and pre-eclampsia (see Ch. 56). The midwife needs to ensure that the results of these screening tests are accurate, as clinical decision making and subsequent care will be informed by the results. Accuracy of the results may be affected by poor technique, or the use of inaccurate or inappropriate equipment.
During antenatal appointments it is usual to measure blood pressure when the woman is sitting upright with her back supported for comfort (see Ch. 56). The woman should rest for 5 minutes prior to the measurement being taken and the midwife should instruct the woman not to talk or eat during the measurement as this may result in an inaccurate higher measurement being recorded (McAlister & Straus 2001). Tight clothing on the arm should be removed; the upper arm supported at heart level and the sphygmomanometer cuff placed at heart level. This is because measurements made with the arm lower than heart level can be 11–12 mmHg higher than those made with the arm supported and the cuff at heart level (Dougherty & Lister 2008). Conversely, if the arm is raised above heart level, the measurement may be falsely low (Beevers et al 2001). Selection of the appropriate sized cuff for the individual woman is important to obtain an accurate reading; the cuff should cover 80% of the circumference of the woman’s upper arm (British Hypertensive Society 2008).
Urine testing for protein can be performed by quickly dipping a reagent strip into a sample of fresh urine. The reagent strips are impregnated with chemicals that react with abnormal substances in the urine and change colour. It is important to inform women that the urine sample should be fresh, as urine that has been stored deteriorates quickly and this can affect the final result (Higgins 2008). To ensure reliable results, it is essential that the reagent strips are stored and used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The reagent strips usually need to be stored in a dry, dark place, so it is important to make certain that the lid is always replaced between antenatal consultations during a clinic.
During pregnancy it is common for women to report an increase in the amount of vaginal discharge they experience. This discharge may contaminate the urine sample and protein be detected in the urine. If abnormal substances are detected in the urine, culture and sensitivity testing under laboratory conditions may be indicated. For example, if a reagent stick test indicated the presence of nitrites or leucocyte esterase in the urine, culture and sensitivity testing would identify the organism and specify the most appropriate treatment (Dougherty & Lister 2008).
During pregnancy, maternal iron requirements increase due to the requirements of the fetus and placenta and an increase in maternal red cell mass (NICE 2008). Maternal plasma volume increases by up to 50% and the red cell mass increases by up to 20%, resulting in a drop in the haemoglobin concentration in the blood which resembles iron deficiency anaemia. In addition to testing for anaemia in early pregnancy, all women should be offered testing for anaemia at 28 weeks’ gestation (NICE 2008). If anaemia is detected, treatment should be considered, as treatment at this point should allow sufficient time for correction of anaemia before term. Haemoglobin levels outside the normal UK range (10.5 g per 100 mL at 28 weeks) should be investigated (NICE 2008). Irrespective of their rhesus D status, it is recommended that all women are screened for atypical red cell antibodies at 28 weeks’ gestation (NICE 2008) (for further details, see Ch. 33).
During the antenatal period, abdominal examination is carried out to determine the symphysis fundal height and, from 36 weeks’ gestation, to determine the presentation of the fetus. To perform an abdominal examination, the midwife needs to be able to observe, palpate and auscultate the woman’s abdomen. Some women may find the nature of this examination intimate and embarrassing. Attention to privacy and the woman’s comfort should reassure the woman. Sensitive communication skills are required to enable the midwife to explain the purpose and procedure of the examination, and as the midwife performs the examination, she should ensure that the woman understands the findings by explaining them using appropriate language and terminology.
Prior to commencing the abdominal examination, the woman should be asked to empty her bladder if she has not done so recently. This is to ensure that the examination does not cause the woman undue discomfort and that a full bladder does not distort either the measurement of symphysis–fundal height or the palpation.
The woman should then lie as flat as she finds comfortable in the supine position. One or two pillows may be required for comfort and she may wish to slightly flex her legs. Some women experience a condition called supine hypotensive syndrome when lying flat on their back, which results from compression of the inferior vena cava and the abdominal aorta by the gravid uterus. Signs that a woman may be suffering from supine hypotensive syndrome include dizziness, pallor, tachycardia, sweating, nausea and hypotension. These unpleasant signs should resolve when the woman is assisted to turn onto her side and blood flow is no longer obstructed. To reduce the risk of this syndrome, the midwife should consider using a wedge, or pillows, under the woman’s right side to alter the centre of gravity and reduce compression of the inferior vena cava and abdominal aorta. Only the woman’s abdomen needs to be exposed, and sheets, or a blanket, can be used to cover legs if required. The midwife should wash and dry her hands prior to commencing the abdominal examination.
During the antenatal period an abdominal examination consists of the following parts:
The approximate size and shape of the uterus should be observed. The size of the uterus should correspond to the estimated period of gestation calculated by the dating scan or, if this is not available, the date of the last known menstrual period. When making this assessment, take into account the height of the woman.
If the uterus appears to be larger than that indicated by the period of gestation, the main possibilities include:
If the uterus appears to be smaller than that indicated by the period of gestation, the most likely causes are:
The gravid uterus is usually a longitudinal ovoid in shape. Sometimes, during late pregnancy, the shape of the uterus may be described as ‘unusual’. This may be due to the fetus lying in either an oblique or transverse position.
Whilst observing the size and shape of the uterus, the midwife may note abdominal scars, striae gravidarum (also called stretch marks), or a line of dark pigmentation called the linea nigra which extends from the umbilicus to the pubis. If not already noted in the maternity records, the reason for abdominal scars should be ascertained and this recorded in the maternity records. Striae gravidarum may be seen as red marks if they are new or silver-coloured marks if they date from a previous pregnancy or weight gain. Fetal movements may also be observed.
Palpation of the abdomen should be carried out gently and smoothly using both hands, warmed. Whilst it is the pads of the fingers that are used to palpate the fetal parts, it is essential that nails are short to avoid causing the woman discomfort. Undue pressure may cause the woman pain and tightening of the abdominal muscles, as well as stimulation of uterine contractions; both of which will make the palpation more difficult. During the palpation, the midwife should position herself so that she is able to observe the woman’s face for signs of discomfort, such as grimacing. If signs of discomfort are observed, the midwife should ascertain the reason for the discomfort, reassure the woman and amend her technique.
Symphysis pubis–fundal height may be estimated by palpation, or, as recommended by NICE (2008), measured using a tape measure. If the midwife is estimating the fundal height by palpation, the ulnar border of the hand is placed at the uppermost point of the fundus of the uterus and the height compared with the size expected for the period of gestation (see Fig. 32.4).
Whilst NICE currently recommends that the symphysis–fundal height is measured using a tape measure, there are some limitations to this procedure. A review of the current evidence base revealed a wide variation in accuracy and limited predictive value in the use of symphysis–fundal height measurement in detecting both small and large-for-gestational-age babies (NICE 2008). Research has also shown that clinicians are biased in their measurement of fundal height if they have knowledge of the gestational age of the pregnancy or if they use a marked tape measure (Ross 2007).
The Perinatal Institute for Maternal and Child Health (2007) recommends using a non-elastic tape measure with the centimetre markings placed on the underside next to the woman’s abdomen to reduce observer error and bias. The tape measure should be secured at the top of the fundus with one hand and, with the tape measure staying in contact with the skin, the tape measure should be run along the longitudinal axis of the uterus to the top of the symphysis pubis, without correcting to the midline of the woman’s abdomen. The measurement should be recorded in the woman’s antenatal maternity record and plotted on a growth chart. Customized symphysis–fundal height charts, adjusted for maternal weight, height, parity and ethnic group, are available. If the midwife suspects that the fetus is small for gestational age, then referral should be made for ultrasound biometric testing (RCOG 2002).
From 36 weeks’ gestation the abdominal examination should include palpation to determine the position of the fetus. Assessment of fetal presentation by abdominal palpation prior to 36 weeks’ gestation should not be routinely offered to women because it is not always accurate, is of little predictive value and may cause unnecessary discomfort (NICE 2008).
The following terms are used in relation to the position of the fetus in utero:
The presentation of the fetus in utero is determined by the part of the fetus lying in the lower pole of the uterus (Fig. 32.5). After 36 weeks’ gestation, the most common presentation is cephalic. Other possible presentations are breech, face, brow and shoulder.
The denominator is a fixed point on the presenting part which is used to indicate the position:
The position of the fetus in utero is the relationship of the denominator to the six areas of the woman’s pelvis (see website). The areas of the woman’s pelvis are:
In a cephalic presentation, the denominator is the occiput, so the position of the fetus is described as:
Anterior positions are more common than posterior positions and help to promote flexion of the fetus. In the anterior position, the fetal back is uppermost and can flex more easily against the woman’s soft abdominal wall than when it lies against the woman’s spinal column as occurs in a posterior position.
The attitude is the relationship of the fetal head and limbs to its body. The attitude of the fetus may be described as being fully flexed, deflexed, partially extended or completely extended (Fig. 32.6). When fully flexed, the fetal head and spine are flexed, the arms are crossed over the chest, and the legs and thighs are flexed, forming a compact ovoid which fits the uterus comfortably.
Engagement of the fetal head occurs when the transverse diameter of the fetal skull has passed through the brim of the pelvis (that is, the biparietal diameter measuring 9.5 cm) (Fig. 32.7). Engagement of the fetal head may be measured in fifths. The amount of head palpable above the brim of the pelvis is assessed and described as follows (Fig. 32.8):
The lie is the relationship of the long axis of the fetus to the long axis of the uterus (Fig. 32.9). The lie of the fetus may be longitudinal, oblique or transverse. In the later weeks of pregnancy, the lie should be longitudinal.
To determine the presentation, position, attitude, engagement and lie of the fetus in utero by abdominal examination, the midwife will use three distinct manoeuvres:
For palpation of the abdomen, see Figure 32.10.
This is the most important manoeuvre in abdominal palpation as it is during the pelvic palpation that the presentation of the fetus is determined. Traditionally, midwives may have performed a fundal palpation, followed by a lateral palpation and then a deep pelvic palpation. However, for some women, palpation of the uterus may cause tightening of the uterine and abdominal muscles, which may make it very difficult to determine fetal presentation, so consideration should be given to performing the pelvic palpation first, when the muscles of the uterus and abdomen are relaxed. In addition to determining the presentation of the fetus, the attitude and degree of engagement of the fetal head may also be identified. To perform a deep pelvic palpation, the midwife stands alongside the woman, facing the woman’s feet. The midwife then places one hand on each side of the uterus near the pelvic brim. The fingertips should then sink gently and smoothly into the pelvis to feel the presentation. The fetal head feels hard and round. If the fetal head is not engaged, it may be possible to ballotte it. This means that if the fetal head is given a gentle tap by an examining finger, the head floats away from the finger and then is felt to return to the examining finger. If the fingertips can sink further into the pelvis, more on one side than the other, this may mean that the head is flexed and the occiput is lying on the side into which the fingers sink more deeply. Occasionally, some midwives or obstetricians may also perform pelvic palpation using a manouevre called ‘Pawlick’s grip’. The thumb and first finger of the hand are spread open and placed just above the symphysis pubis with the thumb and finger tips pointing towards the woman’s face. The thumb and finger then grasp the lower part of the abdomen to determine the presentation and engagement of the presenting part. Some practitioners find this manoeuvre useful if the presenting part is above the pelvic brim; however, it is unlikely that all the information required during a pelvic palpation can be ascertained by use of Pawlick’s grip alone and deep pelvic palpation may need to be carried out in addition to Pawlick’s grip. In order to minimize discomfort for the woman, it may be more prudent to perform deep pelvic palpation first.
Fundal palpation is carried out to determine which part of the fetus is lying in the fundus of the uterus. Still turned to face the woman, the midwife uses both hands to gently palpate the fundus. If the fetal presentation is cephalic, then the breech will be felt in the fundus. The breech feels irregular in outline, less hard than the fetal head, and fetal lower limbs may be felt near it. If the presentation of the fetus is breech, then the fetal head will be felt in the fundus. The fetal head feels smooth, round and hard. It is usually ballottable and separated from the trunk by a groove, the fetal neck. It is possible to move the fetal head more freely than the breech, which can only be moved from side to side.
Lateral palpation is carried out to determine the position of the fetal back. The midwife turns to face the woman’s face. One hand is placed flat on one side of the woman’s abdomen to steady it whilst the other hand gently palpates down the length of the other side of the maternal abdomen. The process is then reversed, with the hand that was being used to steady the abdomen being used to palpate the length of the abdomen and the hand that was firstly used to palpate the abdomen being used to steady the uterus. The fetal back is felt as a continuous smooth resistant object whereas the fetal limbs are felt as being small irregular objects which may move whilst they are being palpated. If the fetal back cannot be palpated but fetal limbs are felt on both sides of the midline of the uterus, the fetal position is most likely to be occipitoposterior.
This is carried out when women visit the antenatal clinic. The early sounds are heard through ultrasound and from about 16 weeks may be heard via the electronic monitor (see Ch. 36).
Auscultation can be done with the Pinard monaural fetal stethoscope or the binaural stethoscope, and/or with an electronic fetal heart monitor. Ideally, the midwife should use the Pinard, and then the electronic monitor, as the means of monitoring the heartbeat are different, and the former is more likely to identify a true fetal heartbeat (Gibb & Arulkumaran 1997). Having palpated the abdomen, the midwife should know where to listen for the fetal heart sounds, which are heard at their maximum at a point over the fetal shoulder. When the fetus is lying in an occipitoanterior or occipitolateral position, the heart sounds are heard from the front and to the right or left according to the side on which the fetal back lies (Fig. 32.11). The fetal heart sounds like the ticking of a watch under a pillow, the rate being about double that of the woman’s heartbeat observed at the wrist. The woman and her partner usually enjoy listening to their baby’s heartbeat too.
A uterine souffle, caused by the flowing of blood through the uterine arteries, may be heard; this is a soft, blowing sound, the rate of which corresponds to the woman’s pulse.
At first, only the height of the fundus is ascertained (see Fig. 32.4).
There is a popular myth that engagement of the head occurs at 36 weeks in a primigravida. In about 50% of primigravidae, engagement of the head occurs between 38 and 42 weeks (Weekes & Flynn 1975), and in 80% of cases labour ensues within 14 days of the head engaging. In multigravidae, because of lax uterine and abdominal muscles, engagement may not take place until labour is established. If the head is engaged, the pelvic brim is certainly of adequate size and the probability is that the cavity and outlet are also adequate.
Engagement is often referred to as lightening, because of the sense of lightness women feel as the pressure is lessened on the diaphragm. In some women the head may not be engaged at term. This may be due to a full bladder or rectum or an occipitoposterior position where the presenting part tends to be deflexed. A steep angle of inclination of the pelvic brim tends to delay engagement until labour is well established. This is seen more commonly as a racial characteristic in West African and West Indian women.
If the head is high, an ultrasound scan may be performed to exclude placenta praevia. It is difficult to determine cephalopelvic disproportion prior to labour because of the factors involved in labour itself.
Following this examination, the findings are recorded and the woman is informed of these.
Most women experience physical changes during pregnancy which, although they are not life threatening, may be a source of anxiety and discomfort. These changes are sometimes referred to as ‘minor disorders of pregnancy’. However, for many women, the impact of these changes is certainly not minor; they have to manage and cope with the ‘minor disorders’ in addition to their ongoing responsibilities for family, home and employment at a time when they may also be experiencing pregnancy-related fatigue and discomfort. It is important that the midwife treats the woman with sensitivity and respect when these changes are being discussed, offering evidence-based information and advice to support the woman at this time (NMC 2008).
Reflective activity 32.3
Ask a pregnant woman what it felt like when her abdomen was palpated.
When you are present at an antenatal examination, observe the verbal and non-verbal communication that occurs between the mother and the midwife, and consider the points that were particularly good as well as those that may be improved.
Many women experience periodontal disease during pregnancy, resulting in local (gingival) and systemic inflammatory and immune responses (Boggess et al 2003, Mukherjee & Almas 2010). Periodontal disease has been associated with preterm birth, pre-eclampsia, second trimester miscarriage and small-for-gestational-age infants (Boggess et al 2003, Moore et al 2004), although the precise links between periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcome are yet unknown.
Gingivitis occurs as food debris and calcified dental plaque collect in the minute spaces between the teeth and the gum, causing irritation and inflammation. Bleeding of the gums may occur during eating, brushing or if the gums are probed. Some women may also report an increase in tooth mobility. All women should be encouraged to attend the dentist (care is free for pregnant women and for a year following the birth of the baby in the UK). Women who experience bleeding gums should be advised to use a soft toothbrush to brush their teeth.
Nausea and vomiting are the most common gastrointestinal symptoms experienced in early pregnancy, with up to 85% of women experiencing nausea and 50% of women actually vomiting (Jewell & Young 2003) (see Ch. 53). Whilst the aetiology is unclear, rising levels of human chorionic gonadotrophin during pregnancy have been implicated. A review by Jewell & Young (2003) suggested that nausea is less common in women who experience miscarriage, and more common in multiple pregnancies and molar pregnancies.
Nausea and vomiting during pregnancy are often referred to as ‘morning sickness’, yet many women report experiencing symptoms throughout the day or in the evening rather than only in the morning. Women may become concerned about the effect of nausea and vomiting upon their pregnancy. The midwife should reassure women that there are no harmful effects upon the fetus as a result of nausea and vomiting, whilst acknowledging the detrimental impact the condition can have upon the woman’s day-to-day activities (NICE 2008).
A number of non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments for the relief of nausea in pregnancy have been suggested, including ginger, P6 acupressure and antihistamines (NICE 2008). Rest and regular small amounts of carbohydrate are thought to be helpful (Jewell & Young 2003).
A small number of women may develop a condition called hyperemesis gravidarum, where excessive vomiting during early pregnancy alters fluid and electrolyte balance (see Ch. 53). Women with hyperemesis gravidarum generally feel very unwell. They may have signs of dehydration, including a dry mouth and mucous membranes, and dipstick urine testing may show the presence of ketones in the urine. Admission to hospital is usually required to correct the fluid and electrolyte imbalance via intravenous fluid therapy.
Heartburn is a frequent complaint during pregnancy, reported by up to 72% of women during the third trimester of pregnancy (Marrero et al 1992). Heartburn is described as a burning sensation, or discomfort, felt behind the sternum or throat. It may be accompanied by regurgitation of the acidic stomach contents into the throat or mouth, causing a bitter taste. Regurgitation may be due to the effects of progesterone relaxing the lower oesophageal sphincter, resulting in gastro-oesophageal reflux. Whilst heartburn is not associated with adverse outcomes of pregnancy, it is important to distinguish between the pain caused by heartburn and epigastric pain associated with pre-eclampsia (NICE 2008). Measuring the woman’s blood pressure and testing her urine for protein enables the midwife to exclude pre-eclampsia.
Treatment of heartburn is aimed at providing relief of symptoms. An upright position, especially after meals, and sleeping in a propped-up position may resolve the symptoms of heartburn. Additionally, eating small frequent meals and reducing the quantity of high-fat foods and gastric irritants, such as caffeine and caffeine derivatives, may prove effective. Antacids may also be considered for the relief of heartburn where lifestyle and dietary modification has not been effective at relieving symptoms.
Constipation may occur as a result of rising progesterone levels in pregnancy, causing a reduction in gastric motility and hence increased gastric transit time. Constipation is associated with poor dietary fibre intake and may cause abdominal discomfort and pain during defecation. Constipation has also been found to be a predisposing factor for haemorrhoids (Quijano & Abalos 2005).
As a preventative measure, and for women who experience constipation, information regarding the benefits of increasing the amount of fibre and fluid within the diet should be offered. Some women may not understand which foods are high in fibre and the midwife may need to discuss how the woman’s diet can be modified to include more fibre-rich foods and fluids. Many women drink carbonated drinks or drinks containing caffeine, and rather than increasing their intake of these fluids, midwives should encourage them to drink additional water or caffeine-free drinks.
If constipation is not resolved by theses simple measures, women may choose to take a fibre supplement (NICE 2008).
Haemorrhoids are swollen veins at, or near, the anus. The aetiology of haemorrhoids is unclear, but predisposing factors include a history of constipation, a low-fibre low-fluid diet, and bowel disease associated with an increase in intra-abdominal pressure or diarrhoea (Quijano & Abalos 2005). Haemorrhoids are normally asymptomatic, but during pregnancy they may become symptomatic as a result of altered tone and position of the pelvic floor and sphincter muscles. Some women report that haemorrhoids cause them to experience a burning sensation or itching around the anus. Intermittent bleeding of the anus and leakage of mucus, faeces or flatus have also been reported (Quijano & Abalos 2005). The symptoms of haemorrhoids are usually transient and in most cases mild, but they can cause some woman discomfort or pain. Treatment of haemorrhoids during pregnancy is aimed at relieving symptoms, especially pain control, and any corrective treatment is usually deferred until after the birth of the baby (Quijano & Abalos 2005). Women should be offered information about increasing the amount of fibre and fluid, particularly water, within their diet, as this has been shown to be an effective treatment for symptomatic haemorrhoids and bleeding (Alonso-Coello et al 2005). A fibre supplement may be considered and local ointments containing an anaesthetic are widely used although there is currently no evidence regarding their effectiveness or safety in pregnancy (NICE 2008).
Varicose veins occur when a valve within the vein weakens and allows a backflow of blood, putting more pressure on the other valves and causing blood to pool and stagnate. The vein then becomes distended and swollen near to the surface of the skin. The veins of the leg are the most commonly affected but veins in the vulva (vulval varicosities) and anus (haemorrhoids) can also be affected. During pregnancy, the veins are placed under increased pressure as a result of an increase in circulating blood volume and the effect of progesterone relaxing the muscular wall of the blood vessels (Bamigboye & Smyth 2007). Varicose veins are thought to affect up to 40% of pregnant women (Rabhi et al 2000) with multiparous women having a greater risk of developing varicose veins than primiparous women (Beebe-Dimmer et al 2005). Symptoms of varicose veins and oedema include heavy achy legs, which the woman may feel are unsightly, pain, night cramps, tingling or numbness (Bamigboye & Smyth 2007). The skin around the varicose vein may feel itchy. Some women report a burning sensation or throbbing. Carr (2006) suggests that for up to 80% of the women who develop problems with varicose veins during pregnancy, these symptoms appear during the first trimester of pregnancy. Treatment for varicose veins may be surgical removal, pharmacological treatments where liquid sclerosing drugs are injected into the affected veins to make them shrink, or non-pharmacological treatments, such as compression bandages, rest, leg elevation, exercise, immersion in water and reflexology. During pregnancy, treatment focuses upon relief of symptoms, with surgical and pharmacological treatments being deferred until after the birth. For the majority of women, the varicose veins resolve on their own within the first 3 or 4 months after the baby’s birth (Bamigboye & Smyth 2007). A review by Bamigboye & Smyth (2007) exploring interventions for varicose veins and oedema during pregnancy concluded that the available evidence was insufficient to make reliable recommendations for clinical practice. The most common treatments for the relief of symptoms of varicose veins and oedema during pregnancy were found to be compression stockings and elevation of the feet, but neither of these treatments had been adequately researched (Bamigboye & Smyth 2007). The review suggested that reflexology appeared to improve the symptoms for women with leg oedema but a larger-scale study is required (Bamigboye & Smyth 2007).
Leucorrhoea describes the change in the amount and type of vaginal discharge that many women experience during pregnancy; this often increases, and is usually white, non-offensive and non-irritant. However, if the change is associated with an itch, soreness, offensive smell, or pain when passing urine, the underlying cause should be determined (NICE 2008). It is essential that when discussing these issues with women, the midwife asks appropriate questions, in a sensitive manner, to determine which investigations and treatment may be required.
The most common causes of vaginal discharge during pregnancy are bacterial vaginosis, vaginal trichomoniasis and vaginal candidiasis (commonly called thrush). Bacterial vaginosis is a common condition caused by an overgrowth of bacteria within the vagina and characterized by a white–grey vaginal discharge which may smell fish-like. The discharge does not usually cause soreness or itching of the vagina or vulva.
Trichomoniasis is one of the most commonly sexually transmitted infections and is characterized by a green–yellow frothy vaginal discharge and pain on urination. The discharge may have an unpleasant or fish-like smell (see Ch. 57).
Vaginal candidiasis is caused by the yeast Candida albicans and is characterized by a white vaginal discharge which may smell of yeast. The discharge may be thicker than the woman’s usual discharge, but in some women it is more watery.
Investigation of the cause of vaginal discharge includes taking vaginal and cervical swabs. If the test result is positive, referral to a medical practitioner will be required. This may be the woman’s own GP or a sexual health clinic.
The recommended treatment of vaginal candidiasis during pregnancy is a 1-week course of a topical imidazole cream and/or vaginal pessaries (NICE 2008). As yet, the safety of oral treatments for vaginal candidiasis in pregnancy has not been ascertained and so they should not be offered to pregnant women (NICE 2008). The midwife should offer the woman information about self-help measures that may reduce the discomfort associated with vaginal candidiasis, including avoiding perfumed soaps, bubble baths and vaginal deodorants which may further irritate the sore skin of the vulva and vagina and keeping the perianal area as cool as possible by wearing loose clothing and cotton underwear. Cold compresses or ice cubes wrapped in a cloth and placed against the vulva may reduce soreness and itching. (For further information on sexually transmitted diseases, see Chapter 57.)
Hyperpigmentation of the skin during pregnancy is very common, occurring in up to 90% of pregnant women. Hyperpigmentation results in a darkening of areas that are already pigmented, like the areola, nipples, vulva and perianal region. Some women also note hyperpigmentation of the skin in the inner thigh region and axilla. It is usually more noticeable in women with dark complexions. The cause of hyperpigmentation is unclear, but it is thought to be related to an increase in serum oestrogen, serum progesterone and melanocyte-stimulating hormone.
Approximately 90% of pregnant women experience striae gravidarum, commonly called ‘stretch marks’, by the end of the second trimester of pregnancy, as a result of abdominal distension, maternal weight gain, genetic predisposition and the hormonal changes that occur in pregnancy (Muallem & Rubeiz 2006). Striae gravidarum appear as red–purple linear streaks over the abdomen, thighs, arms, breasts and buttocks, and gradually fade into pale, skin- or silver-coloured streaks. Itching may accompany the striae gravidarum. A number of preventative measures, including the application of creams and oils, have been suggested as beneficial in preventing the development of striae gravidarum, but studies have shown limited effects (Muallem & Rubeiz 2006).
Back and pelvic pain are common in pregnancy, with up to 76% of women reporting back pain at some point during their pregnancy (Kristiansson et al 1996). It is thought that loosening of the ligaments in the pelvic area under the influence of relaxin and progesterone and altered maternal posture are the main causes of back and pelvic pain during pregnancy.
Posture is altered as pregnancy advances because the curvature of the lower spine becomes exaggerated to balance the increasing anterior weight of the gravid uterus. Many women report that back and pelvic pain are worse during the evening and in the last trimester of pregnancy, disturbing sleep and interfering with ordinary daily activities, such as walking, sitting and working (Pennick & Young 2007). A review found that pregnant-specific exercise programmes, physiotherapy and acupuncture appeared to reduce back or pelvic pain, whilst some women reported pain relief by using pillows to support their stomachs when lying down. Back strain may be reduced by women turning onto their sides when sitting up and as they swing their legs down when they get up off a couch or bed, rather than attempting to raise themselves from their back without using their arms for support (Pennick & Young 2007).
The cause of leg cramps during pregnancy is unclear. It has been suggested that leg cramps may occur as a result of either circulatory changes during pregnancy or changes in calcium and magnesium levels during pregnancy (Jewell & Young 2002). Though leg cramps do not cause any lasting damage, they can be very painful. The pain is caused by a build-up in lactic and pyruvic acid that leads to an involuntary contraction of the calf muscle. Leg cramps are often experienced during the night, so women may suddenly wake in pain; this can be extremely distressing.
During an episode of leg cramps, women may find that getting out of bed, walking around, stretching and massaging the affected muscle helps. A review by Jewell & Young (2002) found that calcium supplementation did not prevent leg cramps in pregnancy, but for some women magnesium supplementation stopped them having leg cramps altogether and for other women the frequency of attacks was reduced.
Carpal tunnel syndrome occurs as a result of oedema in the carpal tunnel; this compresses the median nerve, causing paraesthesia, swelling and pain in the hand or hands and impairs sensory and motor function of the hand (NICE 2008). Interventions to reduce the symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome include wrist splints and analgesia. Referral to the physiotherapist should be considered.
Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain affects approximately one in five pregnant women (Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Women’s Health 2007), who experience pain in the joints of the pelvis; the symphysis pubis joint at the front of the pelvis and the sacroiliac joints at the back of the pelvis. It is thought that the pain is caused by abnormal stretching of the pelvic joints during pregnancy (Wellock 2002). For non-pregnant women the average gap between the pelvic bones at the pubic joint is 4–5 mm. During pregnancy, this gap may widen by 2–3 mm (Leadbetter et al 2004). Studies have shown that many women experience significant pain without great separation of the bones and the degree of pain is unrelated to the degree of separation (Leadbetter et al 2004). Stability of the pubic joint is essential for efficient weight bearing and mobility, and instability may cause pain in the symphysis pubis; mild to severe pain in the groin, inner thigh, lower back, abdomen, perineum or leg (Leadbetter et al 2004); pain during walking or whilst performing activities that require the woman to part, or lift, her legs, such as climbing stairs, getting dressed or turning over in bed (Leadbetter et al 2004, Wellock & Crichton 2007). Women with pelvic girdle pain may be observed walking with a ‘waddling’ gait, whilst some women report hearing or feeling a clicking, snapping or grinding within the symphysis pubis (Leadbetter et al 2004).
In some rare cases, the gap between the pelvic bones widens by more than 10 mm, causing a partial or complete rupture of the symphysis pubis. This condition is called diastasis symphysis pubis (DSP) and may occur as a result of traumatic separation of the symphysis during a spontaneous or operative delivery or as a result of accidental injury to the pelvis during pregnancy (Leadbetter et al 2004). Whilst pelvic girdle pain may be diagnosed by taking a history of the symptoms experienced by the woman, DSP is diagnosed by X-ray.
The onset of symptoms of pelvic girdle pain may occur gradually or acutely during the second or third trimester of pregnancy, or during labour or birth. The actual incidence of SPD is unclear as many women, and their maternity care providers, may dismiss the symptoms of SPD as being the ‘aches and pains’ of pregnancy, thus underdiagnosing the condition. Nevertheless, SPD does have a significant impact upon women’s wellbeing and quality of life. Wellock & Crichton (2007) explored the impact of pelvic girdle pain upon women’s quality of life and found that the chronic pain associated with pelvic girdle pain profoundly affected all aspects of the women’s daily lives and made caring for their homes, families and themselves very difficult. In particular, the women felt unable to care for their children and reported social isolation as their ability to leave the home and, in particular, get in and out of the car, was challenged as a result of pain.
During the antenatal period, the aim of management of the condition is to reduce activities which exacerbate pain. Most cases are managed conservatively and so it is important that women understand the aetiology of the condition and what lifestyle changes they may need to make. These changes may include reducing non-essential activities, and accepting help regarding childcare and household chores. Self-help measures, such as placing pillows between the knees, may make it more comfortable for women when they are side-lying in bed (Wellock & Crichton 2007).
The Pelvic Partnership (2008), a charitable organization aimed at raising awareness of the condition, suggest that women plan ahead prior to performing activities and consider:
Referral to an obstetric physiotherapist for a pelvic and back assessment and advice about posture and mobility should be considered. Elbow crutches or a wheelchair may be required if mobility is significantly impaired. Some women find that a trochanteric, or pelvic, support belt gives some relief of pain, but the belts do not correct pelvic asymmetry and the woman may still require analgesia.
During labour, women with pelvic girdle pain may find it difficult to move into different positions and the midwife may need to be an advocate for the woman, facilitating her to move in ways that do not exacerbate her symptoms. This may include either a lateral or a supported ‘all fours’ position for vaginal examinations and birth. The lateral position may be preferable for fetal blood sampling, assisted deliveries or suturing of the perineum if required. Immersion in water may be beneficial for some women, as water relieves weight bearing and allows for ease of position change, but entering and exiting a birth pool may cause pain and, in some cases, delay treatment. An individual assessment of the woman’s mobility will be required prior to her entering the water.
If the woman chooses either epidural or spinal anaesthesia for labour and birth, the woman and midwife need to be aware of the possibility of the symptoms of pelvic girdle pain being masked and excessive mobilization of the joint, causing increased pain during the postpartum period. Prior to receiving either epidural or spinal anaesthesia, the range of hip abduction should be measured and recorded in the woman’s notes. The midwife needs to ensure that this range is not exceeded whilst the anaesthesia is effective.
During the postnatal period, women with pelvic girdle pain may require assistance with personal hygiene and care of their baby. This may include assisting the woman to the toilet and providing aids within the shower, such as handrails and chairs. Assistance with bathing and changing the baby may be needed as well as help in handing the baby to the mother rather than the mother having to get up to attend to the baby’s needs. Consideration needs to be given to the position the woman adopts to feed her baby; a lateral position may be more comfortable for women who wish to breastfeed their babies. During this period, the midwife should make an assessment of the woman’s risk of being predisposed to a deep vein thrombosis. Antiembolic stockings may be worn and thromboprophylaxis prescribed if appropriate. Women with moderate to severe symptoms may need referral to an obstetric physiotherapist during the postnatal period, and if the symptoms fail to resolve, referral to an orthopaedic surgeon may need to be considered. Very rarely, pelvic suturing may be required.
Conclusion
As this chapter has demonstrated, the antenatal period is a time of tremendous psychological and physical adjustment for the pregnant woman and her family. The midwife can work in partnership with the woman to increase the woman’s understanding of these changes, and to help her prepare for the birth and parenthood, by offering evidence-based information and individualized plans of care and support, taking into account women’s diverse, and sometimes complex, backgrounds. Many women experience physiological changes in pregnancy that may lead to disturbance and discomfort within various body systems. The midwife is ideally placed to offer women information and support to enable them to cope with these changes and the challenges they might present to them in their day-to-day life. Initial and subsequent antenatal care should be provided within an environment of respect and partnership, and the midwife should aim to make every woman feel valued and every antenatal visit positive and informative.
Alonso-Coello P, Guyatt G, Heels-Ansdell D, et al: Laxatives for the treatment of haemorrhoids. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (4):CD004649, 2005.
Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM. Incidence of placenta abruption in relation to cigarette smoking and hypertensive disorders during pregnancy: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1999;93(4):622-628.
Anderson T. Feeling safe enough to let go: the relationship between a woman and her midwife during the second stage of labour. In: Kirkham M, editor. The midwife-mother relationship. London: Macmillan, 2000.
Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Women’s Health. Pregnancy related pelvic girdle pain. Guidance for mothers to be and new mothers (website). www.acpwh.org.uk/docs/ACPWH-PGP_Pat.pdf, 2007. Accessed January 2009
Bamigboye AA, Smyth R: Interventions for varicose veins and leg oedema in pregnancy, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1):CD001066, 2007.
Bastian L, Nanda K, Hasselblad V, et al. Diagnostic efficiency of home pregnancy test kits. Archives of Family Medicine. 1998;7(5):465-469.
Beebe-Dimmer JL, Pfeifer JR, Engle JS, et al. The epidemiology of chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins. Annals of Epidemiology. 2005;15(3):175-184.
Beevers G, Lip GYH, O’Brien E. Blood pressure measurement. Part 1. Sphygomomanometry: factors common to all techniques. British Medical Journal. 2001;322(7292):981-985.
Berry D. Health communication: theory and practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2007.
Bharj KK. Pakistani Muslim women birthing in northern England: exploration of experiences and context. Unpublished thesis. Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University, 2007.
Bharj KK, Chesney M: Pakistani Muslim women and midwives relationship: what are the essential attributes? In press. 2010.
Blackburn ST. Maternal, fetal and neonatal physiology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2007.
Boggess KA, Lieff S, Murtha AP, et al. Maternal periodontal disease is associated with an increased risk for pre-eclampsia. Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2003;10(2):227-231.
British Hypertensive Society. Blood pressure measurement (website). www.bhsoc.org/bp_monitors/BLOOD_PRESSURE_1784b.pdf, 2008. Accessed August 2008
British Medical Association (BMA). Domestic violence: a health care issue?. London: BMA; 1998.
Carr S. Current management of varicose veins. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2006;49(2):414-426.
Castles A, Adams EK, Melvin CL, et al. Effects of smoking during pregnancy: five meta-analyses. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1999;16(3):208-215.
Chudleigh P, Pearce M. Obstetric ultrasound, ed 2. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1994.
Coad J, Dunstall M. Anatomy and physiology for midwives. Edinburgh: Churchillll Livingstone; 2005.
Cokkinides VE, Coker AL, Sanderson M, et al. Physical violence during pregnancy: maternal complications and birth outcomes. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1999;93(5):661-666.
Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection (CHAI). Towards better births: a review of maternity services in England. London: CHAI; 2008.
Davies J. Being with women who are economically without. In: Kirkham M, editor. The midwife-mother relationship. London: Macmillan, 2000.
Department of Health (DH). Changing childbirth, Part 1. Report of the Expert Maternity Group. London: HMSO; 1993.
Department of Health (DH). Why mothers die. Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom 1994–1996. London: The Stationery Office; 1998.
Department of Health (DH). Maternity matters: choice, access and continuity of care in a safe service. London: The Stationery Office; 2007.
Department of Health (DH). The pregnancy book (website). www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_074920, 2007. Accessed August 2008
Department of Health (DH). High quality care for all: NHS Next Stage Review final report. London: The Stationery Office; 2008.
Department of Health (DH), Department for Education and Skills (DfES). National service framework for children, young people and maternity services. London: HMSO; 2004.
DiFranza JR, Lew RA. Effects of maternal cigarette smoking on pregnancy complications and sudden death syndrome. Journal of Family Practice. 1995;40(4):385-394.
Dougherty L, Lister S. The Royal Marsden Hospital manual of clinical nursing procedures. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008.
Dyson S. Ethnicity and screening for sickle cell/thalassaemia. Oxford: Elsevier; 2005.
Edwards N. Birthing autonomy: women’s experiences of planning home births. London: Routledge; 2005.
Foster K, Lader D, Cheesebrough S. Infant feeding 1995. London: Office for National Statistics; 1997.
Gadsby R, Barnie-Adshead AM, Jagger C. A prospective study of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy. British Journal of General Practice. 1993;43(371):245-248.
Gibb DME, Arulkumaran S. Fetal monitoring in practice, ed 2. London: Butterworth Heinemann; 1997.
Gray R, Henderson J. Review of the fetal effects of prenatal alcohol exposure. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit; 2006.
Green JM, Curtis P, Price H, et al. Continuing to care, the organisation of maternity services in the UK: a structured review of evidence. Hale: Books for Midwives; 1998.
Hall J. Free-standing maternity units in England. In: Kirkham M, editor. Birth centres, a social model for maternity services. London: Books for Midwives, 2003.
Hall M, MacIntyre S, Porter M. Antenatal care assessed: a case study of an innovation in Aberdeen. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press; 1985.
Hepburn M. Drug use in pregnancy. British Journal of Hospital Medicine. 1993;49(1):51-55.
Heslehurst N, Ells LJ, Simpson H, et al. Trends in maternal obesity incidence rates, demographic predictors, and health inequalities in 36 821 women over a 15-year period. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2007;114(2):187-194.
Higgins D. Patient assessment. Part 6 – urinalysis. Nursing Times. 2008;104(12):24-25.
H M Treasury. Public Service Agreement 19. Ensure better health for all. London: H M Treasury; 2007.
Janssen PA, Holt VL, Sugg NK, et al. Intimate partner violence and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a population based study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2003;188(5):1341-1347.
Jewell D, Young G: Interventions for leg cramps in pregnancy, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1):CD000121, 2002.
Jewell D, Young G: Interventions for nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (4):CD000145, 2003.
Kirkham M, editor. The midwife-mother relationship. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000.
Kirkham M, editor. Birth centres, a social model for maternity services. London: Books for Midwives, 2003.
NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Report 20. Kirkham M, Stapleton H, editors. Informed choice in maternity care: an evaluation of evidence-based leaflets. York: University of York, 2001.
Kristiansson P, Svardsudd K, Von Schoultz B. Serum relaxin, symphyseal pain and back pain during pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetricians and Gynaecology. 1996;175(5):1342-1347.
Lacroix R, Eason E, Melzack R. Nausea and vomiting during pregnancy: a prospective study of its frequency, intensity, and patterns of change. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2000;182(4):931-937.
Leadbetter RE, Mawer D, Lindow SW. Symphysis pubis dysfunction: a review of the literature. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2004;16(6):349-354.
Lewis G, editor. Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health: Improving the health of mothers, babies and children, “Why mothers die” (2000–2002). The Sixth Report of Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Deaths in United Kingdom. London: RCOG, 2004.
Lewis G, editor. The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Saving mothers’ lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer – 2003-2005 The Seventh Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. London: CEMACH, 2007.
Lumley J, Oliver S, Waters E: Interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2):CD001055, 2000.
Lundgren I, Berg M. Central concepts in the midwife-woman relationship. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Services. 2007;18(2):368-375.
Mander R. Supportive care and midwifery. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2001.
Marrero JM, Goggin PM, Caestecker JS. Determinants of pregnancy heartburn. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1992;99(9):731-734.
McAlister FA, Straus SE. Evidence based treatment for hypertension. British Medical Journal. 2001;322(7291):908-911.
Methven RC: The antenatal booking interview: recording an obstetric history or relating with a mother-to-be? Research and the Midwife Conference Proceedings, Glasgow 1982a:63–76.
Methven RC: The antenatal booking interview: recording an obstetric history or relating with a mother-to-be? Research and the Midwife Conference Proceedings, Glasgow 1982b:77–86.
Mooney J. The hidden figure of domestic violence in North London. London: Islington Council; 1993.
Moore S, Ide M, Coward PY, et al. Periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcome. British Dental Journal. 2004;197(5):251-258.
Muallem MM, Rubeiz NG. Physiological and biological skin changes in pregnancy. Clinics in Dermatology. 2006;24(2):80-83.
Mukherjee PM, Almas K. Orthodontic considerations for gingival health during pregnancy, a review. International Journal of Dental Hygiene. 2010;8(1):3-9.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). NICE clinical guideline 62. Antenatal care: routine care for the healthy pregnant woman. London: NICE; 2008.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Public health guidance, draft scope on ‘how to stop smoking in pregnancy and following childbirth’ (website). www.nice.org.uk/guidance/index.jsp?action=download&o=40145, 2009. Accessed February 2009
Nicholls L, Webb C. What makes a good midwife? An integrative review of methodologically-diverse research. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2006;56(4):414-429.
Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC). The code: standards of conduct, performance and ethics for nurses and midwives. London: NMC; 2008.
O’Dowd M, O’Dowd T. Quickening – a re-evaluation. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1985;92(10):1037-1039.
Page AL, Cooke P, Percival P. Providing one-to-one practice and enjoying it. In: Page L, editor. The new midwifery: science and sensitivity in practice. London: Churchill Livingstone, 2000.
Palmer G, Maclnnes T, Kenway P. Monitoring poverty and social exclusion 2008. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation; 2008.
2008 Pelvic Partnership (website). www.pelvicpartnership.org.uk/index2.html, 2008. Accessed August 2008
Pennick VE, Young G: Interventions for preventing and treating pelvic and back pain in pregnancy, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2):CD001139, 2007.
Perinatal Institute for Maternal and Child Health. Fetal growth fundal height measurements (website). www.pi.nhs.uk/growth/fhm.htm, 2007. Accessed November 2008
Perkins ER, Unell J. Continuity and choice in practice: a study of a community-based team midwifery scheme. In: Kirkham MJ, Perkins ER, editors. 1997 Reflections on midwifery. London: Baillière Tindall, 1997.
Proud J. Understanding obstetric ultrasound, ed 2. Hale: Books for Midwives; 1997.
Quijano CE, Abalos E: Conservative management of symptomatic and/or complicated haemorrhoids in pregnancy and the puerperium, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (3):CD004077, 2005.
Rabhi Y, Charras-Arthapignet C, Gris JC, et al. Lower limb vein enlargement and spontaneous blood flow echogenicity are normal sonographic findings during pregnancy. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound. 2000;28(8):407-413.
Redshaw M, Rowe R, Hockley C, et al. Recorded delivery: a national survey of women’s experience of maternity care. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit; 2007.
Ross MG. Clinical bias in fundal height measurement. Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2007;110(4):892-899.
Rosser J. Calculating the EDD – which is more accurate, scan or LMP? The Practising Midwife. 2000;3(3):28-29.
Royal College of Midwives (RCM). Domestic abuse in pregnancy. London: RCM; 1999.
Royal College of Midwives (RCM). Vision 2000. London: RCM; 2000.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Report from the RCOG Working Party on Antenatal and Intrapartum Care. London: RCOG; 1982.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Violence against women. London: RCOG; 1997.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Investigation and management of the small for gestational (website). wwwrcog.org.uk/files/rcog-comp/uploaded-files/GT31SmallgestationalAgeFetus.pdf, 2002. Accessed September 2009
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Alcohol consumption and the outcomes of pregnancy. RCOG Statement No 5. London: RCOG; 2006.
Sandall J, Davies J, Warwick C. Evaluation of the Albany Midwifery Practice. London: Kings College Hospital; 2001.
Sasaki S. Clinical presentation and management of molar pregnancy. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2003;17(6):885-892.
Shah NR, Bracken MB. A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies on the association between maternal cigarette smoking and preterm delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2000;182(2):465-472.
Siney C. Pregnancy and drug misuse, ed 2. Hale: Books for Midwives; 1999.
Singh D, Newburn M. Access to maternity information and support. London: National Childbirth Trust; 2000.
Stables D, Rankin J. Physiology in childbearing: with anatomy and related biosciences, ed 2. Edinburgh: WB Saunders; 2005.
Standing Nursing and Midwifery Advisory Committee (SNMAC). Midwifery: delivering our future. London: Department of Health; 1998.
Villar J, Carroli G, Khan-Neelofur D, et al: Patterns of routine antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (4):CD000934, 2001.
Walsh D. An ethnographic study of women’s experience of partnership caseload midwifery practice: the professional as friend. Midwifery. 1999;15(3):165-176.
Wardle SA, Wright PJ, Court BV. Knowledge of and preference for the DOMINO delivery option. Midwifery. 1997;13(3):149-153.
Weekes ARL, Flynn MJ. Engagement of the fetal head in primigravidae and its relationship to the duration of gestation and time of onset of labour. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1975;82(1):7-11.
Wellock VK. The ever-widening gap: symphysis pubis dysfunction. British Journal of Midwifery. 2002;10(6):348-353.
Wellock VK, Crichton MA. Understanding pregnant women’s experiences of symphysis pubis dysfunction: the effect of the pain. Evidence Based Midwifery. 2007;5(2):40-46.
Wheeler M. Home and laboratory testing pregnancy testing kits. Professional Nurse. 1999;14(8):571-576.
Whitehead SA, Andrews PLR, Chamberlain GVP. Characterisation of nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy: a survey of 1000 women. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1992;12(6):364-369.
Wraight A, Ball J, Seccombe I, et al. Mapping team midwifery. IMS Report Series 242. Brighton: Institute of Manpower Studies, University of Sussex, 1993.
Wyszynski DF, Duffy DL, Beaty TH. Maternal cigarette smoking and oral clefts: a meta-analysis. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 1997;34(3):206-210.